The Assessment of Speaking

digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id Heaton presented the sample of an oral English rating scale that used 1-6 points. Below is the frame of Heaton ’s Oral English Rating Scale: Table 2.1 6 Pronunciation good – only 2 and 3 grammatical errors - not much searching for words - very few long pauses - fairly easy to understand - very few interruptions necessary - has mastered all oral skills on course. 5 Pronunciation slightly influenced by L1 - a few grammatical errors but most sentences correct - sometimes searchers for words - not too many long pauses - general meaning fairly clear but a few interruption necessary - has mastered almost all oral skills on course. 4 Pronunciation influenced a little by L1 - a few grammatical errors but only 1 or 2 causing serious confusion - searches for words - a few unnatural pauses - conveys general meaning fairly clearly - a few interruptions necessary but intention always clear - has mastered most of oral skills on course. 3 Pronunciation influenced by L1 - pronunciation and grammatical errors - several error cause serious confusion - longer pauses to search for word meaning - fairly limited expressions - much can be understood although some effort needed for parts - some interruptions necessary - has mastered only some of oral skills on course. 2 Several serious pronunciation errors - basic grammar errors - unnaturally long pauses - very limited expressions -needs some effort to understand much of it - interruptions often necessary and sometimes has difficulty in explaining or making meaning clearer - only a few of oral skills on course mastered. 1 A lot of serious pronunciation errors - many basic grammar errors - full of unnaturally long pauses - very halting delivery - extremely limited expressions - almost impossible to understand - interruptions constantly necessary but cannot explain or make meaning clearer - very few of oral skills on course mastered. digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id Each element characteristic is defined into six chart behavioral statements as stated in frames above. The writer will objectively see the characteristic of each students speaking ability whether they achieve 1,2,3,4,5 and 6. In order to case the computation, the writer converts the small score of Heaton to scale of 100 as follow: 6= 87-100 5= 77-86 4= 67-76 3= 57-66 2= 46-56 1= below 45 18

11. Reciprocal Teaching Technique

Before implementation of reciprocal teaching technique, it is necessary to know how the reciprocal teaching technique is. Based on Farris ’s description, she stated that reciprocal teaching is one of the most carefully researched, prominent strategies. In this cooperative learning procedure, the teacher and the students work together to develop an understanding of the text. There are four thoughtfully integrated comprehension strategies at the core of this approach, prediction, questioning, seeking clarification, summarization. 19 It means that, reciprocal teaching technique is a process to comprehend text by using four steps which is done by the teacher and the students to build their speculation about the text. Reciprocal teaching is an approach used by teacher in cooperative learning method by applying four learning strategy, those are questioning, clarifying, summarizing, and predicting. Moreover, Santrock indicate that reciprocal teaching approach is a model of teaching involves the teacher and the students. In this approach, the teacher is explaining and modeling the strategy in comprehending the text firstly. Afterwards, the teacher asks the 18 J. B Heaton, Classroom Testing: Longman Keys to Language Teaching, New York: Longman, 1990, p.70-71. 19 Pamela J. Farris, Teaching Reading a Balance Approach for Today’s Classrooms, New York: The McGraw-Hill Company, 2004, p.340. digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id students to demonstrate the strategy and gives support when the students have learned. Therefore, the students will be motivated in teaching and learning process. Because it claims the students involvement or scaffolding system. 20 Meanwhile, Elizabeth Walter defines, reciprocal as a reciprocal action or arrangement involve two people or groups of people who behave in the same way or agree to help each other and give each other advantages. 21 In other words, reciprocal is regarded as an interaction between two people or more gain same purpose cooperatively. Meanwhile teaching derived from word teach, it is defined as to give someone knowledge or to train someone. 22 According to Palinscar and Brown, there are four components of reciprocal teaching, they are questioning, clarifying, summarizing and predicting: Questioning involves the identification of information, themes, and ideas that are central and important enough to warrant further consideration. The central or important information, themes, or ideas are used to generate questions that are then used as self-tests for the reader. Questioning provides a contexts for exploring the text more deeply and assuring the construction of meaning. Summarizing is the process of identifying the important information, themes, and ideas within a text, integrating these into a clear and concise statement that communicates the essential meaning of the text. It may be based on a single paragraph, a section of text, or an entire passage. Summarizing provides the impetus to create a context for understanding the specifics of a text. Clarifying involves the identification and clarification of unclear, difficult, or unfamiliar aspects of a text. These aspects may include awkward sentence or passage structure, unfamiliar vocabulary, unclear references, or obscure concepts. Clarifying 20 Jhon.W. Santrock, Psikologi Pendidikan, Jakarta:Prenada Media Group, 2007, p.427. 21 Elizabeth Walter, Cambridge Advance Learner’s Dictionary Third Edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p.1187. 22 Elizabeth Walter, Cambridge Advance Learner’s..., p.1492.

Dokumen yang terkait

The Use of Flashcard to Improve the Speaking Skill of the Seventh Grade Students at Mts Al-Urwatul Wutsqo Jombang

0 5 16

THE USE OF PICTURE SERIES IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT SKILL AT THE FIRST GRADE OF SMAN 1 PAGELARAN

0 15 59

TEACHING SPEAKING TECHNIQUES FOR THE SEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 1 WERU IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF Teaching Speaking Techniques For The Seventh Grade Students Of Smp N 1 Weru In The Academic Year Of 2016/2017.

0 3 14

TECHNIQUE FOR TEACHING SPEAKING AT THE SEVENTH GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 1 SAMBI IN 2016/2017 ACADEMIC YEAR Technique For Teaching Speaking At The Seventh Grade Of SMP Negeri 1 Sambi In 2016/2017 Academic Year.

0 5 19

TECHNIQUE FOR TEACHING SPEAKING AT THE SEVENTH GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 1 SAMBI IN 2016/2017 ACADEMIC YEAR Technique For Teaching Speaking At The Seventh Grade Of SMP Negeri 1 Sambi In 2016/2017 Academic Year.

0 4 13

THE USE OF GAMES IN IMPROVING SPEAKING SKILL BY THE FIFTH GRADE STUDENTS OF MIN KETITANG, BOYOLALI

0 2 41

THE USE OF FIRST LANGUAGE IN TEACHING SPEAKING FOR THE SECOND GRADE STUDENTS OF MARKETING DEPARTMENT AT The Use Of First Language In Teaching Speaking For The Second Grade Students Of Marketing Department At SMK N 1 Banyudono In 2013/2014 Academic Year.

0 3 14

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY THROUGH THE USE OF ROLE PLAYING TECHNIQUE FOR GRADE VIII STUDENTS OF SMPN 1 BANGUNTAPAN IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2013/2014.

0 0 207

View of THE TEACHING AND LEARNING ON SPEAKING SKILL: A CASE STUDY AT SEVENTH GRADE VII F STUDENTS OF SMPN 1 KEBONAGUNG PACITAN

0 0 10

THE USE OF DISCUSSION TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL

0 0 73