Analisis CAMEL untuk Menilai Tingkat Kesehatan Bank pada Perusahaan Perbankan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2009 – 2011

  

LAMPIRAN

Lampiran 1

Daftar Perusahaan Perbankan yang Menjadi Sampel

NO. Nama Perusahaan

  14. Bank Int' l Indonesia Tbk  

  Sampel 8

  12. Bank Eksekutif Internasional Tbk

  X

  

  13. Bank Himpunan Saudara 1906 Tbk

  

  Sampel 9

  X

  10. Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk  Sampel 7

  15. Bank Kesawan Tbk  

  X

  16. Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk   

  Sampel 10

  17. Bank Mayapada Internasional Tbk   

  Sampel 11

  18. Bank MEGA Tbk   

  11. Bank Ekonomi Raharja Tbk 

  9. Bank CIMB Niaga Tbk  Sampel 6

  Kriteria Penentuan Sampel Sampel

  Sampel 2

  1

  2

  3

  1. Bank Agroniaga Tbk 

  Sampel 1

  2. Bank Artha Graha Internasional Tbk

  

  3. Bank Bukopin Tbk  Sampel 3

  

  4. Bank Bumi Arta Tbk 

  X

  5. Bank Bumiputera Indonesia Tbk 

  X

  6. Bank Capital Indonesia Tbk  Sampel 4

  7. Bank Central Asia Tbk  Sampel 5

  8. Bank Century Tbk

  X

  Sampel 12

  19. Bank Negara Indonesia Tbk   

   

  X

   

  30. Bank Tabungan Negara Tbk

  X

   

  31. Bank Pundi Indonesia Tbk

  X

  32. Bank Jawa Barat dan Banten Tbk

  Sampel 20

  X

   

  33. Bank Sinamas Tbk

  X  

  34. Bank Of India Indonesia

  X

   

  29. Bank Mutiara Tbk

    

  Sampel 13

  24. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk

  20. Bank OCBC NISP Tbk   

  Sampel 14

  21. Bank Nusantara Parahyangan Tbk    Sampel 15

  22. Bank Pan Indonesia Tbk   

  Sampel 16

  23. Bank Permata Tbk  

  X

    

  28. Bank Windu Kentjana International Tbk

  Sampel 17

  25. Bank Swadesi Tbk

  X   26.

  Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional Tbk

    

  Sampel 18

  27. Bank Victoria International Tbk   

  Sampel 19

  Sumber : www.idx.co.id, 2013

  Lampiran 2 Jadwal Penelitian Tahapan Penelitian 2013 Jan Feb Mar Apr Mei Juli Pengajuan Judul Penyelesaian Proposal Pengumpulan Data Pengolahan Data Bimbingan & Penyelesaian Ujian Komprehensif Lampiran 3

Data-data Variabel Penelitian

Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR)

  NO. Nama Perusahaan Tahun 2009 2010 2011 1.

  Bank Agroniaga Tbk 19.63% 14.42% 19.63% 2. Bank Artha Graha Internasional Tbk 13.77% 13.65% 13.77% 3. Bank Bukopin Tbk 14.36% 13.02% 14.36% 4. Bank Capital Indonesia Tbk 44.62% 29.29% 44.62% 5. Bank Central Asia Tbk 15.30% 13.50% 15.30% 6. Bank CIMB Niaga Tbk 13.88% 13.47% 13.88% 7. Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk 20.70% 16.00% 20.70% 8. Bank Ekonomi Raharja Tbk 21.75% 19.05% 21.75% 9. Bank Himpunan Saudara 1906 Tbk 14.10% 23.00% 14.10%

  10. Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk 15.60% 15.70% 15.60% 11.

  Bank Mayapada Internasional Tbk 17.05% 20.40% 17.05% 12. Bank MEGA Tbk 18.01% 15.03% 18.01% 13. Bank Negara Indonesia Tbk 13.80% 18.60% 13.80% 14. Bank OCBC NISP Tbk 20.45% 17.63% 20.45% 15. Bank Nusantara Parahyangan Tbk 12.56% 12.76% 12.56% 16. Bank Pan Indonesia Tbk 21.76% 16.65% 21.79% 17. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk 13.20% 13.76% 13.20% 18. Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional Tbk 18.50% 23.40% 18.50% 19. Bank Victoria International Tbk 16.92% 13.72% 16.92% 20. Bank Windu Kentjana International Tbk 16.88% 17.84% 16.88%

  Non Performing Loan (NPL) NO. Nama Perusahaan Tahun 2009 2010 2011 1.

  Bank Agroniaga Tbk 4.48% 1.84% 0 % 2. Bank Artha Graha Internasional Tbk 2.83% 2.00% 1.85% 3. Bank Bukopin Tbk 2.81% 3.22% 2.88% 4. Bank Capital Indonesia Tbk 0.58% 1.03% 0.81% 5. Bank Central Asia Tbk 0.70% 0.60% 0.50% 6. Bank CIMB Niaga Tbk 3.06% 2.59% 2.64%

  7. Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk 4.50% 3.00% 2.50% 8.

  Bank Ekonomi Raharja Tbk 1.11% 0.35% 0.74% 9. Bank Himpunan Saudara 1906 Tbk 1.29% 1.76% 2.06% 10. Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk 2.80% 4.70% 2.20% 11. Bank Mayapada Internasional Tbk 0.96% 3.27% 2.51% 12. Bank MEGA Tbk 1.70% 0.90% 0.98% 13. Bank Negara Indonesia Tbk 4.70% 4.30% 3.60% 14. Bank OCBC NISP Tbk 1.44% 0.94% 0.59% 15. Bank Nusantara Parahyangan Tbk 1.81% 0.63% 0.78% 16. Bank Pan Indonesia Tbk 3.16% 4.36% 3.56% 17. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk 3.52% 2.79% 2.32% 18. Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional Tbk 0.50% 1.10% 0.70% 19. Bank Victoria International Tbk 3.00% 5.07% 2.60% 20. Bank Windu Kentjana International Tbk 2.11% 2.08% 2.18%

  

Net Profit Margin (NPM)

NO. Nama Perusahaan Tahun 2009 2010 2011 1.

  Bank Agroniaga Tbk 0.52% 3.76% 12.61% 2. Bank Artha Graha Internasional Tbk 2.51% 5.33% 5.80% 3. Bank Bukopin Tbk 8.78% 11.33% 14.22%

  4. Bank Capital Indonesia Tbk 9.09% 6.55% 15.29% 5.

  Bank Central Asia Tbk 49.43% 30.26% 33.89% 6. Bank CIMB Niaga Tbk 12.22% 18.44% 19.02% 7. Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk 8.26% 16.01% 15.65% 8. Bank Ekonomi Raharja Tbk 18.31% 18.02% 16.54% 9. Bank Himpunan Saudara 1906 Tbk 10.11% 12.90% 16.05% 10. Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk 18.79% 21.48% 24.32% 11. Bank Mayapada Internasional Tbk 4.39% 7.19% 13.10% 12. Bank MEGA Tbk 12.16% 19.97% 16.41% 13. Bank Negara Indonesia Tbk 10.46% 15.84% 21.17% 14. Bank OCBC NISP Tbk 11.28% 8.42% 15.56% 15. Bank Nusantara Parahyangan Tbk 7.11% 10.35% 10.69% 16. Bank Pan Indonesia Tbk 10.99% 13.18% 18.53% 17. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk 18.93% 22.87% 28.36% 18. Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional Tbk 10.54% 14.58% 18.29% 19. Bank Victoria International Tbk 5.87% 10.28% 22.30% 20. Bank Windu Kentjana International Tbk 5.99% 7.31% 6.69%

  Net Interest Margin (NIM) NO. Nama Perusahaan Tahun 2009 2010 2011 1.

  Bank Agroniaga Tbk 4.98% 5.03% 4.54% 2. Bank Artha Graha Internasional Tbk 3.83% 3.97% 3.55% 3. Bank Bukopin Tbk 4.07% 4.75% 4.55% 4. Bank Capital Indonesia Tbk 4.64% 3.95% 3.62% 5. Bank Central Asia Tbk 6.40% 5.30% 5.70% 6. Bank CIMB Niaga Tbk 6.78% 6.46% 5.63% 7. Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk 1.12% 1.13% 9.80% 8. Bank Ekonomi Raharja Tbk 4.63% 4.09% 4.38% 9. Bank Himpunan Saudara 1906 Tbk 7.19% 10.24% 10.00% 10. Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk 5.00% 5.30% 5.10% 11. Bank Mayapada Internasional Tbk 6.74% 6.25% 5.84% 12. Bank MEGA Tbk 4.94% 4.88% 5.40% 13. Bank Negara Indonesia Tbk 6.00% 5.80% 6.00% 14. Bank OCBC NISP Tbk 5.35% 5.04% 4.80% 15. Bank Nusantara Parahyangan Tbk 3.69% 4.91% 4.99% 16. Bank Pan Indonesia Tbk 4.76% 4.59% 4.64% 17. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk 9.14% 10.77% 9.58% 18. Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional Tbk 12.20% 14.00% 13.00%

  19. Bank Victoria International Tbk 2.38% 1.77% 1.86% 20.

  Bank Windu Kentjana International Tbk 4.48% 4.61% 4.62%

  

Biaya Operasional terhadap Pendapatan Operasional (BOPO)

NO. Nama Perusahaan Tahun 2009 2010 2011 1.

  Bank Agroniaga Tbk 97.98% 95.97% 91.65% 2. Bank Artha Graha Internasional Tbk 96.24% 91.79% 96.68% 3. Bank Bukopin Tbk 81.94% 83.66% 82.10% 4. Bank Capital Indonesia Tbk 86.03% 91.75% 92.82% 5. Bank Central Asia Tbk 78.99% 77.11% 76.92% 6. Bank CIMB Niaga Tbk 82.98% 76.80% 76.10% 7. Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk 51.60% 49.70% 54.10% 8. Bank Ekonomi Raharja Tbk 77.79% 76.32% 81.00% 9. Bank Himpunan Saudara 1906 Tbk 85.35% 79.30% 80.70% 10. Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk 79.23% 71.43% 77.00% 11. Bank Mayapada Internasional Tbk 87.36% 86.22% 89.17% 12. Bank MEGA Tbk 85.91% 77.79% 81.84% 13. Bank Negara Indonesia Tbk 84.90% 76.00% 72.60% 14. Bank OCBC NISP Tbk 79.85% 83.25% 76.88% 15. Bank Nusantara Parahyangan Tbk 89.28% 85.17% 85.77%

  16. Bank Pan Indonesia Tbk 80.42% 82.50% 84.12% 17.

  Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk 77.66% 70.86% 66.69% 18. Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional Tbk 89.88% 84.78% 88.58% 19. Bank Victoria International Tbk 92.05% 88.21% 78.33% 20. Bank Windu Kentjana International Tbk 91.92% 91.21% 92.97%

  Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) NO. Nama Perusahaan Tahun 2009 2010 2011 1.

  Bank Agroniaga Tbk 80.99% 86.68% 65.79% 2. Bank Artha Graha Internasional Tbk 84.04% 76.13% 82.21% 3. Bank Bukopin Tbk 75.99% 71.85% 85.01% 4. Bank Capital Indonesia Tbk 49.65% 50.60% 44.24% 5. Bank Central Asia Tbk 50.30% 55.20% 61.70% 6. Bank CIMB Niaga Tbk 95.11% 88.04% 94.41% 7. Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk 88.80% 93.80% 98.30% 8. Bank Ekonomi Raharja Tbk 45.54% 62.44% 70.06% 9. Bank Himpunan Saudara 1906 Tbk 94.94% 100.20% 91.33% 10. Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk 61.40% 59.20% 74.10% 11. Bank Mayapada Internasional Tbk 83.77% 78.38% 82.10% 12. Bank MEGA Tbk 56.82% 56.03% 63.75%

  13. Bank Negara Indonesia Tbk 64.10% 70.20% 70.40% 14.

  Bank OCBC NISP Tbk 73.26% 80.00% 87.04% 15. Bank Nusantara Parahyangan Tbk 73.64% 80.41% 84.92% 16. Bank Pan Indonesia Tbk 73.31% 74.22% 80.36% 17. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk 80.88% 75.17% 70.20% 18. Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional Tbk 85.00% 91.00% 85.00% 19. Bank Victoria International Tbk 50.43% 40.22% 63.62% 20. Bank Windu Kentjana International Tbk 65.58% 81.29% 79.30%

  Lampiran 4

Statistik Deskriptif Variabel Penelitian

Descriptive Statistics

  Sumber: hasil output SPSS yang diolah N Minimum Maximum Mean Standard

  Deviation Skewness Kurtosis CAR

  60

  12.56 44.62 17.7767 6.06914 3.071 11.591 NPL 60 .00 5.07 2.1598 1.30708 .408 -.705 NPM 60 .52 33.89 13.5717 6.80127 .659 .570 NIM

  60

  1.12 14.00 5.6460 2.63713 1.301 2.008 BOPO

  60

  49.70 97.98 82.0533 9.82861 -1.288 2.773 LDR 60 40.22 100.20 73.9742 14.66153 -.408 -.545 TGKT_KES 60 .00 1.00 .9167 .27872 -3.093 7.826 Valid N

  (listwise)

  60

  Lampiran 5 Block 0: Beginning Block Iteration History (a,b,c) Coefficients

  • 2 Log

    Iteration likelihood Constant

    Step 0

  1 37.428 1.667 2 34.553 2.232 3 34.421 2.387 4 34.420 2.398 5 34.420 2.398 a. Constant is included in the model.

  

c. Estimation terminated at iteration number

5 because parameter estimates changed by

less than .001.

  

Sumber: hasil output SPSS yang diolah

Lampiran 6 Block 1: Method = Enter Iteration History (a,b,c,d)

  Coefficients

  • 2 Log NP

    Iteration likelihood Constant CAR NPL M NIM BOPO LDR

    Step 1

  1 28.928 .620 -.011 -.105 .043 .151 .022 -.024 2 17.451 2.946 -.026 -.296 .097 .360 .020 -.057 3 10.262 8.302 -.064 -.552 .163 .717 .000 -.112 4 5.807 16.648 -.117 -.823 .211 1.319 -.041 -.187 5 3.077 29.031 -.170 -1.219 .208 2.261 -.118 -.279

  6 1.350 45.483 -.194 -1.881 .173 3.611 -.234 -.391 7 .525 64.288 -.227 -2.643 .155 5.162 -.364 -.521 8 .201 83.805 -.286 -3.387 .153 6.758 -.495 -.658 9 .077 103.787 -.365 -4.109 .161 8.392 -.628 -.798

  10 .029 124.193 -.463 -4.807 .176 10.066 -.764 -.939 11 .011 144.934 -.581 -5.477 .198 11.777 -.903 -1.080 12 .004 165.893 -.715 -6.122 .225 13.519 -1.045 -1.220 13 .002 186.989 -.857 -6.756 .257 15.281 -1.188 -1.361 14 .001 208.186 -1.003 -7.390 .290 17.058 -1.331 -1.503 15 .000 229.463 -1.149 -8.029 .325 18.847 -1.475 -1.645 16 .000 250.796 -1.294 -8.674 .361 20.645 -1.619 -1.788 17 .000 272.161 -1.437 -9.322 .397 22.449 -1.763 -1.933 18 .000 293.529 -1.579 -9.974 .434 24.259 -1.907 -2.077 19 .000 314.875 -1.720 -10.629 .472 26.074 -2.052 -2.222 20 .000 336.174 -1.858 -11.285 .510 27.891 -2.196 -2.367

  a. Method: Enter b. Constant is included in the model.

  c. Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 34.420

  d. Estimation terminated at iteration number 20 because maximum iterations has been reached. Final solution cannot be found.

  Sumber: hasil output SPSS yang diolah

  Lampiran 7 Nilai Nagelkerke R Square Model Summary Cox &

  • -2 Log Snell R Nagelkerke

    Step likelihood Square R Square a 1 .000 .437 1.000

  a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 20 because maximum iterations has been reached. Final solution cannot be found.

   Sumber: hasil output SPSS yang diolah Lampiran 8 Uji Hosmer and Lemeshow’s Goodness of Fit Test Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

  Chi- Step square df Sig. 1 .000 2 1.000

   Sumber: hasil output SPSS yang diolah

  Lampiran 9 Hasil Uji Multikolonearitas Correlation Matrix Constant CAR NPL NPM NIM BOPO LDR Step 1 Constant 1.000 -.092 -.455 -.637 .226 -.910 -.809

  CAR -.092 1.000 -.705 -.614 -.619 -.063 -.160 NPL -.455 -.705 1.000 .697 .314 .448 .592 NPM -.637 -.614 .697 1.000 .453 .684 .609 NIM .226 -.619 .314 .453 1.000 -.137 -.254 BOPO -.910 -.063 .448 .684 -.137 1.000 .608 LDR -.809 -.160 .592 .609 -.254 .608 1.000

   Sumber: hasil output SPSS yang diolah

  Lampiran 10 Classification Table Predicted Observed TGKT_KES tidak sehat sehat Percentage Correct

  Step

  1 TGKT_KES tidak sehat 5 100.0 Sehat 55 100.0 Overall Percentage 100.0

  Sumber: hasil output SPSS yang diolah

  Lampiran 11 Hasil Uji Koefisien Regresi Logistik Sumber: hasil output SPSS yang diolah

  Variables in the Equation B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Step 1 a CAR -1.858 2.233.234 .000 1 .999 .156 NPL -11.285 5.730.300 .000

  1 .998 .000 NPM .510 842.401 .000 1 1.000 1.665 NIM 27.891 2.775.796 .000 1 .992 1,30E+15 BOPO -2.196 435.593 .000 1 .996 .111 LDR -2.367 375.112 .000 1 .995 .094 Constant 336.174 71.353.590 .000 1 .996 9,97E+148 a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: CAR, NPL, NPM, NIM, BOPO, LDR.

Dokumen yang terkait

Implementasi Sistem Informasi Geografis Untuk Menentukan Jarak Terpendek Menggunakan Algoritma Dijkstra Berbasis Web (Studi Kasus : Tempat Wisata di Kota Banda Aceh)

0 0 27

BAB II TINJAUAN PUSTAKA 2.1 Pengertian Sistem Informasi Geografis - Implementasi Sistem Informasi Geografis Untuk Menentukan Jarak Terpendek Menggunakan Algoritma Dijkstra Berbasis Web (Studi Kasus : Tempat Wisata di Kota Banda Aceh)

0 0 11

IMPLEMENTASI SISTEM INFORMASI GEOGRAFIS UNTUK MENENTUKAN JARAK TERPENDEK MENGGUNAKAN ALGORITMA DIJKSTRA BERBASIS WEB (Studi Kasus : Tempat Wisata di Kota Banda Aceh) SKRIPSI TEUKU MUARRIF IKRAMULLAH 101421016

0 0 12

A. Tindak Pidana Penipuan Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia a. Pengertian dan unsur –unsur tindak pidana - Penerapan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Money Laundering dengan Kejahatan Asal Penipuan (Analisis terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 1329K/PID/2012)

0 0 40

Analisis Ketersediaan Akses Internet dalam Memenuhi Kebutuhan Informasi Pengguna Perpustakaan Universitas Sumatera Utara

0 0 12

BAB II TINJAUAN PUSTAKA 2.1 Uraian Teoritis 2.1.1 Pengertian Citra - Pengaruh Citra Tokoh Politik Terhadap Minat Memilih Pada Pemilu Presiden 2014 di Medan

0 0 21

BAB I PENDAHULUAN 1.1 Latar Belakang - Pengaruh Citra Tokoh Politik Terhadap Minat Memilih Pada Pemilu Presiden 2014 di Medan

0 0 15

Perkembangan Taman Bacaan Masyarakat (TBM) dalam Lingkungan Masyarakat Perkotaan (Studi Kasus Pada Taman Bacaan Masyarakat di Kota Medan)

0 0 50

2.1 Taman Bacaan Masyarakat - Perkembangan Taman Bacaan Masyarakat (TBM) dalam Lingkungan Masyarakat Perkotaan (Studi Kasus Pada Taman Bacaan Masyarakat di Kota Medan)

0 0 11

PERKEMBANGAN TAMAN BACAAN MASYARAKAT (TBM) DALAM LINGKUNGAN MASYARAKAT PERKOTAAN (STUDI KASUS PADA TAMAN BACAAN MASYARAKAT DI KOTA MEDAN) SKRIPSI Diajukan sebagai salah satu persyaratan dalam menyelesaikan studi untuk memperoleh gelar Sarjana Sosial (S.So

0 0 12