Pengaruh Penerapan Kode Etik Dan Penggunaan Teknik Audit Berbantuan Komputer (TABK) Terhadap Efektivitas Audit Oleh Auditor BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Sumatera Utara

Lampiran 1. Permohonan Pengisian Kuesioner
Medan, …… Mei 2012

Perihal

:

Permohonan Pengisian Kuesioner

Kepada Yth.
Auditor BPK - RI
Perwakilan Provinsi Sumatera Utara
diTempat

Dengan hormat

Yang bertanda tangan dibawah ini

Nama

:


Tohirin

Mahasiswa

:

Sekolah Pascasarjana Program Studi Ilmu
Akuntansi Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas
Sumatera Utara Medan

NIM

:

107017067/Akt

Pekerjaan

:


Auditor BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi
Sumatera Utara

Dengan ini memohon kesediaan Bapak/Ibu Auditor BPK RI Perwakilan
Provinsi Sumatera Utara untuk mengisi kuesioner penelitian
sebagaimana terlampir dalam surat permohonan ini.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Adapun kuesioner dalam permohonan ini, dimaksudkan semata – mata
untuk kepentingan penelitian saja, tidak dipublikasi, bukan merupakan
dasar penilaian, dan semua respon yang Bapak/Ibu berikan dijamin
kerahasiaannya.

Demikian permohonan ini disampakan, atas kesediaannya diucapkan
terima kasih.

Hormat saya
Pemohon,


Tohirin
DAFTAR PERTANYAAN PENGARUH PENERAPAN KODE ETIK DAN
PENGGUNAAN TEKNIK AUDIT BERBANTUAN KOMPUTER (TABK)
TERHADAP EFEKTIVITAS AUDIT OLEH AUDITOR BPK RI
PERWAKILAN PROVINSI SUMATERA UTARA

I.

IDENTITAS RESPONDEN

A. Nama Responden : __________________________

B. Jenis Kelamin
Lk

Pr

Universitas Sumatera Utara


C. Umur :
20 – 30 Tahun

31 – 40 Tahun

41 – 50 Tahun

51 – 60 Tahun

D. Pendidikan :
Sarjana Muda (D3)

Sarjana (S1)

Pasca Sarjana (S2)

E. Masa Kerja :
≤ 5 Tahun

6 – 10 Tahun


11 – 15 Tahun

16 – 20 Tahun

> 20 Tahun

F. Peran :
ATY

II.

ATS

KTY

KTS

PT/PJ


PETUNJUK PENGISIAN KUESIONER

1. Sebelum menjawab pertanyaan/pernyataan kuesioner dimohonkan kepada
responden untuk terlebih dahulu mengisi identitas sesuai dengan formulir isian
yang telah disediakan.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

2. Bacalah pernyataan dalam kuesioner ini secara teliti dan berikan tanda√)
( pada
salah satu alternatif jawaban yang menurut Bapak/Ibu sesuai keadaan yang
Bapak/Ibu alami.
3. Bapak/Ibu diberikan lima alternatif pilihan jawaban berskala 1 s.d. 5 dengan
ketentuan sebagai berikut:
STS
TS
KS
S
SS


:
:
:
:
:

Uraian
Sangat Tidak Setuju
Tidak Setuju
Kurang Setuju
Setuju
Sangat Setuju

Skala
1
2
3
4
5


4. Dimohonkan untuk tidak mencoba menganalisis pernyataan secara intensif, dan
jawablah sesuai dengan pengalaman/pendapat anda sendiri tanpa ada paksaan
dari pihak manapun (jujur), karena tidak ada jawaban yang salah atau benar.
5. Dimohonkan untuk tidak mendiskusikan pertanyaan/jawaban kepada orang lain.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Lampiran 4. Hasil Uji Validitas Instrumen Kuesioner Penelitian

4.1. Hasil Uji Validitas Instrumen Kuesioner Efektivitas Audit (Y)

Correlations

Indikator1Y
Indikator1Y

Pearson Correlation

Indikator2Y
1


Indikator2Y

Indikator 3Y

Efektivitas Audit

.028

.000

30

30

30

30

*


1

.391

Sig. (2-tailed)

.023
30
*

30

30

30

*

1


.391

Sig. (2-tailed)

.028

.033

30

30

Sig. (2-tailed)
N

**

**

.756

.000

.401

.799

*

.033

Pearson Correlation

Pearson Correlation

**

.799

.023

.415

N

*

.401

Pearson Correlation

N

*

Efektivitas Audit

.415

Sig. (2-tailed)
N

Indikator 3Y

**

.756

**

.770

.000
30

30

**

1

.770

.000

.000

.000

30

30

30

30

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Universitas Sumatera Utara

4.2. Hasil Uji Validitas Instrumen Kuesioner Independensi (X1)

Correlations

Indikator1X1
Indikator1X1

Pearson Correlation

Indikator2X1

Indikator2X1

Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

Indikator3X1

.286

.318

.002

.125

.087

30

30

30

30

**

1

.196

.008
30

Pearson Correlation

.286

.196

1

.338

Sig. (2-tailed)

.125

.298

30

30

30

30

**

.338

1

.473

.068

Pearson Correlation

.318

Sig. (2-tailed)

.087

.008

.068

30

30

30

30

Pearson Correlation

.252

.399

.369

*

.294

Sig. (2-tailed)

.180

.029

.045

.114

30

30

30

30

**

.227

*

Pearson Correlation

.383

*

.171

Sig. (2-tailed)

.037

.366

.002

.227

30

30

30

30

.455

*

.325

.456

.003

.011

.080

.011

30

30

30

30

N
Indikator7X1

.298
30

N
Indikator6X1

.002

**

.473

30

N
Indikator5X1

.543

.543

30

N
Indikator4X1

Indikator4X1

**

1

Sig. (2-tailed)
N

Indikator3X1

Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

**

.528

.542

*

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Indikator8X1

**

Pearson Correlation

.508

Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Indikator9X1

N
Indikator10X1

N
Independensi

.329

30

30

30

30

.423

*

.286

.009

.020

.126

.000

30

30

30

30

**

.108

.274

.000

.000

.568

.143

30

30

30

30

.606

Sig. (2-tailed)

**

Pearson Correlation

.729

Sig. (2-tailed)
N

.185

.028

**

Pearson Correlation

*

.002

.468

Sig. (2-tailed)

.402

.004

**

Pearson Correlation

**

.551

.655

**

.731

**

.556

**

.604

**

.628

.000

.000

.001

.000

30

30

30

30

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Correlations

Indikator5X1
Indikator1X1

Indikator7X1
*

Indikator8X1
**

.528

**

Pearson Correlation

.252

.383

Sig. (2-tailed)

.180

.037

.003

.004

30

30

30

30

N
Indikator2X1

Indikator6X1

Pearson Correlation

.399

*

.171

.455

Sig. (2-tailed)

.029

.366

.011

.002

30

30

30

30

N

*

.508

**

.551

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Indikator3X1

**

.325

.402

.045

.002

.080

.028

30

30

30

30

Pearson Correlation

.294

.227

.456

*

.185

Sig. (2-tailed)

.114

.227

.011

.329

30

30

30

30

1

.318

.394

.087

.031

.003

30

30

30

30

Pearson Correlation

.318

1

.419

*

.199

Sig. (2-tailed)

.087

.021

.291

30

30

30

*

1

.382

.369

Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Indikator4X1

N
Indikator5X1

*

Pearson Correlation

Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

Indikator6X1

N
Indikator7X1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.031

.021

30

30

30

30

**

.199

.382

*

1

.003

.291

.037

30

30

30

**

.322

.388

.394

.001

.082

.034

.031

30

30

30

30

**

.180

**

.339

.008

.341

.003

.067

30

30

30

30

Pearson Correlation

Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

Independensi

*

.419

N

Indikator10X1

**

.518

.394

Sig. (2-tailed)

Indikator9X1

*

*

*

Pearson Correlation

N
Indikator8X1

30

.542

Pearson Correlation

.518

.572

.478

**

.684

**

.550

.037

*

.522

**

.731

30
*

**

.658

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Sig. (2-tailed)
N

.000

.002

.000

.000

30

30

30

30

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Correlations

Indikator9X1
Indikator1X1

Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

Indikator2X1

**

.729

.009

.000

.000

30

30

30

*

**

**

.020

.000

.000

30

30

30

Pearson Correlation

.286

.108

Sig. (2-tailed)

.126

.568

.001

30

30

30

**

.274

.000

.143

.000

30

30

30

Pearson Correlation

N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)

.604

**

.572

.001

.655

.731

Sig. (2-tailed)

Sig. (2-tailed)

Indikator5X1

**

.606

.423

N
Indikator4X1

**

.468

Pearson Correlation

N
Indikator3X1

Independensi

Indikator10X1

**

.478

.008

**

.556

**

.628

**

.684

.000

Universitas Sumatera Utara

N
Indikator6X1

30

Pearson Correlation

.322

.180

Sig. (2-tailed)

.082

.341

.002

30

30

30

N
Indikator7X1

*

Sig. (2-tailed)

.034

.003

.000

30

30

30

.394

*

.339

Sig. (2-tailed)

.031

.067

.000

30

30

30

Pearson Correlation

1

N
Pearson Correlation

30

30

30

**

1

30
**

.742

Sig. (2-tailed)
N

**

.742

.000

**

.700

.000

.008

N
Pearson Correlation

**

.472

.658

.008

.472

Sig. (2-tailed)

Independensi

**

Pearson Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

Indikator10X1

**

.731

.388

N
Indikator9X1

**

.522

**

.550

Pearson Correlation

N
Indikator8X1

30

30

30

30

**

1

.700

.000

.000

30

30

30

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Universitas Sumatera Utara

4.3. Hasil Uji Validitas Instrumen Kuesioner Integritas (X2)

Correlations
Indikator1X2
Indikator1X2

Pearson Correlation

Indikator2X2

Indikator2X2

Pearson Correlation

.207

.007

.000

.272

30

30

30

30

**

1

.397

*

.061

Sig. (2-tailed)

.030

.750

N

30

30

30

Indikator3X2

Pearson Correlation

*

1

.408

Sig. (2-tailed)

**

.611

.397

*

30

30

30

Pearson Correlation

.207

.061

.408

*

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.272

.750

.025

30

30

30

30

-.010

.412

*

.133

.270

.959

.024

.484

.149

30

30

30

30

**

.337

**

.302

.000

.069

.009

.104

30

30

30

30

**

.112

.000

.556

Pearson Correlation

N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Indikator7X2

30

30

Sig. (2-tailed)

Indikator6X2

.007

.611

.030

N
Indikator5X2

.482

.000

N
Indikator4X2

.482

**

Indikator4X2
**

1

Sig. (2-tailed)
N

Indikator3X2

Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)

.602

**

.741

.000

**

.594

.001

.025

.471

.611

Universitas Sumatera Utara

N
Integritas

Pearson Correlation

30
**

.814

Sig. (2-tailed)

30
**

.704

30
**

.774

30
*

.463

.000

.000

.000

.010

30

30

30

30

N
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Correlations

Indikator5X2
Indikator1X2

Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

Indikator2X2

.000

.000

.000

30

30

30

30

Sig. (2-tailed)

.024

.069

.001

.000

30

30

30

30

.594

**

**

.774

.133

Sig. (2-tailed)

.484

.009

.000

.000

30

30

30

30

Pearson Correlation

.270

.302

.112

.463

Sig. (2-tailed)

.149

.104

.556

.010

30

30

30

30

1

.088

.142

.366

.645

.453

.047

30

30

30

30

Pearson Correlation

.088

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.645

Pearson Correlation

30

30

30

**

1

.453

.007

30

30

*

**

.725

30

Sig. (2-tailed)

.366

*

.000

.142

Pearson Correlation

**

.483

*

.007

Pearson Correlation

N

.611

.704

Pearson Correlation

N

Integritas

**

.471

**

**

.337

N

Indikator7X2

**

.814

.959

Sig. (2-tailed)

Indikator6X2

**

.741

*

N
Indikator5X2

**

.602

.412

N
Indikator4X2

-.010

Integritas

Indikator7X2

Pearson Correlation

N
Indikator3X2

Indikator6X2

.483

**

.725

**

.817

.000
30

30

**

1

.817

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Sig. (2-tailed)

.047

.000

.000

30

30

30

N

30

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Universitas Sumatera Utara

4.4. Hasil Uji Validitas Instrumen Kuesioner Profesionalisme (X3)

Correlations

Indikator1X3
Indikator1X3

Pearson Correlation

Indikator2X3
1

.085

.084

.000

30

30

30

30

Pearson Correlation

.320

1

.337

Sig. (2-tailed)

.085

N

.068

.001

30

30

Pearson Correlation

.321

.337

1

.357

Sig. (2-tailed)

.084

.068

30

30

30

30

**

.357

1

.000

.001

.053

30

30

30

30

**

.081

Pearson Correlation

N

**

.609

.587

.053

Pearson Correlation

.381

*

.160

Sig. (2-tailed)

.038

.399

.005

.671

30

30

30

30

N
Profesionalisme

**

.587

30

Sig. (2-tailed)

Indikator5X3

.609

30

N
Indikator4X3

**

.321

N

Indikator3X3

Indikator4X3

.320

Sig. (2-tailed)

Indikator2X3

Indikator3X3

Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

**

.752

**

.687

.498

**

.716

**

.746

.000

.000

.000

.000

30

30

30

30

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Correlations
Profesionalisme

Indikator5X3
Indikator1X3

Sig. (2-tailed)

.038

.000

30

30

.160

Sig. (2-tailed)

.399

.000

30

30

Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

Indikator4X3

**

.498

.005

.000

30

30
**

.746

.081

Sig. (2-tailed)

.671

.000

30

30

Pearson Correlation

1

N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

**

.605

.000

Sig. (2-tailed)

Profesionalisme

**

.716

Pearson Correlation

N
Indikator5X3

**

.687

Pearson Correlation

N
Indikator3X3

**

.752

.381

N
Indikator2X3

*

Pearson Correlation

30

30

**

1

.605

.000
30

30

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Universitas Sumatera Utara

4.5. Hasil Uji Validitas Instrumen Kuesioner Computer Attitude (X4)

Correlations

Indikator1X4
Indikator1X4

Pearson Correlation

Indikator2X4
1

.010

30

30

30

Pearson Correlation

.345

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.062

N
Pearson Correlation

N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Compter Attitude

Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

**

.538

.002

30

Sig. (2-tailed)

Indikator4X4

.463

.062

N

Indikator3X4

**

.345

Sig. (2-tailed)

Indikator2X4

Indikator3X4

**

.463

30

30

**

1

.538

.010

.002

30

30

**

.307

.000

.099

.009

30

30

30

.702

**

30
**

.469

**

.819

**

.681

.805

.000

.000

.000

30

30

30

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Correlations
Compter
Attitude

Indikator4X4
Indikator1X4

Pearson Correlation

**

.702

**

.819

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Indikator2X4

30

30
**

.681

.307

Sig. (2-tailed)

.099

.000

30

30
**

**

Pearson Correlation

.805

.469

Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Indikator4X4

.000

Pearson Correlation

N
Indikator3X4

.000

Pearson Correlation

.009

.000

30

30
**

.799

1

.000

Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Compter Attitude

Pearson Correlation

30

30

**

1

.799

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

N

30

30

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

4.6. Hasil Uji Validitas Instrumen Kuesioner Computer Trainning (X5)

Correlations
Indikator5X1
Indikator5X1

Pearson Correlation

Indikator5X2
1

.343

.335

.064

.070

30

30

30

Pearson Correlation

.343

1

.452

Sig. (2-tailed)

.064

Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Indikator5X2

Indikator5X3

*

.012

Universitas Sumatera Utara

N
Indikator5X3

30

30

30

Pearson Correlation

.335

.452

*

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.070

.012

30

30

30

Pearson Correlation

.281

.355

.335

Sig. (2-tailed)

.132

.054

.070

30

30

30

N
Indikator5X4

N
Computer Trainning

Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

**

**

.641

**

.776

.755

.000

.000

.000

30

30

30

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Correlations
Computer
Trainning

Indikator5X4
Indikator5X1

.281

Sig. (2-tailed)

.132

.000

30

30

N
Indikator5X2

.355

Sig. (2-tailed)

.054

.000

30

30
**

.755

Pearson Correlation

.335

Sig. (2-tailed)

.070

.000

30

30

N
Indikator5X4

**

.776

Pearson Correlation

N
Indikator5X3

**

.641

Pearson Correlation

Pearson Correlation

1

**

.687

Universitas Sumatera Utara

.000

Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Computer Trainning

Pearson Correlation

30

30

**

1

.687

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

N

30

30

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Lampiran 5. Hasil Uji Reliabilitas Instrumen Kuesioner Penelitian

5.1. Hasil Uji Reliabilitas Instrumen Kuesioner Efektivitas Audit (Y)

Case Processing Summary
N
Cases

Valid
a

Excluded
Total

%
30

100.0

0

.0

30

100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
.667

N of Items
3

5.2. Hasil Uji Reliabilitas Instrumen Kuesioner Independensi (X1)

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Case Processing Summary
N
Cases

Valid

%
30

100.0

0

.0

30

100.0

a

Excluded
Total

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha

N of Items

.866

10

5.3. Hasil Uji Reliabilitas Instrumen Kuesioner Integritas (X2)

Case Processing Summary

N
Cases

Valid
a

Excluded
Total

%
30

100.0

0

.0

30

100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
.806

N of Items
7

Universitas Sumatera Utara

5.4. Hasil Uji Reliabilitas Instrumen Kuesioner Profesionalisme (X3)

Case Processing Summary
N
Cases

Valid
a

Excluded
Total

%
30

100.0

0

.0

30

100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha

N of Items

.742

5

5.5. Hasil Uji Reliabilitas Instrumen Kuesioner Computer Attitude (X4)

Case Processing Summary
N
Cases

Valid
a

Excluded
Total

%
30

100.0

0

.0

30

100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
.781

N of Items
4

Universitas Sumatera Utara

5.6. Hasil Uji Reliabilitas Instrumen Kuesioner Computer Trainning (X5)

Case Processing Summary
N
Cases

Valid

%
30

100.0

0

.0

30

100.0

a

Excluded
Total

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the
procedure.

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
.683

N of Items
4

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Lampiran 7. Output SPSS Analisis Deskriptif Distribusi Frekuensi

7.1. Hasil Analisis Deskriptif Variabel Efektivitas Audit (Y)

Statistics
Indikator1Y
N

Valid

Indikator2Y

Indikator 3Y

72

72

72

0

0

0

Mean

3.6111

3.9861

3.8889

Std. Deviation

.92775

.86388

.77923

Minimum

2.00

2.00

2.00

Maximum

5.00

5.00

5.00

Missing

Frequency Table

Indikator1Y

Frequency
Valid

Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

7

9.7

9.7

9.7

Kurang Setuju

29

40.3

40.3

50.0

Setuju

21

29.2

29.2

79.2

Sangat Setuju

15

20.8

20.8

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Indikator2Y

Frequency
Valid

Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

3

4.2

4.2

4.2

Kurang Setuju

18

25.0

25.0

29.2

Setuju

28

38.9

38.9

68.1

Sangat Setuju

23

31.9

31.9

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Indikator 3Y

Frequency
Valid

Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

2

2.8

2.8

2.8

Kurang Setuju

20

27.8

27.8

30.6

Setuju

34

47.2

47.2

77.8

Sangat Setuju

16

22.2

22.2

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

7.2. Hasil Analisis Deskriptif Variabel Independensi (X1)

Statistics
Indikator1X1
N

Valid
Missing
Mean

Indikator2X1

Indikator3X1

Indikator4X1

Indikator5X1

72

72

72

72

72

0

0

0

0

0

3.8056

3.8472

3.6389

3.9028

3.7222

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Std. Deviation

.91373

.86659

.84429

.93688

.85945

Minimum

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

Maximum

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

Statistics

Indikator6X1
N

Valid

Indikator7X1

Indikator8X1

Indikator9X1

Indikator10X1

72

72

72

72

72

0

0

0

0

0

Mean

3.7639

3.9028

3.7500

3.8750

3.9583

Std. Deviation

.89589

.80770

.83497

.97775

.87914

Minimum

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

Maximum

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

Missing

Frequency Table

Indikator1X1

Frequency
Valid

Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

6

8.3

8.3

8.3

Kurang Setuju

20

27.8

27.8

36.1

Setuju

28

38.9

38.9

75.0

Sangat Setuju

18

25.0

25.0

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Indikator2X1

Frequency
Valid

Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

4

5.6

5.6

5.6

Kurang Setuju

21

29.2

29.2

34.7

Setuju

29

40.3

40.3

75.0

Sangat Setuju

18

25.0

25.0

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Indikator3X1

Frequency
Valid

Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

4

5.6

5.6

5.6

Kurang Setuju

31

43.1

43.1

48.6

Setuju

24

33.3

33.3

81.9

Sangat Setuju

13

18.1

18.1

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Indikator4X1

Frequency
Valid

Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

6

8.3

8.3

8.3

Kurang Setuju

17

23.6

23.6

31.9

Setuju

27

37.5

37.5

69.4

Sangat Setuju

22

30.6

30.6

100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Indikator4X1

Frequency
Valid

Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

6

8.3

8.3

8.3

Kurang Setuju

17

23.6

23.6

31.9

Setuju

27

37.5

37.5

69.4

Sangat Setuju

22

30.6

30.6

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Indikator5X1

Frequency
Valid

Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

5

6.9

6.9

6.9

Kurang Setuju

24

33.3

33.3

40.3

Setuju

29

40.3

40.3

80.6

Sangat Setuju

14

19.4

19.4

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Indikator6X1

Frequency
Valid

Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

4

5.6

5.6

5.6

Kurang Setuju

27

37.5

37.5

43.1

Setuju

23

31.9

31.9

75.0

Sangat Setuju

18

25.0

25.0

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Indikator7X1

Frequency
Valid

Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

2

2.8

2.8

2.8

Kurang Setuju

21

29.2

29.2

31.9

Setuju

31

43.1

43.1

75.0

Sangat Setuju

18

25.0

25.0

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Indikator8X1

Frequency
Valid

Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

5

6.9

6.9

6.9

Kurang Setuju

21

29.2

29.2

36.1

Setuju

33

45.8

45.8

81.9

Sangat Setuju

13

18.1

18.1

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Indikator9X1

Frequency
Valid

Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

4

5.6

5.6

5.6

Kurang Setuju

27

37.5

37.5

43.1

Setuju

15

20.8

20.8

63.9

Sangat Setuju

26

36.1

36.1

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Indikator10X1

Frequency
Valid

Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

3

4.2

4.2

4.2

Kurang Setuju

20

27.8

27.8

31.9

Setuju

26

36.1

36.1

68.1

Sangat Setuju

23

31.9

31.9

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

7.3. Hasil Analisis Deskriptif Variabel Integritas (X2)

Statistics
Indikator1X2
N

Valid

Indikator2X2

Indikator3X2

Indikator4X2

Indikator5X2

72

72

72

72

72

0

0

0

0

0

3.7917

3.6944

3.8889

3.8472

3.9306

1.09978

1.06993

.92775

.85018

.73784

Minimum

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

3.00

Maximum

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

Missing
Mean
Std. Deviation

Statistics

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Indikator6X2
N

Valid

Indikator7X2

72

72

0

0

3.7639

3.7361

1.02769

1.10049

Minimum

2.00

2.00

Maximum

5.00

5.00

Missing
Mean
Std. Deviation

Frequency Table

Indikator1X2

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Tidak Setuju

12

16.7

16.7

16.7

Kurang Setuju

16

22.2

22.2

38.9

Setuju

19

26.4

26.4

65.3

Sangat Setuju

25

34.7

34.7

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Indikator2X2

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Tidak Setuju

12

16.7

16.7

16.7

Kurang Setuju

19

26.4

26.4

43.1

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Setuju

20

27.8

27.8

70.8

Sangat Setuju

21

29.2

29.2

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Indikator3X2

Frequency
Valid

Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

6

8.3

8.3

8.3

Kurang Setuju

17

23.6

23.6

31.9

Setuju

28

38.9

38.9

70.8

Sangat Setuju

21

29.2

29.2

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Indikator4X2

Frequency
Valid

Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

3

4.2

4.2

4.2

Kurang Setuju

23

31.9

31.9

36.1

Setuju

28

38.9

38.9

75.0

Sangat Setuju

18

25.0

25.0

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Indikator5X2

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Kurang Setuju

22

30.6

30.6

30.6

Setuju

33

45.8

45.8

76.4

Sangat Setuju

17

23.6

23.6

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Indikator6X2

Frequency
Valid

Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

9

12.5

12.5

12.5

Kurang Setuju

21

29.2

29.2

41.7

Setuju

20

27.8

27.8

69.4

Sangat Setuju

22

30.6

30.6

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Indikator7X2

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Tidak Setuju

12

16.7

16.7

16.7

Kurang Setuju

19

26.4

26.4

43.1

Setuju

17

23.6

23.6

66.7

Sangat Setuju

24

33.3

33.3

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

7.4. Hasil Analisis Deskriptif Variabel Profesionalisme (X3)
Statistics
Indikator1X3
N

Valid

Indikator2X3

Indikator3X3

Indikator4X3

Indikator5X3

72

72

72

72

72

0

0

0

0

0

3.5417

3.6667

3.6250

3.6528

3.5972

1.36286

1.35314

1.34727

1.32325

1.46950

Minimum

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Maximum

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

Missing
Mean
Std. Deviation

Frequency Table

Indikator1X3

Frequency
Valid

Sangat Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

10

13.9

13.9

13.9

Tidak Setuju

7

9.7

9.7

23.6

Kurang Setuju

9

12.5

12.5

36.1

Setuju

26

36.1

36.1

72.2

Sangat Setuju

20

27.8

27.8

100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Indikator1X3

Frequency
Valid

Sangat Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

10

13.9

13.9

13.9

Tidak Setuju

7

9.7

9.7

23.6

Kurang Setuju

9

12.5

12.5

36.1

Setuju

26

36.1

36.1

72.2

Sangat Setuju

20

27.8

27.8

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Indikator2X3

Frequency
Valid

Sangat Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

6

8.3

8.3

8.3

Tidak Setuju

11

15.3

15.3

23.6

Kurang Setuju

12

16.7

16.7

40.3

Setuju

15

20.8

20.8

61.1

Sangat Setuju

28

38.9

38.9

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Indikator3X3

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Sangat Tidak Setuju

8

11.1

11.1

11.1

Tidak Setuju

8

11.1

11.1

22.2

11

15.3

15.3

37.5

Kurang Setuju

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Setuju

21

29.2

29.2

66.7

Sangat Setuju

24

33.3

33.3

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Indikator4X3

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Sangat Tidak Setuju

7

9.7

9.7

9.7

Tidak Setuju

8

11.1

11.1

20.8

Kurang Setuju

13

18.1

18.1

38.9

Setuju

19

26.4

26.4

65.3

Sangat Setuju

25

34.7

34.7

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Indikator5X3

Frequency
Valid

Sangat Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

12

16.7

16.7

16.7

5

6.9

6.9

23.6

Kurang Setuju

10

13.9

13.9

37.5

Setuju

18

25.0

25.0

62.5

Sangat Setuju

27

37.5

37.5

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Tidak Setuju

7.5. Hasil Analisis Deskriptif Variabel Computer Attitude (X4)

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Statistics
Indikator1X4
N

Valid

Indikator2X4

Indikator3X4

Indikator4X4

72

72

72

72

0

0

0

0

3.3611

3.3750

3.5139

3.2917

1.35632

1.21537

1.38394

1.22690

Minimum

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Maximum

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

Missing
Mean
Std. Deviation

Frequency Table

Indikator1X4

Frequency
Valid

Sangat Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

7

9.7

9.7

9.7

Tidak Setuju

17

23.6

23.6

33.3

Kurang Setuju

10

13.9

13.9

47.2

Setuju

19

26.4

26.4

73.6

Sangat Setuju

19

26.4

26.4

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Indikator2X4

Frequency
Valid

Sangat Tidak Setuju
Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

6

8.3

8.3

8.3

13

18.1

18.1

26.4

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Kurang Setuju

14

19.4

19.4

45.8

Setuju

26

36.1

36.1

81.9

Sangat Setuju

13

18.1

18.1

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Indikator3X4

Frequency
Valid

Sangat Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

7

9.7

9.7

9.7

Tidak Setuju

13

18.1

18.1

27.8

Kurang Setuju

13

18.1

18.1

45.8

Setuju

14

19.4

19.4

65.3

Sangat Setuju

25

34.7

34.7

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Indikator4X4

Frequency
Valid

Sangat Tidak Setuju

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

4

5.6

5.6

5.6

Tidak Setuju

20

27.8

27.8

33.3

Kurang Setuju

13

18.1

18.1

51.4

Setuju

21

29.2

29.2

80.6

Sangat Setuju

14

19.4

19.4

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

7.6. Hasil Analisis Deskriptif Variabel Computer Trainning (X5)

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Statistics
Indikator5X1
N

Valid

Indikator5X2

Indikator5X3

Indikator5X4

72

72

72

72

0

0

0

0

2.6389

2.7639

2.8194

2.6667

1.37693

1.46790

1.54123

1.42414

Minimum

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Maximum

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

Missing
Mean
Std. Deviation

Indikator5X1

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Sangat Tidak Setuju

22

30.6

30.6

30.6

Tidak Setuju

13

18.1

18.1

48.6

Kurang Setuju

12

16.7

16.7

65.3

Setuju

19

26.4

26.4

91.7

6

8.3

8.3

100.0

72

100.0

100.0

Sangat Setuju
Total

Indikator5X2

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Sangat Tidak Setuju

19

26.4

26.4

26.4

Tidak Setuju

17

23.6

23.6

50.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Kurang Setuju

11

15.3

15.3

65.3

Setuju

12

16.7

16.7

81.9

Sangat Setuju

13

18.1

18.1

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Indikator5X3

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Sangat Tidak Setuju

21

29.2

29.2

29.2

Tidak Setuju

13

18.1

18.1

47.2

Kurang Setuju

12

16.7

16.7

63.9

Setuju

10

13.9

13.9

77.8

Sangat Setuju

16

22.2

22.2

100.0

Total

72

100.0

100.0

Indikator5X4

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Sangat Tidak Setuju

20

27.8

27.8

27.8

Tidak Setuju

19

26.4

26.4

54.2

7

9.7

9.7

63.9

17

23.6

23.6

87.5

9

12.5

12.5

100.0

72

100.0

100.0

Kurang Setuju
Setuju
Sangat Setuju
Total

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Lampiran 10. Hasil Uji Kolmogrov – Smirnov

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

AbsUt
N
a,,b

Normal Parameters

72

Mean

.3362

Std. Deviation
Most Extreme Differences

.26194

Absolute

.139

Positive

.139

Negative

-.103

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z

1.182

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)

.122

a. Test distribution is Normal.
b. Calculated from data.

Lampiran 11. Hasil Uji Glejser

Variables Entered/Removed

Model
1

Variables
Entered

Variables
Removed

Computer
Trainning ,
Independensi ,
Profesionalisme ,
Computer
Attitude ,
a
Integritas

Method
. Enter

a. All requested variables entered.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

a

Coefficients

Unstandardized Coefficients
Model
1

B
(Constant)

Std. Error
.256

.257

-.007

.008

Integritas

.005

Profesionalisme

Standardized
Coefficients
Beta

t

Sig.
.994

.324

-.141

-.935

.353

.008

.088

.579

.565

.002

.005

.048

.391

.697

Computer Attitude

.012

.007

.213

1.746

.085

Computer Trainning

.003

.006

.057

.473

.637

Independensi

a. Dependent Variable: AbsUt

Lampiran 12. Hasil Analisis Regresi Linier Berganda

Variables Entered/Removed

Model
1

Variables Entered
Computer Trainning , Independensi ,
Profesionalisme , Computer Attitude ,
a
Integritas

Variables
Removed

Method
. Enter

a. All requested variables entered.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

b

Model Summary

Model

R

R Square
a

1

.973

Adjusted R Square

.946

Std. Error of the Estimate

.942

.44400

a. Predictors: (Constant), Computer Trainning , Independensi , Profesionalisme , Computer
Attitude , Integritas
b. Dependent Variable: Efektivitas Audit

b

Model Summary

Change Statistics

Model

R Square
Change

1

F Change

.946

df1

df2

230.165

5

Sig. F Change
66

.000

b. Dependent Variable: Efektivitas Audit

b

ANOVA
Model
1

Sum of Squares
Regression
Residual
Total

df

Mean Square

226.864

5

45.373

13.011

66

.197

239.875

71

F
230.165

Sig.
a

.000

a. Predictors: (Constant), Computer Trainning , Independensi , Profesionalisme , Computer
Attitude , Integritas
b. Dependent Variable: Efektivitas Audit

a

Coefficients

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized
Coefficients

Universitas Sumatera Utara

B
1

(Constant)

Std. Error

Beta

-2.581

.434

Independensi

.321

.013

Integritas

.029

Profesionalisme

t

Sig.

-5.945

.000

.897

24.777

.000

.014

.077

2.125

.037

.020

.009

.066

2.246

.028

Computer Attitude

.028

.012

.071

2.425

.018

Computer Trainning

.026

.010

.075

2.585

.012

a. Dependent Variable: Efektivitas Audit

a

Coefficients

95.0% Confidence Interval for B
Model
1

Lower Bound
(Constant)

Upper Bound

Correlations
Zero-order

Partial

Part

-3.447

-1.714

Independensi

.295

.347

.961

.950

.710

Integritas

.002

.056

.635

.253

.061

Profesionalisme

.002

.037

.165

.266

.064

Computer Attitude

.005

.051

.247

.286

.070

Computer Trainning

.006

.046

.077

.303

.074

a. Dependent Variable: Efektivitas Audit

Universitas Sumatera Utara

a

Coefficients

Collinearity Statistics
Model
1

Tolerance

VIF

Independensi

.627

1.595

Integritas

.621

1.609

Profesionalisme

.948

1.055

Computer Attitude

.953

1.049

Computer Trainning

.984

1.017

a. Dependent Variable: Efektivitas Audit

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Dokumen yang terkait

PENGARUH PENERAPAN TEKNIK AUDIT BERBANTUAN KOMPUTER TERHADAP KINERJA AUDITOR.

9 41 37

PENGARUH PENERAPAN NILAI DASAR KODE ETIK BPK RI TERHADAP KINERJA AUDITOR PEMERINTAH : Studi Pada Auditor BPK-RI Perwakilan Provinsi Jawa Barat.

1 6 43

Pengaruh Penerapan Kode Etik Dan Penggunaan Teknik Audit Berbantuan Komputer (TABK) Terhadap Efektivitas Audit Oleh Auditor BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Sumatera Utara

0 0 20

Pengaruh Penerapan Kode Etik Dan Penggunaan Teknik Audit Berbantuan Komputer (TABK) Terhadap Efektivitas Audit Oleh Auditor BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Sumatera Utara

0 0 3

Pengaruh Penerapan Kode Etik Dan Penggunaan Teknik Audit Berbantuan Komputer (TABK) Terhadap Efektivitas Audit Oleh Auditor BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Sumatera Utara

0 0 8

Pengaruh Penerapan Kode Etik Dan Penggunaan Teknik Audit Berbantuan Komputer (TABK) Terhadap Efektivitas Audit Oleh Auditor BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Sumatera Utara

0 0 17

Pengaruh Penerapan Kode Etik Dan Penggunaan Teknik Audit Berbantuan Komputer (TABK) Terhadap Efektivitas Audit Oleh Auditor BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Sumatera Utara

0 1 3

PENGARUH KOMPETENSI, PROFESIONALISME, DAN PENGALAMAN AUDIT TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN AUDITOR BADAN PEMERIKSA KEUANGAN (BPK) DALAM MENDETEKSI FRAUD DENGAN TEKNIK AUDIT BERBANTUAN KOMPUTER (TABK) SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERASI

0 0 16

PENGARUH INDEPENDENSI, SKEPTISISME PROFESIONAL AUDITOR, PENERAPAN STANDAR AUDIT, DAN ETIKA AUDIT TERHADAP KUALITAS HASIL AUDIT (STUDI PADA AUDITOR BPK RI PERWAKILAN PROVINSI ACEH)

0 1 11

PENGARUH TEKNIK AUDIT BERBANTUAN KOMPUTER, KOMPETENSI AUDITOR, INDEPENDENSI, DAN PENGALAMAN KERJA TERHADAP KUALITAS AUDIT (STUDI PADA AUDITOR BPK RI PERWAKILAN PROVINSI ACEH)

1 2 10