Nilai Golden Proportion Antara Jarak Interkantal dengan Lebar Kedua Gigi Insisivus Sentralis Maksila Suku India Malaysia

56

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Kaur J, Sharma N, Gupt P, Babbar AK. Awareness and Preference of Needs
Among Dental Patients Towards Artificial Prosthesis. Journal of Dental Herald
2014 ; 1(2) : 17.
2. George S, Bhat V. Inner Canthal Distance and Golden Proportion as Predictors of
Maxillary Central Incisor Width in South Indian Population. Indian Journal of
Dental Research 2010 ; 21(4) : 492-3.
3. Bali P, Singh S, Singh AP, Goyal RR. Biometric Relationship Between Inner
Canthal Distance and Geometric Progression for the Prediction of Maxillary
Central Incisor Width. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences 2013 ; 5(4) : 53.
4. Shetty K, Kumar M, Palagiri K, Amanna S, Shetty S. Facial Measurements as
Predictors of the Length of the Maxillary Central Incisor in a Cross Section of the
Indian Population - A Clinical Study. Oral Hyg Health 2013 ; 1(1) : 2.
5. Al Wazzan K. The Relationship Between Intercanthal Dimension and the Width
of Maxillary Teeth. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2001 ; 86(6): 609.
6. Prendergast PM. Facial Proportions. Ireland : Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg,
2012 . 16-8.
7. Jayaprakash P, Chopra A, Jayaprakash MB. Golden Proportion: God's Signature

on His Masterpieces. Indian Journal of Dental Research and Review 2012 : 19-21.
8. Hong Q, Koirala R, Jun T dkk. A Study About Tooth Size and Arch Width
Measurement. Journal of Hard Tissue Biology 2008 ; 17(3) : 92-6.
9. Blumenfeld J. Racial Identification in the Skull and Teeth. The University of
Western Ontario Journal of Anthropology 2000 ; 8(1) : 22-6.
10. Reddy N, Singh R, Reddy S, Guruprasad Y. A Cross-Sectional Clinical Study on
Shape of Nose Inner-Canthal Distance and Geometric Progression as Predictors
for Width of the Maxillary Incisor Teeth. Journal of Natural Science, Biology and
Medicine 2014 ; 5 (2) : 266-7.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

57

11. Le TT, Farkas LG, Ngim RC, Levin LS, Forrest CR. Proportionality in Asian and
North American Caucasian Faces Using Neoclassical Facial Canons as Criteria.
Aesthetic Plast Surg 2002 ; 26(1): 67.
12. Kumar KVA, Gupta SH, Sandhu HS. Determination of Mesiodistal Width of
Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Inner Canthal Distance. Medical Journal Armed
Forces India 2014: 5.

13. Koesoemahardja HD, Indrawati A, Jenie I. Tumbuh Kembang Dentofasial
Manusia. Edisi ke-2.Jakarta : Penerbit Universitas Trisakti, 2008: 31-6.
14. Agrawal J, Yogesh AS, Shukla CK, Banerjee C, Chandrakar AK. Orbitofacial
Anthropometric Assessment of Inter-canthal and Outercanthal Distance
Measurement in Chhattisgarh Region. Biomedical Research 2013 ; 24 (3) : 365.
15. Hill M. Integumentary System - Eyelid Development.
https://embryology.med...unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Integumentary_Sys
tem__Eyelid_Development ( 8 Januari 2016)
16. Fehrenbach MJ, Herring SW. Anatomy of the Head and Neck. Edisi ke-3 Canada
: Penerbit Saunders Elsevier, 2007 : 15-6.
17. Paradipta A. Pertumbuhan Gigi Susu dan Gigi Permanen Dilihat dari Umur.
http://paradipta.blogspot.co.id/2011/02/pertumbuhan-gigi-susu-dan-gigipermanen.html (10 November 2015).
18. Andasa K. Anatomi Gigi. http://dentistrylearn.blogspot.co.id/2012/05/ …
nomenklatur-anatomigigi.html (01 November 2015).
19. Nelson SJ. Ash MM. Dental Anatomy, Physiology, and Occlusion. Edisi ke-9.
China : Penerbit Elsevier Inc, 2010 : 100.
20. Egwu OA, Ewunonu EO, Eteudo AN, Ovuocba KN, Njoku CO, Ugwu CO.
Normal Values of Inner and Outer Intercanthal Distances in a Student Population
in Southeast Nigeria. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci 2008 ; 2(3) : 355-8.
21. Seper LI, Celebic A, Petricevic N, Selimovic E. Anthropometric Differences

Between Males and Females in Face Dimensions and Dimensions of Central
Maxillary Incisors. Medicinski glasnik 2006 ; 3(2) : 58.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

58

22. Levin EI. The Updated Application of the Golden Proportion to Dental
Aesthetics. Aesthetic dentistry today 2011 ; 5(3) : 22-5.
23. Merry M, Paul, Abraham ST. Golden Proportion in Denture Esthetics. Health
Sciences 2013 ; 2(1) : 2-3.
24. Mahsid M, Khoshvaghti A, Varshosaz M, Vallaei N. Evaluation of ‘‘Golden
Proportion’’ in Individuals with an Esthetic Smile. Journal of Esthetics And
Restorative Dentistry 2004 ; 16(3) : 186-90.
25. Diers NR, Diers NT. Device, Method and Kit for Determining Orthodontic
Dimensions. United States Patent 2010 : 3-4.
26. EL-Sheikh NMA, Mendilawi LRB, Khalifa N. Intercanthal Distance of a
Sudanese Population Sample as a Reference for Selection of Maxillary Anterior
Teeth Size. Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences 2010 ; 5 : 118.
27. Deogade SC, Mantri SS, Sumathi K, Rajoriya S. The Relationship Between

Innercanthal Dimension and Interalar Width to the Intercanine Width of
Maxillary Anterior Teeth in Central Indian Population. The Journal of Indian
Prosthodontic Society 2015. 15(2). 93.
28. Kumar MV, Ahila SC, Devi SS. The Science of Anterior Teeth Selection for a
Completely Edentulous Patient: A Literature Review. Journal of

Indian

Prosthodont Soc 2011 ; 11(1) :9.
29. Rawat A, Godbole SR, Sathe S, Patidar N, Ramteke S. Evaluation of Relation
Between Bizygomatic Width and Mesiodistal Dimension of Maxillary Central
Incisor in Indian Population: An In Vivo Study. International Journal of Scientific
Study 2015 ; 3(6) : 39.
30. Hussain MW, Qamar K, Naeem S. Significance of Intercommissural Width and
Anterior Teeth Selection. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal 2013 ; 33(2) : 393-6.
31. Hossain S, Islam KZ, Islam KMM. Correlation Between Maxillary Canines and
Facial Anatomical Landmarks in a Group of Bangladeshi People. Journal of City
Dental College 2012; 9(2) : 13.

Universitas Sumatera Utara


59

32. Habbu NS, Nagdir DV, Joshi N, Murati R. Interpupillary Distance as a Guide for
the Selection of Upper Anterior Teeth. The Internet Journal of Dental Science
2010 ; 9(1) : 1-6.
33. Vasanthakumar P, Kumar P, Rao M. Anthropometric Analysis of Palpebral
Fissure Dimensions and Its Position in South Indian Ethnic Adults. Oman
Medical Journal 2013; 28(1) : 27.
34. Qamar K, Hussain MW, Naeem S. The Role of the Interalar Width in the Anterior
Teeth Selection. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal 2012 ; 32(3) : 570.
35. Hanihara T, Ishida H. Metric Dental Variation of Major Human Populations.
American Journal of Physical Anthropology 2005 ; 128 : 287–98.
36. Zhuang Z, Landsittel D, Benson S, Roberge R, Shaffer R. Facial Anthropometric
Differences Among Gender, Ethnicity, and Age Groups. Ann. Occup. Hyg 2010;
54(4): 395–400.
37. Horvath SD. Ludwigs A. Wegstein PG. Lüthi M. Blatz BM. The Correlation
Between Anterior Tooth Form and Gender – A 3D Analysis in Humans. The
European Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 2012. 7(3).4-6.
38. Dahlan MS. Besar Sampel dan Cara Pengambilan Sampel dalam Penelitian

Kedokteran dan Kesehatan. Jakarta: Salemba Medika, 2013: 103-4.
39. Ahmed N, Abbas M, Naz A, Maqsood A. Correlation Between Innercanthal
Distance and the Mesiodistal Width of the Maxillary Central Incisors. Isra
Medical Journal 2015; 7(3): 139-40.
40. Batubar JRL. Adolescent Development (Perkembangan Remaja). Sari Pediatri
2010; 12(1) : 21-3.
41. Dempsey PJ, Townsend GC. Genetic and Environmental Contributions to
Variation in Human Tooth Size. The Genetics Society of Great Britain 2001: 68592.
42. Jose M. Essentials of Oral Biology (Oral anatomy, Histology, Physiology &
Embryology). India : CBS Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd, 2008 : 194 -5.
43. Ngeow WC, Aljunid ST. Craniofacial Anthropometric Norms of Malaysian
Indians. Indian Journal of Dental Research 2009 ; 20(3) : 313-9.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

60

44. Prasanna LC, Bhosale S, D’Souza AS, Mamatha H, Thomas RH, Sachin KS.
Facial Indices of North and South Indian Adults: Reliability in Stature Estimation
and Sexual Dimorphism. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2013; 7(8):

1541-2.

Universitas Sumatera Utara