Pengaruh Faktor Host Dan Environment Terhadap Kejadian Penyakit Tb Paru Di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Tomuan Kota Pematangsiantar Tahun 2015

Widoyono, 2008. Penyakit Tropis Epidemiologi, Penularan, Pencegahan &
Pemberantasannya. Jakarta: Erlangga.
WHO, 2011. Global Tuberculosis Control. Switzerland: World Health Organization
Library Cataloguing in Publication Data.
____, 2014. Global Tuberculosis Report 2014. Switzerland: World Health
Organization Library Cataloguing in Publication Data.
Lampiran 1 : Kuisioner Penelitian

KUESIONER PENELITIAN
Pengaruh Faktor Host Dan Environment Terhadap Kejadian
Penyakit TB Paru Di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Tomuan
Pematangsiantar Tahun 2015

A. DATA UMUM
1. Hari/Tgl Wawancara

:

2. Nomor Urut Responden

:

3. Nama Pewawancara

:

B. IDENTITAS RESPONDEN
1. Nama Responden

:

2. Status Responden

: 1. Kasus
2. Kontrol

3. Alamat Responden

: ……………………………………………
……………………………………………

……………………………………………
C. FAKTOR HOST/ KARAKTERISTIK INDIVIDU
1. Umur Responden

: ………… tahun

2. Jenis Kelamin

: 1. Laki-laki
2. Perempuan

3. Pendidikan Responden

: 1. Tidak pernah sekolah
2. Tidak tamat SD
3. Tamat SD/sederajat
4. Tamat SLTP/sederajat
5. Tamat SLTA/sederajat
6. Tamat Akademi/Perguruan Tinggi

4. Status Gizi

: 1.Tidak Baik, IMT < 18,5 dan > 25,0
2. Baik, IMT 18,5 – 25,0

a. BB

: ……. kg

b. TB

: ……. m

Berat Badan (kg)
IMT =
(Tinggi Badan)² (m)
5. Berapa jumlah penghasilan setiap bulan? Rp. …………..
1. Rendah, UMP< Rp. 1.505.850,-

2. Tinggi, UMP ≥ Rp. 1.505.850,-

D.FAKTOR ENVIRONMENT/LINGKUNGAN
1. Kepadatan hunian

: 1. 30 ºC
2. 18 ºC – 30 ºC

Ket:
Untuk Faktor Lingkungan

:1. Tidak memenuhi syarat
2. Memenuhi syarat

Lampiran 2 : Master Data
MASTER DATA
No

TB
Paru

Umur

Sttsgizi

Penghasln

Hunian

Lantai

Ventilasi

Cahaya

Lembab

Suhu

1
2

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35

1
1
1
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2

2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
2

1
1
1
1
1

1
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1

1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1

1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1

2
2
2
1
2
2
1

1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
2

2
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
2

2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
2

1
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
1

1

2
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
2

36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

2
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1

2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2

2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1

2
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1

2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2

2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2

2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

1
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
1

Keterangan :
*TB Paru

1. Kasus
2. Kontrol

*Umur

1. 15-50 tahun (usia produktif)
2. > 50 tahun

*Status GIzi

1. Tidak Baik (IMT25)
2. Baik (IMT 18,5-25)

*Penghasilan

1. Rendah ( 50 tahun

Total

kelompok
Kasus
Kontrol
21
20
20.5
20.5
48.8%
51.2%
57.1%
60.0%
28.6%
30.0%
15
14
14.5
14.5
51.7%
48.3%
42.9%
40.0%
21.4%
20.0%
35
35
35.0
35.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%

Count
Expected Count
% within umur
% within kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within umur
% within kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within umur
% within kelompok
% of Total

Total
41
41.0
100.0%
58.6%
58.6%
29
29.0
100.0%
41.4%
41.4%
70
70.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction a
Likelihood Ratio
Fis her's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
As sociation
N of Valid Cases

Value
.059b
.000
.059

.058

df
1
1
1

1

As ymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.808
1.000
.808

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

1.000

.500

.810

70

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.
50.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for umur
(15-50 tahun / > 50 tahun)
For cohort kelompok =
Kasus
For cohort kelompok =
Kontrol
N of Valid Cases

95% Confidence
Interval
Lower
Upper

.889

.343

2.302

.943

.589

1.511

1.061

.656

1.716

70

status gizi * kelompok
Crosstab

status
gizi

Tidak baik

Baik

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within status gizi
% within kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within status gizi
% within kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within status gizi
% within kelompok
% of Total

kelompok
Kasus
Kontrol
21
3
12.0
12.0
87.5%
12.5%
60.0%
8.6%
30.0%
4.3%
14
32
23.0
23.0
30.4%
69.6%
40.0%
91.4%
20.0%
45.7%
35
35
35.0
35.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%

Total
24
24.0
100.0%
34.3%
34.3%
46
46.0
100.0%
65.7%
65.7%
70
70.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction a
Likelihood Ratio
Fis her's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
As sociation
N of Valid Cases

Value
20.543 b
18.324
22.421

20.250

df
1
1
1

1

As ymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
.000
.000

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.000

.000

.000

70

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.
00.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for s tatus
gizi (Tidak baik / Baik)
For cohort kelompok =
Kasus
For cohort kelompok =
Kontrol
N of Valid Cases

95% Confidence
Interval
Lower
Upper

16.000

4.094

62.528

2.875

1.811

4.565

.180

.061

.527

70

penghasilan * kelompok
Crosstab

penghasilan

Rendah

Tinggi

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within penghasilan
% within kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within penghasilan
% within kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within penghasilan
% within kelompok
% of Total

kelompok
Kasus
Kontrol
27
15
21.0
21.0
64.3%
35.7%
77.1%
42.9%
38.6%
21.4%
8
20
14.0
14.0
28.6%
71.4%
22.9%
57.1%
11.4%
28.6%
35
35
35.0
35.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%

Total
42
42.0
100.0%
60.0%
60.0%
28
28.0
100.0%
40.0%
40.0%
70
70.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction a
Likelihood Ratio
Fis her's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
As sociation
N of Valid Cases

Value
8.571b
7.202
8.790

8.449

df
1
1
1

1

As ymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.003
.007
.003

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.007

.003

.004

70

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.
00.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for
penghasilan
(Rendah / Tinggi)
For cohort
kelompok = Kas us
For cohort
kelompok = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases

95% Confidence
Interval
Lower
Upper

4.500

1.599

12.664

2.250

1.201

4.214

.500

.313

.799

70

kepadatan hunian * kelompok
Crosstab

kepadatan
hunian

TMS

MS

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within
kepadatan hunian
% within kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within
kepadatan hunian
% within kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within
kepadatan hunian
% within kelompok
% of Total

kelompok
Kasus
Kontrol
23
12
17.5
17.5

Total
35
35.0

65.7%

34.3%

100.0%

65.7%
32.9%
12
17.5

34.3%
17.1%
23
17.5

50.0%
50.0%
35
35.0

34.3%

65.7%

100.0%

34.3%
17.1%
35
35.0

65.7%
32.9%
35
35.0

50.0%
50.0%
70
70.0

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

100.0%
50.0%

100.0%
50.0%

100.0%
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value
6.914b
5.714
7.033

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction a
Likelihood Ratio
Fis her's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
As sociation
N of Valid Cases

df
1
1
1

6.816

As ymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.009
.017
.008

1

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.016

.008

.009

70

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 17.
50.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for kepadatan
hunian (TMS / MS)
For cohort kelompok =
Kasus
For cohort kelompok =
Kontrol
N of Valid Cases

95% Confidence
Interval
Lower
Upper

3.674

1.369

9.858

1.917

1.143

3.215

.522

.311

.875

70

lantai rumah * kelompok
Crosstab

lantai rumah

TMS

MS

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within lantai rumah
% within kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within lantai rumah
% within kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within lantai rumah
% within kelompok
% of Total

kelompok
Kasus
Kontrol
11
7
9.0
9.0
61.1%
38.9%
31.4%
20.0%
15.7%
10.0%
24
28
26.0
26.0
46.2%
53.8%
68.6%
80.0%
34.3%
40.0%
35
35
35.0
35.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%

Total
18
18.0
100.0%
25.7%
25.7%
52
52.0
100.0%
74.3%
74.3%
70
70.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction a
Likelihood Ratio
Fis her's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
As sociation
N of Valid Cases

Value
1.197b
.673
1.204

1.179

df
1
1
1

1

As ymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.274
.412
.272

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.413

.206

.277

70

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.
00.

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence
Interval
Lower
Upper

Value
Odds Ratio for lantai
rumah (TMS / MS)
For cohort kelompok
= Kasus
For cohort kelompok
= Kontrol
N of Valid Cases

1.833

.614

5.471

1.324

.827

2.121

.722

.384

1.358

70

ventilasi * kelompok
Crosstab

ventilas i

TMS

MS

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within ventilas i
% within kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within ventilas i
% within kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within ventilas i
% within kelompok
% of Total

kelompok
Kasus
Kontrol
23
8
15.5
15.5
74.2%
25.8%
65.7%
22.9%
32.9%
11.4%
12
27
19.5
19.5
30.8%
69.2%
34.3%
77.1%
17.1%
38.6%
35
35
35.0
35.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%

Total
31
31.0
100.0%
44.3%
44.3%
39
39.0
100.0%
55.7%
55.7%
70
70.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction a
Likelihood Ratio
Fis her's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
As sociation
N of Valid Cases

Value
13.027 b
11.348
13.492

df
1
1
1

12.841

As ymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
.001
.000

1

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.001

.000

.000

70

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15.
50.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for
ventilas i (TMS / MS)
For cohort
kelompok = Kas us
For cohort
kelompok = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases

95% Confidence
Interval
Lower
Upper

6.469

2.256

18.548

2.411

1.441

4.034

.373

.198

.702

70

cahaya * kelompok
Crosstab

cahaya

TMS

MS

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within cahaya
% within kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within cahaya
% within kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within cahaya
% within kelompok
% of Total

kelompok
Kasus
Kontrol
15
4
9.5
9.5
78.9%
21.1%
42.9%
11.4%
21.4%
5.7%
20
31
25.5
25.5
39.2%
60.8%
57.1%
88.6%
28.6%
44.3%
35
35
35.0
35.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%

Total
19
19.0
100.0%
27.1%
27.1%
51
51.0
100.0%
72.9%
72.9%
70
70.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction a
Likelihood Ratio
Fis her's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
As sociation
N of Valid Cases

Value
8.741b
7.224
9.174

8.616

df
1
1
1

1

As ymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.003
.007
.002

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.006

.003

.003

70

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.
50.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for
cahaya (TMS / MS)
For cohort
kelompok = Kas us
For cohort
kelompok = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases

95% Confidence
Interval
Lower
Upper

5.813

1.686

20.044

2.013

1.332

3.043

.346

.141

.850

70

kelembaban * kelompok
Crosstab

kelembaban

TMS

MS

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within kelembaban
% within kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within kelembaban
% within kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within kelembaban
% within kelompok
% of Total

kelompok
Kasus
Kontrol
13
4
8.5
8.5
76.5%
23.5%
37.1%
11.4%
18.6%
5.7%
22
31
26.5
26.5
41.5%
58.5%
62.9%
88.6%
31.4%
44.3%
35
35
35.0
35.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%

Total
17
17.0
100.0%
24.3%
24.3%
53
53.0
100.0%
75.7%
75.7%
70
70.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction a
Likelihood Ratio
Fis her's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
As sociation
N of Valid Cases

Value
6.293b
4.972
6.553

6.203

df
1
1
1

1

As ymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.012
.026
.010

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.024

.012

.013

70

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.
50.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for
kelembaban (TMS / MS)
For cohort kelompok =
Kasus
For cohort kelompok =
Kontrol
N of Valid Cases

95% Confidence
Interval
Lower
Upper

4.580

1.316

15.932

1.842

1.217

2.788

.402

.166

.976

70

suhu * kelompok
Crosstab

suhu

TMS

MS

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within suhu
% within kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within suhu
% within kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within suhu
% within kelompok
% of Total

kelompok
Kasus
Kontrol
12
10
11.0
11.0
54.5%
45.5%
34.3%
28.6%
17.1%
14.3%
23
25
24.0
24.0
47.9%
52.1%
65.7%
71.4%
32.9%
35.7%
35
35
35.0
35.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%

Total
22
22.0
100.0%
31.4%
31.4%
48
48.0
100.0%
68.6%
68.6%
70
70.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction a
Likelihood Ratio
Fis her's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
As sociation
N of Valid Cases

Value
.265b
.066
.265

.261

df
1
1
1

1

As ymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.607
.797
.606

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.797

.399

.609

70

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.
00.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for
suhu (TMS / MS)
For cohort
kelompok = Kas us
For cohort
kelompok = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases

95% Confidence
Interval
Lower
Upper

1.304

.474

3.590

1.138

.703

1.844

.873

.513

1.486

70

Lampiran 5 : Hasil Uji Analisis Multivariat

HASIL ANALISIS MULTIVARIAT

Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Cases
Selected Cases

a

N
Included in Analysis
Mis sing Cases
Total

Unselected Cas es
Total

Percent
100.0
.0
100.0
.0
100.0

70
0
70
0
70

a. If weight is in effect, s ee class ification table for the total
number of cases.

De pendent V aria ble Encodi ng
Original Value
Kasus
Kontrol

Int ernal Value
0
1

Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Table a,b
Predicted

Step 0

Observed
kelompok

Kasus
Kontrol

Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500

kelompok
Kasus
Kontrol
0
35
0
35

Percentage
Correct
.0
100.0
50.0

Va riables in the Equa tion

St ep 0

B
.000

Constant

S. E.
.239

W ald
.000

df
1

Sig.
1.000

1
1
1
1
1
1
6

Sig.
.000
.003
.009
.000
.003
.012
.000

Variables not in the Equation
Step
0

Variables

Score
20.543
8.571
6.914
13.027
8.741
6.293
38.247

sttsgizi
penghasilan
hunian
ventilas i
cahaya
kelembaban

Overall Statistics

df

Block 1: Method = Backward Stepwise (Likelihood Ratio)
Om nibus Tests of Model Coe fficients
St ep 1

St ep 2a

St ep
Block
Model
St ep
Block
Model

Chi-square
51.319
51.319
51.319
-2. 415
48.904
48.904

df
6
6
6
1
5
5

Sig.
.000
.000
.000
.120
.000
.000

a. A negative Chi-squares value indicates that the
Chi-squares value has dec reas ed from the
previous st ep.
Mode l Summ ary
St ep
1
2

-2 Log
Cox & Snell
lik elihood
R Square
45.721a
.520
48.137a
.503

Nagelk erke
R Square
.693
.670

a. Es timation terminated at it erat ion number 6 bec aus e
parameter estimat es c hanged by less than .001.

Ex p(B )
1.000

a
Cl assi fica tion Table

Predic ted

St ep 1

Observed
kelompok

St ep 2

Overall Percentage
kelompok

kelompok
Kasus
Kontrol
29
6
5
30

Kasus
Kontrol
Kasus
Kontrol

28
6

7
29

Overall Percentage

Percentage
Correc t
82.9
85.7
84.3
80.0
82.9
81.4

a. The cut value is .500

Va riables in the Equa tion

Sta ep
1

Sta ep
2

stt sgiz i
penghasilan
hunian
ventilas i
cahaya
kelembaban
Constant
stt sgiz i
hunian
ventilas i
cahaya
kelembaban
Constant

B
3.123
1.296
1.807
2.059
1.707
1.915
-19.394
3.468
2.034
1.888
1.942
1.796
-18.508

S. E.
.995
.868
.933
.956
.976
.915
4.800
.969
.880
.885
.945
.885
4.552

W ald
9.857
2.232
3.752
4.641
3.055
4.376
16.322
12.805
5.339
4.551
4.229
4.116
16.529

df
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Sig.
.002
.135
.053
.031
.080
.036
.000
.000
.021
.033
.040
.042
.000

Ex p(B)
22.711
3.655
6.091
7.835
5.511
6.786
.000
32.088
7.642
6.606
6.975
6.023
.000

a. Variable(s) entered on s tep 1: st tsgiz i, penghasilan, hunian, ventilasi, c ahaya, kelembaban.

95.0% C.I. for E XP(B )
Lower
Upper
3.233
159.549
20.011
.667
.979
37.900
1.204
50.987
.813
37.356
1.128
40.811
4.801
1.362
1.166
1.095
1.063

214.481
42.898
37.428
44.412
34.132

Model if Term Rem oved

Variable
St ep
stt sgiz i
1
penghasilan
hunian
ventilas i
cahaya
kelembaban
St ep
stt sgiz i
2
hunian
ventilas i
cahaya
kelembaban

Model Log
Lik elihood
-29.934
-24.068
-25.049
-25.484
-24.547
-25.273
-33.755
-27.371
-26.603
-26.449
-26.280

Change in
-2 Log
Lik elihood
14.147
2.415
4.377
5.247
3.373
4.825
19.373
6.605
5.069
4.762
4.423

df
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Sig. of the
Change
.000
.120
.036
.022
.066
.028
.000
.010
.024
.029
.035

Variables not in the Equation
Step 2a

Variables
Overall Statistics

penghasilan

a. Variable(s) removed on s tep 2: penghasilan.

Score
2.370
2.370

df
1
1

Sig.
.124
.124