Kanal Pengetahuan | Reportase Kongres InaHEA ke 3 Unun khamida

(1)

The Effects of Pro-Poor Health Insurance

on Health Facility Delivery (HFD) and

Skilled Birth Delivery (SBD) In Indonesia:

Lessons learned from jamkesmas

dissertation by m. ibrahim Brooks, Drph

presented at the third indonesian health association

(inahea) congress in yogya

by

unun khamida qodarina

July, 29 2016 M. Ibrahim (Bram) Brooks, MPH


(2)

Overview

Background

Maternal Mortality

UHC

Methodology

Research objectives

Results

Part I: Quantitative

Part II: Qualitative

Conclusion & Recommendations


(3)

(4)

Maternal Mortality – Global

Scenario

The

poorest

and

least

educated women

are

most vulnerable

Countries where women

are least likely to have

skilled birth delivery

(SBD)

and

health

facility delivery

(HFD)

have higher MMR

Source: WHO, 2008; UN, 2011; WHO, 2014

Background Methodology Results Conclusion & Recommendations


(5)

Significance

Strong push for UHC

Large investments have been made to increase

health access for the poor and near-poor

High MMR

Disproportionally affects the poor

Goal of dissertation

Public health question: Have the recent pro-poor

health insurance programs improved maternal

health services among poor women in

Indonesia?


(6)

UHC in Indonesia

UHC timeline

 2004: Askeskin (national

health insurance for the poor)

 2008: Jamkesmas (national

health insurance for the poor & near-poor)

Jamkesda (regional health

insurance for the poor & near-poor)

 2011: Jampersal (universal

maternal health insurance)

 2014: JKN (national health

insurance)

All SHI merged under one

agency

GOAL: achieve UHC by

2019

Background Methodology Results Conclusion & Recommendations


(7)

Study frameworkResearch objectivesResearch design


(8)

Study Framework

Ref: Comfort, Peterson, Hatt, 2014

Figure 3. Pathways for effect of insurance on the use of MH service, quality, and health outcomes

Outcome : skilled

birth delivery (SBD)

Outcome: health facility delivery (HFD)

Outcome: MMR

Background Methodology Results Conclusion & Recommendations


(9)

Research Objectives

Objective 1

Estimate the effect of

Jamkesmas

health

insurance coverage on HFD and SBD

among poor women

Objective 2

Describe the success and challenges of

health insurance membership and maternal

health services among poor women


(10)

Research Design

Part I: Quantitative Component (Quant)

Secondary analysis of Indonesian Demographic Health

Survey (IDHS) from 2007 and 2012

 Design: cross-sectional household survey  Method: two-stage cluster sampling design

 Respondents: women of reproductive age (15-49)  Data: reproductive, maternal, and child health issues

Part II: Qualitative Component (Qual)

Interviews with poor women, community

representatives, and key informants

Ethical review and approval:

BUMC IRB: Protocol # H-33905, study determination =

EXEMPT

UI: Ministry and local government approvals for

interviews

Background Methodology Results Conclusion & Recommendations


(11)

Part I (Quant): IDHS

Timeline

2003-2012: Jamkesda (regional health insurance for the near-poor) implemented in select Provinces and Districts

2007: IDHS time point 1 (data collection = Jun – Dec 2007; N=32,895)

Live birth data from 2003-2007 (n=14,042)

2008: Jamkesmas (national health insurance for the poor & near-poor) implemented nationally

 

2011: Jampersal (universal maternal health insurance) implemented nationally

2012: IDHS time point 2 (data collection = May – Jul 2012; N=45,605)

Live birth data from 2008-2012 (n=14,783)

 

2014: JKN (national health insurance) implemented nationally

merging all social health insurance programs, including Jamkesmas,

Jamkesda, and Jampersal


(12)

Part I (Quant): Data

Analysis Plan

Quantitative analysis performed in SAS v9.4

Descriptive statistics

Comparison of HFD and SBD overtime

Cross-tabulation of pro-poor health insurance status

Difference-in-Differences (DiD) estimate

Absolute difference of HFD and SBD between poor

and non-poor

Multivariate analysis

Propensity Score Matching (PSM) analysis to

measure the association of

Jamkesmas

on HFD and

SBD among the poor

Background Methodology Results Conclusion & Recommendations


(13)

Part II (Qual): Approach

Background Methodology Results Conclusion & Recommendations

Qualitative analysis

performed in Nvivo

v10

 Data analysis plan:

framework analysis

Ref: Judith & Thorogood, 2009; Ritchie, Lewis, Nicholls, & Ormston, 2003


(14)

Part I: Quantitative (Quant)Part II Qualitative (Qual)

Results


(15)

Objective 1

Estimate the effect of

Jamkesmas

health insurance coverage on HFD and

SBD among poor women

Part I (Quant)


(16)

Part I (Quant): Study

Population

Table 8. Background characteristics of women of reproductive age (15-49) who had a live birth in the five years preceding the IDHS 2007 and IDHS 2012

Background Methodology Results Conclusion & Recommendations


(17)

Figure 6. Change in health facility delivery and skilled birth

delivery among poor and non-poor women in Indonesia from 2007 to 2012

Part I (Quant): Change in

HFD and SBD between

2007 and 2012 (Obj 1)


(18)

Objective 1 summary

Among women of reproductive age, HFD

and SBD delivery increased from

2007-2012

Poor women potentially benefited from the

scale-up of pro-poor health insurance

programs from 2007-2012

Percentage point increase in HFD and SBD was

much higher among poor women

Part I (Quant): Change in

HFD and SBD between

2007 and 2012 (Obj 1)

Background Methodology Results Conclusion & Recommendations


(19)

Part I (Quant): Description

of women with

Jamkesmas

Wealth Quintile None

Jamkes

mas Other*

Total (N) All (wealth index 1-5) 63.0% 19.1% 17.9% 45,533

Lowest (wealth index 1) 64.0% 28.3% 7.7% 7,759

Second (wealth index 2) 65.1% 22.8% 12.1% 8,755

Middle (wealth index 3) 65.3% 19.0% 15.8% 9,237

Fourth (wealth index 4) 64.4% 19.4% 16.2% 9,727

Highest (wealth index 5) 57.1% 8.6% 34.3% 10,056

Table 11. Health insurance coverage among Indonesian women of reproductive age (15-49), 2012 - by wealth quintile

*Includes: Civil servant health insurance, military/veteran health insurance, social health insurance for private sector workers, private health insurance, other health insurance schemes.


(20)

Summary

In 2012, approx two-thirds of women in

Indonesia were not covered by any health

insurance schemes

Among the poor, only one-fourth of poor

women were covered by

Jamkesmas

A large proportion of non-poor women are

also covered by

Jamkesmas

Part I (Quant): Description

of women with

Jamkesmas

Background Methodology Results Conclusion & Recommendations


(21)

Part I (Quant): Effect of

Jamkesmas

on HFD and SBD

among poor women

Primary Outcome No Insurance [Ref] % Jamkesmas % Crude OR (95% CI) Adjusted* OR (95% CI)

% of women with health facility delivery

35.4% 38.6%

1.15 (1.01-1.31) 1.21 (1.05-1.39)

% of women who had skilled birth delivery

65.8% 68.6%

1.13 (0.99-1.30) 1.20 (1.03-1.39)

Table 14. Comparison of health facility delivery and skilled birth delivery among poor women of reproductive age (15-49) with and without Jamkesmas health insurance using PSM dataset, Indonesia 2012

*Controlling for women’s age, marital status, education level, wealth, residence, provincial region, employment status, sex of household head, household number, and media exposure to paper, radio, and television.


(22)

Summary

In 2012, poor women with

Jamkesmas

were

more likely to have HFD and SBD in

comparison to poor women without any

health insurance

Moderate effect of

Jamkesmas

on HFD and SBD

Part I (Quant): Effect of

Jamkesmas

on HFD and SBD

among poor women

Background Methodology Results Conclusion & Recommendations


(23)

Objective 2

Describe the success and challenges of

health insurance membership and

maternal health services among poor

women

Part II (Qual)


(24)

Part II (Qual): Study

participants

Table 6. Sample size for qualitative component

Background Methodology Results Conclusion & Recommendations


(25)

Part II (Qual): Health

insurance access among

poor women

Table 15. Barriers for health insurance access among

poor women


(26)

Perception that health insurance is unimportant

“I'm not sick yet, so I don't need it.”

- Poor woman, Jakarta

Lack of valid government identification

Puskesmas

[community health center] has already offered

health insurance, but I didn't have the documents… I didn't

have time to take care of the

Kartu Keluarga

(KK)

[government family card].”

- Poor woman, Banten

Misidentification of the poor

“For

Jamkesmas

there needs to be a household survey [to

identify the poor], after that, the government provides

health insurance for those that are poor. However, there is

some nepotism that takes place so that some well-off

families will also get

Jamkesmas

health insurance.”

- Midwife, Banten

Part II (Qual): Health

insurance access among

poor women

Background Methodology Results Conclusion & Recommendations


(27)

Part II (Qual): Maternal

health services among poor

women

Table 16. Barriers for maternal health services

among poor women


(28)

Socio-cultural

Preference to deliver at parental village

"My parents are there, [if I deliver here] no one will help take care of me."

- Poor woman, Jakarta

Use of traditional birth attendants (TBA)

"Women like to use paraji [TBA] because they accept whatever you have... they also help raise the baby, take care of the

mother, and help with other household chores." - Midwife, Banten

Fatalistic point of view

"There was one woman who was delivering her fourth baby with a dukun [TBA]... she had heavy bleeding but did not want any assistance from a midwife or any skilled birth attendant because she believed that life and death is God's will...both mother and baby died."

- Midwife, Banten

Part II (Qual): Maternal

health services among poor

women

Background Methodology Results Conclusion & Recommendations


(29)

Accessibility

Distance to health facility

"The puskesmas [community health center] is very far... I delivered with my midwife and dukun [TBA] at home."

- Poor woman, Banten

Poor referral system

"Our referral system is a mess... there is a lot of hospital

"touring" as we look for hospitals that can deal with emergency situation... as a result, we have a lot of deaths in transit."

- Government representative, Banten

Non-facility based expenditure

"When we refer patients to higher level health facilities, they sometimes refuse. We tell them that it's free, but they respond, "It may be free for me, but how do we pay for food for the

people that will be waiting with me?" - Midwife, Banten

Part II (Qual): Maternal

health services among poor

women


(30)

Quality of care

 Shortage of qualified health providers

"I was afraid last time I was [in the puskesmas]... I was yelling "help doctor, help midwife, my baby is coming!" No one was there, everyone was on vacation... there was only one nurse in the puskesmas."

- Poor woman, Jakarta

 Overcrowded health facilities

"Here in this puskesmas, the number of patients is very high...the one that I met on Wednesday originally came down on Monday...ha-ha-ha... there are not enough seats in the waiting room for all the patients." - Midwife, Banten

 Lack of health facility accreditation

"The cost associated with health facility accreditation is very high... you need to hire a consultant and a team to identify the issues... then you need a lot of resources to fix all the issues so you can be

accredited... most puskesmas don't have the money to be accredited." - Government representative, Banten

Part II (Qual): Maternal

health services among poor

women

Background Methodology Results Conclusion & Recommendations


(31)

Overview

Study limitationsRecommendations


(32)

Conclusion

Pro-poor health insurance can remove

financial barriers to maternal health care

Increase access to key maternal health services

Pro-poor health insurance will not solve high

MMR

Modest effect of health insurance on HFD and SBD

In order to reduce MMR in Indonesia

Increase health insurance coverage among the

poor

Address supply side issues

Background Methodology Results Conclusion & Recommendations


(33)

Recommendations

Provide strong support from multi-sectoral and

inter-governmental stakeholders:

 Strong buy-in from local governments can increase district and

village government support and help increase community awareness of pro-poor health insurance and maternal health programs in the community

 Multisector involvement (ie. private sector, donor agencies,

etc) will be required to implement long-term investment for improving road infrastructure, transportation, and delivery of health services in remote areas

Improve coverage of health insurance membership

among the poor:

 Increase awareness of health insurance among the poor

through integration with community-based programs and targeted education campaigns

 Ensure community awareness of health insurance registration

for the poor

 Address non-facility cost


(34)

Recommendations

Improve access and quality of maternal health

programs:

 Increase awareness of maternal health issues and programs  Improve human resources for health availability and

distribution

 Implement accreditation system for health facilities

 Increase access to facilities that provide comprehensive

emergency obstetric care

Background Methodology Results Conclusion & Recommendations


(35)

(36)

Thank you!

Dissertation committee

Lora Sabin

Rich Feeley

Veronika Wirtz

Matt Fox

Hasbullah Thabrany

Team UI

Yuniar Hajaraeni

Unun Khamida

Arinditya Pujiastuti

SAS support group

Tej Mishra

Alana Brennan

DrPH colleagues

“No quitters club”

Gene Declercq

Sebastian Bach

Family and friends

Erin

Mark & Farida

Adam & Reza

CGHD


(1)

Overview


(2)

Conclusion

Pro-poor health insurance can remove

financial barriers to maternal health care

Increase access to key maternal health services

Pro-poor health insurance will not solve high

MMR

Modest effect of health insurance on HFD and SBD

In order to reduce MMR in Indonesia

Increase health insurance coverage among the

poor

Address supply side issues

Background Methodology Results Conclusion & Recommendations


(3)

Recommendations

Provide strong support from multi-sectoral and

inter-governmental stakeholders:

 Strong buy-in from local governments can increase district and

village government support and help increase community awareness of pro-poor health insurance and maternal health programs in the community

 Multisector involvement (ie. private sector, donor agencies,

etc) will be required to implement long-term investment for improving road infrastructure, transportation, and delivery of health services in remote areas

Improve coverage of health insurance membership

among the poor:

 Increase awareness of health insurance among the poor

through integration with community-based programs and targeted education campaigns

 Ensure community awareness of health insurance registration


(4)

Recommendations

Improve access and quality of maternal health

programs:

 Increase awareness of maternal health issues and programs  Improve human resources for health availability and

distribution

 Implement accreditation system for health facilities

 Increase access to facilities that provide comprehensive

emergency obstetric care

Background Methodology Results Conclusion & Recommendations


(5)

(6)

Thank you!

Dissertation committee

Lora Sabin

Rich Feeley

Veronika Wirtz

Matt Fox

Hasbullah Thabrany

Team UI

Yuniar Hajaraeni

Unun Khamida

Arinditya Pujiastuti

SAS support group

Tej Mishra

Alana Brennan

DrPH colleagues

“No quitters club”

Gene Declercq

Sebastian Bach

Family and friends

Erin

Mark & Farida

Adam & Reza

CGHD