THE BRUTALITY OF KRUEGER IN SAMUEL BAYER’S The Brutality Of Krueger In Samuel Bayer’s A Nightmare On Elm Street Movie (2010): A Psychoanalytic Perspective.
THE BRUTALITY OF KRUEGER IN SAMUEL BAYER’S
A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET MOVIE (2010):
A PSYCHOANALYTIC PERSPECTIVE
RESEARCH PAPER
Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement
for Getting Bachelor Degree of Education
in English Department
by:
IPUNG ASANI
A 320 080 004
SCHOOL OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
2012
i
APPROVAL
THE BRUTALITY OF KRUEGER IN SAMUEL BAYER’S
A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET MOVIE (2010):
A PSYCHOANALYTIC PERSPECTIVE
RESEARCH PAPER
by:
IPUNG ASANI
A 320 080 004
Approved to be Examined
by the Consultant Team:
First Consultant
Second Consultant
Titis Setyabudi, S.S. M. Hum.
Dr. Phil. Dewi Candraningrum, M.Ed.
NIK. 772
NIK. 948
ii
ACCEPTANCE
THE BRUTALITY OF KRUEGER IN SAMUEL BAYER’S
A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET MOVIE (2010):
A PSYCHOANALYTIC PERSPECTIVE
Prepared and Arranged by:
IPUNG ASANI
A 320 080 004
Accepted and Approved by the Board of Examiners
School of Teacher Training and Education
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
On February 2012
Team of Examiners:
1. Dr. Phil. Dewi Candraningrum, M.Ed.
(...........................)
2. Titis Setyabudi, S.S. M. Hum.
(...........................)
3. Drs. H. Abdillah Nugroho, M.Hum.
(...........................)
Approved by
School of Teacher Training and Education
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
Dean
Drs. Sofyan Anif, M.Si.
NIK. 547
iii
TESTIMONY
I hereby assert that there is no plagiarism in this research paper. There is no
other work that has been submitted to obtain the bachelor degree and as far as I am
concerned there is no opinion that has been written or published before, except the
written references which are referred in this paper and mentioned in bibliography.
If any incorrectness is proved in the future dealing with my statement above, I
will be fully responsible.
Surakarta,
February 2012
The Writer
IPUNG ASANI
A 320080004
iv
MOTTO
(1) Ojo seneng barang sekilas!
Mengko gelo ing tembe
By. My father
(2) Kabeh kuwi lakone sing Kuasa
Manusia hidup tinggal menjalani
By. My Father
(3) Keikhlasan diri kita pada kehidupan inilah, yang akan membawa diri kita pada
kedamaian kita sendiri.
By. Pannadi Santosa
(4) Hidup adalah bagaimana kita berusaha untuk bangkit dari kesalahan, kegagalan, dan
permasalahan. Berusaha untuk bertahan menghadapi dan menjalani masalah itu disetiap
harinya!
By. The Writer
(5) “Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance, you must keep moving.”
By. Albert Einstein
v
DEDICATION
This research paper is proudly dedicated to:
My beloved Mom and Dad
My lovely sister
My sweet friends
vi
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Assalamualaikum, Wr. Wb.
Alhamdulillahirobbil’alamin, first of all, the writer would like to say thank to
the Greatest Allah SWT as the Glorious, The Lord of the universe, the One who sent
the Messenger Muhammad SAW to guide human to the safest religion, Islam. Thanks
for blessing the writer in finishing her research paper entitled “The Brutality of
Krueger in Samuel Bayer’s A Nightmare on Elm Street Movie (2010): A
Psychoanalytic Perspective”. The writer also would like to say thank you for her
beloved person in the world, Muhammad SAW for his guidance to the human kind in
the earth and for bringing them into His light. The writer hopes that she can be with
him in heaven. Furthermore, she would like to express her thanks and appreciation to
the people who have contributed so many things for the writer in finishing her paper.
1. Drs. Sofyan Anif, M.Si, the Dean of Teacher Training and Education Faculty
of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta, who has given the legalization
toward the research paper.
2. Titis Setyabudi, S.S. M. Hum, the Head of English Department for giving
permission to conduct this research.
3. Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M.Pd., the Academic Consultant.
4. The first consultant, Dr. Phil. Dewi Candraningrum, M.Ed., who has
guided and advised her from the beginning to the end of this research paper.
vii
5. The second consultant, Titis Setyabudi, S.S. M. Hum who has corrected and
given advice in the process of making this research paper.
6. All the lecturers of English Department. Pak Djoko Sridjono, Pak Fitri
Kurniawan, Pak Abdillah, Pak Thoy, Bu Hepy, Bu Yeni, Bu Qonitah, Bu
Rini, Bu Laila, Bu Khuzaimah, Bu Aryati, Bu Zuhriah, Pak Nur Hidayat,
Pak Maryadi, Pak Anam Sutopo, Pak Budi Purnomo, Bu Dyah and every
lecturer who cannot be mentioned one by one. Thanks for the knowledge they
shared to her.
7. The Enormous Father and Mother, Widodo Martini. She really loves them.
Thanks for their love, care and for every struggle they faced in keeping the
continuity of her study. Although she can never pay back what they have
given to her, but she will give you the best.
8. Her sister, Nugrahani Pertiwi, S.T. Thanks for supporting her until she can
finish her research paper.
9. All of her friends in class A, Yuni Peh, Nisa, Dyah, Rina, Netty, Nyami,
Fitri Jambi, Win, Purnomo Fitriyani, Jamaludin, Ambar, Aryuni, Yuni
Gemi, Dewi Boyolali, Iva, Dewi Peh, Tri Handayani, Etika, Fatma, Fitri,
Vita, Avi, Dharista, Silla, Karina, Karlina, Karmila, Sabar, Oka, Yogi,
Yosi, etc.
10. All of her friends in English Department, Fitri Aceh, Joe, Arum, Harma,
Dwi Novi, Ifa, Dwi Jogonalan, Rini, Fajar Budi, Anita, Mbak Dian, Mbak
viii
Rere, Yuni, Nisa, Dyah, Rina, Netty, Nyami, Fitri Jambi, Parto,
Jamaludin, Win, and all of the writer’s classmate. Thanks.
11. Her friends and students in PPL SMK MUHAMMADIYAH DELANGGU
2011
12. The staffs of Copy Centre, Bang Mail Sumail and Pak Yanto who always
greet her.
13. Those whose names cannot be mentioned one by one. Thanks a lot.
Wassalamualaikum Wr. Wb.
Surakarta,
February 2012
The Writer
IPUNG ASANI
ix
TABLE OF CONTENT
COVER …………………………………………………………………...
i
APPROVAL ………………………………………………………………
ii
ACCEPTANCE …..........…………………………………………….........
iii
TESTIMONY ….........…………………………………………….............
iv
MOTTO …................……………………………………………................
v
DEDICATION …............................………………………………….........
vi
ACKNOWLEDGMENT ............……………………………………......
vii
TABLE OF CONTENT …. ……………………………………………....
x
LIST OF FIGURES …..............…………………………………………..
xiv
ABSTRACT .........………………………………………….......................
xviii
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Study ……..………………....... .
1
B. Literature Review ………………………………......
13
C. Problem Statement ……………………………….....
15
D. Limitation of the Study ……………………….........
16
E. Objective of the Study ..………………………….....
16
F. Benefit of the Study …........ …………………........
16
1. Theoretical Benefit ………………………………
16
2. Practical Benefit …………………………………
17
x
G. Research Method ……………………………………....... 17
CHAPTER II:
1. Object of the Study …………………………………
17
2. Type of the Study …………………………………..
17
3. Type of Data and the Data Source …………………
17
a. Type of the Data ……………………………
17
b. The Data Source ……………………............
17
1) Primary Data Source ………………………
18
2) Secondary Data Source ……………………
18
4. Technique of the Data Collection ………………...
18
5. Technique of the Data Analysis …………………..
18
H. Research Paper Organization ……………………………
19
UNDERLYING THEORY
A. Notion of Psychoanalysis …………….………................
20
B. System of Personality ……………….…………..….
23
1. Id ………………………………..………………
23
2. Ego ……………….……………………………..
24
3. Super Ego …………………………………………...
24
C. Structural Elements of the Movie ………………………
25
1. Narrative Elements ………………………………….
25
a. Character and Characterization …………………
25
b. Casting …………………………………………….. 26
c. Plot ……….…………………………………..
xi
26
d. Setting …………………………………………..
28
e. Point of View …………………………………….. 28
f. Theme …………………………………………….. 29
2. Technical Elements …………………………………
30
a. Mise – en – Scene ……………………………….
30
b. Cinematography …..……………………………... 32
c. Sounds ……………………………………………. 32
d. Editing ………………….………………………… 33
D. Theoretical Application …………………………………. 34
CHAPTER III:
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
A. Structural Elements of the Movie ………………………
36
1. Narrative Elements …………………………………..
36
a. Character and Characterization ………………….
36
1) Major Character ……………………………... 37
2) Minor Characters ……………………………. 40
b. Casting …………………………………………… 47
c. Plot ………………………………………………. 50
d. Setting ……………………………………………. 53
e. Point of View …………………………………….. 55
f. Theme …………………………………………….. 56
2. Technical Elements …………………………………
56
a. Mise – en – Scene ………………………………
56
xii
b. Cinematography ………………. …………………. 64
c. Sound ……………………………………………
68
d. Editing …………………………………………..
70
B. Discussion ……………………………………………….
75
CHAPTER IV:
PSYCHOANALYTIC ANALYSIS
A. Structure of Krueger’s Personality ………………………
80
1. Id of Krueger …………………………………..…....
81
2. Super Ego of Krueger ………………. ……………… 83
3. Ego of Krueger ……….……………………………..
85
B. Brutality of Krueger ……………………………………..
88
C. Discussion ……………………………………………….
91
CHAPTER V:
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
A. Conclusion ….…………………………………………...
94
B. Suggestion ….………………………...............................
95
BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPENDIX
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Krueger’s Profile ………………………………………………………. 37
Figure 2. Nancy’s Profile ……….……………………………………………….. 40
Figure 3. Quentin’s Profile ………………………………………………………. 42
Figure 4. Kris’s Profile ………………………………………………………….. 43
Figure 5. Dean’s Profile …………………………………………………………. 44
Figure 6. Jesse’s Profile ………………………………………............................. 45
Figure 7. Gwen’s Profile ………………………………………………………… 46
Figure 8. Alan’s Profile ………………………………………………………….
46
Figure 9. Elm Street ……………………………………………………………... 54
Figure 10. Elm Street …………………………………………………………….. 54
Figure 11. Elm Street …………………………………………………………….. 54
Figure 12. Badham Preschool ……………………………………………………. 54
Figure 13. Springwood Dinner Cafes…………………………………………...… 55
Figure 14. Krueger with striped red and green striped sleeves …………………… 58
Figure 15. Krueger with his face and skin was burned…………………………… 58
Figure 16. Krueger with knives on his fingers ….………………………………... 58
Figure 17. Nancy’s arm was hurt by Krueger ……………………………………... 59
Figure 18. Krueger is in front of blackboard in Badham Preschool ………………. 60
Figure 19. Frontal Lighting ……………………...……………………………….... 60
xiv
Figure 20. Side Lighting ………………………………………………………….. 60
Figure 21. Top Lighting …………………………………………………………... 60
Figure 22. Top Lighting …………………………………………………………... 60
Figure 23. Under Lighting ………………………………………………………… 61
Figure 24. Back Lighting …………………………………………………………. 61
Figure 25. Back Lighting …………………………………………………………. 61
Figure 26. Key Light ……………………………………………………………… 62
Figure 27. Fill Light ………………………………………………………………. 62
Figure 28. Low Key Lighting... …………………………………………………… 63
Figure 29. High Key Lighting …………………………………………………….. 63
Figure 30. Badham Classroom …………….……………………………………… 63
Figure 31. Nancy’s room ……………….………………………………………… 64
Figure 32. Krueger tries to kill Kris ………………………………………………. 65
Figure 33. People on Elm Street………………………………………………….. 65
Figure 34. Low Angle ……………………..………………………………………. 66
Figure 35. High Angle …………………………………………………………….. 66
Figure 36. Straight On Angle ……………………………………………………… 66
Figure 37. Extreme Long Shot ……………………………………………………. 67
Figure 38. Long Shot ……………………………………………………………… 67
Figure 39. Medium Long Shot ……………………………………………………. 67
Figure 40. Medium Shot ………………………………………………………….. 67
Figure 41. Extreme Close Up …………………………………………………….. 67
xv
Figure 42. Medium Close Up …………………………………………………….. 67
Figure 43. Axis of Action 1……………………………………………………….. 71
Figure 44. Axis of Action 2……………………………………………………….. 71
Figure 45. Axis of Action 3 ………………………………………………………. 71
Figure 46. Establishing Shot 1…………………………………………………….. 71
Figure 47. Establishing Shot 2 ……………………………………………………. 71
Figure 48. A Reverse Shot ………………………………………………………... 72
Figure 49. Reestablishing Shot 1 …………………………………………………. 73
Figure 50. Reestablishing Shot 2 …………………………………………………. 73
Figure 51. Match on Action 1 …………………………………………………….. 73
Figure 52. Match on Action 2 …………………………………………………….. 73
Figure 53. Cross Cutting 1 .……………………………………………………….. 74
Figure 54. Cross Cutting 2 ………………………………………………………... 74
Figure 55. Cross Cutting 3 ………………………………………………………… 74
Figure 56. Cross Cutting 4 ………………………………………………………… 74
Figure 57 She sees some finger knives in her book …………………………….
83
Figure 58. Imagines of Krueger …………………………………………………. 83
Figure 59. Kris in her dreams …………………………………………………… 84
Figure 60. Kris Dead …………………………………………………………….
86
Figure 61. Jesse in Jail …………………………………………………………..
86
Figure 62. Jesse in his dream ……………………………………………………
86
Figure 63. Krueger with knives …………………………………………………. 86
xvi
Figure 64. Krueger hurts Jesse …………………………………………………..
86
Figure 65. Krueger tries to stabbed Nancy ……………………………………… 87
Figure 66. He tries to kill Nancy ………………………………………………… 87
Figure 67. Krueger tries to hurt Nancy ………………………………………….. 89
Figure 68. Krueger threatens Kris ……………………………………………….
89
Figure 69. Krueger cuts Dean’s throat …………………………………………..
90
Figure 70. Kris Corpse …………………………………………………………..
90
Figure 71. Krueger stabbed Jesse Chest ………………………………………… 90
xvii
ABSTRACT
IPUNG ASANI. A320080004. THE BRUTALITY OF KRUEGER IN SAMUEL
BAYER’S A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET MOVIE (2010): A
PSYCHOANALYTIC
PERSPECTIVE.
RESEARCH
PAPER.
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA. 2012.
This study is aimed to explore the brutality of the major character on his
life. The objective of the research is to analyze the major character based on its
structural elements and psychoanalytic perspective. In analyzing the psychoanalytic
aspects, the researcher applies the theory of psychoanalysis proposed by Sigmund
Freud.
The researcher employs the qualitative research as a type of the research.
The data sources are divided into two, namely primary data source and secondary
data source. The primary data source is A Nightmare on Elm Street movie directed by
Samuel Bayer released in 2010. While the secondary data sources are other materials
taken from books, journal, essay, and internet related to the study.
The results of this study are as follows. Firstly, the structural elements of
the movie present a unity. It appears in the beginning, middle, and end of the story.
Secondly, the psychoanalytic analysis shows the phenomenon of brutality which is
done by the major character. He always comes and kills the children from Preschool
through their dream. Finally, the psychoanalytic analysis shows that brutality which
is done by him happened because of his revenge. The revenge of him as a victim of
being burnt alive by the parents of the children in Badham Preschool.
Key words: Brutality, A Nightmare on Elm Street, Psychoanalytic Perspective
First Consultant
Second Consultant
Dr. Phil. Dewi Candraningrum, M.Ed.
Titis Setyabudi, S.S. M.Hum.
NIK. 772
NIK. 948
Dean
Drs. Sofyan Anif, M.Si.
NIK. 547
xviii
A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET MOVIE (2010):
A PSYCHOANALYTIC PERSPECTIVE
RESEARCH PAPER
Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement
for Getting Bachelor Degree of Education
in English Department
by:
IPUNG ASANI
A 320 080 004
SCHOOL OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
2012
i
APPROVAL
THE BRUTALITY OF KRUEGER IN SAMUEL BAYER’S
A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET MOVIE (2010):
A PSYCHOANALYTIC PERSPECTIVE
RESEARCH PAPER
by:
IPUNG ASANI
A 320 080 004
Approved to be Examined
by the Consultant Team:
First Consultant
Second Consultant
Titis Setyabudi, S.S. M. Hum.
Dr. Phil. Dewi Candraningrum, M.Ed.
NIK. 772
NIK. 948
ii
ACCEPTANCE
THE BRUTALITY OF KRUEGER IN SAMUEL BAYER’S
A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET MOVIE (2010):
A PSYCHOANALYTIC PERSPECTIVE
Prepared and Arranged by:
IPUNG ASANI
A 320 080 004
Accepted and Approved by the Board of Examiners
School of Teacher Training and Education
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
On February 2012
Team of Examiners:
1. Dr. Phil. Dewi Candraningrum, M.Ed.
(...........................)
2. Titis Setyabudi, S.S. M. Hum.
(...........................)
3. Drs. H. Abdillah Nugroho, M.Hum.
(...........................)
Approved by
School of Teacher Training and Education
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
Dean
Drs. Sofyan Anif, M.Si.
NIK. 547
iii
TESTIMONY
I hereby assert that there is no plagiarism in this research paper. There is no
other work that has been submitted to obtain the bachelor degree and as far as I am
concerned there is no opinion that has been written or published before, except the
written references which are referred in this paper and mentioned in bibliography.
If any incorrectness is proved in the future dealing with my statement above, I
will be fully responsible.
Surakarta,
February 2012
The Writer
IPUNG ASANI
A 320080004
iv
MOTTO
(1) Ojo seneng barang sekilas!
Mengko gelo ing tembe
By. My father
(2) Kabeh kuwi lakone sing Kuasa
Manusia hidup tinggal menjalani
By. My Father
(3) Keikhlasan diri kita pada kehidupan inilah, yang akan membawa diri kita pada
kedamaian kita sendiri.
By. Pannadi Santosa
(4) Hidup adalah bagaimana kita berusaha untuk bangkit dari kesalahan, kegagalan, dan
permasalahan. Berusaha untuk bertahan menghadapi dan menjalani masalah itu disetiap
harinya!
By. The Writer
(5) “Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance, you must keep moving.”
By. Albert Einstein
v
DEDICATION
This research paper is proudly dedicated to:
My beloved Mom and Dad
My lovely sister
My sweet friends
vi
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Assalamualaikum, Wr. Wb.
Alhamdulillahirobbil’alamin, first of all, the writer would like to say thank to
the Greatest Allah SWT as the Glorious, The Lord of the universe, the One who sent
the Messenger Muhammad SAW to guide human to the safest religion, Islam. Thanks
for blessing the writer in finishing her research paper entitled “The Brutality of
Krueger in Samuel Bayer’s A Nightmare on Elm Street Movie (2010): A
Psychoanalytic Perspective”. The writer also would like to say thank you for her
beloved person in the world, Muhammad SAW for his guidance to the human kind in
the earth and for bringing them into His light. The writer hopes that she can be with
him in heaven. Furthermore, she would like to express her thanks and appreciation to
the people who have contributed so many things for the writer in finishing her paper.
1. Drs. Sofyan Anif, M.Si, the Dean of Teacher Training and Education Faculty
of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta, who has given the legalization
toward the research paper.
2. Titis Setyabudi, S.S. M. Hum, the Head of English Department for giving
permission to conduct this research.
3. Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M.Pd., the Academic Consultant.
4. The first consultant, Dr. Phil. Dewi Candraningrum, M.Ed., who has
guided and advised her from the beginning to the end of this research paper.
vii
5. The second consultant, Titis Setyabudi, S.S. M. Hum who has corrected and
given advice in the process of making this research paper.
6. All the lecturers of English Department. Pak Djoko Sridjono, Pak Fitri
Kurniawan, Pak Abdillah, Pak Thoy, Bu Hepy, Bu Yeni, Bu Qonitah, Bu
Rini, Bu Laila, Bu Khuzaimah, Bu Aryati, Bu Zuhriah, Pak Nur Hidayat,
Pak Maryadi, Pak Anam Sutopo, Pak Budi Purnomo, Bu Dyah and every
lecturer who cannot be mentioned one by one. Thanks for the knowledge they
shared to her.
7. The Enormous Father and Mother, Widodo Martini. She really loves them.
Thanks for their love, care and for every struggle they faced in keeping the
continuity of her study. Although she can never pay back what they have
given to her, but she will give you the best.
8. Her sister, Nugrahani Pertiwi, S.T. Thanks for supporting her until she can
finish her research paper.
9. All of her friends in class A, Yuni Peh, Nisa, Dyah, Rina, Netty, Nyami,
Fitri Jambi, Win, Purnomo Fitriyani, Jamaludin, Ambar, Aryuni, Yuni
Gemi, Dewi Boyolali, Iva, Dewi Peh, Tri Handayani, Etika, Fatma, Fitri,
Vita, Avi, Dharista, Silla, Karina, Karlina, Karmila, Sabar, Oka, Yogi,
Yosi, etc.
10. All of her friends in English Department, Fitri Aceh, Joe, Arum, Harma,
Dwi Novi, Ifa, Dwi Jogonalan, Rini, Fajar Budi, Anita, Mbak Dian, Mbak
viii
Rere, Yuni, Nisa, Dyah, Rina, Netty, Nyami, Fitri Jambi, Parto,
Jamaludin, Win, and all of the writer’s classmate. Thanks.
11. Her friends and students in PPL SMK MUHAMMADIYAH DELANGGU
2011
12. The staffs of Copy Centre, Bang Mail Sumail and Pak Yanto who always
greet her.
13. Those whose names cannot be mentioned one by one. Thanks a lot.
Wassalamualaikum Wr. Wb.
Surakarta,
February 2012
The Writer
IPUNG ASANI
ix
TABLE OF CONTENT
COVER …………………………………………………………………...
i
APPROVAL ………………………………………………………………
ii
ACCEPTANCE …..........…………………………………………….........
iii
TESTIMONY ….........…………………………………………….............
iv
MOTTO …................……………………………………………................
v
DEDICATION …............................………………………………….........
vi
ACKNOWLEDGMENT ............……………………………………......
vii
TABLE OF CONTENT …. ……………………………………………....
x
LIST OF FIGURES …..............…………………………………………..
xiv
ABSTRACT .........………………………………………….......................
xviii
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Study ……..………………....... .
1
B. Literature Review ………………………………......
13
C. Problem Statement ……………………………….....
15
D. Limitation of the Study ……………………….........
16
E. Objective of the Study ..………………………….....
16
F. Benefit of the Study …........ …………………........
16
1. Theoretical Benefit ………………………………
16
2. Practical Benefit …………………………………
17
x
G. Research Method ……………………………………....... 17
CHAPTER II:
1. Object of the Study …………………………………
17
2. Type of the Study …………………………………..
17
3. Type of Data and the Data Source …………………
17
a. Type of the Data ……………………………
17
b. The Data Source ……………………............
17
1) Primary Data Source ………………………
18
2) Secondary Data Source ……………………
18
4. Technique of the Data Collection ………………...
18
5. Technique of the Data Analysis …………………..
18
H. Research Paper Organization ……………………………
19
UNDERLYING THEORY
A. Notion of Psychoanalysis …………….………................
20
B. System of Personality ……………….…………..….
23
1. Id ………………………………..………………
23
2. Ego ……………….……………………………..
24
3. Super Ego …………………………………………...
24
C. Structural Elements of the Movie ………………………
25
1. Narrative Elements ………………………………….
25
a. Character and Characterization …………………
25
b. Casting …………………………………………….. 26
c. Plot ……….…………………………………..
xi
26
d. Setting …………………………………………..
28
e. Point of View …………………………………….. 28
f. Theme …………………………………………….. 29
2. Technical Elements …………………………………
30
a. Mise – en – Scene ……………………………….
30
b. Cinematography …..……………………………... 32
c. Sounds ……………………………………………. 32
d. Editing ………………….………………………… 33
D. Theoretical Application …………………………………. 34
CHAPTER III:
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
A. Structural Elements of the Movie ………………………
36
1. Narrative Elements …………………………………..
36
a. Character and Characterization ………………….
36
1) Major Character ……………………………... 37
2) Minor Characters ……………………………. 40
b. Casting …………………………………………… 47
c. Plot ………………………………………………. 50
d. Setting ……………………………………………. 53
e. Point of View …………………………………….. 55
f. Theme …………………………………………….. 56
2. Technical Elements …………………………………
56
a. Mise – en – Scene ………………………………
56
xii
b. Cinematography ………………. …………………. 64
c. Sound ……………………………………………
68
d. Editing …………………………………………..
70
B. Discussion ……………………………………………….
75
CHAPTER IV:
PSYCHOANALYTIC ANALYSIS
A. Structure of Krueger’s Personality ………………………
80
1. Id of Krueger …………………………………..…....
81
2. Super Ego of Krueger ………………. ……………… 83
3. Ego of Krueger ……….……………………………..
85
B. Brutality of Krueger ……………………………………..
88
C. Discussion ……………………………………………….
91
CHAPTER V:
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
A. Conclusion ….…………………………………………...
94
B. Suggestion ….………………………...............................
95
BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPENDIX
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Krueger’s Profile ………………………………………………………. 37
Figure 2. Nancy’s Profile ……….……………………………………………….. 40
Figure 3. Quentin’s Profile ………………………………………………………. 42
Figure 4. Kris’s Profile ………………………………………………………….. 43
Figure 5. Dean’s Profile …………………………………………………………. 44
Figure 6. Jesse’s Profile ………………………………………............................. 45
Figure 7. Gwen’s Profile ………………………………………………………… 46
Figure 8. Alan’s Profile ………………………………………………………….
46
Figure 9. Elm Street ……………………………………………………………... 54
Figure 10. Elm Street …………………………………………………………….. 54
Figure 11. Elm Street …………………………………………………………….. 54
Figure 12. Badham Preschool ……………………………………………………. 54
Figure 13. Springwood Dinner Cafes…………………………………………...… 55
Figure 14. Krueger with striped red and green striped sleeves …………………… 58
Figure 15. Krueger with his face and skin was burned…………………………… 58
Figure 16. Krueger with knives on his fingers ….………………………………... 58
Figure 17. Nancy’s arm was hurt by Krueger ……………………………………... 59
Figure 18. Krueger is in front of blackboard in Badham Preschool ………………. 60
Figure 19. Frontal Lighting ……………………...……………………………….... 60
xiv
Figure 20. Side Lighting ………………………………………………………….. 60
Figure 21. Top Lighting …………………………………………………………... 60
Figure 22. Top Lighting …………………………………………………………... 60
Figure 23. Under Lighting ………………………………………………………… 61
Figure 24. Back Lighting …………………………………………………………. 61
Figure 25. Back Lighting …………………………………………………………. 61
Figure 26. Key Light ……………………………………………………………… 62
Figure 27. Fill Light ………………………………………………………………. 62
Figure 28. Low Key Lighting... …………………………………………………… 63
Figure 29. High Key Lighting …………………………………………………….. 63
Figure 30. Badham Classroom …………….……………………………………… 63
Figure 31. Nancy’s room ……………….………………………………………… 64
Figure 32. Krueger tries to kill Kris ………………………………………………. 65
Figure 33. People on Elm Street………………………………………………….. 65
Figure 34. Low Angle ……………………..………………………………………. 66
Figure 35. High Angle …………………………………………………………….. 66
Figure 36. Straight On Angle ……………………………………………………… 66
Figure 37. Extreme Long Shot ……………………………………………………. 67
Figure 38. Long Shot ……………………………………………………………… 67
Figure 39. Medium Long Shot ……………………………………………………. 67
Figure 40. Medium Shot ………………………………………………………….. 67
Figure 41. Extreme Close Up …………………………………………………….. 67
xv
Figure 42. Medium Close Up …………………………………………………….. 67
Figure 43. Axis of Action 1……………………………………………………….. 71
Figure 44. Axis of Action 2……………………………………………………….. 71
Figure 45. Axis of Action 3 ………………………………………………………. 71
Figure 46. Establishing Shot 1…………………………………………………….. 71
Figure 47. Establishing Shot 2 ……………………………………………………. 71
Figure 48. A Reverse Shot ………………………………………………………... 72
Figure 49. Reestablishing Shot 1 …………………………………………………. 73
Figure 50. Reestablishing Shot 2 …………………………………………………. 73
Figure 51. Match on Action 1 …………………………………………………….. 73
Figure 52. Match on Action 2 …………………………………………………….. 73
Figure 53. Cross Cutting 1 .……………………………………………………….. 74
Figure 54. Cross Cutting 2 ………………………………………………………... 74
Figure 55. Cross Cutting 3 ………………………………………………………… 74
Figure 56. Cross Cutting 4 ………………………………………………………… 74
Figure 57 She sees some finger knives in her book …………………………….
83
Figure 58. Imagines of Krueger …………………………………………………. 83
Figure 59. Kris in her dreams …………………………………………………… 84
Figure 60. Kris Dead …………………………………………………………….
86
Figure 61. Jesse in Jail …………………………………………………………..
86
Figure 62. Jesse in his dream ……………………………………………………
86
Figure 63. Krueger with knives …………………………………………………. 86
xvi
Figure 64. Krueger hurts Jesse …………………………………………………..
86
Figure 65. Krueger tries to stabbed Nancy ……………………………………… 87
Figure 66. He tries to kill Nancy ………………………………………………… 87
Figure 67. Krueger tries to hurt Nancy ………………………………………….. 89
Figure 68. Krueger threatens Kris ……………………………………………….
89
Figure 69. Krueger cuts Dean’s throat …………………………………………..
90
Figure 70. Kris Corpse …………………………………………………………..
90
Figure 71. Krueger stabbed Jesse Chest ………………………………………… 90
xvii
ABSTRACT
IPUNG ASANI. A320080004. THE BRUTALITY OF KRUEGER IN SAMUEL
BAYER’S A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET MOVIE (2010): A
PSYCHOANALYTIC
PERSPECTIVE.
RESEARCH
PAPER.
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA. 2012.
This study is aimed to explore the brutality of the major character on his
life. The objective of the research is to analyze the major character based on its
structural elements and psychoanalytic perspective. In analyzing the psychoanalytic
aspects, the researcher applies the theory of psychoanalysis proposed by Sigmund
Freud.
The researcher employs the qualitative research as a type of the research.
The data sources are divided into two, namely primary data source and secondary
data source. The primary data source is A Nightmare on Elm Street movie directed by
Samuel Bayer released in 2010. While the secondary data sources are other materials
taken from books, journal, essay, and internet related to the study.
The results of this study are as follows. Firstly, the structural elements of
the movie present a unity. It appears in the beginning, middle, and end of the story.
Secondly, the psychoanalytic analysis shows the phenomenon of brutality which is
done by the major character. He always comes and kills the children from Preschool
through their dream. Finally, the psychoanalytic analysis shows that brutality which
is done by him happened because of his revenge. The revenge of him as a victim of
being burnt alive by the parents of the children in Badham Preschool.
Key words: Brutality, A Nightmare on Elm Street, Psychoanalytic Perspective
First Consultant
Second Consultant
Dr. Phil. Dewi Candraningrum, M.Ed.
Titis Setyabudi, S.S. M.Hum.
NIK. 772
NIK. 948
Dean
Drs. Sofyan Anif, M.Si.
NIK. 547
xviii