Faktor-Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Penggunaan Alat Kontrasepsi Dalam Rahim (Akdr) Pada Pasangan Suami Istri Di Desa Durin Jangak Kecamatan Pancur Batu Kabupaten Deli Serdang Tahun 2015
85
Lampiran 1. Kuesioner Penelitian
FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG BERHUBUNGAN DENGAN PENGGUNAAN
ALAT KONTRASEPSI DALAM RAHIM (AKDR) PADA PASANGAN
SUAMI ISTRI DI DESA DURIN JANGAK KECAMATAN
PANCUR BATU KABUPATEN DELI SERDANG
TAHUN 2015
I.
Identitas Responden
1. No. Responden
2. Nama responden
3. Jumlah anak
4. Pendidikan
5. Umur
: .....................
: .....................
: ...................... (orang)
: ......................
:....................... (tahun)
II. Pengetahuan
Petunjuk : Berilah tanda cheklis (√) pada Jawaban yang Anda Anggap Benar
pada Kolom Telah Disediakan
No.
Pernyataan
1.
Alat Kontrasepsi Dalam Rahim (AKDR) merupakan
alat kontrasepsi terbuat dari plastik yang flesibel
dipasang dalam rahim
Pemakaian AKDR untuk menjarangkan kelahiran anak
AKDR dapat digunakan Ibu yang mengalami penyakit
kelamin atau infeksi dalam rahim
AKDR dapat dipasang kapan saja ibu inginkan
AKDR sangat efektif dapat digunakan dalam jangka
waktu yang panjang
AKDR merupakan alat kontrasepsi hormonal
AKDR dapat mencegah kehamilan ektopik
Komplikasi AKDR adalah merasa sakit dan kejang
selam 2 minggu
AKDR tidak boleh digunakan oleh ibu yang baru saja
melahirkan (2 – 28 hari pasca persalinan)
Dokter kandungan bisa melakukan pencabutan AKDR
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
85
Jawaban
Benar
Salah
86
III. Sikap
Petunjuk : Berilah tanda cheklis (√) pada jawaban yang telah disediakan.
ST = Sangat Setuju
S = Setuju
TS = Tidak Setuju
STS= Snata tidak Setuju
No.
Pertanyaan
1.
AKDR merupakan alat kontrasepsi yang aman
dan efektif
AKDR lebih praktis dari pada alat kontrasepsi
lainnya
AKDR dapat menjarangkan kelahiran
AKDR merupakan alat kontrasepsi jangka
panjang
Pencabutan AKDR tidak mempengaruhi tingkat
kesuburan ibu
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
SS
Jawaban
S
TS STS
3
3
3
4
Ibu tidak perlu malu saat pemasangan AKDR
AKDR tidak menggangu pola hubungan seksual
Pemasangan AKDR dapat menyebabkan
timbulnya penyakit lain
Pemasangan AKDR memerlukan waktu relatif
cepat
Biaya pemasangan AKDR terjangkau oleh
masyarakat
3
2
2
3
2
3
IV. Ingin Punya Anak Lagi
No.
1.
Pernyataan
Jawaban
Ya
Tidak
Apakah anda ingin punya anak lagi
V. Efek Samping
Petunjuk : Berilah Tanda Cheklis (√) pada Jawaban yang Anda Anggap Benar
pada Kolom Telah Disediakan
No.
Pernyataan
1.
2.
Ibu mengalami perubahan siklus haid
Ibu mengalami haid lebih lama dan banyak saat
menggunakan AKDR
Ibu mengalami rasa nyeri haid
Ibu mengalami bercak hitam di pipi
Ibu mengalami perdarahan di luar haid
3.
4.
5.
86
Jawaban
Ya
Tidak
87
VI. Dukungan Suami
Petunjuk : Berilah Tanda Cheklis (√) pada Jawaban yang Anda Anggap Benar
pada Kolom Telah Disediakan
Jawaban
No.
Pernyataan
Ya
Tidak
1.
Suami memiliki pandangan yang baik mengenai alat
kontrasepsi tentang penggunaan AKDR
2.
Suami memperbolehkan Ibu untuk menggunakan alat
kontrasepsi AKDR
3.
Suami menganjurkan Ibu untuk menggunakan alat
kontrasepsi selain AKDR
4.
suami Ibu pernah mendapat informasi mengenai
penggunaan AKDR
5.
suami Ibu pernah menyarankan untuk menggunakn alat
kontrasepsi lain selain AKDR
VII. Dukungan Petugas Kesehatan
Petunjuk : Berilah Tanda Cheklis (√) pada Jawaban yang Anda Anggap Benar
pada Kolom Telah Disediakan
Jawaban
No.
Pernyataan
Ya
Tidak
1.
Petugas pernah memberikan infomasi mengenai jenis
AKDR
2.
Petugas memberikan informasi tentang persyaratan
pemakaian AKDR
3.
Petugas pernah menjelaskan keuntungan penggunaan
AKDR
4.
Petugas pernah melakukan konseling kepada ibu
tentang AKDR
5.
Petugas menganjurkan ibu untuk menggunakan AKDR
VIII. Penggunaan AKDR
1.
2.
3.
Apakah saat ini ibu menggunakan alat kontrasepsi AKDR ?
a. Ya
b. Tidak
Jika tidak, alat kontrasepsi apa yang ibu pakai ? .............
Jika ya, kapan mulai menggunakan AKDR ? Bulan ....... tahun ....
87
88
Lampiran 2. Master Data Penelitian
88
89
89
90
90
91
91
92
Lampiran 3. Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas
1. Pengetahuan
Case Processing Summary
N
Cases
Valid
a
Excluded
Total
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
%
30
100.0
0
.0
30
100.0
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.883
10
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item
Deleted
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
P7
P8
P9
P10
4.17
4.13
4.47
4.40
4.37
4.47
4.43
4.57
4.43
4.37
Scale Variance if
Item Deleted
Corrected Item- Cronbach's Alpha if
Total Correlation
Item Deleted
10.075
9.913
9.223
8.938
9.275
9.775
10.254
10.116
9.082
9.964
.501
.586
.761
.850
.724
.562
.392
.486
.803
.483
.879
.874
.861
.853
.863
.875
.888
.880
.857
.881
2. Sikap
Case Processing Summary
N
Cases
Valid
a
Excluded
Total
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
92
%
30
100.0
0
.0
30
100.0
93
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.892
10
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item
Deleted
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
Scale Variance if
Item Deleted
25.43
25.33
25.63
25.63
25.63
25.87
25.87
25.97
26.03
26.00
Corrected Item- Cronbach's Alpha if
Total Correlation
Item Deleted
14.323
14.230
12.861
12.861
12.861
12.671
12.671
13.137
13.689
12.759
.375
.495
.737
.737
.737
.746
.746
.661
.390
.754
.897
.890
.874
.874
.874
.873
.873
.879
.902
.873
3. Efek Samping
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing Summary
N
Cases
Valid
a
Excluded
Total
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
%
30
100.0
0
.0
30
100.0
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.906
93
5
94
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item
Deleted
EF1
EF2
EF3
EF4
EF5
Scale Variance if
Item Deleted
1.40
1.17
1.13
1.40
1.43
Corrected Item- Cronbach's Alpha if
Total Correlation
Item Deleted
2.593
2.420
2.395
2.524
2.599
.757
.728
.745
.817
.810
.888
.896
.892
.876
.879
3. Dukungan Suami
Case Processing Summary
N
Cases
Valid
Excludeda
Total
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
%
30
0
30
100.0
.0
100.0
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.801
5
Item-Total Statistics
DS1
DS2
DS3
DS4
DS5
Scale Mean if Item Scale Variance if
Corrected Item- Cronbach's Alpha if
Deleted
Item Deleted
Total Correlation
Item Deleted
1.77
2.392
.434
.805
1.87
2.120
.576
.765
2.20
2.097
.596
.759
2.17
1.937
.716
.718
2.13
2.051
.599
.758
5. Dukungan Petugas
Case Processing Summary
N
Cases
Valid
Excludeda
Total
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
94
%
30
0
30
100.0
.0
100.0
95
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.803
5
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item
Deleted
DP1
DP2
DP3
DP4
DP5
1.50
1.67
1.93
1.97
2.00
Scale Variance if
Item Deleted
Corrected Item- Cronbach's Alpha if
Total Correlation
Item Deleted
2.190
1.954
1.926
1.895
2.207
.515
.594
.656
.715
.464
.787
.764
.743
.724
.801
Lampiran : Uji Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Kuesioner Penelitian Faktor-Faktor yang
Berhubungan dengan Penggunaan Alat Kontrasepsi dalam Rahim (AKDR) pada
Pasangan Suami Istri (PUS) di Desa Durin Jangak Kecamatan Pancur Batu
Kabupaten Deli Serdang Tahun 2015
Variabel
Pengetahuan
p1
p2
p3
p4
p5
p6
p7
p8
p9
p10
Sikap
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
n
Corrected itemtotal correlation
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
0,501
0,586
0,761
0,850
0,724
0,562
0,392
0,486
0,803
0,483
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
0,375
0,495
0,737
0,737
0,737
0,746
0,746
0,661
Cronbach’s
alpha
0,883
0,892
95
Keterangan
Reliabel
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Reliabel
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
96
S9
S10
Efek Samping
EF1
F2
EF3
EF4
EF5
Dukungan
Suami
DS1
DS2
DS3
DS4
DS5
Dukungan
Petugas
DP1
DP2
DP3
DP4
DP5
30
30
0,390
0,754
30
30
30
30
30
0,757
0,728
0,745
0,817
0,810
0,906
0,801
30
30
30
30
30
0,434
0,576
0,596
0,716
0,599
Valid
Valid
Reliabel
valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Reliabel
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
0,803
30
30
30
30
30
0,515
0,594
0,656
0,715
0,464
96
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
97
Lampiran 4. Analisis Univariat
Frequency Table
Penggunaan AKDR
Valid
Tidak AKDR
AKDR
Total
Frequency
125
36
161
Percent
77.6
22.4
100.0
Valid Percent
77.6
22.4
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
77.6
100.0
Umur
Frequency
Valid
20-35
40
Percent
24.8
>35
Total
121
161
75.2
100.0
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
24.8
24.8
75.2
100.0
100.0
Pendidikan
Frequency
Valid
SD
SMP
SMA
D3
S1
Total
Percent
13.7
30.4
47.2
6.8
1.9
100.0
22
49
76
11
3
161
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
13.7
13.7
30.4
44.1
47.2
91.3
6.8
98.1
1.9
100.0
100.0
Jumlahanak
Frequency
Valid
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
< 2 orang
98
60.9
60.9
60.9
> 2 orang
63
39.1
39.1
100.0
161
100.0
100.0
Total
Valid
Percent
Kurang
Baik
Total
Pengetahuan
Frequency
Percent
88
54.7
73
161
45.3
100.0
97
Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
54.7
54.7
45.3
100.0
100.0
98
Sikap
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Negatif
76
47.2
47.2
47.2
Positif
Total
85
161
52.8
100.0
52.8
100.0
100.0
Inginanak
Frequency
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
33
20.5
20.5
20.5
128
161
79.5
100.0
79.5
100.0
100.0
Efeksamping
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Berat
143
88.8
88.8
88.8
Ringan
Total
18
161
11.2
100.0
11.2
100.0
100.0
Dukgansuami
Valid
Kurang
Baik
Total
Frequency
146
15
161
Frequency
Valid
Kurang
Baik
Total
110
51
161
Percent
90.7
9.3
100.0
Dukganptgs
Percent
68.3
31.7
100.0
Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
90.7
90.7
9.3
100.0
100.0
Valid Percent
68.3
31.7
100.0
Cumulative Percent
68.3
100.0
99
Lampiran 5. Analisis Bivariat
1.
Umur
Umur
20-35
>35
Total
Umur * KBygdgnkan Crosstabulation
KBygdgnkan
Tidak AKDR
AKDR
Count
33
7
Expected Count
31.1
8.9
% within Umur
82.5%
17.5%
Count
92
29
Expected Count
93.9
27.1
% within Umur
76.0%
24.0%
Count
125
36
Expected Count
125.0
36.0
% within Umur
77.6%
22.4%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value
df
(2-sided)
a
.724
1
.395
.400
1
.527
.753
1
.385
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Total
40
40.0
100.0%
121
121.0
100.0%
161
161.0
100.0%
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
.513
Linear-by-Linear
.720
1
.396
Association
b
N of Valid Cases
161
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.94.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.268
Symmetric Measures
Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Contingency Coefficient
99
Value
.067
161
Approx. Sig.
.395
100
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Upper
Value
Odds Ratio for Umur (20-35 / >35)
For cohort KBygdgnkan = Tidak
AKDR
For cohort KBygdgnkan = AKDR
1.486
.594
3.715
1.085
.911
1.292
.730
.347
1.536
N of Valid Cases
2.
161
Jumlah Anak
Jumlahanak
Jumlahanak * KBygdgnkan Crosstabulation
KBygdgnkan
Tidak AKDR AKDR
< 2 orang Count
83
15
> 2 orang
Total
Expected Count
% within Jumlahanak
Count
Expected Count
% within Jumlahanak
Count
Expected Count
% within Jumlahanak
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value
df
(2-sided)
a
7.179
1
.007
6.178
1
.013
7.035
1
.008
76.1
84.7%
42
48.9
66.7%
125
125.0
77.6%
21.9
15.3%
21
14.1
33.3%
36
36.0
22.4%
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Total
98
98.0
100.0%
vvxz63
63.0
100.0%
161
161.0
100.0%
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
.011
.007
Linear-by-Linear
7.134
1
.008
Association
N of Valid Casesb
161
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.09.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
101
Symmetric Measures
Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Value
.207
161
Contingency Coefficient
Approx. Sig.
.007
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Upper
Value
Odds Ratio for Jumlahanak (< 2 orang
/ > 2 orang)
For cohort KBygdgnkan = Tidak
AKDR
For cohort KBygdgnkan = AKDR
2.767
1.295
5.913
1.270
1.047
1.542
.459
.257
.822
N of Valid Cases
3.
161
Pengetahuan
Pengetahuan
Pengetahuan * KBygdgnkan Crosstabulation
KBygdgnkan
Tidak AKDR AKDR
Kurang Count
84
4
Baik
Total
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
Expected Count
% within Pengetahuan
Count
Expected Count
% within Pengetahuan
Count
Expected Count
% within Pengetahuan
68.3
95.5%
41
56.7
56.2%
125
125.0
77.6%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value
df
(2-sided)
a
35.480
1
.000
33.253
1
.000
38.490
1
.000
19.7
4.5%
32
16.3
43.8%
36
36.0
22.4%
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
35.260
161
1
.000
Total
88
88.0
100.0%
73
73.0
100.0%
161
161.0
100.0%
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.000
102
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.32.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Contingency Coefficient
Value
.425
161
Approx. Sig.
.000
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Upper
Value
Odds Ratio for Pengetahuan (Kurang /
Baik)
For cohort KBygdgnkan = Tidak
AKDR
For cohort KBygdgnkan = AKDR
N of Valid Cases
4.
16.390
5.432
49.459
1.700
1.381
2.092
.104
.038
.280
161
Sikap
Sikap
Negatif
Positif
Total
Sikap * KBygdgnkan Crosstabulation
KBygdgnkan
Tidak AKDR
AKDR
Count
67
9
Expected Count
59.0
17.0
% within Sikap
88.2%
11.8%
Count
58
27
Expected Count
66.0
19.0
% within Sikap
68.2%
31.8%
Count
125
36
Expected Count
125.0
36.0
% within Sikap
77.6%
22.4%
Total
76
76.0
100.0%
85
85.0
100.0%
161
161.0
100.0%
103
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig. (2sided)
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
9.174a
1
.002
Continuity Correctionb
8.062
1
.005
Likelihood Ratio
9.564
1
.002
Fisher's Exact Test
.003
Linear-by-Linear
9.117
1
.003
Association
N of Valid Casesb
161
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.99.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.002
Symmetric Measures
Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Value
.232
161
Contingency Coefficient
Approx. Sig.
.002
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Sikap (Negatif / Positif)
For cohort KBygdgnkan = Tidak AKDR
For cohort KBygdgnkan = AKDR
N of Valid Cases
5.
Lower
Upper
3.466
1.508
7.966
1.292
1.093
1.527
.373
.187
.742
161
Ingin Punya Anak Lagi
Inginanak * KBygdgnkan Crosstabulation
KBygdgnkan
Tidak AKDR
Inginanak
Ya
Count
Expected Count
% within Inginanak
Tidak
Count
Expected Count
Total
% within Inginanak
Count
Expected Count
% within Inginanak
AKDR
Total
30
3
33
25.6
7.4
33.0
90.9%
9.1%
100.0%
95
33
128
99.4
28.6
128.0
74.2%
125
125.0
77.6%
25.8%
36
36.0
22.4%
100.0%
161
161.0
100.0%
104
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value
df
(2-sided)
a
4.210
1
.040
3.303
1
.069
4.901
1
.027
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
.059
Linear-by-Linear
4.184
1
.041
Association
N of Valid Casesb
161
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.38.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.029
Symmetric Measures
Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Value
.160
161
Contingency Coefficient
Approx. Sig.
.040
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Upper
Value
Odds Ratio for Inginanak (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort KBygdgnkan = Tidak
AKDR
For cohort KBygdgnkan = AKDR
N of Valid Cases
6. Efek Samping
3.474
.994
12.138
1.225
1.056
1.421
.353
.115
1.079
161
Efeksamping * KBygdgnkan Crosstabulation
KBygdgnkan
Tidak AKDR
Efeksamping
Berat
Count
Expected Count
% within Efeksamping
Ringan
Count
Expected Count
Total
% within Efeksamping
Count
Expected Count
% within Efeksamping
AKDR
Total
122
21
143
111.0
32.0
143.0
85.3%
14.7%
100.0%
3
15
18
14.0
4.0
18.0
16.7%
125
125.0
77.6%
83.3%
36
36.0
22.4%
100.0%
161
161.0
100.0%
105
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig. (2sided)
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
43.399a
1
.000
b
Continuity Correction
39.535
1
.000
Likelihood Ratio
35.578
1
.000
Fisher's Exact Test
.000
Linear-by-Linear
43.129
1
.000
Association
b
N of Valid Cases
161
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.02.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.000
Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Contingency Coefficient
Approx. Sig.
.461
161
.000
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Efeksamping (Berat /
Ringan)
For cohort KBygdgnkan = Tidak AKDR
Lower
Upper
29.048
7.734
109.092
5.119
1.818
14.413
For cohort KBygdgnkan = AKDR
.176
.113
.275
N of Valid Cases
161
7.
Dukungan Suami
Dukgansuami * KBygdgnkan Crosstabulation
KBygdgnkan
Tidak AKDR
Dukgansuami
Kurang
Count
Expected Count
% within Dukgansuami
Baik
Count
Expected Count
Total
% within Dukgansuami
Count
Expected Count
% within Dukgansuami
AKDR
121
Total
25
146
113.4
32.6
146.0
82.9%
17.1%
100.0%
4
11
15
11.6
3.4
15.0
26.7%
125
125.0
77.6%
73.3%
36
36.0
22.4%
100.0%
161
161.0
100.0%
106
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Asymp. Sig. (2sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
24.756a
1
.000
Continuity Correctionb
21.624
1
.000
Likelihood Ratio
20.035
1
.000
Fisher's Exact Test
.000
Linear-by-Linear
24.603
1
.000
Association
N of Valid Casesb
161
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.35.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.000
Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Contingency Coefficient
Approx. Sig.
.365
161
.000
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Dukgansuami (Kurang /
Baik)
For cohort KBygdgnkan = Tidak AKDR
For cohort KBygdgnkan = AKDR
N of Valid Cases
8.
Lower
Upper
13.310
3.919
45.205
3.108
1.338
7.217
.233
.146
.373
161
Dukungan Petugas
dukganptgs * KBygdgnkan Crosstabulation
KBygdgnkan
Tidak AKDR
dukganptgs
Kurang
Count
Expected Count
% within dukganptgs
Baik
Count
Expected Count
Total
% within dukganptgs
Count
Expected Count
% within dukganptgs
AKDR
Total
97
13
110
85.4
24.6
110.0
88.2%
11.8%
100.0%
28
23
51
39.6
11.4
51.0
54.9%
125
125.0
77.6%
45.1%
36
36.0
22.4%
100.0%
161
161.0
100.0%
107
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value
df
(2-sided)
a
22.230
1
.000
20.354
1
.000
20.987
1
.000
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
.000
.000
Linear-by-Linear
22.092
1
.000
Association
N of Valid Casesb
161
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.40.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Contingency Coefficient
Value
.348
161
Approx. Sig.
.000
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Upper
Value
Odds Ratio for dukganptgs (Kurang /
Baik)
For cohort KBygdgnkan = Tidak
AKDR
For cohort KBygdgnkan = AKDR
N of Valid Cases
6.129
2.755
13.635
1.606
1.241
2.079
.262
.145
.474
161
108
Lampiran 6. Analisis Multivariat
Logistic Regression
Original Value
Tidak AKDR
AKDR
Dependent Variable Encoding
Internal Value
0
1
Block 1: Method = Backward Stepwise (Likelihood Ratio)
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Chi-square
df
Sig.
Step 1
Step
70.947
8
.000
Block
70.947
8
.000
Model
70.947
8
.000
a
Step 2
Step
-.247
1
.619
Block
70.700
7
.000
Model
70.700
7
.000
Step 3a
Step
-.307
1
.579
Block
70.393
6
.000
Model
70.393
6
.000
a
Step 4
Step
-.177
1
.674
Block
70.216
5
.000
Model
70.216
5
.000
a
Step 5
Step
-.333
1
.564
Block
69.883
4
.000
Model
69.883
4
.000
a. A negative Chi-squares value indicates that the Chi-squares value has decreased from the
previous step.
Model Summary
Step
-2 Log likelihood
Cox & Snell R Square
Nagelkerke R Square
a
1
99.666
.358
.546
a
2
99.913
.357
.545
3
100.220a
.356
.543
a
4
100.397
.355
.542
5
100.730a
.354
.540
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 6 because parameter estimates changed by less
than .001.
108
109
Classification Tablea
Step 1
Observed
KBygdgnkan
Predicted
KBygdgnkan
Tidak AKDR AKDR
Percentage
Correct
Tidak AKDR
117
7
94.4
15
21
117
14
7
22
Step 3
AKDR
Overall Percentage
KBygdgnkan Tidak AKDR
AKDR
Overall Percentage
KBygdgnkan Tidak AKDR
7
22
Step 4
AKDR
Overall Percentage
KBygdgnkan Tidak AKDR
117
14
7
22
Step 5
AKDR
Overall Percentage
KBygdgnkan Tidak AKDR
117
14
117
14
7
22
58.3
86.2
94.4
61.1
86.9
94.4
61.1
86.9
94.4
61.1
86.9
94.4
61.1
86.9
Step 2
AKDR
Overall Percentage
a. The cut value is .500
Variables in the Equation
a
Step 1 Jumlahanak
Pengetahuan
Sikap
Inginanak
Efeksamping
Dukgansuami
dukganptgs
Umur
Constant
Step 2a Jumlahanak
Pengetahuan
Sikap
B
.308
2.228
1.076
.383
2.773
-.769
1.526
-.360
-4.508
.303
2.322
1.080
S.E.
.544
.647
.560
.782
.960
1.272
.531
.620
.987
.543
.623
.560
Wald
.321
11.850
3.693
.240
8.354
.365
8.251
.336
20.848
.312
13.904
3.724
df
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Sig. Exp(B)
.571 1.361
.001 9.284
.055 2.933
.625 1.466
.004 16.011
.546
.464
.004 4.601
.562
.698
.000
.011
.576 1.354
.000 10.197
.054 2.945
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
.469 3.950
2.611 33.020
.979 8.790
.317 6.793
2.442 104.991
.038 5.612
1.624 13.035
.207 2.354
.467 3.922
3.009 34.559
.983 8.821
110
Efeksamping
2.744
.959 8.189
1
.004 15.550 2.374 101.853
Dukgansuami
-.696 1.266
.302
1
.583
.499
.042 5.958
dukganptgs
1.501
.528 8.088
1
.004 4.485 1.594 12.618
Umur
-.345
.619
.311
1
.577
.708
.211 2.381
Constant
-4.254
.825 26.591
1
.000
.014
a
Step 3 Jumlahanak
.220
.521
.178
1
.673 1.246
.449 3.457
Pengetahuan
2.305
.619 13.856
1
.000 10.024 2.978 33.737
Sikap
1.118
.556 4.049
1
.044 3.059 1.029 9.091
Efeksamping
2.687
.950 8.004
1
.005 14.693 2.283 94.547
Dukgansuami
-.706 1.277
.306
1
.580
.494
.040 6.028
dukganptgs
1.473
.525 7.868
1
.005 4.360 1.558 12.201
Constant
-4.456
.749 35.423
1
.000
.012
a
Step 4 Pengetahuan
2.333
.617 14.308
1
.000 10.309 3.078 34.529
Sikap
1.156
.549 4.425
1
.035 3.176 1.082 9.321
Efeksamping
2.732
.947 8.323
1
.004 15.357 2.401 98.239
Dukgansuami
-.722 1.273
.322
1
.570
.486
.040 5.889
dukganptgs
1.479
.524 7.954
1
.005 4.387 1.570 12.259
Constant
-4.402
.732 36.156
1
.000
.012
a
Step 5 Pengetahuan
2.315
.611 14.363
1
.000 10.121 3.057 33.502
Sikap
1.093
.533 4.204
1
.040 2.983 1.049 8.481
Efeksamping
2.430
.768 10.002
1
.002 11.357 2.519 51.198
dukganptgs
1.421
.513 7.677
1
.006 4.140 1.515 11.308
Constant
-4.330
.709 37.297
1
.000
.013
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Jumlahanak, Pengetahuan, Sikap, Inginanak, Efeksamping,
Dukgansuami, dukganptgs, Umur.
Model if Term Removed
Model Log
Likelihood
Variable
Step 1
Step 2
Change in -2 Log
Likelihood
df
Sig. of the Change
Jumlahanak
-49.993
.320
1
.572
Pengetahuan
-57.174
14.682
1
.000
Sikap
-51.800
3.933
1
.047
Inginanak
-49.956
.247
1
.619
Efeksamping
-54.772
9.878
1
.002
Dukgansuami
-50.023
.379
1
.538
dukganptgs
-54.106
8.547
1
.003
Umur
Jumlahanak
Pengetahuan
Sikap
Efeksamping
-49.999
-50.112
-58.917
-51.940
-54.803
.333
.310
17.922
3.967
9.693
1
1
1
1
1
.564
.577
.000
.046
.002
111
-50.113
-54.138
-50.110
.313
8.363
.307
1
1
1
.576
.004
.579
Step 3
Dukgansuami
dukganptgs
Umur
Jumlahanak
-50.198
.177
1
.674
-58.994
-52.277
-54.823
-50.267
-54.169
17.768
4.334
9.426
.315
8.118
1
1
1
1
1
.000
.037
.002
.574
.004
Step 4
Pengetahuan
Sikap
Efeksamping
Dukgansuami
dukganptgs
Pengetahuan
-59.421
18.446
1
.000
-52.580
-55.094
-50.365
-54.297
4.763
9.790
.333
8.197
1
1
1
1
.029
.002
.564
.004
Step 5
Sikap
Efeksamping
Dukgansuami
dukganptgs
Pengetahuan
-59.603
18.476
1
.000
Sikap
Efeksamping
dukganptgs
-52.598
-56.533
-54.298
4.467
12.337
7.866
1
1
1
.035
.000
.005
Step 2
a
Variables
Variables not in the Equation
Score
Inginanak
.241
Overall Statistics
Variables
Inginanak
Umur
Overall Statistics
Step 4c
Variables
Jumlahanak
Inginanak
Umur
Overall Statistics
Step 5d
Variables
Jumlahanak
Inginanak
Dukgansuami
Umur
Overall Statistics
a. Variable(s) removed on step 2: Inginanak.
b. Variable(s) removed on step 3: Umur.
c. Variable(s) removed on step 4: Jumlahanak.
d. Variable(s) removed on step 5: Dukgansuami.
Step 3b
.241
.216
.312
.555
.178
.212
.176
.733
.196
.152
.322
.173
1.051
df
Sig.
1
.623
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
4
.623
.642
.576
.758
.673
.645
.675
.865
.658
.696
.571
.677
.902
112
Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Tablea,b
Step 0
Observed
KBygdgnkan
Tidak AKDR
AKDR
Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500
Step 0
Step 0
Constant
Variables
Predicted
KBygdgnkan
Tidak AKDR AKDR
124
0
36
0
Variables in the Equation
B
S.E.
Wald
df
-1.237
.189
42.675
Variables not in the Equation
Score
Jumlahanak
6.994
Pengetahuan
Sikap
Inginanak
Efeksamping
Dukgansuami
dukganptgs
Umur
Overall Statistics
35.047
8.926
4.287
43.043
24.528
21.924
.765
68.020
Percentage
Correct
100.0
.0
77.5
Sig.
.000
1
df
Exp(B)
.290
Sig.
1
.008
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
.000
.003
.038
.000
.000
.000
.382
.000
113
Lampiran 7. Dokumentasi Penelitian
114
Lampiran 1. Kuesioner Penelitian
FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG BERHUBUNGAN DENGAN PENGGUNAAN
ALAT KONTRASEPSI DALAM RAHIM (AKDR) PADA PASANGAN
SUAMI ISTRI DI DESA DURIN JANGAK KECAMATAN
PANCUR BATU KABUPATEN DELI SERDANG
TAHUN 2015
I.
Identitas Responden
1. No. Responden
2. Nama responden
3. Jumlah anak
4. Pendidikan
5. Umur
: .....................
: .....................
: ...................... (orang)
: ......................
:....................... (tahun)
II. Pengetahuan
Petunjuk : Berilah tanda cheklis (√) pada Jawaban yang Anda Anggap Benar
pada Kolom Telah Disediakan
No.
Pernyataan
1.
Alat Kontrasepsi Dalam Rahim (AKDR) merupakan
alat kontrasepsi terbuat dari plastik yang flesibel
dipasang dalam rahim
Pemakaian AKDR untuk menjarangkan kelahiran anak
AKDR dapat digunakan Ibu yang mengalami penyakit
kelamin atau infeksi dalam rahim
AKDR dapat dipasang kapan saja ibu inginkan
AKDR sangat efektif dapat digunakan dalam jangka
waktu yang panjang
AKDR merupakan alat kontrasepsi hormonal
AKDR dapat mencegah kehamilan ektopik
Komplikasi AKDR adalah merasa sakit dan kejang
selam 2 minggu
AKDR tidak boleh digunakan oleh ibu yang baru saja
melahirkan (2 – 28 hari pasca persalinan)
Dokter kandungan bisa melakukan pencabutan AKDR
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
85
Jawaban
Benar
Salah
86
III. Sikap
Petunjuk : Berilah tanda cheklis (√) pada jawaban yang telah disediakan.
ST = Sangat Setuju
S = Setuju
TS = Tidak Setuju
STS= Snata tidak Setuju
No.
Pertanyaan
1.
AKDR merupakan alat kontrasepsi yang aman
dan efektif
AKDR lebih praktis dari pada alat kontrasepsi
lainnya
AKDR dapat menjarangkan kelahiran
AKDR merupakan alat kontrasepsi jangka
panjang
Pencabutan AKDR tidak mempengaruhi tingkat
kesuburan ibu
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
SS
Jawaban
S
TS STS
3
3
3
4
Ibu tidak perlu malu saat pemasangan AKDR
AKDR tidak menggangu pola hubungan seksual
Pemasangan AKDR dapat menyebabkan
timbulnya penyakit lain
Pemasangan AKDR memerlukan waktu relatif
cepat
Biaya pemasangan AKDR terjangkau oleh
masyarakat
3
2
2
3
2
3
IV. Ingin Punya Anak Lagi
No.
1.
Pernyataan
Jawaban
Ya
Tidak
Apakah anda ingin punya anak lagi
V. Efek Samping
Petunjuk : Berilah Tanda Cheklis (√) pada Jawaban yang Anda Anggap Benar
pada Kolom Telah Disediakan
No.
Pernyataan
1.
2.
Ibu mengalami perubahan siklus haid
Ibu mengalami haid lebih lama dan banyak saat
menggunakan AKDR
Ibu mengalami rasa nyeri haid
Ibu mengalami bercak hitam di pipi
Ibu mengalami perdarahan di luar haid
3.
4.
5.
86
Jawaban
Ya
Tidak
87
VI. Dukungan Suami
Petunjuk : Berilah Tanda Cheklis (√) pada Jawaban yang Anda Anggap Benar
pada Kolom Telah Disediakan
Jawaban
No.
Pernyataan
Ya
Tidak
1.
Suami memiliki pandangan yang baik mengenai alat
kontrasepsi tentang penggunaan AKDR
2.
Suami memperbolehkan Ibu untuk menggunakan alat
kontrasepsi AKDR
3.
Suami menganjurkan Ibu untuk menggunakan alat
kontrasepsi selain AKDR
4.
suami Ibu pernah mendapat informasi mengenai
penggunaan AKDR
5.
suami Ibu pernah menyarankan untuk menggunakn alat
kontrasepsi lain selain AKDR
VII. Dukungan Petugas Kesehatan
Petunjuk : Berilah Tanda Cheklis (√) pada Jawaban yang Anda Anggap Benar
pada Kolom Telah Disediakan
Jawaban
No.
Pernyataan
Ya
Tidak
1.
Petugas pernah memberikan infomasi mengenai jenis
AKDR
2.
Petugas memberikan informasi tentang persyaratan
pemakaian AKDR
3.
Petugas pernah menjelaskan keuntungan penggunaan
AKDR
4.
Petugas pernah melakukan konseling kepada ibu
tentang AKDR
5.
Petugas menganjurkan ibu untuk menggunakan AKDR
VIII. Penggunaan AKDR
1.
2.
3.
Apakah saat ini ibu menggunakan alat kontrasepsi AKDR ?
a. Ya
b. Tidak
Jika tidak, alat kontrasepsi apa yang ibu pakai ? .............
Jika ya, kapan mulai menggunakan AKDR ? Bulan ....... tahun ....
87
88
Lampiran 2. Master Data Penelitian
88
89
89
90
90
91
91
92
Lampiran 3. Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas
1. Pengetahuan
Case Processing Summary
N
Cases
Valid
a
Excluded
Total
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
%
30
100.0
0
.0
30
100.0
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.883
10
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item
Deleted
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
P7
P8
P9
P10
4.17
4.13
4.47
4.40
4.37
4.47
4.43
4.57
4.43
4.37
Scale Variance if
Item Deleted
Corrected Item- Cronbach's Alpha if
Total Correlation
Item Deleted
10.075
9.913
9.223
8.938
9.275
9.775
10.254
10.116
9.082
9.964
.501
.586
.761
.850
.724
.562
.392
.486
.803
.483
.879
.874
.861
.853
.863
.875
.888
.880
.857
.881
2. Sikap
Case Processing Summary
N
Cases
Valid
a
Excluded
Total
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
92
%
30
100.0
0
.0
30
100.0
93
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.892
10
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item
Deleted
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
Scale Variance if
Item Deleted
25.43
25.33
25.63
25.63
25.63
25.87
25.87
25.97
26.03
26.00
Corrected Item- Cronbach's Alpha if
Total Correlation
Item Deleted
14.323
14.230
12.861
12.861
12.861
12.671
12.671
13.137
13.689
12.759
.375
.495
.737
.737
.737
.746
.746
.661
.390
.754
.897
.890
.874
.874
.874
.873
.873
.879
.902
.873
3. Efek Samping
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing Summary
N
Cases
Valid
a
Excluded
Total
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
%
30
100.0
0
.0
30
100.0
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.906
93
5
94
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item
Deleted
EF1
EF2
EF3
EF4
EF5
Scale Variance if
Item Deleted
1.40
1.17
1.13
1.40
1.43
Corrected Item- Cronbach's Alpha if
Total Correlation
Item Deleted
2.593
2.420
2.395
2.524
2.599
.757
.728
.745
.817
.810
.888
.896
.892
.876
.879
3. Dukungan Suami
Case Processing Summary
N
Cases
Valid
Excludeda
Total
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
%
30
0
30
100.0
.0
100.0
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.801
5
Item-Total Statistics
DS1
DS2
DS3
DS4
DS5
Scale Mean if Item Scale Variance if
Corrected Item- Cronbach's Alpha if
Deleted
Item Deleted
Total Correlation
Item Deleted
1.77
2.392
.434
.805
1.87
2.120
.576
.765
2.20
2.097
.596
.759
2.17
1.937
.716
.718
2.13
2.051
.599
.758
5. Dukungan Petugas
Case Processing Summary
N
Cases
Valid
Excludeda
Total
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
94
%
30
0
30
100.0
.0
100.0
95
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.803
5
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item
Deleted
DP1
DP2
DP3
DP4
DP5
1.50
1.67
1.93
1.97
2.00
Scale Variance if
Item Deleted
Corrected Item- Cronbach's Alpha if
Total Correlation
Item Deleted
2.190
1.954
1.926
1.895
2.207
.515
.594
.656
.715
.464
.787
.764
.743
.724
.801
Lampiran : Uji Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Kuesioner Penelitian Faktor-Faktor yang
Berhubungan dengan Penggunaan Alat Kontrasepsi dalam Rahim (AKDR) pada
Pasangan Suami Istri (PUS) di Desa Durin Jangak Kecamatan Pancur Batu
Kabupaten Deli Serdang Tahun 2015
Variabel
Pengetahuan
p1
p2
p3
p4
p5
p6
p7
p8
p9
p10
Sikap
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
n
Corrected itemtotal correlation
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
0,501
0,586
0,761
0,850
0,724
0,562
0,392
0,486
0,803
0,483
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
0,375
0,495
0,737
0,737
0,737
0,746
0,746
0,661
Cronbach’s
alpha
0,883
0,892
95
Keterangan
Reliabel
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Reliabel
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
96
S9
S10
Efek Samping
EF1
F2
EF3
EF4
EF5
Dukungan
Suami
DS1
DS2
DS3
DS4
DS5
Dukungan
Petugas
DP1
DP2
DP3
DP4
DP5
30
30
0,390
0,754
30
30
30
30
30
0,757
0,728
0,745
0,817
0,810
0,906
0,801
30
30
30
30
30
0,434
0,576
0,596
0,716
0,599
Valid
Valid
Reliabel
valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Reliabel
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
0,803
30
30
30
30
30
0,515
0,594
0,656
0,715
0,464
96
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
97
Lampiran 4. Analisis Univariat
Frequency Table
Penggunaan AKDR
Valid
Tidak AKDR
AKDR
Total
Frequency
125
36
161
Percent
77.6
22.4
100.0
Valid Percent
77.6
22.4
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
77.6
100.0
Umur
Frequency
Valid
20-35
40
Percent
24.8
>35
Total
121
161
75.2
100.0
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
24.8
24.8
75.2
100.0
100.0
Pendidikan
Frequency
Valid
SD
SMP
SMA
D3
S1
Total
Percent
13.7
30.4
47.2
6.8
1.9
100.0
22
49
76
11
3
161
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
13.7
13.7
30.4
44.1
47.2
91.3
6.8
98.1
1.9
100.0
100.0
Jumlahanak
Frequency
Valid
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
< 2 orang
98
60.9
60.9
60.9
> 2 orang
63
39.1
39.1
100.0
161
100.0
100.0
Total
Valid
Percent
Kurang
Baik
Total
Pengetahuan
Frequency
Percent
88
54.7
73
161
45.3
100.0
97
Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
54.7
54.7
45.3
100.0
100.0
98
Sikap
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Negatif
76
47.2
47.2
47.2
Positif
Total
85
161
52.8
100.0
52.8
100.0
100.0
Inginanak
Frequency
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
33
20.5
20.5
20.5
128
161
79.5
100.0
79.5
100.0
100.0
Efeksamping
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Berat
143
88.8
88.8
88.8
Ringan
Total
18
161
11.2
100.0
11.2
100.0
100.0
Dukgansuami
Valid
Kurang
Baik
Total
Frequency
146
15
161
Frequency
Valid
Kurang
Baik
Total
110
51
161
Percent
90.7
9.3
100.0
Dukganptgs
Percent
68.3
31.7
100.0
Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
90.7
90.7
9.3
100.0
100.0
Valid Percent
68.3
31.7
100.0
Cumulative Percent
68.3
100.0
99
Lampiran 5. Analisis Bivariat
1.
Umur
Umur
20-35
>35
Total
Umur * KBygdgnkan Crosstabulation
KBygdgnkan
Tidak AKDR
AKDR
Count
33
7
Expected Count
31.1
8.9
% within Umur
82.5%
17.5%
Count
92
29
Expected Count
93.9
27.1
% within Umur
76.0%
24.0%
Count
125
36
Expected Count
125.0
36.0
% within Umur
77.6%
22.4%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value
df
(2-sided)
a
.724
1
.395
.400
1
.527
.753
1
.385
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Total
40
40.0
100.0%
121
121.0
100.0%
161
161.0
100.0%
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
.513
Linear-by-Linear
.720
1
.396
Association
b
N of Valid Cases
161
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.94.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.268
Symmetric Measures
Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Contingency Coefficient
99
Value
.067
161
Approx. Sig.
.395
100
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Upper
Value
Odds Ratio for Umur (20-35 / >35)
For cohort KBygdgnkan = Tidak
AKDR
For cohort KBygdgnkan = AKDR
1.486
.594
3.715
1.085
.911
1.292
.730
.347
1.536
N of Valid Cases
2.
161
Jumlah Anak
Jumlahanak
Jumlahanak * KBygdgnkan Crosstabulation
KBygdgnkan
Tidak AKDR AKDR
< 2 orang Count
83
15
> 2 orang
Total
Expected Count
% within Jumlahanak
Count
Expected Count
% within Jumlahanak
Count
Expected Count
% within Jumlahanak
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value
df
(2-sided)
a
7.179
1
.007
6.178
1
.013
7.035
1
.008
76.1
84.7%
42
48.9
66.7%
125
125.0
77.6%
21.9
15.3%
21
14.1
33.3%
36
36.0
22.4%
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Total
98
98.0
100.0%
vvxz63
63.0
100.0%
161
161.0
100.0%
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
.011
.007
Linear-by-Linear
7.134
1
.008
Association
N of Valid Casesb
161
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.09.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
101
Symmetric Measures
Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Value
.207
161
Contingency Coefficient
Approx. Sig.
.007
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Upper
Value
Odds Ratio for Jumlahanak (< 2 orang
/ > 2 orang)
For cohort KBygdgnkan = Tidak
AKDR
For cohort KBygdgnkan = AKDR
2.767
1.295
5.913
1.270
1.047
1.542
.459
.257
.822
N of Valid Cases
3.
161
Pengetahuan
Pengetahuan
Pengetahuan * KBygdgnkan Crosstabulation
KBygdgnkan
Tidak AKDR AKDR
Kurang Count
84
4
Baik
Total
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
Expected Count
% within Pengetahuan
Count
Expected Count
% within Pengetahuan
Count
Expected Count
% within Pengetahuan
68.3
95.5%
41
56.7
56.2%
125
125.0
77.6%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value
df
(2-sided)
a
35.480
1
.000
33.253
1
.000
38.490
1
.000
19.7
4.5%
32
16.3
43.8%
36
36.0
22.4%
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
35.260
161
1
.000
Total
88
88.0
100.0%
73
73.0
100.0%
161
161.0
100.0%
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.000
102
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.32.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Contingency Coefficient
Value
.425
161
Approx. Sig.
.000
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Upper
Value
Odds Ratio for Pengetahuan (Kurang /
Baik)
For cohort KBygdgnkan = Tidak
AKDR
For cohort KBygdgnkan = AKDR
N of Valid Cases
4.
16.390
5.432
49.459
1.700
1.381
2.092
.104
.038
.280
161
Sikap
Sikap
Negatif
Positif
Total
Sikap * KBygdgnkan Crosstabulation
KBygdgnkan
Tidak AKDR
AKDR
Count
67
9
Expected Count
59.0
17.0
% within Sikap
88.2%
11.8%
Count
58
27
Expected Count
66.0
19.0
% within Sikap
68.2%
31.8%
Count
125
36
Expected Count
125.0
36.0
% within Sikap
77.6%
22.4%
Total
76
76.0
100.0%
85
85.0
100.0%
161
161.0
100.0%
103
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig. (2sided)
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
9.174a
1
.002
Continuity Correctionb
8.062
1
.005
Likelihood Ratio
9.564
1
.002
Fisher's Exact Test
.003
Linear-by-Linear
9.117
1
.003
Association
N of Valid Casesb
161
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.99.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.002
Symmetric Measures
Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Value
.232
161
Contingency Coefficient
Approx. Sig.
.002
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Sikap (Negatif / Positif)
For cohort KBygdgnkan = Tidak AKDR
For cohort KBygdgnkan = AKDR
N of Valid Cases
5.
Lower
Upper
3.466
1.508
7.966
1.292
1.093
1.527
.373
.187
.742
161
Ingin Punya Anak Lagi
Inginanak * KBygdgnkan Crosstabulation
KBygdgnkan
Tidak AKDR
Inginanak
Ya
Count
Expected Count
% within Inginanak
Tidak
Count
Expected Count
Total
% within Inginanak
Count
Expected Count
% within Inginanak
AKDR
Total
30
3
33
25.6
7.4
33.0
90.9%
9.1%
100.0%
95
33
128
99.4
28.6
128.0
74.2%
125
125.0
77.6%
25.8%
36
36.0
22.4%
100.0%
161
161.0
100.0%
104
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value
df
(2-sided)
a
4.210
1
.040
3.303
1
.069
4.901
1
.027
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
.059
Linear-by-Linear
4.184
1
.041
Association
N of Valid Casesb
161
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.38.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.029
Symmetric Measures
Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Value
.160
161
Contingency Coefficient
Approx. Sig.
.040
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Upper
Value
Odds Ratio for Inginanak (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort KBygdgnkan = Tidak
AKDR
For cohort KBygdgnkan = AKDR
N of Valid Cases
6. Efek Samping
3.474
.994
12.138
1.225
1.056
1.421
.353
.115
1.079
161
Efeksamping * KBygdgnkan Crosstabulation
KBygdgnkan
Tidak AKDR
Efeksamping
Berat
Count
Expected Count
% within Efeksamping
Ringan
Count
Expected Count
Total
% within Efeksamping
Count
Expected Count
% within Efeksamping
AKDR
Total
122
21
143
111.0
32.0
143.0
85.3%
14.7%
100.0%
3
15
18
14.0
4.0
18.0
16.7%
125
125.0
77.6%
83.3%
36
36.0
22.4%
100.0%
161
161.0
100.0%
105
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig. (2sided)
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
43.399a
1
.000
b
Continuity Correction
39.535
1
.000
Likelihood Ratio
35.578
1
.000
Fisher's Exact Test
.000
Linear-by-Linear
43.129
1
.000
Association
b
N of Valid Cases
161
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.02.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.000
Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Contingency Coefficient
Approx. Sig.
.461
161
.000
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Efeksamping (Berat /
Ringan)
For cohort KBygdgnkan = Tidak AKDR
Lower
Upper
29.048
7.734
109.092
5.119
1.818
14.413
For cohort KBygdgnkan = AKDR
.176
.113
.275
N of Valid Cases
161
7.
Dukungan Suami
Dukgansuami * KBygdgnkan Crosstabulation
KBygdgnkan
Tidak AKDR
Dukgansuami
Kurang
Count
Expected Count
% within Dukgansuami
Baik
Count
Expected Count
Total
% within Dukgansuami
Count
Expected Count
% within Dukgansuami
AKDR
121
Total
25
146
113.4
32.6
146.0
82.9%
17.1%
100.0%
4
11
15
11.6
3.4
15.0
26.7%
125
125.0
77.6%
73.3%
36
36.0
22.4%
100.0%
161
161.0
100.0%
106
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Asymp. Sig. (2sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
24.756a
1
.000
Continuity Correctionb
21.624
1
.000
Likelihood Ratio
20.035
1
.000
Fisher's Exact Test
.000
Linear-by-Linear
24.603
1
.000
Association
N of Valid Casesb
161
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.35.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.000
Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Contingency Coefficient
Approx. Sig.
.365
161
.000
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Dukgansuami (Kurang /
Baik)
For cohort KBygdgnkan = Tidak AKDR
For cohort KBygdgnkan = AKDR
N of Valid Cases
8.
Lower
Upper
13.310
3.919
45.205
3.108
1.338
7.217
.233
.146
.373
161
Dukungan Petugas
dukganptgs * KBygdgnkan Crosstabulation
KBygdgnkan
Tidak AKDR
dukganptgs
Kurang
Count
Expected Count
% within dukganptgs
Baik
Count
Expected Count
Total
% within dukganptgs
Count
Expected Count
% within dukganptgs
AKDR
Total
97
13
110
85.4
24.6
110.0
88.2%
11.8%
100.0%
28
23
51
39.6
11.4
51.0
54.9%
125
125.0
77.6%
45.1%
36
36.0
22.4%
100.0%
161
161.0
100.0%
107
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value
df
(2-sided)
a
22.230
1
.000
20.354
1
.000
20.987
1
.000
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
.000
.000
Linear-by-Linear
22.092
1
.000
Association
N of Valid Casesb
161
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.40.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Contingency Coefficient
Value
.348
161
Approx. Sig.
.000
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Upper
Value
Odds Ratio for dukganptgs (Kurang /
Baik)
For cohort KBygdgnkan = Tidak
AKDR
For cohort KBygdgnkan = AKDR
N of Valid Cases
6.129
2.755
13.635
1.606
1.241
2.079
.262
.145
.474
161
108
Lampiran 6. Analisis Multivariat
Logistic Regression
Original Value
Tidak AKDR
AKDR
Dependent Variable Encoding
Internal Value
0
1
Block 1: Method = Backward Stepwise (Likelihood Ratio)
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Chi-square
df
Sig.
Step 1
Step
70.947
8
.000
Block
70.947
8
.000
Model
70.947
8
.000
a
Step 2
Step
-.247
1
.619
Block
70.700
7
.000
Model
70.700
7
.000
Step 3a
Step
-.307
1
.579
Block
70.393
6
.000
Model
70.393
6
.000
a
Step 4
Step
-.177
1
.674
Block
70.216
5
.000
Model
70.216
5
.000
a
Step 5
Step
-.333
1
.564
Block
69.883
4
.000
Model
69.883
4
.000
a. A negative Chi-squares value indicates that the Chi-squares value has decreased from the
previous step.
Model Summary
Step
-2 Log likelihood
Cox & Snell R Square
Nagelkerke R Square
a
1
99.666
.358
.546
a
2
99.913
.357
.545
3
100.220a
.356
.543
a
4
100.397
.355
.542
5
100.730a
.354
.540
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 6 because parameter estimates changed by less
than .001.
108
109
Classification Tablea
Step 1
Observed
KBygdgnkan
Predicted
KBygdgnkan
Tidak AKDR AKDR
Percentage
Correct
Tidak AKDR
117
7
94.4
15
21
117
14
7
22
Step 3
AKDR
Overall Percentage
KBygdgnkan Tidak AKDR
AKDR
Overall Percentage
KBygdgnkan Tidak AKDR
7
22
Step 4
AKDR
Overall Percentage
KBygdgnkan Tidak AKDR
117
14
7
22
Step 5
AKDR
Overall Percentage
KBygdgnkan Tidak AKDR
117
14
117
14
7
22
58.3
86.2
94.4
61.1
86.9
94.4
61.1
86.9
94.4
61.1
86.9
94.4
61.1
86.9
Step 2
AKDR
Overall Percentage
a. The cut value is .500
Variables in the Equation
a
Step 1 Jumlahanak
Pengetahuan
Sikap
Inginanak
Efeksamping
Dukgansuami
dukganptgs
Umur
Constant
Step 2a Jumlahanak
Pengetahuan
Sikap
B
.308
2.228
1.076
.383
2.773
-.769
1.526
-.360
-4.508
.303
2.322
1.080
S.E.
.544
.647
.560
.782
.960
1.272
.531
.620
.987
.543
.623
.560
Wald
.321
11.850
3.693
.240
8.354
.365
8.251
.336
20.848
.312
13.904
3.724
df
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Sig. Exp(B)
.571 1.361
.001 9.284
.055 2.933
.625 1.466
.004 16.011
.546
.464
.004 4.601
.562
.698
.000
.011
.576 1.354
.000 10.197
.054 2.945
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
.469 3.950
2.611 33.020
.979 8.790
.317 6.793
2.442 104.991
.038 5.612
1.624 13.035
.207 2.354
.467 3.922
3.009 34.559
.983 8.821
110
Efeksamping
2.744
.959 8.189
1
.004 15.550 2.374 101.853
Dukgansuami
-.696 1.266
.302
1
.583
.499
.042 5.958
dukganptgs
1.501
.528 8.088
1
.004 4.485 1.594 12.618
Umur
-.345
.619
.311
1
.577
.708
.211 2.381
Constant
-4.254
.825 26.591
1
.000
.014
a
Step 3 Jumlahanak
.220
.521
.178
1
.673 1.246
.449 3.457
Pengetahuan
2.305
.619 13.856
1
.000 10.024 2.978 33.737
Sikap
1.118
.556 4.049
1
.044 3.059 1.029 9.091
Efeksamping
2.687
.950 8.004
1
.005 14.693 2.283 94.547
Dukgansuami
-.706 1.277
.306
1
.580
.494
.040 6.028
dukganptgs
1.473
.525 7.868
1
.005 4.360 1.558 12.201
Constant
-4.456
.749 35.423
1
.000
.012
a
Step 4 Pengetahuan
2.333
.617 14.308
1
.000 10.309 3.078 34.529
Sikap
1.156
.549 4.425
1
.035 3.176 1.082 9.321
Efeksamping
2.732
.947 8.323
1
.004 15.357 2.401 98.239
Dukgansuami
-.722 1.273
.322
1
.570
.486
.040 5.889
dukganptgs
1.479
.524 7.954
1
.005 4.387 1.570 12.259
Constant
-4.402
.732 36.156
1
.000
.012
a
Step 5 Pengetahuan
2.315
.611 14.363
1
.000 10.121 3.057 33.502
Sikap
1.093
.533 4.204
1
.040 2.983 1.049 8.481
Efeksamping
2.430
.768 10.002
1
.002 11.357 2.519 51.198
dukganptgs
1.421
.513 7.677
1
.006 4.140 1.515 11.308
Constant
-4.330
.709 37.297
1
.000
.013
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Jumlahanak, Pengetahuan, Sikap, Inginanak, Efeksamping,
Dukgansuami, dukganptgs, Umur.
Model if Term Removed
Model Log
Likelihood
Variable
Step 1
Step 2
Change in -2 Log
Likelihood
df
Sig. of the Change
Jumlahanak
-49.993
.320
1
.572
Pengetahuan
-57.174
14.682
1
.000
Sikap
-51.800
3.933
1
.047
Inginanak
-49.956
.247
1
.619
Efeksamping
-54.772
9.878
1
.002
Dukgansuami
-50.023
.379
1
.538
dukganptgs
-54.106
8.547
1
.003
Umur
Jumlahanak
Pengetahuan
Sikap
Efeksamping
-49.999
-50.112
-58.917
-51.940
-54.803
.333
.310
17.922
3.967
9.693
1
1
1
1
1
.564
.577
.000
.046
.002
111
-50.113
-54.138
-50.110
.313
8.363
.307
1
1
1
.576
.004
.579
Step 3
Dukgansuami
dukganptgs
Umur
Jumlahanak
-50.198
.177
1
.674
-58.994
-52.277
-54.823
-50.267
-54.169
17.768
4.334
9.426
.315
8.118
1
1
1
1
1
.000
.037
.002
.574
.004
Step 4
Pengetahuan
Sikap
Efeksamping
Dukgansuami
dukganptgs
Pengetahuan
-59.421
18.446
1
.000
-52.580
-55.094
-50.365
-54.297
4.763
9.790
.333
8.197
1
1
1
1
.029
.002
.564
.004
Step 5
Sikap
Efeksamping
Dukgansuami
dukganptgs
Pengetahuan
-59.603
18.476
1
.000
Sikap
Efeksamping
dukganptgs
-52.598
-56.533
-54.298
4.467
12.337
7.866
1
1
1
.035
.000
.005
Step 2
a
Variables
Variables not in the Equation
Score
Inginanak
.241
Overall Statistics
Variables
Inginanak
Umur
Overall Statistics
Step 4c
Variables
Jumlahanak
Inginanak
Umur
Overall Statistics
Step 5d
Variables
Jumlahanak
Inginanak
Dukgansuami
Umur
Overall Statistics
a. Variable(s) removed on step 2: Inginanak.
b. Variable(s) removed on step 3: Umur.
c. Variable(s) removed on step 4: Jumlahanak.
d. Variable(s) removed on step 5: Dukgansuami.
Step 3b
.241
.216
.312
.555
.178
.212
.176
.733
.196
.152
.322
.173
1.051
df
Sig.
1
.623
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
4
.623
.642
.576
.758
.673
.645
.675
.865
.658
.696
.571
.677
.902
112
Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Tablea,b
Step 0
Observed
KBygdgnkan
Tidak AKDR
AKDR
Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500
Step 0
Step 0
Constant
Variables
Predicted
KBygdgnkan
Tidak AKDR AKDR
124
0
36
0
Variables in the Equation
B
S.E.
Wald
df
-1.237
.189
42.675
Variables not in the Equation
Score
Jumlahanak
6.994
Pengetahuan
Sikap
Inginanak
Efeksamping
Dukgansuami
dukganptgs
Umur
Overall Statistics
35.047
8.926
4.287
43.043
24.528
21.924
.765
68.020
Percentage
Correct
100.0
.0
77.5
Sig.
.000
1
df
Exp(B)
.290
Sig.
1
.008
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
.000
.003
.038
.000
.000
.000
.382
.000
113
Lampiran 7. Dokumentasi Penelitian
114