Pengaruh Karakteristik Dan Motivasi Ibu Hamil Terhadap Pemanfaatan Jkn Di Puskesmas Pancur Batu Tahun 2015
Lampiran 1. Kuesioner Penelitian
PENGARUH KARAKTERISTIK DAN MOTIVASI IBU HAMIL
TERHADAP PEMANFAATAN JKN DI PUSKESMAS
PANCUR BATU TAHUN 2015
Responden yang saya hormati,
Penyebaran kuesioner ini adalah murni untuk penelitian guna memenuhi syarat
dalam pengambilan gelar Master Kesehatan (M.Kes) pada Sekolah Pascasarjana
USU Program Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat, dan Peneliti menjamin kerahasiaan
dan kemurnian hasil penelitian ini, oleh karena itu Peneliti sangat mengharapkan
kejujuran dan keterbukaan dari semua pihak, agar hasil penelitian ini dapat
berguna baik bagi peneliti maupun bagi perkembangan ilmu kesehatan.
Nama / Inisial
: .................................................
Alamat tempat tinggal
: .................................................
Tanggal/bulan
: ………………………………..
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lebih memudahkan biaya dalam melakukan pemeriksan kehamilan
Dapat digunakan untuk pemeriksaan kesehatan yang lain, selain
pemeriksaan kehamilan.
Keadaan ekonomi yang renda untuk melakukan kunjungan kehamilan
di Puskesmas dalam memanfaatkan JKN dikarenakan jarak yang terlalu
jauh dari tempat tinggal.
Responden di mohon untuk mengisi kuesioner di bawah ini dengan tingkat
kepentingan yang tersedia di tabel dengan memberi tanda ceklis (√) pada salah
satu kotak angka 1, 2, 3, 4, dan 5
Keterangan pengisian adalah sebagai berikut :
4
= Diperlukan
3
= Netral
2
= Tidak Diperlukan
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Alternatif Jawaban
Variabel
Item Pernyataan (Indikator)
1
2
3
4
5
Berikan jawaban yang paling tepat
terhadap pernyataan di bawah ini:
Responden di mohon untuk mengisi kuesioner di bawah ini dengan tingkat
kepentingan yang tersedia di tabel dengan memberi tanda ceklis (√) pada salah
satu kotak angka 1, 2, 3, 4 dan 5
Keterangan pengisian adalah sebagai berikut :
5
= Sangat Diperlukan
Universitas Sumatera Utara
3
= Netral
2
= Tidak Diperlukan
1
= Sangat Tidak Diperlukan
Alternatif Jawaban
Variabel
Item Pernyataan (Indikator)
1
2
3
4
5
Berikan jawaban yang paling tepat
terhadap pernyataan di bawah ini :
Universitas Sumatera Utara
1 = Sangat Tidak Diperlukan
Alternatif Jawaban
Variabel
Item Pernyataan (Indikator)
1
2
3
4
5
Berikan jawaban yang paling tepat
terhadap pernyataan di bawah ini:
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Responden di mohon untuk mengisi kuesioner di bawah ini dengan tingkat
kepentingan yang tersedia di tabel dengan memberi tanda ceklis (√) pada salah
satu kotak angka 1, 2, 3, 4, dan 5
2 = Tidak Didukung
1 = Sangat Tidak Didukung
Alternatif Jawaban
Variabel
Item Pernyataan (Indikator)
1
2
3
4
5
Berikan jawaban yang paling tepat
terhadap pernyataan di bawah ini :
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 2. Univariat
Statistics
Motivasi Motivasi
JKN Umur Pendidikan Pekerjaan Penghasilan instrinsik ekstrinsik
N
Valid
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
Missing
0
.36
.00
39
0
.26
.00
28
0
.31
.00
33
0
.23
.00
25
0
.23
.00
25
0
.34
.00
36
0
.27
.00
29
Mean
Median
Sum
Frequency Table
JKN
Valid
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Tidak
memanfaatkan
68
63.6
63.6
63.6
Memanfaatkan
39
36.4
36.4
100.0
Total
107
100.0
100.0
Umur
Valid
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
16-35
79
73.8
73.8
73.8
>36
28
26.2
26.2
100.0
Total
107
100.0
100.0
Pendidikan
Valid
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Pendidikan Dasar
74
69.2
69.2
69.2
Pendidikan Lanjutan
33
30.8
30.8
100.0
Total
107
100.0
100.0
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Pekerjaan
Valid
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Tidak bekerja
82
76.6
76.6
76.6
Bekerja
25
23.4
23.4
100.0
Total
107
100.0
100.0
Penghasilan
Valid
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Rendah
82
76.6
76.6
76.6
Tinggi
25
23.4
23.4
100.0
Total
107
100.0
100.0
Motivasi Intrinsik
Valid
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Kurang
71
66.4
66.4
66.4
Baik
36
33.6
33.6
100.0
Total
107
100.0
100.0
Motivasi Ekstrinsik
Valid
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Kurang
78
72.9
72.9
72.9
Baik
29
27.1
27.1
100.0
Total
107
100.0
100.0
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 3. Bivariat
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Missing
N
Percent
Valid
N
Percent
Umur * JKN
Pendidikan * JKN
Pekerjaan * JKN
Penghasilan * JKN
Motivasi Instrinsik * JKN
Motivasi Ekstrinsik * JKN
107
107
107
107
107
107
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0%
.0%
.0%
.0%
.0%
.0%
Total
N
Percent
107
107
107
107
107
107
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Umur * JKN
Crosstab
JKN
Umur
16-35
>36
Total
Tidak
memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan
Total
56
23
79
% within umur
70.9%
29.1%
100.0%
% within JKN
82.4%
59.0%
73.8%
% of Total
52.3%
21.5%
73.8%
12
16
28
% within umur
42.9%
57.1%
100.0%
% within JKN
17.6%
41.0%
26.2%
% of Total
Count
% within umur
% within JKN
% of Total
11.2%
68
63.6%
100.0%
63.6%
15.0%
39
36.4%
100.0%
36.4%
26.2%
107
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Count
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
7.011a
1
.008
b
Continuity Correction
5.854
1
.016
Likelihood Ratio
6.831
1
.009
Fisher's Exact Test
.012
.008
Linear-by-Linear
6.946
1
.008
Association
N of Valid Casesb
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.21.
Pendidikan * JKN
Crosstab
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan
Pendidikan Pendidikan Dasar Count
Pendidikan
Lanjutan
Total
55
19
Total
74
% within
pendidikan
74.3%
25.7% 100.0%
% within JKN
80.9%
48.7%
69.2%
% of Total
51.4%
17.8%
69.2%
13
20
33
Count
% within
pendidikan
39.4%
60.6% 100.0%
% within JKN
19.1%
51.3%
30.8%
% of Total
Count
% within
pendidikan
% within JKN
% of Total
12.1%
68
18.7%
39
30.8%
107
63.6%
36.4% 100.0%
100.0%
63.6%
100.0% 100.0%
36.4% 100.0%
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
12.022a
1
.001
Continuity Correction
10.561
1
.001
Likelihood Ratio
11.817
1
.001
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
11.909
N of Valid Casesb
107
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.001
.001
.001
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.03.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Pekerjaan * JKN
Crosstab
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan
Pekerjaan Tidak bekerja Count
Bekerja
58
24
82
% within
pekerjaan
70.7%
29.3%
100.0%
% within JKN
85.3%
61.5%
76.6%
% of Total
54.2%
22.4%
76.6%
10
15
25
% within
pekerjaan
40.0%
60.0%
100.0%
% within JKN
14.7%
38.5%
23.4%
% of Total
Count
% within
pekerjaan
% within JKN
% of Total
9.3%
68
14.0%
39
23.4%
107
63.6%
36.4%
100.0%
100.0%
63.6%
100.0%
36.4%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Total
Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1(2-sided)
sided)
sided)
Df
7.812a
1
.005
Continuity Correction
6.541
1
.011
Likelihood Ratio
7.580
1
.006
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
.008
7.739
1
.006
.005
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.11.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Penghasilan * JKN
Crosstab
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan
Penghasilan Rendah Count
Tinggi
58
24
82
% within penghasilan
70.7%
29.3%
100.0%
% within JKN
85.3%
61.5%
76.6%
% of Total
54.2%
22.4%
76.6%
10
15
25
% within penghasilan
40.0%
60.0%
100.0%
% within JKN
14.7%
38.5%
23.4%
9.3%
14.0%
23.4%
68
39
107
63.6%
100.0%
63.6%
36.4%
100.0%
36.4%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
% of Total
Count
Total
Total
% within penghasilan
% within JKN
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1(2-sided)
sided)
sided)
Value
df
7.812
a
1
.005
Continuity Correction
6.541
1
.011
Likelihood Ratio
7.580
1
.006
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Fisher's Exact Test
.008
Linear-by-Linear
Association
7.739
N of Valid Casesb
107
1
.006
.005
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.11.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Motivasi Intrinsik * JKN
Crosstab
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan
Motivasi
intrinsik
Kurang Count
Baik
Total
Total
52
19
71
% within motivasi
intrinsik
73.2%
26.8%
100.0%
% within JKN
76.5%
48.7%
66.4%
% of Total
48.6%
17.8%
66.4%
16
20
36
% within motivasi
intrinsik
44.4%
55.6%
100.0%
% within JKN
23.5%
51.3%
33.6%
% of Total
Count
% within motivasi
intrinsik
% within JKN
% of Total
15.0%
68
18.7%
39
33.6%
107
63.6%
36.4%
100.0%
100.0%
63.6%
100.0%
36.4%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
(2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Value
df
8.551
a
1
.003
Continuity Correction
7.353
1
.007
Likelihood Ratio
8.431
1
.004
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Fisher's Exact Test
.005
Linear-by-Linear
Association
8.471
N of Valid Casesb
107
1
.004
.004
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.12.
b. Computed only for a 2x2
table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Motivasi Ekstrinsik * JKN
Crosstab
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan
Motivasi
ekstrinsik
Kurang Count
Baik
Total
Total
56
22
78
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
71.8%
28.2%
100.0%
% within JKN
82.4%
56.4%
72.9%
% of Total
52.3%
20.6%
72.9%
12
17
29
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
41.4%
58.6%
100.0%
% within JKN
17.6%
43.6%
27.1%
% of Total
Count
11.2%
15.9%
27.1%
68
39
107
63.6%
36.4%
100.0%
100.0%
63.6%
100.0%
36.4%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
% within JKN
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
8.443a
1
.004
b
Continuity Correction 7.181
1
.007
Likelihood Ratio
8.237
1
.004
Fisher's Exact Test
.006
.004
Linear-by-Linear
8.364
1
.004
Association
N of Valid Casesb
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.57.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 4. Kolinaritas
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Valid
N
Percent
Pendidikan * Umur
Pekerjaan * Umur
Penghasilan *Umur
Motivasi intrinsik*
Umur
Motivasi ekstrinsik*
Umur
Cases
Missing
N
Percent
Total
N
Percent
107
107
107
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
0
0
0
.0%
.0%
.0%
107
107
107
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
>36
Total
Pendidikan * Umur
Crosstab
Umur
16-35
Pendidikan Pendidikan Dasar Count
Pendidikan
Lanjutan
Total
60
14
74
% within pendidikan
81.1%
18.9%
100.0%
% within umur
75.9%
50.0%
69.2%
% of Total
56.1%
13.1%
69.2%
19
14
33
% within pendidikan
57.6%
42.4%
100.0%
% within umur
24.1%
50.0%
30.8%
% of Total
Count
17.8%
13.1%
30.8%
79
28
107
73.8%
100.0%
73.8%
26.2%
100.0%
26.2%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
% within pendidikan
% within umur
% of Total
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
6.526a
1
.011
Continuity Correction
5.367
1
.021
Likelihood Ratio
6.235
1
.013
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.017
.011
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
6.465
1
.011
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
8.64.
b. Computed only for a 2x2
table
Pekerjaan * Umur
Crosstab
Umur
16-35
Pekerjaan Tidak bekerja Count
Bekerja
Total
>36
Total
27
13
40
% within pekerjaan
67.5%
32.5%
100.0%
% within umur
34.2%
46.4%
37.4%
% of Total
25.2%
12.1%
37.4%
52
15
67
% within pekerjaan
77.6%
22.4%
100.0%
% within umur
65.8%
53.6%
62.6%
% of Total
Count
48.6%
14.0%
62.6%
79
28
107
73.8%
100.0%
73.8%
26.2%
100.0%
26.2%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
% within pekerjaan
% within umur
% of Total
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
1.326a
1
.250
Continuity Correction
.854
1
.355
Likelihood Ratio
1.305
1
.253
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.265
.177
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
1.313
1
.252
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
10.47.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Penghasilan * Umur
Crosstab
Umur
16-35
Penghasilan
Rendah
Tinggi
Count
Total
73
9
82
% within penghasilan
89.0%
11.0%
100.0%
% within umur
92.4%
32.1%
76.6%
% of Total
68.2%
8.4%
76.6%
6
19
25
24.0%
76.0%
100.0%
% within umur
7.6%
67.9%
23.4%
% of Total
Count
5.6%
17.8%
23.4%
79
28
107
73.8%
100.0%
73.8%
26.2%
100.0%
26.2%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
% within penghasilan
Total
>36
% within penghasilan
% within umur
% of Total
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
41.928a
1
.000
Continuity Correctionb 38.630
1
.000
Likelihood Ratio
1
.000
Pearson Chi-Square
38.710
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.000
.000
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
41.536
1
.000
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
6.54.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Motivasi intrinsik * Umur
Crosstab
Umur
16-35
Motivasi intrinsik
Kurang
Baik
Total
Count
>36
Total
30
8
38
% within motivasi
intrinsik
78.9%
21.1%
100.0%
% within umur
38.0%
28.6%
35.5%
% of Total
28.0%
7.5%
35.5%
49
20
69
% within motivasi
intrinsik
71.0%
29.0%
100.0%
% within umur
62.0%
71.4%
64.5%
% of Total
Count
45.8%
18.7%
64.5%
79
28
107
73.8%
26.2%
100.0%
100.0%
73.8%
100.0%
26.2%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
% within motivasi
intrinsik
% within umur
% of Total
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.798a
1
.372
Continuity Correction
.440
1
.507
Likelihood Ratio
.816
1
.366
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.492
.256
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
.791
1
.374
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
9.94.
b. Computed only for a 2x2
table
Motivasi ekstrinsik * Umur
Crosstab
Umur
16-35
Motivasi Kurang
ekstrinsik
Baik
Total
Count
>36
Total
32
9
41
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
78.0%
22.0%
100.0%
% within umur
40.5%
32.1%
38.3%
% of Total
29.9%
8.4%
38.3%
47
19
66
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
71.2%
28.8%
100.0%
% within umur
59.5%
67.9%
61.7%
% of Total
Count
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
% within umur
% of Total
43.9%
79
17.8%
28
61.7%
107
73.8%
26.2%
100.0%
100.0%
73.8%
100.0%
26.2%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.612a
1
.434
Continuity Correction
.309
1
.578
Likelihood Ratio
.622
1
.430
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
.606
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.502
.291
.436
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
10.73.
b. Computed only for a 2x2
table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Valid
N
Percent
Pekerjaan * Pendidikan
Penghasilan *
Pendidikan
Motivasi intrinsik *
Pendidikan
Motivasi ekstrinsik *
Pendidikan
Cases
Missing
N
Percent
Total
N
Percent
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
Pekerjaan * Pendidikan
Crosstab
Pendidikan
Pendidikan Pendidikan
Dasar
Lanjutan
Pekerjaan Tidak bekerja Count
% within pekerjaan
% within pendidikan
% of Total
Bekerja
Count
% within pekerjaan
% within pendidikan
% of Total
Total
Count
% within pekerjaan
% within pendidikan
% of Total
Total
22
18
40
55.0%
45.0%
100.0%
29.7%
54.5%
37.4%
20.6%
16.8%
37.4%
52
15
67
77.6%
22.4%
100.0%
70.3%
45.5%
62.6%
48.6%
14.0%
62.6%
74
69.2%
100.0%
69.2%
33
30.8%
100.0%
30.8%
107
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
6.004
a
1
.014
Continuity Correction
4.991
1
.025
Likelihood Ratio
5.905
1
.015
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.018
.013
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
5.948
1
.015
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
12.34.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Penghasilan * Pendidikan
Crosstab
Pendidikan
Pendidikan
Dasar
Penghasilan Rendah Count
Total
65
17
82
% within penghasilan
79.3%
20.7%
100.0%
% within pendidikan
87.8%
51.5%
76.6%
% of Total
60.7%
15.9%
76.6%
9
16
25
% within penghasilan
36.0%
64.0%
100.0%
% within pendidikan
12.2%
48.5%
23.4%
% of Total
Count
% within penghasilan
% within pendidikan
% of Total
8.4%
74
69.2%
100.0%
69.2%
15.0%
33
30.8%
100.0%
30.8%
23.4%
107
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Tinggi Count
Total
Pendidikan
Lanjutan
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
16.816
a
1
.000
Continuity Correction
14.849
1
.000
Likelihood Ratio
15.841
1
.000
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.000
.000
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
16.659
1
.000
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
7.71.
b. Computed only for a 2x2
table
Motivasi intrinsik * Pendidikan
Crosstab
Pendidikan
Pendidikan
Dasar
Motivasi Kurang
intrinsik
Baik
Total
Count
Pendidikan
Lanjutan
26
12
Total
38
% within motivasi intrinsik
68.4%
31.6% 100.0%
% within pendidikan
35.1%
36.4% 35.5%
% of Total
24.3%
11.2% 35.5%
Count
48
21
69
% within motivasi intrinsik
69.6%
30.4% 100.0%
% within pendidikan
64.9%
63.6% 64.5%
% of Total
Count
% within motivasi intrinsik
% within pendidikan
% of Total
44.9%
74
69.2%
100.0%
69.2%
19.6%
33
30.8%
100.0%
30.8%
64.5%
107
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
.015a
1
.902
Continuity Correctionb
.000
1
1.000
Likelihood Ratio
.015
1
.902
Fisher's Exact Test
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
1.000
.535
Linear-by-Linear
.015
1
.903
Association
N of Valid Casesb
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
11.72.
b. Computed only for a 2x2
tabel
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Motivasi ekstrinsik * Pendidikan
Crosstab
Pendidikan
Pendidikan Pendidikan
Dasar
Lanjutan Total
Motivasi ekstrinsik Kurang Count
Baik
Total
30
11
41
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
73.2%
26.8% 100.0%
% within
pendidikan
40.5%
33.3% 38.3%
% of Total
28.0%
10.3% 38.3%
Count
44
22
66
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
66.7%
33.3% 100.0%
% within
pendidikan
59.5%
66.7% 61.7%
41.1%
74
20.6% 61.7%
33
107
69.2%
30.8% 100.0%
100.0%
100.0% 100.0%
69.2%
30.8% 100.0%
% of Total
Count
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
% within
pendidikan
% of Total
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
.502a
1
.479
Continuity Correctionb
.243
1
.622
Likelihood Ratio
.507
1
.476
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
.497
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.525
.313
.481
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
12.64.
b. Computed only for a 2x2
table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Valid
N
Percent
Penghasilan * Pekerjaan
Motivasi intrinsik *
Pekerjaan
Motivasi ekstrinsik *
Pekerjaan
Cases
Missing
N
Percent
Total
N
Percent
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
Penghasilan * Pekerjaan
Crosstab
Pekerjaan
Tidak
bekerja
Penghasilan
Rendah Count
Tinggi
Total
Bekerja
Total
29
53
82
% within penghasilan
35.4%
64.6%
100.0%
% within pekerjaan
72.5%
79.1%
76.6%
% of Total
27.1%
49.5%
76.6%
11
14
25
% within penghasilan
44.0%
56.0%
100.0%
% within pekerjaan
27.5%
20.9%
23.4%
% of Total
Count
10.3%
13.1%
23.4%
40
67
107
37.4%
100.0%
37.4%
62.6%
100.0%
62.6%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
% within penghasilan
% within pekerjaan
% of Total
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
.610a
1
.435
Continuity Correctionb
.297
1
.586
Likelihood Ratio
.602
1
.438
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
.604
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.483
.291
.437
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
9.35.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Motivasi intrinsik * Pekerjaan
Crosstab
Pekerjaan
Tidak bekerja Bekerja
Motivasi intrinsik
Kurang
Baik
Total
Count
11
27
Total
38
% within motivasi
intrinsik
28.9%
71.1% 100.0%
% within pekerjaan
27.5%
40.3% 35.5%
% of Total
10.3%
25.2% 35.5%
Count
29
40
69
% within motivasi
intrinsik
42.0%
58.0% 100.0%
% within pekerjaan
72.5%
59.7% 64.5%
% of Total
Count
% within motivasi
intrinsik
% within pekerjaan
% of Total
27.1%
40
37.4% 64.5%
67
107
37.4%
62.6% 100.0%
100.0%
37.4%
100.0% 100.0%
62.6% 100.0%
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square
1.791
1
.181
b
Continuity Correction
1.276
1
.259
Likelihood Ratio
1.825
1
.177
Fisher's Exact Test
.214
.129
Linear-by-Linear
1.775
1
.183
Association
N of Valid Casesb
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
14.21.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Motivasi ekstrinsik * Pekerjaan
Crosstab
Pekerjaan
Tidak
bekerja
Motivasi ekstrinsik Kurang Count
Baik
Total
Bekerja
Total
17
24
41
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
41.5%
58.5%
100.0%
% within pekerjaan
42.5%
35.8%
38.3%
% of Total
15.9%
22.4%
38.3%
23
43
66
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
34.8%
65.2%
100.0%
% within pekerjaan
57.5%
64.2%
61.7%
% of Total
Count
21.5%
40.2%
61.7%
40
67
107
37.4%
62.6%
100.0%
100.0%
37.4%
100.0%
62.6%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
% within pekerjaan
% of Total
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.473a
1
.492
Continuity Correction
.232
1
.630
Likelihood Ratio
.471
1
.493
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
.468
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.541
.314
.494
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
15.33.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
Missing
Total
N
Percent
N
Percent
N
Percent
Motivasi intrinsik *
Penghasilan
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
Motivasi ekstrinsik *
Penghasilan
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
Motivasi intrinsik * Penghasilan
Crosstab
Penghasilan
Rendah
Motivasi intrinsik Kurang Count
Baik
Total
Tinggi
Total
30
8
38
% within motivasi
intrinsik
78.9%
21.1%
100.0%
% within penghasilan
36.6%
32.0%
35.5%
% of Total
28.0%
7.5%
35.5%
52
17
69
% within motivasi
intrinsik
75.4%
24.6%
100.0%
% within penghasilan
63.4%
68.0%
64.5%
% of Total
Count
48.6%
15.9%
64.5%
82
25
107
76.6%
23.4%
100.0%
100.0%
76.6%
100.0%
23.4%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
% within motivasi
intrinsik
% within penghasilan
% of Total
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square
.176
1
.675
b
Continuity Correction
.033
1
.857
Likelihood Ratio
.178
1
.673
Fisher's Exact Test
.813
.433
Linear-by-Linear
.174
1
.676
Association
N of Valid Casesb
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
8.88.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Motivasi ekstrinsik * Penghasilan
Crosstab
Penghasilan
Rendah
Motivasi ekstrinsik Kurang Count
Baik
Total
Tinggi
Total
33
8
41
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
80.5%
19.5%
100.0%
% within penghasilan
40.2%
32.0%
38.3%
% of Total
30.8%
7.5%
38.3%
49
17
66
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
74.2%
25.8%
100.0%
% within penghasilan
59.8%
68.0%
61.7%
% of Total
Count
45.8%
15.9%
61.7%
82
25
107
76.6%
23.4%
100.0%
100.0%
76.6%
100.0%
23.4%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
% within penghasilan
% of Total
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.551a
1
.458
Continuity Correction
.257
1
.612
Likelihood Ratio
.560
1
.454
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
.546
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.492
.309
.460
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
9.58.
b. Computed only for a 2x2
table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
Motivasi intrinsik *
Motivasi ekstrinsik
Missing
Total
N
Percent
N
Percent
N
Percent
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
Motivasi intrinsik * Motivasi ekstrinsik
Crosstab
Motivasi ekstrinsik
Kurang
Motivasi intrinsik
Kurang
Count
Total
1
Total
37
38
% within motivasi
intrinsik
2.6%
97.4% 100.0%
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
2.4%
56.1%
35.5%
.9%
34.6%
35.5%
40
29
69
% of Total
Baik
Baik
Count
% within motivasi
intrinsik
58.0%
42.0% 100.0%
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
97.6%
43.9%
64.5%
37.4%
27.1%
64.5%
41
66
107
% of Total
Count
% within motivasi
intrinsik
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
% of Total
38.3%
61.7% 100.0%
100.0%
100.0% 100.0%
38.3%
61.7% 100.0%
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
31.751a
1
.000
Continuity Correction
29.453
1
.000
Likelihood Ratio
39.296
1
.000
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
31.454
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.000
.000
.000
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
14.56.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 5. Pemodelan
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Casesa
Selected Cases
Included in Analysis
N
Percent
107
100.0
0
.0
Missing Cases
Total
107
100.0
Unselected Cases
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value
Internal Value
Tidak memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan
0
1
Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Tablea,b
Predicted
JKN
Observed
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Step 0 JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
68
0
100.0
Memanfaatkan
39
0
.0
Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500
63.6
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Variables in the Equation
Step 0 Constant
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
-.556
.201
7.660
1
.006
.574
Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1
Chi-square
df
Sig.
Step
6.847
2
.033
Block
6.847
2
.033
Model
6.847
2
.033
Classification Tablea
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan
Observed
Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Step 1 JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
56
12
82.4
Memanfaatkan
23
16
41.0
Overall Percentage
a. The cut value is .500
67.3
Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
.054
.432
.016
1
.901
1.055
.452
2.464
1.184
.459 6.669
1
.010
3.269
1.330
8.030
Constant
-.926 .379 5.964
a. Variable(s) entered on Step 1: Pekerjaan,
Umur.
1
.015
.396
Step Pekerjaan
1a Umur
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Casesa
Selected Cases
Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
N
Percent
107
100.0
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
Unselected Cases
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value
Internal Value
Tidak memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan
0
1
Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Tablea,b
Predicted
JKN
Observed
Tidak
memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Step 0 JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
68
0
100.0
Memanfaatkan
39
0
.0
Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
63.6
b. The cut value is .500
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Variables in the Equation
Step 0 Constant
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
-.556
.201
7.660
1
.006
.574
Block 1: Method = Enter
Classification Tablea
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Observed
Step 1 JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan
56
12
82.4
Memanfaatkan
23
16
41.0
Overall Percentage
a. The cut value is .500
67.3
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1
Chi-square
df
Sig.
Step
6.849
2
.033
Block
6.849
2
.033
Model
6.849
2
.033
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
Step Motivasi intrinsik .058 .438 .018
1a
umur
1.172 .457 6.586
1
.894 1.060
1
.010 3.229 1.319 7.905
Constant
-.926 .369 6.289
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Motivasi
intrinsik, Umur.
1
.012
.450
2.500
.396
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
pUnweighted Casesa
Selected Cases Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
N
Percent
107
100.0
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
Unselected Cases
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value
Internal Value
Tidak memanfaatkan
0
Memanfaatkan
1
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Tablea,b
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Observed
Step 0 JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
68
0
100.0
Memanfaatkan
39
0
.0
Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500
63.6
Variables in the Equation
Step 0 Constant
B
S.E.
Wald
Df
Sig.
Exp(B)
-.556
.201
7.660
1
.006
.574
Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1
Chi-square
df
Sig.
Step
8.017
2
.018
Block
8.017
2
.018
Model
8.017
2
.018
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Classification Tablea
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Observed
Step 1 JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan
56
12
82.4
Memanfaatkan
23
16
41.0
Overall Percentage
a. The cut value is .500
67.3
Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
Motivasi
ekstrinsik
-.467
.429
1.182
1
.277
.627
Umur
1.231
.462
7.100
1
.008
3.426 1.385 8.475
Constant
-.623 .343 3.300
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Motivasi
ekstrinsik, Umur.
Logistic Regression
1
.069
.536
Step
1a
.270
1.455
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Casesa
Selected Cases
Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
N
Percent
107
100.0
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
Unselected Cases
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value
Internal Value
Tidak memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan
0
1
Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Tablea,b
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Observed
Step 0 JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
68
0
100.0
Memanfaatkan
39
0
.0
Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500
63.6
Variables in the Equation
Step
0
Constant
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
-.556
.201
7.660
1
.006
.574
Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1
Chi-square
df
Sig.
Step
11.996
2
.002
Block
11.996
2
.002
Model
11.996
2
.002
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Classification Tablea
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Observed
Step 1
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan
55
13
80.9
Memanfaatkan
19
20
51.3
Overall Percentage
a. The cut value is .500
70.1
Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Step
1a
B
S.E.
Wald
Df
Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
Motivasi
instrinsik
.190
.449
.178
1
.673
1.209
.501
pendidikan
1.499
.445
11.320
1
.001
4.477
1.870 10.719
.003
.305
Constant
-1.188 .402 8.740
1
a. Variable(s) entered on Step 1: Motivasi intrinsik,
Pendidikan.
2.915
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Casesa
Selected Cases
Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
N
Percent
107
100.0
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
Unselected Cases
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value
Internal Value
Tidak memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan
0
1
Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Tablea,b
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Observed
Step 0 JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
68
0
100.0
Memanfaatkan
39
0
.0
Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
63.6
b. The cut value is .500
Variables in the Equation
Step 0
Constant
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
-.556
.201
7.660
1
.006
.574
Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1
Chi-square
df
Sig.
Step
13.157
2
.001
Block
13.157
2
.001
Model
13.157
2
.001
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Classification Tablea
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Observed
Step 1 JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
55
13
80.9
Memanfaatkan
19
20
51.3
Overall Percentage
a. The cut value is .500
70.1
Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)
B
Step
1a
Motivasi
ekstrinsik
Pendidikan
-.510
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
Lower
Upper
.442 1.331
1
.249
.601
.253
1.428
11.74
1
1
.001
4.723
1.943
11.477
1
.030
.461
1.552 .453
Constant
-.775 .357 4.700
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Motivasi
ekstrinsik, Pendidikan.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Casesa
Selected Cases
Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
N
Percent
107
100.0
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
Unselected Cases
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value
Internal Value
Tidak memanfaatkan
0
Memanfaatkan
1
Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Tablea,b
Predicted
JKN
Observed
Step 0 JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Tidak
memanfaatkan
68
0
100.0
Memanfaatkan
39
0
.0
Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500
63.6
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Variables in the Equation
Step 0
Constant
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
-.556
.201
7.660
1
.006
.574
Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1
Chi-square
df
Sig.
Step
7.644
2
.022
Block
7.644
2
.022
Model
7.644
2
.022
Classification Tablea
Predicted
JKN
Observed
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Step 1 JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
58
10
85.3
Memanfaatkan
24
15
38.5
Overall Percentage
a. The cut value is .500
68.2
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)
B
Step
1a
Motivasi
intrinsik
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
.111
.439
.064
1
.800
1.118
.473
2.640
1.284
.475
7.294
1
.007
3.610
1.422
9.163
Constant
-.953
.373 6.543
1
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Motivasi intrinsik,
Penghasilan.
.011
.385
Penghasilan
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Casesa
Selected Cases
Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
N
Percent
107
100.0
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
Unselected Cases
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value
Internal Value
Tidak memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan
0
1
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Tablea,b
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Observed
Step 0
JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
68
0
100.0
Memanfaatkan
39
0
.0
Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500
63.6
Variables in the Equation
Step 0
Constant
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
-.556
.201
7.660
1
.006
.574
Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1
Chi-square
df
Sig.
Step
8.775
2
.012
Block
8.775
2
.012
Model
8.775
2
.012
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Classification Tablea
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Observed
Step 1
JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
58
10
85.3
Memanfaatkan
24
15
38.5
Overall Percentage
a. The cut value is .500
68.2
Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Step
1a
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
Motivasi
ekstrinsik
-.470
.431
1.191
1
.275
.625
.269
Penghasilan
1.343
.482
7.759
1
.005
3.830
1.489 9.853
.072
.542
Constant
-.612 .341 3.229
1
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Motivasi ekstrinsik,
Penghasilan.
1.454
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 6. Pemeriksaan Interaksi
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Casesa
Selected Cases
Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
N
Percent
107
100.0
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
Unselected Cases
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value
Internal Value
Tidak memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan
0
1
Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Tablea,b
Predicted
JKN
Observed
Step 0
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Tidak
memanfaatkan
68
0
100.0
Memanfaatkan
39
0
.0
Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500
63.6
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Variables in the Equation
Step 0 Constant
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
-.556
.201
7.660
1
.006
.574
Score
df
Sig.
12.022
1
.001
.722
1
.396
3.916
1
.048
13.476
3
.004
Variables not in the Equation
Step 0
Variables
Pendidikan
Motivasi ekstrinsik
Motivasi ekstrinsik
Pendidikan
Overall Statistics
by
Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1
Chi-square
df
Sig.
Step
13.351
3
.004
Block
13.351
3
.004
Model
13.351
3
.004
Model Summary
Step
-2 Log likelihood
Cox & Snell R Square
Nagelkerke R Square
1
127.024a
.117
.161
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 4 because parameter estimates changed
by less than .001.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Classification Tablea
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Observed
Step 1
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan
55
13
80.9
Memanfaatkan
19
20
51.3
Overall Percentage
a. The cut value is .500
70.1
Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Step
1a
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B) Lower Upper
Pendidikan
1.828
.786
5.416
1
.020
6.222 1.334 29.013
Motivasi
ekstrinsik
-.376
.537
.492
1
.483
.686
.240
1.965
Motivasi
ekstrinsik by -.422
Pendidikan
.964
.192
1
.662
.656
.099
4.340
Constant
-.847 .398 4.523
1
.033
.429
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Pendidikan, Motivasi ekstrinsik,
Motivasi ekstrinsik * Pendidikan .
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 7. Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Casesa
Selected Cases
Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
N
Percent
107
100.0
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
Unselected Cases
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value
Internal Value
Tidak memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan
0
1
Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Tablea,b
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan
Percentage
Correct
Step 0 JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
68
0
100.0
Memanfaatkan
39
0
.0
Observed
Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500
63.6
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Variables in the Equation
Step 0 Constant
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
-.556
.201
7.660
1
.006
.574
Score
df
Sig.
12.022
1
.001
.722
1
.396
13.209
2
.001
Variables not in the Equation
Step 0
Variables
Pendidikan
Motivasi ekstrinsik
Overall Statistics
Block 1: Method = Backward Stepwise (Likelihood Ratio)
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1
Step 2
a
Chi-square
df
Sig.
Step
13.157
2
.001
Block
13.157
2
.001
Model
Step
13.157
2
.001
-1.340
1
.247
Block
11.817
1
.001
Model
11.817
1
.001
a. A negative Chi-squares value indicates that the Chi-squares value has decreased
from the previous step.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Model Summary
Step
-2 Log likelihood
Cox & Snell R Square
Nagelkerke R Square
a
1
127.218
.116
.158
a
2
128.558
.105
.143
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 4 because parameter estimates changed
by less than .001.
Classification Tablea
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan
Percentage
Correct
Tidak
memanfaatkan
55
13
80.9
Memanfaatkan
19
20
51.3
Observed
Step 1 JKN
Overall Percentage
Step 2 JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan
Overall Percentage
a. The cut value is .500
70.1
55
13
80.9
19
20
51.3
70.1
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)
B
Step Pendidikan
1a
Motivasi
ekstrinsik
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
1.552
.453 11.741
1
.001
4.723
1.943
11.477
-.510
.442
1
.249
.601
.253
1.428
1
1
1
.030
.001
.000
.461
4.453
.345
1.863
10.646
1.331
Constant
-.775 .357 4.700
Step Pendidikan 1.494 .445 11.283
2a
Constant
-1.063 .266 15.954
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Pendidikan,
Motivasi ekstrinsik.
Model if Term Removed
Variable
Step 1 Pendidikan
Motivasi
ekstrinsik
Step 2 Pendidikan
Model Log
Likelihood
Change in -2
Log Likelihood
df
Sig. of the
Change
-69.828
12.439
1
.000
-64.279
1.340
1
.247
-70.187
11.817
1
.001
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 8. Validitas dan Reliabelitas
Scale: All Variable
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
Excluded
a
N
%
30
100.0
0
.0
Total
30
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
100.0
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.894
15
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Scale Variance
Item Deleted if Item Deleted
Corrected
Item-Total
Correlation
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
Kebutuhan 1
34.17
108.557
.486
.891
Kebutuhan 2
34.77
110.116
.675
.886
Kebutuhan 3
33.87
107.292
.529
.889
Kebutuhan 4
33.53
101.982
.663
.883
Kebutuhan 5
34.13
106.395
.663
.884
Harapan 1
33.97
106.033
.485
.892
Harapan 2
33.40
105.352
.553
.888
Harapan 3
34.03
108.792
.451
.892
Harapan 4
33.80
106.510
.585
.887
Harapan 5
33.80
108.648
.544
.889
Minat 1
33.93
106.616
.486
.891
Minat 2
34.37
104.240
.608
.886
Minat 3
34.63
106.585
.673
.884
Minat 4
33.70
103.597
.670
.883
Minat 5
33.97
107.895
.575
.887
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Scale: All Variables
Case Processing Summary
Cases
N
%
Valid
30
100.0
Excludeda
0
.0
Total
30
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
100.0
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.854
5
Item-Total Statistics
d1
d2
d3
d4
d5
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance
if Item Deleted
Corrected
Item-Total
Correlation
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
9.30
9.70
9.57
9.00
9.10
11.803
11.597
14.392
11.724
12.093
.681
.742
.506
.672
.747
.820
.803
.861
.824
.804
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Master Data
JKN
No Res
Memanfaatkan
1
KAT
UMUR
KAT
PENDIDIKAN
KAT
PEKERJAAN
KAT
PENGHASILAN
1
36
1
SMA
1
WIRASWASTA
1
>1.600.000
tidak memanfaaatkan
Memanfaatkan
2
tidak memanfaaatkan
0
37
1
S1
1
IRT
0
>1.600.000
3
tidak memanfaaatkan
0
38
1
AKADEMI
1
PEGAWAISWASTA
1
>1.600.00
4
Memanfaatkan
1
37
1
SMA
1
WIRASWASTA
1
>1.600.000
5
Memanfaatkan
1
39
1
SMP
0
WIRASWASTA
1
>1.600.000
WIRASWASTA
1
>1.600.000
6
tidak memanfaaatkan
0
38
1
SMP
0
7
tidak memanfaaatkan
0
22
0
SMA
1
IRT
0
1.600.000
9
tidak memanfaaatkan
0
25
0
AKADEMI
1
IRT
0
1.600.000
0
21
0
SMP
0
IRT
0
PENGARUH KARAKTERISTIK DAN MOTIVASI IBU HAMIL
TERHADAP PEMANFAATAN JKN DI PUSKESMAS
PANCUR BATU TAHUN 2015
Responden yang saya hormati,
Penyebaran kuesioner ini adalah murni untuk penelitian guna memenuhi syarat
dalam pengambilan gelar Master Kesehatan (M.Kes) pada Sekolah Pascasarjana
USU Program Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat, dan Peneliti menjamin kerahasiaan
dan kemurnian hasil penelitian ini, oleh karena itu Peneliti sangat mengharapkan
kejujuran dan keterbukaan dari semua pihak, agar hasil penelitian ini dapat
berguna baik bagi peneliti maupun bagi perkembangan ilmu kesehatan.
Nama / Inisial
: .................................................
Alamat tempat tinggal
: .................................................
Tanggal/bulan
: ………………………………..
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lebih memudahkan biaya dalam melakukan pemeriksan kehamilan
Dapat digunakan untuk pemeriksaan kesehatan yang lain, selain
pemeriksaan kehamilan.
Keadaan ekonomi yang renda untuk melakukan kunjungan kehamilan
di Puskesmas dalam memanfaatkan JKN dikarenakan jarak yang terlalu
jauh dari tempat tinggal.
Responden di mohon untuk mengisi kuesioner di bawah ini dengan tingkat
kepentingan yang tersedia di tabel dengan memberi tanda ceklis (√) pada salah
satu kotak angka 1, 2, 3, 4, dan 5
Keterangan pengisian adalah sebagai berikut :
4
= Diperlukan
3
= Netral
2
= Tidak Diperlukan
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Alternatif Jawaban
Variabel
Item Pernyataan (Indikator)
1
2
3
4
5
Berikan jawaban yang paling tepat
terhadap pernyataan di bawah ini:
Responden di mohon untuk mengisi kuesioner di bawah ini dengan tingkat
kepentingan yang tersedia di tabel dengan memberi tanda ceklis (√) pada salah
satu kotak angka 1, 2, 3, 4 dan 5
Keterangan pengisian adalah sebagai berikut :
5
= Sangat Diperlukan
Universitas Sumatera Utara
3
= Netral
2
= Tidak Diperlukan
1
= Sangat Tidak Diperlukan
Alternatif Jawaban
Variabel
Item Pernyataan (Indikator)
1
2
3
4
5
Berikan jawaban yang paling tepat
terhadap pernyataan di bawah ini :
Universitas Sumatera Utara
1 = Sangat Tidak Diperlukan
Alternatif Jawaban
Variabel
Item Pernyataan (Indikator)
1
2
3
4
5
Berikan jawaban yang paling tepat
terhadap pernyataan di bawah ini:
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Responden di mohon untuk mengisi kuesioner di bawah ini dengan tingkat
kepentingan yang tersedia di tabel dengan memberi tanda ceklis (√) pada salah
satu kotak angka 1, 2, 3, 4, dan 5
2 = Tidak Didukung
1 = Sangat Tidak Didukung
Alternatif Jawaban
Variabel
Item Pernyataan (Indikator)
1
2
3
4
5
Berikan jawaban yang paling tepat
terhadap pernyataan di bawah ini :
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 2. Univariat
Statistics
Motivasi Motivasi
JKN Umur Pendidikan Pekerjaan Penghasilan instrinsik ekstrinsik
N
Valid
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
Missing
0
.36
.00
39
0
.26
.00
28
0
.31
.00
33
0
.23
.00
25
0
.23
.00
25
0
.34
.00
36
0
.27
.00
29
Mean
Median
Sum
Frequency Table
JKN
Valid
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Tidak
memanfaatkan
68
63.6
63.6
63.6
Memanfaatkan
39
36.4
36.4
100.0
Total
107
100.0
100.0
Umur
Valid
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
16-35
79
73.8
73.8
73.8
>36
28
26.2
26.2
100.0
Total
107
100.0
100.0
Pendidikan
Valid
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Pendidikan Dasar
74
69.2
69.2
69.2
Pendidikan Lanjutan
33
30.8
30.8
100.0
Total
107
100.0
100.0
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Pekerjaan
Valid
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Tidak bekerja
82
76.6
76.6
76.6
Bekerja
25
23.4
23.4
100.0
Total
107
100.0
100.0
Penghasilan
Valid
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Rendah
82
76.6
76.6
76.6
Tinggi
25
23.4
23.4
100.0
Total
107
100.0
100.0
Motivasi Intrinsik
Valid
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Kurang
71
66.4
66.4
66.4
Baik
36
33.6
33.6
100.0
Total
107
100.0
100.0
Motivasi Ekstrinsik
Valid
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Kurang
78
72.9
72.9
72.9
Baik
29
27.1
27.1
100.0
Total
107
100.0
100.0
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 3. Bivariat
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Missing
N
Percent
Valid
N
Percent
Umur * JKN
Pendidikan * JKN
Pekerjaan * JKN
Penghasilan * JKN
Motivasi Instrinsik * JKN
Motivasi Ekstrinsik * JKN
107
107
107
107
107
107
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0%
.0%
.0%
.0%
.0%
.0%
Total
N
Percent
107
107
107
107
107
107
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Umur * JKN
Crosstab
JKN
Umur
16-35
>36
Total
Tidak
memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan
Total
56
23
79
% within umur
70.9%
29.1%
100.0%
% within JKN
82.4%
59.0%
73.8%
% of Total
52.3%
21.5%
73.8%
12
16
28
% within umur
42.9%
57.1%
100.0%
% within JKN
17.6%
41.0%
26.2%
% of Total
Count
% within umur
% within JKN
% of Total
11.2%
68
63.6%
100.0%
63.6%
15.0%
39
36.4%
100.0%
36.4%
26.2%
107
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Count
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
7.011a
1
.008
b
Continuity Correction
5.854
1
.016
Likelihood Ratio
6.831
1
.009
Fisher's Exact Test
.012
.008
Linear-by-Linear
6.946
1
.008
Association
N of Valid Casesb
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.21.
Pendidikan * JKN
Crosstab
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan
Pendidikan Pendidikan Dasar Count
Pendidikan
Lanjutan
Total
55
19
Total
74
% within
pendidikan
74.3%
25.7% 100.0%
% within JKN
80.9%
48.7%
69.2%
% of Total
51.4%
17.8%
69.2%
13
20
33
Count
% within
pendidikan
39.4%
60.6% 100.0%
% within JKN
19.1%
51.3%
30.8%
% of Total
Count
% within
pendidikan
% within JKN
% of Total
12.1%
68
18.7%
39
30.8%
107
63.6%
36.4% 100.0%
100.0%
63.6%
100.0% 100.0%
36.4% 100.0%
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
12.022a
1
.001
Continuity Correction
10.561
1
.001
Likelihood Ratio
11.817
1
.001
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
11.909
N of Valid Casesb
107
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.001
.001
.001
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.03.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Pekerjaan * JKN
Crosstab
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan
Pekerjaan Tidak bekerja Count
Bekerja
58
24
82
% within
pekerjaan
70.7%
29.3%
100.0%
% within JKN
85.3%
61.5%
76.6%
% of Total
54.2%
22.4%
76.6%
10
15
25
% within
pekerjaan
40.0%
60.0%
100.0%
% within JKN
14.7%
38.5%
23.4%
% of Total
Count
% within
pekerjaan
% within JKN
% of Total
9.3%
68
14.0%
39
23.4%
107
63.6%
36.4%
100.0%
100.0%
63.6%
100.0%
36.4%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Total
Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1(2-sided)
sided)
sided)
Df
7.812a
1
.005
Continuity Correction
6.541
1
.011
Likelihood Ratio
7.580
1
.006
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
.008
7.739
1
.006
.005
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.11.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Penghasilan * JKN
Crosstab
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan
Penghasilan Rendah Count
Tinggi
58
24
82
% within penghasilan
70.7%
29.3%
100.0%
% within JKN
85.3%
61.5%
76.6%
% of Total
54.2%
22.4%
76.6%
10
15
25
% within penghasilan
40.0%
60.0%
100.0%
% within JKN
14.7%
38.5%
23.4%
9.3%
14.0%
23.4%
68
39
107
63.6%
100.0%
63.6%
36.4%
100.0%
36.4%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
% of Total
Count
Total
Total
% within penghasilan
% within JKN
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1(2-sided)
sided)
sided)
Value
df
7.812
a
1
.005
Continuity Correction
6.541
1
.011
Likelihood Ratio
7.580
1
.006
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Fisher's Exact Test
.008
Linear-by-Linear
Association
7.739
N of Valid Casesb
107
1
.006
.005
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.11.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Motivasi Intrinsik * JKN
Crosstab
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan
Motivasi
intrinsik
Kurang Count
Baik
Total
Total
52
19
71
% within motivasi
intrinsik
73.2%
26.8%
100.0%
% within JKN
76.5%
48.7%
66.4%
% of Total
48.6%
17.8%
66.4%
16
20
36
% within motivasi
intrinsik
44.4%
55.6%
100.0%
% within JKN
23.5%
51.3%
33.6%
% of Total
Count
% within motivasi
intrinsik
% within JKN
% of Total
15.0%
68
18.7%
39
33.6%
107
63.6%
36.4%
100.0%
100.0%
63.6%
100.0%
36.4%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
(2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Value
df
8.551
a
1
.003
Continuity Correction
7.353
1
.007
Likelihood Ratio
8.431
1
.004
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Fisher's Exact Test
.005
Linear-by-Linear
Association
8.471
N of Valid Casesb
107
1
.004
.004
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.12.
b. Computed only for a 2x2
table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Motivasi Ekstrinsik * JKN
Crosstab
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan
Motivasi
ekstrinsik
Kurang Count
Baik
Total
Total
56
22
78
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
71.8%
28.2%
100.0%
% within JKN
82.4%
56.4%
72.9%
% of Total
52.3%
20.6%
72.9%
12
17
29
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
41.4%
58.6%
100.0%
% within JKN
17.6%
43.6%
27.1%
% of Total
Count
11.2%
15.9%
27.1%
68
39
107
63.6%
36.4%
100.0%
100.0%
63.6%
100.0%
36.4%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
% within JKN
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
8.443a
1
.004
b
Continuity Correction 7.181
1
.007
Likelihood Ratio
8.237
1
.004
Fisher's Exact Test
.006
.004
Linear-by-Linear
8.364
1
.004
Association
N of Valid Casesb
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.57.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 4. Kolinaritas
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Valid
N
Percent
Pendidikan * Umur
Pekerjaan * Umur
Penghasilan *Umur
Motivasi intrinsik*
Umur
Motivasi ekstrinsik*
Umur
Cases
Missing
N
Percent
Total
N
Percent
107
107
107
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
0
0
0
.0%
.0%
.0%
107
107
107
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
>36
Total
Pendidikan * Umur
Crosstab
Umur
16-35
Pendidikan Pendidikan Dasar Count
Pendidikan
Lanjutan
Total
60
14
74
% within pendidikan
81.1%
18.9%
100.0%
% within umur
75.9%
50.0%
69.2%
% of Total
56.1%
13.1%
69.2%
19
14
33
% within pendidikan
57.6%
42.4%
100.0%
% within umur
24.1%
50.0%
30.8%
% of Total
Count
17.8%
13.1%
30.8%
79
28
107
73.8%
100.0%
73.8%
26.2%
100.0%
26.2%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
% within pendidikan
% within umur
% of Total
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
6.526a
1
.011
Continuity Correction
5.367
1
.021
Likelihood Ratio
6.235
1
.013
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.017
.011
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
6.465
1
.011
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
8.64.
b. Computed only for a 2x2
table
Pekerjaan * Umur
Crosstab
Umur
16-35
Pekerjaan Tidak bekerja Count
Bekerja
Total
>36
Total
27
13
40
% within pekerjaan
67.5%
32.5%
100.0%
% within umur
34.2%
46.4%
37.4%
% of Total
25.2%
12.1%
37.4%
52
15
67
% within pekerjaan
77.6%
22.4%
100.0%
% within umur
65.8%
53.6%
62.6%
% of Total
Count
48.6%
14.0%
62.6%
79
28
107
73.8%
100.0%
73.8%
26.2%
100.0%
26.2%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
% within pekerjaan
% within umur
% of Total
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
1.326a
1
.250
Continuity Correction
.854
1
.355
Likelihood Ratio
1.305
1
.253
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.265
.177
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
1.313
1
.252
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
10.47.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Penghasilan * Umur
Crosstab
Umur
16-35
Penghasilan
Rendah
Tinggi
Count
Total
73
9
82
% within penghasilan
89.0%
11.0%
100.0%
% within umur
92.4%
32.1%
76.6%
% of Total
68.2%
8.4%
76.6%
6
19
25
24.0%
76.0%
100.0%
% within umur
7.6%
67.9%
23.4%
% of Total
Count
5.6%
17.8%
23.4%
79
28
107
73.8%
100.0%
73.8%
26.2%
100.0%
26.2%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
% within penghasilan
Total
>36
% within penghasilan
% within umur
% of Total
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
41.928a
1
.000
Continuity Correctionb 38.630
1
.000
Likelihood Ratio
1
.000
Pearson Chi-Square
38.710
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.000
.000
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
41.536
1
.000
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
6.54.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Motivasi intrinsik * Umur
Crosstab
Umur
16-35
Motivasi intrinsik
Kurang
Baik
Total
Count
>36
Total
30
8
38
% within motivasi
intrinsik
78.9%
21.1%
100.0%
% within umur
38.0%
28.6%
35.5%
% of Total
28.0%
7.5%
35.5%
49
20
69
% within motivasi
intrinsik
71.0%
29.0%
100.0%
% within umur
62.0%
71.4%
64.5%
% of Total
Count
45.8%
18.7%
64.5%
79
28
107
73.8%
26.2%
100.0%
100.0%
73.8%
100.0%
26.2%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
% within motivasi
intrinsik
% within umur
% of Total
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.798a
1
.372
Continuity Correction
.440
1
.507
Likelihood Ratio
.816
1
.366
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.492
.256
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
.791
1
.374
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
9.94.
b. Computed only for a 2x2
table
Motivasi ekstrinsik * Umur
Crosstab
Umur
16-35
Motivasi Kurang
ekstrinsik
Baik
Total
Count
>36
Total
32
9
41
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
78.0%
22.0%
100.0%
% within umur
40.5%
32.1%
38.3%
% of Total
29.9%
8.4%
38.3%
47
19
66
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
71.2%
28.8%
100.0%
% within umur
59.5%
67.9%
61.7%
% of Total
Count
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
% within umur
% of Total
43.9%
79
17.8%
28
61.7%
107
73.8%
26.2%
100.0%
100.0%
73.8%
100.0%
26.2%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.612a
1
.434
Continuity Correction
.309
1
.578
Likelihood Ratio
.622
1
.430
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
.606
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.502
.291
.436
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
10.73.
b. Computed only for a 2x2
table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Valid
N
Percent
Pekerjaan * Pendidikan
Penghasilan *
Pendidikan
Motivasi intrinsik *
Pendidikan
Motivasi ekstrinsik *
Pendidikan
Cases
Missing
N
Percent
Total
N
Percent
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
Pekerjaan * Pendidikan
Crosstab
Pendidikan
Pendidikan Pendidikan
Dasar
Lanjutan
Pekerjaan Tidak bekerja Count
% within pekerjaan
% within pendidikan
% of Total
Bekerja
Count
% within pekerjaan
% within pendidikan
% of Total
Total
Count
% within pekerjaan
% within pendidikan
% of Total
Total
22
18
40
55.0%
45.0%
100.0%
29.7%
54.5%
37.4%
20.6%
16.8%
37.4%
52
15
67
77.6%
22.4%
100.0%
70.3%
45.5%
62.6%
48.6%
14.0%
62.6%
74
69.2%
100.0%
69.2%
33
30.8%
100.0%
30.8%
107
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
6.004
a
1
.014
Continuity Correction
4.991
1
.025
Likelihood Ratio
5.905
1
.015
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.018
.013
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
5.948
1
.015
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
12.34.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Penghasilan * Pendidikan
Crosstab
Pendidikan
Pendidikan
Dasar
Penghasilan Rendah Count
Total
65
17
82
% within penghasilan
79.3%
20.7%
100.0%
% within pendidikan
87.8%
51.5%
76.6%
% of Total
60.7%
15.9%
76.6%
9
16
25
% within penghasilan
36.0%
64.0%
100.0%
% within pendidikan
12.2%
48.5%
23.4%
% of Total
Count
% within penghasilan
% within pendidikan
% of Total
8.4%
74
69.2%
100.0%
69.2%
15.0%
33
30.8%
100.0%
30.8%
23.4%
107
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Tinggi Count
Total
Pendidikan
Lanjutan
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
16.816
a
1
.000
Continuity Correction
14.849
1
.000
Likelihood Ratio
15.841
1
.000
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.000
.000
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
16.659
1
.000
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
7.71.
b. Computed only for a 2x2
table
Motivasi intrinsik * Pendidikan
Crosstab
Pendidikan
Pendidikan
Dasar
Motivasi Kurang
intrinsik
Baik
Total
Count
Pendidikan
Lanjutan
26
12
Total
38
% within motivasi intrinsik
68.4%
31.6% 100.0%
% within pendidikan
35.1%
36.4% 35.5%
% of Total
24.3%
11.2% 35.5%
Count
48
21
69
% within motivasi intrinsik
69.6%
30.4% 100.0%
% within pendidikan
64.9%
63.6% 64.5%
% of Total
Count
% within motivasi intrinsik
% within pendidikan
% of Total
44.9%
74
69.2%
100.0%
69.2%
19.6%
33
30.8%
100.0%
30.8%
64.5%
107
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
.015a
1
.902
Continuity Correctionb
.000
1
1.000
Likelihood Ratio
.015
1
.902
Fisher's Exact Test
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
1.000
.535
Linear-by-Linear
.015
1
.903
Association
N of Valid Casesb
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
11.72.
b. Computed only for a 2x2
tabel
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Motivasi ekstrinsik * Pendidikan
Crosstab
Pendidikan
Pendidikan Pendidikan
Dasar
Lanjutan Total
Motivasi ekstrinsik Kurang Count
Baik
Total
30
11
41
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
73.2%
26.8% 100.0%
% within
pendidikan
40.5%
33.3% 38.3%
% of Total
28.0%
10.3% 38.3%
Count
44
22
66
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
66.7%
33.3% 100.0%
% within
pendidikan
59.5%
66.7% 61.7%
41.1%
74
20.6% 61.7%
33
107
69.2%
30.8% 100.0%
100.0%
100.0% 100.0%
69.2%
30.8% 100.0%
% of Total
Count
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
% within
pendidikan
% of Total
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
.502a
1
.479
Continuity Correctionb
.243
1
.622
Likelihood Ratio
.507
1
.476
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
.497
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.525
.313
.481
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
12.64.
b. Computed only for a 2x2
table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Valid
N
Percent
Penghasilan * Pekerjaan
Motivasi intrinsik *
Pekerjaan
Motivasi ekstrinsik *
Pekerjaan
Cases
Missing
N
Percent
Total
N
Percent
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
Penghasilan * Pekerjaan
Crosstab
Pekerjaan
Tidak
bekerja
Penghasilan
Rendah Count
Tinggi
Total
Bekerja
Total
29
53
82
% within penghasilan
35.4%
64.6%
100.0%
% within pekerjaan
72.5%
79.1%
76.6%
% of Total
27.1%
49.5%
76.6%
11
14
25
% within penghasilan
44.0%
56.0%
100.0%
% within pekerjaan
27.5%
20.9%
23.4%
% of Total
Count
10.3%
13.1%
23.4%
40
67
107
37.4%
100.0%
37.4%
62.6%
100.0%
62.6%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
% within penghasilan
% within pekerjaan
% of Total
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
.610a
1
.435
Continuity Correctionb
.297
1
.586
Likelihood Ratio
.602
1
.438
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
.604
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.483
.291
.437
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
9.35.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Motivasi intrinsik * Pekerjaan
Crosstab
Pekerjaan
Tidak bekerja Bekerja
Motivasi intrinsik
Kurang
Baik
Total
Count
11
27
Total
38
% within motivasi
intrinsik
28.9%
71.1% 100.0%
% within pekerjaan
27.5%
40.3% 35.5%
% of Total
10.3%
25.2% 35.5%
Count
29
40
69
% within motivasi
intrinsik
42.0%
58.0% 100.0%
% within pekerjaan
72.5%
59.7% 64.5%
% of Total
Count
% within motivasi
intrinsik
% within pekerjaan
% of Total
27.1%
40
37.4% 64.5%
67
107
37.4%
62.6% 100.0%
100.0%
37.4%
100.0% 100.0%
62.6% 100.0%
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square
1.791
1
.181
b
Continuity Correction
1.276
1
.259
Likelihood Ratio
1.825
1
.177
Fisher's Exact Test
.214
.129
Linear-by-Linear
1.775
1
.183
Association
N of Valid Casesb
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
14.21.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Motivasi ekstrinsik * Pekerjaan
Crosstab
Pekerjaan
Tidak
bekerja
Motivasi ekstrinsik Kurang Count
Baik
Total
Bekerja
Total
17
24
41
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
41.5%
58.5%
100.0%
% within pekerjaan
42.5%
35.8%
38.3%
% of Total
15.9%
22.4%
38.3%
23
43
66
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
34.8%
65.2%
100.0%
% within pekerjaan
57.5%
64.2%
61.7%
% of Total
Count
21.5%
40.2%
61.7%
40
67
107
37.4%
62.6%
100.0%
100.0%
37.4%
100.0%
62.6%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
% within pekerjaan
% of Total
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.473a
1
.492
Continuity Correction
.232
1
.630
Likelihood Ratio
.471
1
.493
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
.468
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.541
.314
.494
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
15.33.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
Missing
Total
N
Percent
N
Percent
N
Percent
Motivasi intrinsik *
Penghasilan
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
Motivasi ekstrinsik *
Penghasilan
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
Motivasi intrinsik * Penghasilan
Crosstab
Penghasilan
Rendah
Motivasi intrinsik Kurang Count
Baik
Total
Tinggi
Total
30
8
38
% within motivasi
intrinsik
78.9%
21.1%
100.0%
% within penghasilan
36.6%
32.0%
35.5%
% of Total
28.0%
7.5%
35.5%
52
17
69
% within motivasi
intrinsik
75.4%
24.6%
100.0%
% within penghasilan
63.4%
68.0%
64.5%
% of Total
Count
48.6%
15.9%
64.5%
82
25
107
76.6%
23.4%
100.0%
100.0%
76.6%
100.0%
23.4%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
% within motivasi
intrinsik
% within penghasilan
% of Total
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square
.176
1
.675
b
Continuity Correction
.033
1
.857
Likelihood Ratio
.178
1
.673
Fisher's Exact Test
.813
.433
Linear-by-Linear
.174
1
.676
Association
N of Valid Casesb
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
8.88.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Motivasi ekstrinsik * Penghasilan
Crosstab
Penghasilan
Rendah
Motivasi ekstrinsik Kurang Count
Baik
Total
Tinggi
Total
33
8
41
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
80.5%
19.5%
100.0%
% within penghasilan
40.2%
32.0%
38.3%
% of Total
30.8%
7.5%
38.3%
49
17
66
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
74.2%
25.8%
100.0%
% within penghasilan
59.8%
68.0%
61.7%
% of Total
Count
45.8%
15.9%
61.7%
82
25
107
76.6%
23.4%
100.0%
100.0%
76.6%
100.0%
23.4%
100.0%
100.0%
Count
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
% within penghasilan
% of Total
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.551a
1
.458
Continuity Correction
.257
1
.612
Likelihood Ratio
.560
1
.454
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
.546
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.492
.309
.460
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
9.58.
b. Computed only for a 2x2
table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
Motivasi intrinsik *
Motivasi ekstrinsik
Missing
Total
N
Percent
N
Percent
N
Percent
107
100.0%
0
.0%
107
100.0%
Motivasi intrinsik * Motivasi ekstrinsik
Crosstab
Motivasi ekstrinsik
Kurang
Motivasi intrinsik
Kurang
Count
Total
1
Total
37
38
% within motivasi
intrinsik
2.6%
97.4% 100.0%
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
2.4%
56.1%
35.5%
.9%
34.6%
35.5%
40
29
69
% of Total
Baik
Baik
Count
% within motivasi
intrinsik
58.0%
42.0% 100.0%
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
97.6%
43.9%
64.5%
37.4%
27.1%
64.5%
41
66
107
% of Total
Count
% within motivasi
intrinsik
% within motivasi
ekstrinsik
% of Total
38.3%
61.7% 100.0%
100.0%
100.0% 100.0%
38.3%
61.7% 100.0%
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
31.751a
1
.000
Continuity Correction
29.453
1
.000
Likelihood Ratio
39.296
1
.000
Pearson Chi-Square
b
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb
31.454
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.000
.000
.000
107
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
14.56.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 5. Pemodelan
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Casesa
Selected Cases
Included in Analysis
N
Percent
107
100.0
0
.0
Missing Cases
Total
107
100.0
Unselected Cases
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value
Internal Value
Tidak memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan
0
1
Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Tablea,b
Predicted
JKN
Observed
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Step 0 JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
68
0
100.0
Memanfaatkan
39
0
.0
Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500
63.6
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Variables in the Equation
Step 0 Constant
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
-.556
.201
7.660
1
.006
.574
Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1
Chi-square
df
Sig.
Step
6.847
2
.033
Block
6.847
2
.033
Model
6.847
2
.033
Classification Tablea
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan
Observed
Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Step 1 JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
56
12
82.4
Memanfaatkan
23
16
41.0
Overall Percentage
a. The cut value is .500
67.3
Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
.054
.432
.016
1
.901
1.055
.452
2.464
1.184
.459 6.669
1
.010
3.269
1.330
8.030
Constant
-.926 .379 5.964
a. Variable(s) entered on Step 1: Pekerjaan,
Umur.
1
.015
.396
Step Pekerjaan
1a Umur
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Casesa
Selected Cases
Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
N
Percent
107
100.0
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
Unselected Cases
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value
Internal Value
Tidak memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan
0
1
Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Tablea,b
Predicted
JKN
Observed
Tidak
memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Step 0 JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
68
0
100.0
Memanfaatkan
39
0
.0
Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
63.6
b. The cut value is .500
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Variables in the Equation
Step 0 Constant
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
-.556
.201
7.660
1
.006
.574
Block 1: Method = Enter
Classification Tablea
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Observed
Step 1 JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan
56
12
82.4
Memanfaatkan
23
16
41.0
Overall Percentage
a. The cut value is .500
67.3
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1
Chi-square
df
Sig.
Step
6.849
2
.033
Block
6.849
2
.033
Model
6.849
2
.033
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
Step Motivasi intrinsik .058 .438 .018
1a
umur
1.172 .457 6.586
1
.894 1.060
1
.010 3.229 1.319 7.905
Constant
-.926 .369 6.289
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Motivasi
intrinsik, Umur.
1
.012
.450
2.500
.396
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
pUnweighted Casesa
Selected Cases Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
N
Percent
107
100.0
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
Unselected Cases
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value
Internal Value
Tidak memanfaatkan
0
Memanfaatkan
1
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Tablea,b
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Observed
Step 0 JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
68
0
100.0
Memanfaatkan
39
0
.0
Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500
63.6
Variables in the Equation
Step 0 Constant
B
S.E.
Wald
Df
Sig.
Exp(B)
-.556
.201
7.660
1
.006
.574
Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1
Chi-square
df
Sig.
Step
8.017
2
.018
Block
8.017
2
.018
Model
8.017
2
.018
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Classification Tablea
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Observed
Step 1 JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan
56
12
82.4
Memanfaatkan
23
16
41.0
Overall Percentage
a. The cut value is .500
67.3
Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
Motivasi
ekstrinsik
-.467
.429
1.182
1
.277
.627
Umur
1.231
.462
7.100
1
.008
3.426 1.385 8.475
Constant
-.623 .343 3.300
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Motivasi
ekstrinsik, Umur.
Logistic Regression
1
.069
.536
Step
1a
.270
1.455
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Casesa
Selected Cases
Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
N
Percent
107
100.0
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
Unselected Cases
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value
Internal Value
Tidak memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan
0
1
Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Tablea,b
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Observed
Step 0 JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
68
0
100.0
Memanfaatkan
39
0
.0
Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500
63.6
Variables in the Equation
Step
0
Constant
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
-.556
.201
7.660
1
.006
.574
Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1
Chi-square
df
Sig.
Step
11.996
2
.002
Block
11.996
2
.002
Model
11.996
2
.002
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Classification Tablea
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Observed
Step 1
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan
55
13
80.9
Memanfaatkan
19
20
51.3
Overall Percentage
a. The cut value is .500
70.1
Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Step
1a
B
S.E.
Wald
Df
Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
Motivasi
instrinsik
.190
.449
.178
1
.673
1.209
.501
pendidikan
1.499
.445
11.320
1
.001
4.477
1.870 10.719
.003
.305
Constant
-1.188 .402 8.740
1
a. Variable(s) entered on Step 1: Motivasi intrinsik,
Pendidikan.
2.915
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Casesa
Selected Cases
Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
N
Percent
107
100.0
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
Unselected Cases
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value
Internal Value
Tidak memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan
0
1
Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Tablea,b
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Observed
Step 0 JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
68
0
100.0
Memanfaatkan
39
0
.0
Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
63.6
b. The cut value is .500
Variables in the Equation
Step 0
Constant
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
-.556
.201
7.660
1
.006
.574
Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1
Chi-square
df
Sig.
Step
13.157
2
.001
Block
13.157
2
.001
Model
13.157
2
.001
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Classification Tablea
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Observed
Step 1 JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
55
13
80.9
Memanfaatkan
19
20
51.3
Overall Percentage
a. The cut value is .500
70.1
Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)
B
Step
1a
Motivasi
ekstrinsik
Pendidikan
-.510
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
Lower
Upper
.442 1.331
1
.249
.601
.253
1.428
11.74
1
1
.001
4.723
1.943
11.477
1
.030
.461
1.552 .453
Constant
-.775 .357 4.700
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Motivasi
ekstrinsik, Pendidikan.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Casesa
Selected Cases
Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
N
Percent
107
100.0
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
Unselected Cases
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value
Internal Value
Tidak memanfaatkan
0
Memanfaatkan
1
Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Tablea,b
Predicted
JKN
Observed
Step 0 JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Tidak
memanfaatkan
68
0
100.0
Memanfaatkan
39
0
.0
Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500
63.6
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Variables in the Equation
Step 0
Constant
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
-.556
.201
7.660
1
.006
.574
Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1
Chi-square
df
Sig.
Step
7.644
2
.022
Block
7.644
2
.022
Model
7.644
2
.022
Classification Tablea
Predicted
JKN
Observed
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Step 1 JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
58
10
85.3
Memanfaatkan
24
15
38.5
Overall Percentage
a. The cut value is .500
68.2
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)
B
Step
1a
Motivasi
intrinsik
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
.111
.439
.064
1
.800
1.118
.473
2.640
1.284
.475
7.294
1
.007
3.610
1.422
9.163
Constant
-.953
.373 6.543
1
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Motivasi intrinsik,
Penghasilan.
.011
.385
Penghasilan
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Casesa
Selected Cases
Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
N
Percent
107
100.0
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
Unselected Cases
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value
Internal Value
Tidak memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan
0
1
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Tablea,b
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Observed
Step 0
JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
68
0
100.0
Memanfaatkan
39
0
.0
Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500
63.6
Variables in the Equation
Step 0
Constant
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
-.556
.201
7.660
1
.006
.574
Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1
Chi-square
df
Sig.
Step
8.775
2
.012
Block
8.775
2
.012
Model
8.775
2
.012
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Classification Tablea
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Observed
Step 1
JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
58
10
85.3
Memanfaatkan
24
15
38.5
Overall Percentage
a. The cut value is .500
68.2
Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Step
1a
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
Motivasi
ekstrinsik
-.470
.431
1.191
1
.275
.625
.269
Penghasilan
1.343
.482
7.759
1
.005
3.830
1.489 9.853
.072
.542
Constant
-.612 .341 3.229
1
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Motivasi ekstrinsik,
Penghasilan.
1.454
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 6. Pemeriksaan Interaksi
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Casesa
Selected Cases
Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
N
Percent
107
100.0
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
Unselected Cases
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value
Internal Value
Tidak memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan
0
1
Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Tablea,b
Predicted
JKN
Observed
Step 0
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Tidak
memanfaatkan
68
0
100.0
Memanfaatkan
39
0
.0
Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500
63.6
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Variables in the Equation
Step 0 Constant
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
-.556
.201
7.660
1
.006
.574
Score
df
Sig.
12.022
1
.001
.722
1
.396
3.916
1
.048
13.476
3
.004
Variables not in the Equation
Step 0
Variables
Pendidikan
Motivasi ekstrinsik
Motivasi ekstrinsik
Pendidikan
Overall Statistics
by
Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1
Chi-square
df
Sig.
Step
13.351
3
.004
Block
13.351
3
.004
Model
13.351
3
.004
Model Summary
Step
-2 Log likelihood
Cox & Snell R Square
Nagelkerke R Square
1
127.024a
.117
.161
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 4 because parameter estimates changed
by less than .001.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Classification Tablea
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Percentage Correct
Observed
Step 1
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan
55
13
80.9
Memanfaatkan
19
20
51.3
Overall Percentage
a. The cut value is .500
70.1
Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Step
1a
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B) Lower Upper
Pendidikan
1.828
.786
5.416
1
.020
6.222 1.334 29.013
Motivasi
ekstrinsik
-.376
.537
.492
1
.483
.686
.240
1.965
Motivasi
ekstrinsik by -.422
Pendidikan
.964
.192
1
.662
.656
.099
4.340
Constant
-.847 .398 4.523
1
.033
.429
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Pendidikan, Motivasi ekstrinsik,
Motivasi ekstrinsik * Pendidikan .
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 7. Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Casesa
Selected Cases
Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
N
Percent
107
100.0
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
Unselected Cases
0
.0
Total
107
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value
Internal Value
Tidak memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan
0
1
Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Tablea,b
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan
Percentage
Correct
Step 0 JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
68
0
100.0
Memanfaatkan
39
0
.0
Observed
Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500
63.6
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Variables in the Equation
Step 0 Constant
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
-.556
.201
7.660
1
.006
.574
Score
df
Sig.
12.022
1
.001
.722
1
.396
13.209
2
.001
Variables not in the Equation
Step 0
Variables
Pendidikan
Motivasi ekstrinsik
Overall Statistics
Block 1: Method = Backward Stepwise (Likelihood Ratio)
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1
Step 2
a
Chi-square
df
Sig.
Step
13.157
2
.001
Block
13.157
2
.001
Model
Step
13.157
2
.001
-1.340
1
.247
Block
11.817
1
.001
Model
11.817
1
.001
a. A negative Chi-squares value indicates that the Chi-squares value has decreased
from the previous step.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Model Summary
Step
-2 Log likelihood
Cox & Snell R Square
Nagelkerke R Square
a
1
127.218
.116
.158
a
2
128.558
.105
.143
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 4 because parameter estimates changed
by less than .001.
Classification Tablea
Predicted
JKN
Tidak
memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan
Percentage
Correct
Tidak
memanfaatkan
55
13
80.9
Memanfaatkan
19
20
51.3
Observed
Step 1 JKN
Overall Percentage
Step 2 JKN Tidak
memanfaatkan
Memanfaatkan
Overall Percentage
a. The cut value is .500
70.1
55
13
80.9
19
20
51.3
70.1
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)
B
Step Pendidikan
1a
Motivasi
ekstrinsik
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
1.552
.453 11.741
1
.001
4.723
1.943
11.477
-.510
.442
1
.249
.601
.253
1.428
1
1
1
.030
.001
.000
.461
4.453
.345
1.863
10.646
1.331
Constant
-.775 .357 4.700
Step Pendidikan 1.494 .445 11.283
2a
Constant
-1.063 .266 15.954
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Pendidikan,
Motivasi ekstrinsik.
Model if Term Removed
Variable
Step 1 Pendidikan
Motivasi
ekstrinsik
Step 2 Pendidikan
Model Log
Likelihood
Change in -2
Log Likelihood
df
Sig. of the
Change
-69.828
12.439
1
.000
-64.279
1.340
1
.247
-70.187
11.817
1
.001
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 8. Validitas dan Reliabelitas
Scale: All Variable
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
Excluded
a
N
%
30
100.0
0
.0
Total
30
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
100.0
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.894
15
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Scale Variance
Item Deleted if Item Deleted
Corrected
Item-Total
Correlation
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
Kebutuhan 1
34.17
108.557
.486
.891
Kebutuhan 2
34.77
110.116
.675
.886
Kebutuhan 3
33.87
107.292
.529
.889
Kebutuhan 4
33.53
101.982
.663
.883
Kebutuhan 5
34.13
106.395
.663
.884
Harapan 1
33.97
106.033
.485
.892
Harapan 2
33.40
105.352
.553
.888
Harapan 3
34.03
108.792
.451
.892
Harapan 4
33.80
106.510
.585
.887
Harapan 5
33.80
108.648
.544
.889
Minat 1
33.93
106.616
.486
.891
Minat 2
34.37
104.240
.608
.886
Minat 3
34.63
106.585
.673
.884
Minat 4
33.70
103.597
.670
.883
Minat 5
33.97
107.895
.575
.887
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Scale: All Variables
Case Processing Summary
Cases
N
%
Valid
30
100.0
Excludeda
0
.0
Total
30
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
100.0
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.854
5
Item-Total Statistics
d1
d2
d3
d4
d5
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance
if Item Deleted
Corrected
Item-Total
Correlation
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
9.30
9.70
9.57
9.00
9.10
11.803
11.597
14.392
11.724
12.093
.681
.742
.506
.672
.747
.820
.803
.861
.824
.804
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Master Data
JKN
No Res
Memanfaatkan
1
KAT
UMUR
KAT
PENDIDIKAN
KAT
PEKERJAAN
KAT
PENGHASILAN
1
36
1
SMA
1
WIRASWASTA
1
>1.600.000
tidak memanfaaatkan
Memanfaatkan
2
tidak memanfaaatkan
0
37
1
S1
1
IRT
0
>1.600.000
3
tidak memanfaaatkan
0
38
1
AKADEMI
1
PEGAWAISWASTA
1
>1.600.00
4
Memanfaatkan
1
37
1
SMA
1
WIRASWASTA
1
>1.600.000
5
Memanfaatkan
1
39
1
SMP
0
WIRASWASTA
1
>1.600.000
WIRASWASTA
1
>1.600.000
6
tidak memanfaaatkan
0
38
1
SMP
0
7
tidak memanfaaatkan
0
22
0
SMA
1
IRT
0
1.600.000
9
tidak memanfaaatkan
0
25
0
AKADEMI
1
IRT
0
1.600.000
0
21
0
SMP
0
IRT
0