AN ANALYSIS OF METAPHOR IN CRADLE OF FILTH'S SONG LYRICS.
AN ANALYSIS QF META?TioR
IN CR,{DIE O]''1'?{ S SONG LYRICS
SubhAL.t in Panitl
Futilndl
oJlh.
gtujono
Requirtutlot
sdn
th. D.Ere
f,NCLISIt DEPARTMEi'T - FACULTY OF LTTTERS
AND{AS iJNI!'ERSTTY
}ADANG
ol
D.lam skipsi nri. penuh ncnbals penggmM mctalbra drlm hnk
lagu, larena lnik ke! nerupaks salan salu bcntuk karla sstra. Tuliff if,i
benbku kepada lip€'lipe da Darm mclalifa ydg €rdapat dalm lirik laaD
mdk af lihh. t'qlA de\ p.nulise ini a.laLn menemukan tipe-lip€ nehlon
Landa(d teori tmB disunahm ddm ncngdalisis dan adalah teori ybg
dikenukals oleh Ldkolt & Johnen. Mcrka hcngmuka*d bahsa inti
metaldh adalan pengeni d penahme ses@d hal denAan me.eemaltur
nenah@an at hal lain. Densm dcnikian. nelalbh tidak haya uskane,
ndun jusa nrerupake konep pcmikiro ndusia. Deid6ar*d
kodeplualisi. Lahotl &
Johnson ncmbagi netatbE
raitu: otientatioul netapho\ odrtosical
keddm iga gdis
netaphoL dan
proscs
bcs!
etrctut ndqhor.
Ontoloaical netaphor dibasi nenjadi liga lipe, f^itu : s"bstance anl e tilr
netaphor. cortuike/ netaphor, dak p$ohilinhn Bcrdslr&u konsep i1uloh
sknFi ini dibut. Selsjubya penbalam malna neratbra rcBebur drMrkm
berdAarku konleks dan isi kesclumnb hgu, Ddu pensunpuld tlara p€nutis
mensaunahe metode obseryasi (leieamalan), dm dalm !€nBrnslisan iata
penulis mengeealM nel.de ellEnsial dd merode disribuional. Kenrudiar
hail dalhis disajikm dalm benllk kala-kala da didutus dengd lengsuntr
tllel unrk menpedeld hasil alisis,
Dalm ualisis y g dilakukM p.dd 13 lagu yeg dimbil scbalai datl
penuh nenenukan balwa/o^,,,:/i.dn, nerupakm jenis nolrldn ymg Flina
bdyak diguakd, yaitu denCm fi€lueNi 6 lemuc tu.Koudi4ori. tationo]
netaphor dak sbtctttul nduphor dense frekuensi 4 l.ductld. Sthidhc.
and entjt! etuphot .l^n cantat.r udrapr.. maing nsirA dcrge Ackuensi
Yang san4 3 kemunculan.
CHAPTER
1
l
The Bxclgmund of rhe Study
Lmrra8e is
as
I
a bad, cm
a
nedim in vhi.h
dprss lndnelves lhough it.
th€ir fecline, idea thousht
There
re $
ad
so
sonc Aoups ofpeople, such
someone or
By lmguaAe- p@plc cid express
fonh.
mmy ways to dpre$
or spokcn fom. &d song lync is one of
tftush
it
lmeMee, il can
be
Mift€n
Lyric is the languogc ol music in
which n cm rErrom bolh in spoken, by singine il md in wrinen. in tom otsons
Tre $ng lync can
be
res
ded as a
*orl ol liteBture
sincc it is a kird of an
ibm.
Hockctt ( 1953:553) s,id $at lilerarure h dhtinguished trom othg 0rr foms by thc
medim in Bhich n wo sr leeuage. Thc chracteristic oa lilealure is lh3r
conlains la.sua8e which is
difcienl lrcn ordinary lmguage usse
(1973:60) cxplained thal lilerary vrircrs have a habit
conventions of conmon sp€ech in questions of whal
de lappropnat. even whar is
1o
is
ir
Chapman
of going belon'l
lhe
c6ftecr', which choiccs
b. Essrded as conpehensible, d in olhei
Thc leAuasc cxniession uscd in a lireraJy v.rks is difleEff non rhc
everyday one
in shich n is sonelimes tgmtve. FiguEtive
l
Cuagc
is
a
ldguage expEssion wbose rhe meming is diferenl fron ils lilcnt onc, m{i
mehphor
h of its kind.
According 10
Chalrn
(t963:45) a nellphor is
u
expession
fi
in whicn a mrd or
ph6e d the concept repEsented nand
gdarilely fo. dother word .r phraie
two
lhi4s in which
lhe
fi6t thins
and ils
conept
11
is a
conpaJiso bclwEen
compared Io the scon,l dinss
indirtclly The
spcalcr or wrird uses meLphor ro meu sn€$nlg difetonl lrun ll,e lilcnl
D@ing, that tbe listene$ or €ades sbelch then imasination Ior mother
inierpElalion. Such mn
lned
m
inleruelalion of smtnccs
callcd mcraphor
(rronkin elal, 1990:230).
Mebthor h
a
lbguag€ cxtression in which people uF itlo exprcss iheir
ide!" leelin8, emolion, even
Ltr
fic ncanin8thai emeone Bes
influence emeonc s nind.
in mind lo the odre^. Wellcr
!
nnctioE to lr@sfcr
Enblcr in Kouler md
When se *ish lo say sonething aboui ouBclvcs oi ou c.ulomen! we
choose a vay of orderin8 oLU thoughls, a wry rhich will bc, we hopc
meminctul lo ou^clles d our Ustcn€*, a wry Bhich wilr dojusticc to thc
eaCcr .ctivity in ou ni.ds. Mctaphor apped to be a very efectiv€ way of
Tbllinr abour literar)
so s is ralkine ah.d
imtlied in it. The lbCuge ced in lnal
innuences rhe inrerpElarion
ofnearine trmsfeired ed bow
proccss
orund6lrndi.g,4 blolrstated
ad
meanine
especi.lly thc use of mclaploi
ol$e *orks ikllsu(e
process
l&CU.€e
metaphor concms witn rhc
the mctuing is cxpressed, so n affech rhe
in his papcr ( 200s
)
whal I md odres
lound is that mebphor llays a najor rcle in semulics.
The lyncs that the witer takes
of Ftlth. Cradle
d
Filth is
^
s
dara is the lyncs oa a
bdd nmed Cradle
bhck nelal band forned in SuFolk. Lnslmd in
1991.
Ilis
band is categorird
6
blacl nelal one since
Lhey
play
D
rtdly hL{vy
ne1.l. b€side their lyrical thenes and imagery e hcavily iinrencsl by go0tc
lncmtuc. pocty.
The
n'dolory
witer is inrere{ed
lound lhd $ey have a
d
homr filns.
ii
dal}zing this blnd
s lydcs because the
uiq@ style in {itins rheir lyrics
in
ol figuraiile lofrs in it. As se know, pcople assme $al
Cla.le
oJ Firh
a
^a
lnat they
se
*dl
u*
they
lbm to expre$
Rhat they
a
lot
! deol bdd, such rs
ttut\tal style in wilins then lyric bur in facr. rhc $aird
figurarive
m.ssaBe thcy
siich
Miter
loud
med in order to trasfer
dre
lo scnd lo dDir listcnc6 Bcsides. lnis scmc is lne nost
conmunicative wilh lhen listenes in express,ng lheir Lhouaht lnd i{leolo8y. ln
{ithin ihe nusic,
so rhai
do not oniy llslen 1o lhen husic but also 10 shst thcy say
h lhcn
addilio'r. it has nore enolive md poelic comunication
ficir lisre.e$
1.2
The ldcntificltion of Problem
This
Frrri
Esedh
sone lydcs
Atul thcr
ed aho
m
L wbal
lyiics
2.
is focused oD the analysis
ofnLlapbor
as
]nund in
aidile o/
its neanins.
two rcscdch qucsrions rclated to this oalysh, they
are rhe
fom of netaphot
s Latoffdd
wlal de
the
f.ud
mr
in i},e (radle ol Firh s sane
Joh.son proposed?
neming.ftb€ neraphor lound
nr ihe lyrics?
In rhis chapter. the
eng lyrics.
ner
thosc
otl
r
:ml}?ine thc dar. latcn 6om t3 engs
aiatys( ot ,nsraph..
ofaz/.rs,/F/rri
eng Llrici wilh
thc
mo{ peNena8e.6 ofrobt (cumccs Tl'o
^nd
etudxrul ?,!r4pr.r, c&h
.4 occurenc.s.
Jl,rr,r.,
oa$em.
Funhermorej thc inlcrpRhrion olrhe mcaning oi nclaphor in thir
Ihc
sr]
ihey
pa orrlzrb,ijtheqpeotmdaphormont}
tditr mlophat sd .a dret,"rarrol rnh :l mcurcncs 6ch
ba*d on
ii
rhar
the
orietu1i.h.l nerarhar
dtul
rhe rcsuh
witer linds
arc20olrhem.
Nd ii
sriier prcscna
rhe conlext
tyic 6
ol rhe son!. the line b.toE and atcr il. ln tac! mcbpho. is
used by thc song wrirer ro
exprcs his idea or ro cmphash hn$oushr [)
lhe lineneE. In inldrpreting rhe neaning of neiophoricat expE$io . rhe wirer
rh.uLd reler to thc {hole conrenl ofrhc song and rake thenr as a union ihai
influcnce ro each orher in order lo eel
t,Lnd
ho.
rt.
n
.n Cor
'
Thpho
,u
Finally, rhe wirer congludes rhar
thi5 case,Ih. netaphor has a Ercar
demslvcs lor tney pnvide
rhe
$c nght tnrerprdarion. Hcrc,
o.
'.etaphor
cfecr
mming
I.I e.i I .a
ro
rhe
wner
s.
docs exi$ in rnc
sng tyric. ln
lhc inrerpretation ofrhe son8 tyrics
thar rhe
witer inlendcd
ro
ey ii
a
p*lic
BIBLIOCRAPHY
Chapnm, Ray ond.l9T3 Linguittsdrd Ln.nnure: an inta.lrction
rl,lrir.a. Un iled States o I Am eric a: Wh ilehall Companl'
( h^mn, S.
11)68.
,1, intrcdu.liok ]D the lonxuE! .t
podrr
b li!..dt|
lJ.sron: Hargnnn
MiminConpa.y.
D Alan.2!011. (b8r,?ir. rirsrnrir.
Clmbidse tlnireEil] Press.
Croh. Willirm nnd Cruse,
Cmbrid-ae:
Clruf.l). Al!n. 200rl. ,UearDA in Lohqaage An ln1r.&!cti.n to\c dnicsahd
/'r"ArarLr Manche$er: Oxaord Univesitl lres.
Emblcr, wcller. I967. 'li!e meraphoA tion thc frodem rtpeno.y inGd)Rartrer
Konlerand Marlin Lisht. Tite r?/1zl,lwr.t. Donon: lloudtonMifln1
Fmnrknr. Vicioria et aU. 1984.
/h tnh-.lftthr
Austalil H.h Ri.ehan
to t,unlrun!? tJ\d
Aulruhu
tLt)
dnd Winsr.n
Gow, Cordon. 2001. ljd/ial ,i/d td"har nt lhe i:ork.f Mo^rall t tL&un
Canadian lounral of Connnnic.lnh vol.26. No L Rcricvcd lDrn
htpL
rwtit
ohtin
at jtettitb.php!4.Allelllt!!! Ilrll
tlockcr!F. Charlcs. 1958.,{ ai,u'st 11M.t1em
Ma.nrillm Conrpa.y.
Lihgtjii.\ Ncs \.tt:
l-akoli: Cieorec md JohnsoD. Mdk. l 9S0. Met plio6 Wo Llve
of Anoic.: rI. Unive^i!, olChicago l,rcss.
Br
the
l Jnircd
Sd.s
Lalofi. Cco+.. ?005. P,sro, P/Per an M.ta?hot A\^il^bL at
h , //vwv 6 nloz 4l/o.t/Tlt3i/tfil7 t09l ptt{
Leech,Ceollrey.1981 Sehahti!: the
LevnNon. a. Stcphcn.
nLlt oJh.ohihs (1r etl) Lonnan:tlg
1931.|'lsu!rtr.
MAKHallid.yddRuqaiyaHxtu
Cambndse: cmbndse Univcnit}
1985 LahA dhg., Coht.i, unn Te!t:
,1:pecls DlLang uKe in a Socel 5'. tdlic /rdr.\pz.rir.. lleakin: Deallin
IN CR,{DIE O]''1'?{ S SONG LYRICS
SubhAL.t in Panitl
Futilndl
oJlh.
gtujono
Requirtutlot
sdn
th. D.Ere
f,NCLISIt DEPARTMEi'T - FACULTY OF LTTTERS
AND{AS iJNI!'ERSTTY
}ADANG
ol
D.lam skipsi nri. penuh ncnbals penggmM mctalbra drlm hnk
lagu, larena lnik ke! nerupaks salan salu bcntuk karla sstra. Tuliff if,i
benbku kepada lip€'lipe da Darm mclalifa ydg €rdapat dalm lirik laaD
mdk af lihh. t'qlA de\ p.nulise ini a.laLn menemukan tipe-lip€ nehlon
Landa(d teori tmB disunahm ddm ncngdalisis dan adalah teori ybg
dikenukals oleh Ldkolt & Johnen. Mcrka hcngmuka*d bahsa inti
metaldh adalan pengeni d penahme ses@d hal denAan me.eemaltur
nenah@an at hal lain. Densm dcnikian. nelalbh tidak haya uskane,
ndun jusa nrerupake konep pcmikiro ndusia. Deid6ar*d
kodeplualisi. Lahotl &
Johnson ncmbagi netatbE
raitu: otientatioul netapho\ odrtosical
keddm iga gdis
netaphoL dan
proscs
bcs!
etrctut ndqhor.
Ontoloaical netaphor dibasi nenjadi liga lipe, f^itu : s"bstance anl e tilr
netaphor. cortuike/ netaphor, dak p$ohilinhn Bcrdslr&u konsep i1uloh
sknFi ini dibut. Selsjubya penbalam malna neratbra rcBebur drMrkm
berdAarku konleks dan isi kesclumnb hgu, Ddu pensunpuld tlara p€nutis
mensaunahe metode obseryasi (leieamalan), dm dalm !€nBrnslisan iata
penulis mengeealM nel.de ellEnsial dd merode disribuional. Kenrudiar
hail dalhis disajikm dalm benllk kala-kala da didutus dengd lengsuntr
tllel unrk menpedeld hasil alisis,
Dalm ualisis y g dilakukM p.dd 13 lagu yeg dimbil scbalai datl
penuh nenenukan balwa/o^,,,:/i.dn, nerupakm jenis nolrldn ymg Flina
bdyak diguakd, yaitu denCm fi€lueNi 6 lemuc tu.Koudi4ori. tationo]
netaphor dak sbtctttul nduphor dense frekuensi 4 l.ductld. Sthidhc.
and entjt! etuphot .l^n cantat.r udrapr.. maing nsirA dcrge Ackuensi
Yang san4 3 kemunculan.
CHAPTER
1
l
The Bxclgmund of rhe Study
Lmrra8e is
as
I
a bad, cm
a
nedim in vhi.h
dprss lndnelves lhough it.
th€ir fecline, idea thousht
There
re $
ad
so
sonc Aoups ofpeople, such
someone or
By lmguaAe- p@plc cid express
fonh.
mmy ways to dpre$
or spokcn fom. &d song lync is one of
tftush
it
lmeMee, il can
be
Mift€n
Lyric is the languogc ol music in
which n cm rErrom bolh in spoken, by singine il md in wrinen. in tom otsons
Tre $ng lync can
be
res
ded as a
*orl ol liteBture
sincc it is a kird of an
ibm.
Hockctt ( 1953:553) s,id $at lilerarure h dhtinguished trom othg 0rr foms by thc
medim in Bhich n wo sr leeuage. Thc chracteristic oa lilealure is lh3r
conlains la.sua8e which is
difcienl lrcn ordinary lmguage usse
(1973:60) cxplained thal lilerary vrircrs have a habit
conventions of conmon sp€ech in questions of whal
de lappropnat. even whar is
1o
is
ir
Chapman
of going belon'l
lhe
c6ftecr', which choiccs
b. Essrded as conpehensible, d in olhei
Thc leAuasc cxniession uscd in a lireraJy v.rks is difleEff non rhc
everyday one
in shich n is sonelimes tgmtve. FiguEtive
l
Cuagc
is
a
ldguage expEssion wbose rhe meming is diferenl fron ils lilcnt onc, m{i
mehphor
h of its kind.
According 10
Chalrn
(t963:45) a nellphor is
u
expession
fi
in whicn a mrd or
ph6e d the concept repEsented nand
gdarilely fo. dother word .r phraie
two
lhi4s in which
lhe
fi6t thins
and ils
conept
11
is a
conpaJiso bclwEen
compared Io the scon,l dinss
indirtclly The
spcalcr or wrird uses meLphor ro meu sn€$nlg difetonl lrun ll,e lilcnl
D@ing, that tbe listene$ or €ades sbelch then imasination Ior mother
inierpElalion. Such mn
lned
m
inleruelalion of smtnccs
callcd mcraphor
(rronkin elal, 1990:230).
Mebthor h
a
lbguag€ cxtression in which people uF itlo exprcss iheir
ide!" leelin8, emolion, even
Ltr
fic ncanin8thai emeone Bes
influence emeonc s nind.
in mind lo the odre^. Wellcr
!
nnctioE to lr@sfcr
Enblcr in Kouler md
When se *ish lo say sonething aboui ouBclvcs oi ou c.ulomen! we
choose a vay of orderin8 oLU thoughls, a wry rhich will bc, we hopc
meminctul lo ou^clles d our Ustcn€*, a wry Bhich wilr dojusticc to thc
eaCcr .ctivity in ou ni.ds. Mctaphor apped to be a very efectiv€ way of
Tbllinr abour literar)
so s is ralkine ah.d
imtlied in it. The lbCuge ced in lnal
innuences rhe inrerpElarion
ofnearine trmsfeired ed bow
proccss
orund6lrndi.g,4 blolrstated
ad
meanine
especi.lly thc use of mclaploi
ol$e *orks ikllsu(e
process
l&CU.€e
metaphor concms witn rhc
the mctuing is cxpressed, so n affech rhe
in his papcr ( 200s
)
whal I md odres
lound is that mebphor llays a najor rcle in semulics.
The lyncs that the witer takes
of Ftlth. Cradle
d
Filth is
^
s
dara is the lyncs oa a
bdd nmed Cradle
bhck nelal band forned in SuFolk. Lnslmd in
1991.
Ilis
band is categorird
6
blacl nelal one since
Lhey
play
D
rtdly hL{vy
ne1.l. b€side their lyrical thenes and imagery e hcavily iinrencsl by go0tc
lncmtuc. pocty.
The
n'dolory
witer is inrere{ed
lound lhd $ey have a
d
homr filns.
ii
dal}zing this blnd
s lydcs because the
uiq@ style in {itins rheir lyrics
in
ol figuraiile lofrs in it. As se know, pcople assme $al
Cla.le
oJ Firh
a
^a
lnat they
se
*dl
u*
they
lbm to expre$
Rhat they
a
lot
! deol bdd, such rs
ttut\tal style in wilins then lyric bur in facr. rhc $aird
figurarive
m.ssaBe thcy
siich
Miter
loud
med in order to trasfer
dre
lo scnd lo dDir listcnc6 Bcsides. lnis scmc is lne nost
conmunicative wilh lhen listenes in express,ng lheir Lhouaht lnd i{leolo8y. ln
{ithin ihe nusic,
so rhai
do not oniy llslen 1o lhen husic but also 10 shst thcy say
h lhcn
addilio'r. it has nore enolive md poelic comunication
ficir lisre.e$
1.2
The ldcntificltion of Problem
This
Frrri
Esedh
sone lydcs
Atul thcr
ed aho
m
L wbal
lyiics
2.
is focused oD the analysis
ofnLlapbor
as
]nund in
aidile o/
its neanins.
two rcscdch qucsrions rclated to this oalysh, they
are rhe
fom of netaphot
s Latoffdd
wlal de
the
f.ud
mr
in i},e (radle ol Firh s sane
Joh.son proposed?
neming.ftb€ neraphor lound
nr ihe lyrics?
In rhis chapter. the
eng lyrics.
ner
thosc
otl
r
:ml}?ine thc dar. latcn 6om t3 engs
aiatys( ot ,nsraph..
ofaz/.rs,/F/rri
eng Llrici wilh
thc
mo{ peNena8e.6 ofrobt (cumccs Tl'o
^nd
etudxrul ?,!r4pr.r, c&h
.4 occurenc.s.
Jl,rr,r.,
oa$em.
Funhermorej thc inlcrpRhrion olrhe mcaning oi nclaphor in thir
Ihc
sr]
ihey
pa orrlzrb,ijtheqpeotmdaphormont}
tditr mlophat sd .a dret,"rarrol rnh :l mcurcncs 6ch
ba*d on
ii
rhar
the
orietu1i.h.l nerarhar
dtul
rhe rcsuh
witer linds
arc20olrhem.
Nd ii
sriier prcscna
rhe conlext
tyic 6
ol rhe son!. the line b.toE and atcr il. ln tac! mcbpho. is
used by thc song wrirer ro
exprcs his idea or ro cmphash hn$oushr [)
lhe lineneE. In inldrpreting rhe neaning of neiophoricat expE$io . rhe wirer
rh.uLd reler to thc {hole conrenl ofrhc song and rake thenr as a union ihai
influcnce ro each orher in order lo eel
t,Lnd
ho.
rt.
n
.n Cor
'
Thpho
,u
Finally, rhe wirer congludes rhar
thi5 case,Ih. netaphor has a Ercar
demslvcs lor tney pnvide
rhe
$c nght tnrerprdarion. Hcrc,
o.
'.etaphor
cfecr
mming
I.I e.i I .a
ro
rhe
wner
s.
docs exi$ in rnc
sng tyric. ln
lhc inrerpretation ofrhe son8 tyrics
thar rhe
witer inlendcd
ro
ey ii
a
p*lic
BIBLIOCRAPHY
Chapnm, Ray ond.l9T3 Linguittsdrd Ln.nnure: an inta.lrction
rl,lrir.a. Un iled States o I Am eric a: Wh ilehall Companl'
( h^mn, S.
11)68.
,1, intrcdu.liok ]D the lonxuE! .t
podrr
b li!..dt|
lJ.sron: Hargnnn
MiminConpa.y.
D Alan.2!011. (b8r,?ir. rirsrnrir.
Clmbidse tlnireEil] Press.
Croh. Willirm nnd Cruse,
Cmbrid-ae:
Clruf.l). Al!n. 200rl. ,UearDA in Lohqaage An ln1r.&!cti.n to\c dnicsahd
/'r"ArarLr Manche$er: Oxaord Univesitl lres.
Emblcr, wcller. I967. 'li!e meraphoA tion thc frodem rtpeno.y inGd)Rartrer
Konlerand Marlin Lisht. Tite r?/1zl,lwr.t. Donon: lloudtonMifln1
Fmnrknr. Vicioria et aU. 1984.
/h tnh-.lftthr
Austalil H.h Ri.ehan
to t,unlrun!? tJ\d
Aulruhu
tLt)
dnd Winsr.n
Gow, Cordon. 2001. ljd/ial ,i/d td"har nt lhe i:ork.f Mo^rall t tL&un
Canadian lounral of Connnnic.lnh vol.26. No L Rcricvcd lDrn
htpL
rwtit
ohtin
at jtettitb.php!4.Allelllt!!! Ilrll
tlockcr!F. Charlcs. 1958.,{ ai,u'st 11M.t1em
Ma.nrillm Conrpa.y.
Lihgtjii.\ Ncs \.tt:
l-akoli: Cieorec md JohnsoD. Mdk. l 9S0. Met plio6 Wo Llve
of Anoic.: rI. Unive^i!, olChicago l,rcss.
Br
the
l Jnircd
Sd.s
Lalofi. Cco+.. ?005. P,sro, P/Per an M.ta?hot A\^il^bL at
h , //vwv 6 nloz 4l/o.t/Tlt3i/tfil7 t09l ptt{
Leech,Ceollrey.1981 Sehahti!: the
LevnNon. a. Stcphcn.
nLlt oJh.ohihs (1r etl) Lonnan:tlg
1931.|'lsu!rtr.
MAKHallid.yddRuqaiyaHxtu
Cambndse: cmbndse Univcnit}
1985 LahA dhg., Coht.i, unn Te!t:
,1:pecls DlLang uKe in a Socel 5'. tdlic /rdr.\pz.rir.. lleakin: Deallin