T1 112010155 Full text

Students’ Responses Through the Application of Cooperative Learning

Type Numbered Head Together (NHT) in Junior High School

THESIS

Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of

SarjanaPendidikan

Jelita Silaban

112010155

ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM

FACULTY OF LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE

SATYA WACANA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY

SALATIGA

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This thesis contains no such material as has been submitted for examination in any course or accepted for the fulfillment of any degree or diploma in any university. To the best of my knowledge and my belief, this contains no material previously published or written by any other person except where due reference is made in the text.

Copyright@2014. Jelita Silaban and Drs. Martha Nandari, M.A.

All rights reserved. No part of this thesis may be reproduced by any means without the permission of at least one of the copyright owners or the English Department, Faculty of Language and Literature, Satya Wacana Christian University, Salatiga. Jelita Silaban

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Cover Page i

Approval Page ii

Copyright Statement iii

Publication Agreement Declaration iv

Table of Content v

List of Table vi

List of Appendices vii

Abstract viii

Introduction

Background of the study 1-3

Relevant Studies Related to the Study 3

Aim of The Study 3

Significance of the Study 4

Theoretical Framework

Students’ Responses 5-7

Cooperative Learning 7-9

Numbered Head Together 9-12

The Study

Types of Research 13

Context of the Study 13-14

Participants of the Study 14

Data Collection Instrument 14-15

Data Collection Procedures 16-17

Data Analysis Procedures 17-18

Findings and Disscussion 18-37

Conclusion and Recommendation 37-40

References 41-42

Acknowledgements 43

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: Desired Responses (DRs) 16

Table 1a: Verbal Desired Response (VDRs) 18

Table 1b: NonVerbal Desired Response (NVDRs) 20

Table 1ba: Physical responses to the instruction and Physical responses to the material

21

Table 2: UnDesired Responses (UDRs) 26

Table 2a: Verbal UnDesired Responses (VUDRs) 27

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix 1: Observation table 36

Appendix 2: Interview Question 37

Appendix 3: Interview Result 38-41

Appendix 4: Observation Note 42-44

Appendix 5: List of DRs, UDRs, VRs, and NVRs 45-46

STUDENTS

’ RESPONSE

S THROUGH THE APPLICATION OF

COOPERATIVE LEARNING TYPE NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER

(NHT) IN THE ENGLISH CLASS OF THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS OF

SMPN 2 TUNTANG

Jelita Silaban

Abstract

This study investigated the students’ responses through the application of Numbered Head Together (NHT) in Junior High School. The participants were the VIIG class’ students and one English teacher. The data were collected using observations and semi-structured interview and analyzed and described it qualitatively. The data were categorized based on Borich’s classification of responses as cited in Muhammad (2014); they are Desired Responses (DRs), Undesired Responses (UDRs), Verbal Responses (VRs), and Non-Verbal Responses (NVRs). In this study, the researcher found both DRs and UDRs. The DRs showed by the students were paying attention to the teacher’s explanation and discussing the topic and the UDRs were walking around the class and disturbing their friends. Both DRs and UDRs were categorized into two groups, VRs and NVRs. The VRs of the students were discussing the topic and asking friend for the answer; NVRs of the students were standing and looking for their group quickly, taking notes, and reading handout. This method is helpful to motivate the students to be active. The UDRs were made by certain students who didn’t seem to be motivated to study. These students who did UDRs need a further study on their motivation and their family background.

INTRODUCTION

A.

Background of the study

Since English has become an international language, the uses and the needs for English are increasing from year to year. It has become one of the courses that is tested in the National Exam in Indonesia. To have an effective teaching and learning process, the teacher needs to develop and use appropriate materials, methods, and strategies. Brown (2000) defines learning as a process of acquiring or getting knowledge of a subject or skill by study, experience, or instruction and teaching as showing, helping, guiding, facilitating someone to learn something and making the learners understand what have been taught.

Discussing about English teaching-learning process, there is one thing that the teachers should remember, that is the interaction among the students. According to Johnson (1998), an interaction with other people is essential for human survival. It is the same in the English teaching-learning process, the teacher has to interact with the students and the students also have to have interactions with other students.

However, nowadays some learning process still focuses on the teacher (teacher-centered). The teachers talk in front of the class while the students are only sitting, listening to teacher, and taking notes Lie (2008). Looking to such case, educators have to use another method to teach the students; a method which

has to include students’ participation in the teaching-learning process in order to encourage students to be more active in class. The method is called cooperative learning. Lie (2008) also said that cooperative learning is a series of learning activities in the classroom emphasizing the concept of think together and work together in a small group (3-5 students). The results are expected to increase the student learning.

The cooperative learning model that the researcher was interested in was Numbered Heads Together strategy (NHT). According to Kagan (1992), NHT is a strategy that conditions the students to be able to integrate, draw conclusions from the results of diverse minds to exchange ideas or opinions among their peers in the group. In this model, students attempt to answer the question when his/her number is called randomly by the teacher. It could become a motivation for the students because they can obtain points not only for him/herself but also for the acquisition of the group. Therefore, the application of the strategy is expected to trigger NHT students to develop the knowledge and the results of their study. Gultom as cited in Anita and Rita (2004) argues that the application of Cooperative Learning NHT could enable students to be active in class and always be prepared for learning the class material and interact with friends in the group. Other scientists, Lie (2008) also revealed that the activity of interaction with friends in cooperative learning groups would encourage the students to form a synergy that benefits all students. In this study, the researcher tried to investigate

the implementation of NHT as the strategy to make students become active in the learning process. This study was also meant to know the students’ responses through the application of NHT strategy in their English learning process.

B. Relevant Studies Related to the Study

Kartiningrum (2007) in her research found that the application of cooperative learning NHT model in Seventh Grade Students of SMP 14 Semester II Pekalongan in the Academic Year 2005/2006 could improve the learning outcomes and student activities. Another research was done by Nisak (2013) to see the effectiveness of the application of NHT method to increase the study result of the 10th grade students in SMAN 9 Malang. _{The result of the study was} that the students’ study results were increasing. However, in those studies, the NHT strategies were not applied in the English language learning process. Therefore, this study was meant to know the students’ responses through the application of NHT strategy in English teaching.

C. Aim of the Study

The aim of the study is to find out the students’ responses in the learning process through Cooperative Learning using Numbered Head Together (NHT) strategy among the students in VIIG class of SMPN 2 Tuntang.

D. Significance of the Study

It is expected that this study could provide useful information about Cooperative Learning, especially Numbered Head Together strategy. It is also hoped that the result of this study could be helpful and could give knowledge or benefit to English teachers in Junior High School who wish to have active involvement of their students especially for those who are still using “teacher -centered” model in their learning process.

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

A. Students’ Responses

Students’ responses are the activities that the students do in the learning process. Students’ responses are important and will positively impact their performance. We can find many kinds of students’ responses when they are doing the learning process. For example, students are speaking or keeping silent when they are doing the learning process. Students’ noise and annoyance to other students could also be classified as the student’s response. The term of response here deals with behavior/attitude of students during the English teaching and learning process. According to McKechnie as cited in Muhammad (2014) response is an act or action of responding (as by an answer); a responsive or corresponding act or feeling, or a responding act to a motivating force or situation. Students’ response can be an action of movements that go into some complicated bit of behavior like walking, and closing the door.

Borich as cited in Muhammad (2014) that there are two kinds of students’ responses, the first is desired responses and the second is undesired responses. Those responses are seen from the point of view of the teacher. A desired response can be the response when the teacher “wants” certain activities to be done by the students and the students can fulfill it. Thus the response is desired by the teacher since it can support the teaching and learning process. On the other hand, an undesired response

is the response that is not desirable by the teacher since the response can destruct the teaching and learning process or the response is not related to the teaching and learning process. Borich as cited in Muhammad (2014) also states that responses typically are divided in verbal and nonverbal responses. A verbal response is when the students respond the teachers by the students’ utterance which can be answering or saying something, or when students are answering questions, performing speaking and chatting with friends. Whereas, a non verbal response is when students are paying attention, reading the book/handout, keeping silent, walking in the room, and disturbing other friends.

Borich as cited in Muhammad (2014) also stated that those types of response are also called positive responses and negative responses caused by their influence to the teaching and learning process. A positive response means that the response is desired by the teacher since it can support the teaching and learning process; while a negative response means that the response is not desired by the teacher since the response can destruct the teaching and learning process or the response is not related to the teaching and learning process.

However, Yelon as cited in Muhammad (2014) said that a response is not only desirable. If the students do not respond as the way the teacher ‘wants’, they are not indicated by the performance that they have learned. When students do show any response it doesn’t mean that the students did learn; we have no way of knowing whether learning has taken place. So, we need to evoke/rise students’ responses since

responses are essential in the teaching and learning process. The way to evoke the students’ response can be by using the effective learning strategy.

B. Cooperative Learning

1. Defining Cooperative Learning

Cooperative Learning is a series of learning strategy in the classroom. Cooperative Learning is one of the most widespread and fruitful areas of theory, research, and practice in education. According to Johnson (1998), Cooperative Learning exists when students work together to accomplish shared learning goals. Each student can achieve his or her learning goal if the other group members achieve theirs. It means that each student needs to cooperate with other students because Cooperative Learning is related to group learning. The emphasis of Cooperative Learning is the students need to learn and apply their knowledge, concepts, skills to the other students who need that. So it can be mutually beneficial among low-achieving students and high-low-achieving students (Lie, 2008).

2. Principles of Cooperative Learning

Cooperative Learning is one of the learning strategies that supports contextual learning. Cooperative Learning systems can be defined as a system of work or Cooperative Learning principles are arranged in a regular or structured way. According to Sanjaya as cited in Ibrahim (2000), there are four principles of Cooperative Learning, namely:

Tasks that can be resolved depends on the efforts of each member of the group

b. Individual responsibility.

Duty is a responsibility of every member of the group. The success of each group member is to complete the task.

c. Face to face interaction.

In cooperative learning, it is necessary to have a good interaction with each other.

d. Participation and communication.

Learning of cooperative training students to be able to actively participate and communicate

3. Types of Cooperative Learning

Even though the Cooperative Learning is not new in teaching and learning process as the teachers have applied for many years in the form of laboratory groups, task groups, group discussions, and so on, currently, researchers worldwide are studying the practical application of principles of cooperative learning. As a result, many cooperative learning models have been found. Some of the models described by Slavin (2009) are: Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD), Teams Games Together (TGT), and Jigsaw. In addition he also added a model Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) and Accelerated Team Instruction.

of cooperative learning that can be applied by teachers. The techniques are : 1) find a partner, 2) exchange a partner, 3) think in pairs foursome, 4) send greetings and questions, 5) head numbered, 6) heads numbered structured, 7) two lived two guests, 8) around the group, 9) buttons clatter, 10) around the classroom, 11) small circle big circle, 12) bamboo dance, 13) jigsaw, and 14) tells the story in pairs (paired storytelling).

NHT is a part of cooperative learning techniques with a structural approach. Developed by Kagan (1992)."Although it has many similarities with other strategies, structural model emphasizes the special structures designed to affect students' interaction patterns". Sugiyanto as cited in Suharsimi (2007 said that it is expected that students work together and help each other in small groups and more on cooperative awards and individual awards. The structural approach consists of some sorts such as: finding a partner, partner swapping, exchanging greetings and questions, storytelling in pairs, two lived two guests, roving groups, clattering studs, etc. From many various examples of structural approach, there are two kinds of well-known structures which are Think-Pair Share (TPS) and Numbered-Head Together (NHT).

C. Numbered Head Together (NHT)

Numbered Head Together (NHT) is one type of cooperative learning’s techniques that emphasizes the special structure that is designed to influence the pattern of interaction of students and has a goal to improve the academic mastery. This technique which was developed by Kagen, as cited in Ibrahim (2000), is to engage students in reviewing the material covered in the lesson and check their understanding of the lesson content. Students are grouped and each person is given a number (from one to the maximum number in each group). The teacher poses a question and students "put their heads together" with their group to figure out the answer. The teacher calls a specific number to respond as the spokesperson for the group. By having students work together in a group, this strategy ensures that each member knows the answer to problems or questions asked by the teacher. Each member must be prepared with the answer because no one knows which number will be called. In order to have a better understanding about NHT, the details about it could be explained as follow:

1. Important notes in NHT techniques

This technique is excellent for adding individual responsibility in group discussion. The numbering on the students will motivate each student to help and encourage each other in the learning process. Thus, they will prepare themselves with understanding the discussed material by forming an active role in the student learning

process. According to Lie (2008), "the head of teaching and learning techniques numbered (number of heads) provides the opportunity for students to exchange ideas and consider the most appropriate answer ". Furthermore, this technique also encourages students to enhance their spirit of cooperation. This can be used in all subjects and for all students’ age levels.

2. Steps in NHT

Lie (2008) suggests some steps to implement NHT in the classroom, as follow:

1. Students are divided into groups. Each student in the group gets the number. 2. Teacher gives assignments and each group can do it.

3. The group discusses the correct answers and ensures each member of the group can do/know the answer.

4. Teacher calls one student with numbers in order to report the results of their cooperation.

In addition, Trianto (2007), recommends the teacher to use a four phase structures as NHT syntax in applying the NHT strategies to the entire class, which are:

a. Phase 1 : Numbering

In this phase, the teacher divides students into groups of 3-5 people and to each member of the group is numbered from 1 to 5.

The teacher asks a question to the students. The question can be varied; It can be very general or specific. Teacher makes sure

everyone knows at least a way to describe the

answer/things/people/place. c. Phase 3 : Thinking with together

Students unite their opinion on the question and answer. Then they have to make sure that each member of the team knows the answer. d. Phase 4 : Answering

Teacher calls one particular number, and then student whose number is called will answer that question by discussing it before with his/her group member.

THE STUDY

A. Research Question

This study was conducted to answer the research question: What were the students’ responses through the application of Cooperative Learning type Number Head Together at the First Year Students of SMPN 2 Tuntang?

B. Type of Research

This study was a descriptive research to describe the behaviors and responses of the students over the use of Cooperative Learning using Numbered Head Together strategy. The researcher gathered data from the class activities and analyzed the data into descriptive qualitative report. The researcher provided more information specifically on the research instrument and the procedure applied in this study.

C. Context of the Study

To answer the research question above, the study was conducted at a State Junior High School (Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri II Tuntang, Kab. Semarang). This school was not a favorite school, which means that, according to the teacher, most of the students who enrolled in this school were the students who were not accepted to study at other schools. The teacher also said that most of the students were from middle and lower social classes and could be said that education wasn’t important for them. It could be proven by the participation of the parents to support their children.

Such as when the teacher was giving homework or an invitation letter to meet the class teacher, just some of the parents participated on this meeting and just some of the parents helped their children to do the homework.

By looking at the context above, the researcher was interested in knowing what the students’ responses were through the application of NHT strategy in this school.

D. Participants of the Study

The participants of this study were the 1st year of junior high school at SMPN II Tuntang, Kab. Semarang in the academic year of 2013-2014. There were 7 classes, which were labeled A-G. In the research, the researcher only took one class as the sample (class VIIG). This class consists of 35 (thirty five) students whose ages were between 12-13 years old. Based on the English teacher of the 1st year at this school, VIIG is the most passive students among all classes. That’s why the teacher prefers to apply the NHT strategy in this VIIG class as the way to make the students more active.

E. Data Collection Instruments

In collecting the data, the researcher used observation note and interview. Those two instruments could be further explained as follows:

1. Classroom Observation

Classroom observation was used to see the application of the model NHT learning and to determine the involvement of the students or the students’ responses during the learning process. The observation which was filled in during the learning process by the researcher can be found in Appendix 1. 2. Interview

To support the observation note, the researcher conducted a structured interview. The interview was held during the observation from February 17th until May 23rd 2014. There were two interviews. The first interview was with the English class teacher to gain information about students’ actitivies during the learning process and the second was interviewing 10 students from the class. The interview with the students was for gaining the information about the students’ responses when the teacher use Cooperative Learning using NHT technique in class. From those students, the researcher only took two students out of 10 students per observation to be interviewed straightly after the lesson. There are 5 questions for the teacher and 5 questions for the students. The interview questions were using Bahasa Indonesia as shown in Appendix 2.

F. Data Collection Procedures

The researcher passed numerous steps of research procedures, because the research took place in the formal institution. The research procedures as follow:

1. Planning.

Firstly, the researcher asked for permission from the Principal and the English teacher of the school to observe the learning process. Second, the researcher consulted and arranged the schedule with the English teacher to observe the learning process in the English class. The third was arranging the research instruments.

2. Actuating

In this second step, teacher implemented the NHT technique, while the researcher in this step acted as a passive participant who merely observed the learning process.

3. Observing

The researcher observed the class activity led by the teacher. The researcher observed the learning process by taking notes of everything that was happening during the learning process. The data gathered were according to the activities in class. The aspects being observed were the activities and the

instructions that were given by the teacher and the responses of students during the learning process.

4. Interviewing the students and teacher

In this step, the researcher interviewed 10 students after the learning process, during the break time. The interview was conducted 5 times and only 2 students were interviewed per observation. The researcher observed the learning process 6 times during the study. After interviewing the students, the researcher interviewed the teacher in her office. The lists of interview result are shown in Appendix 3.

5. Data Analysis Procedure

In analyzing the data, the researcher used Observation Method. It was done by writing down whatever got during the observation. Firstly, from the observation note in Appendix 4, the researcher categorized the responses into desired responses, undesired responses, verbal responses, and non verbal responses based on what Borich said as cited in Muhammad (2014) about responses. The list of Desire Response (DR), Undesired Response (UDR), Verbal Response (VR), and Non Verbal Response (NVR) are shown in Appendix 5.

As can be seen in Appendix 5, the researcher used a check list to help the researcher to analysis and then categorized the data again into 4 groups (in

Appendix 6). After the researcher categorized the responses, the researcher reviewed the results of the categorization. After all the data from the observation notes were gathered, then the researcher looked at the result of students’ and teacher’s interviews to gain more information about the students’ responses. Finally the researcher concluded and interpreted it. So the data were categorized, interpreted, and finally written in the form of narration.

FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

FINDINGS

The discussion of students’ responses toward the application of Cooperative Learning using Numbered Head Together (NHT) technique in the English classroom among the first year students of SMPN 2 Tuntang was based on notes of the observation which were collected through observation in class from February 17th until May 23rd 2014. The discussion would also becombined and related to the theory stated by Borich as cited in Muhammad (2014). From all the observation notes, the responses could be classified as Desired Responses (DR) and Undesired Responses (UDR) based on Borich’s as cited in Muhammad (2014) classification of students’ responses.

From all of the six observations done in the class activities, the researcher combined all of the results and found both Desired Responses (DR) and Undesired Responses (UDR) toward the activities given by the teacher. Those findings could be explained as below:

1. Desired Responses (DR)

As has been stated before, DR was the response when the teacher “wanted” certain activity to be done and the students could fulfill it; or the responses supported the teaching and learning process. The activities or the instructions that were given by the teacher during the learning process were based on the NHT step (written on page 8-9)

The DRs from the observation note can be described in the table below: Table 1.

Desired Responses (DR)

Activity or instruction given by the teacher

The Desired Response (DR) by the students

Teacher was numbering the students to form groups.

Standing and looking for their group quickly

Yelling “wey, tadi aku di group mana?”

Meaning: Hi guys, which one is my group?)

Teacher was delivering the material. Paying attention to the teacher (by looking at the teacher).

Opening and closing the book frequently.

Listening to the teacher carefully (by keeping silent and looking for the teacher).

Teacher was asking the students to think together.

Some students were having discussion.

Speaking up with the members of their group related to the topic. Busy of opening the dictionary.

Reading handout and writing notes.

Chatting with friends and laughing by looking at the handout.

Teacher was mentioning certain numbers to answer the question

Standing up quickly.

Quickly answering the question. Looking at her/his notes.

The table above shows us the DRs showed by the students. First when the teacher asked the students to form a group, some of the students were standing and looking for their group quickly and there were also some students who were yelling and said in Bahasa Indonesia, “Wey, tadi aku di group mana?(“Hi guys, which one is my group?”) while walking and looking for which groups they belonged to. Second when the teacher was delivering the material; some of the students were looking at the teacher and the others were opening and closing their books frequently. Those actions such as looking at the teacher and opening books indicated that the

students were paying attention to the teacher. The third DR which was also shown by some of the students was when the teacher was asking questions, the students were discussing it such as speaking and chatting, taking notes, opening a dictionary to look up the meaning of a certain word and some of them were reading their handouts. These actions showed that even the students were making noise but in this situation, the teacher ‘wanted’ these responses to be done by the students.

The fourth DR shown was when the teacher was asking the students to think together, some of the students were discussing with their friends or speaking up with the members of the group related to the topic. Whereas some students were busily opening their dictionary or reading handouts and writing notes, while the others were chatting with friends and laughing by looking at the handouts. The fifth DR was when the teacher was mentioning a certain number to answer the questions; the students were standing up quickly; some of them were quickly answering the question or just looking at her/his notes. All of those responses were desired by the teacher.

All these desired responses could be further classified into some sub-headings. The idea was also based on what Borich as cited in Muhammad’s journal (2014) said that both DRs and UDRs could be divided into verbal or non-verbal responses. A verbal response shown as DR is called as Verbal Desired Response (VDR), whereas Nonverbal DR is named NVDR. Further explanation about the differences of those two type of responses are as follows:

a. Verbal Desired Response (VDR) is when the students’ responses toward the teacher’s materials and instructions are shown by their verbal reactions such as answering questions or saying something, or performing speaking, and chatting with friends.

Yelling is a desired response that was found by the researcher. When the teacher was asking the students to form a group, some students were yelling and said “wey, tadi aku di group mana?” (“Hi guys, which one is my group?”). Some teachers might not want their students to be yelling during the class activity because students’ yelling might disturb other students and also other classes. However, in this context, such a response was VDR because the teacher was asking them to form a group and the students’ yelling was a way to find their group. The other observed VDR was the students’ discussing and speaking up with their group members or the students’ asking their friends about the answer, or their chatting with friends related to the topic. Those observed VDRs could be summarized in the following table: Table 1a.

Verbal Desired Responses (VDRs) Activity or instruction given by the teacher

Verbal Desire Responses Teacher numbering the students to

form groups.

Yelling “wey, tadi aku di group mana?” (“Hi guys, which one is my group?”) Teacher delivering the material

Discussing the topic

Speaking up with the members of their group related to the topic

Teacher asking questions Asking friends for the answer

Teacher ask the students to think together

The table above showed the VDRs that occurred during the activities in the learning process. The students’ responses were different according to the instruction given by the teacher. For example when the students were yelling while the teacher was delivering the materials; the teacher might not want this action to be done by the students because it might disturb the learning process and also disturb other students who focused on the material. Another content, the teacher might allow the students to yell if their yelling supports the learning process. Support the learning process means, they were yelling when the teacher was asking them to form a group. When the teacher was asking them to form a group, students’ yelling was desired by the teacher because it showed that they gave responses which were desired by the teacher. Yelling to form a group was classified as a desired response because in the step of NHT the students should form a group. From the observation, the students were forming the group and the way to form a group was yelling.

b. Non-Verbal Desired Responses (NVDRs). It is when the students were paying attention, reading the book/handout, keeping silent, walking in the room, and taking notes.

It is a physical gesture or response shown by the students that are desired by the teacher. The physical responses showed by the students during observation were standing and looking for their group quickly when the teacher asked them to form a group. This response was NVDR because they were standing and looking for the group using a physical response instead of using their verbal responses. In this situation, the teacher allowed the students to walk and stand because forming a group

needed some moving. Another situation, the teacher might not allow the students to walk or to stand because the teacher might be still explaining the material or it was not the time to form a group. Writing on their book was also showed by the students when the teacher was explaining the material. The NVDR could be seen from the table below.

Table 1b.

NonVerbal Desired Responses (NVDRs) Activity or instruction given by the teacher

NonVerbal Desired Responses (NVDRs) Teacher was numbering the students

to form groups.

Standing and looking for their group quickly

Writing on their book Teacher was delivering the material

Paying attention to the teacher (by looking at the teacher)

Taking notes

Opening and closing the book Reading handout

Teacher was asking questions Listening to the teacher carefully (by

keeping silent and looking for the teacher) Looking at her/his note

Taking notes Teacher was asking the students to do

discussion

Opening the dictionary

Reading handout and writing notes Teacher was mentioning a certain

number to answer the question

Quick response to the instructions (Standing up quickly)

Borrowing friend’s note

From the table above, the researcher classified the NVDRs into 2 groups. Those 2 NVDRs groups were named: Physical responses to the instruction and physical responses to the material. A physical response to the instruction is the response when the students get the instruction from the teacher while physical

responses to the material is the response that is shown by the students when the teacher is delivering the material related to the material/books/handout/notes. The responses can be seen as follows:

Table 1ba

Physical responses to the instruction and Physical responses to the material Activity or instruction given

by the teacher

Physical responses to the instruction

Physical responses to the material Teacher was numbering the

students to form groups.

Standing and looking for their group quickly

Writing on their book

Teacher was delivering the material

Paying attention to the teacher (by looking at the teacher)

Taking note

Opening and closing the book

Reading handout Listening to the teacher

carefully (by keeping silent and looking for the teacher)

Looking at her/his note

Taking note

Teacher was asking questions

Quick response to the instructions (Standing up quickly)

Opening the dictionary

Reading handout and writing notes

Borrowing friend’s note

Borrowing friend’s note

1. Physical desired responses to the instruction

As said above that this type of responses was the response when the students got the instruction from the teacher, such as asking the students to form a group. The responses that were found during the observation were the students standing and looking for their group by walking around the class. Some students also showed their physical responses to the instruction when the teacher called their number. The student whose number was called was standing up, raising their hand or coming forward quickly. Those actions such as walking and standing up were desired by the teacher because those responses support the learning process especially when the teacher called the number. In addition, keeping silent and just looking for their teacher when explaining could be also be classified as physical desire responses because sometimes those two responses were desired by the teacher, especially when the teacher was explaining the important points of the lesson; the students were supposed to be silent and paying attention to the teacher. Normally, the teacher assumed that the students were listening when they were keeping silent and sometimes looking at the teacher. However, there were also some students who learned and understood even he/she doesn’t look at the teacher when the teacher is explaining the lesson. For instance, from the observation, there was one student who was laying his head on the table when teacher was explaining the material. The teacher might not like such response but when

Therefore, it could be said that even when the students showed the response that was “unwanted” by the teacher but the students could answer the questions which was desired by the teacher. Another situation, the students’ silence might not be desired by the teacher especially when the teacher was asking them to discuss the topic. When discussing the topics, the teacher wanted the students to speak up and had discussion with their groups. From those situations, it could be seen that students’ responses depend on the situation that were happening during the learning process.

2. Physical desired responses to the material

This response is different with the previous one. This type of responses is related to the material/books/handout/notes used during the learning process. When teacher was delivering the material, some students were doing many different kinds of activities, such as writing or taking notes, and opening a dictionary. Some students were just reading the handout or their notes when the teacher called their number and asked them a question. These responses didn’t relate to any instruction from the teacher but the responses were still classified as DR because all the responses supported the learning process and were still related to the material.

2. Undesired Responses (UDRs)

An UDR is the response that is not related to the teaching and learning process or which destruct the teaching and learning process. It means the teacher doesn’t want the students to do such things. There are many kinds of UDRs, which

can affect the whole class, the group members or just affect themselves personally but still destruct the learning process.

The researcher found many UDRs showed by the students. Those responses could be affected by the students’ variety of social background. As it was written in the background of the study that the study was done at a school that is not a favorite one. According to the teachers, most of the students who entered the school were the students that were not accepted in other schools. In addition, the teacher also said that most of the students were from middle and lower social classes, so it could be said that education isn’t important for them. It could be proven by the low participation of the parents to support their children. Such as when the teacher gave homework or gave a letter of invitation to meet the class teacher, only some of the parents participated on this meeting and only some of the parents helped their children to do the homework.

The students’ family background that did not consider education important may explain the undesired responses given by the students. The UDRs found during the class activity for instance was when the teacher was asking the students to form a group; some students were just walking around the class without any purposes. This ‘walking’ could destruct or disturb their friends, whereas some students were not paying attention and were chatting with friends, instead. Another situation, the teacher might ask the students to walk if the context needed the students’ walking such as looking for their group. The other responses was also shown by the students

on the table and some of them were disturbing other friends by taking their friend’s note and there were some students tweaked their friend’s ear, scratched on the table and drew pictures such as animals and cartoon. All those responses definitely would destroy the learning process.

Furthermore when the teacher was asking the students to answer questions, some students showed responses. Such as, the students were busy of folding the paper or they were just laughing with their friends beside her/him talking about someone else. When the students were folding the paper, in one side they might keep silent but another side, even though they were keeping silent such a response was undesired by the teacher because while they were keeping silent they were doing something else which disturbed the learning atmosphere because they did not concentrate on the learning process. Definitely, they would fly the paper toward their friends in another side. The other responses were also shown by the students. When the teacher was asking the students to discuss the answer of the questions, some students were moving to the other group and some students were also cheating other groups’ answers. When the students were grouping, some students whose best friends weren’t in the same group with them, tended to move to the groups where their best friends belonged to. This moving could destroy the group because in one side the moving students might not be accepted by other group members. Another side, the student who was moving might be needed in her/his own group to do some discussion.

The last response shown by the students was when the teacher was mentioning numbers to answer the question. Some students who didn’t pay attention

to the teacher were forgetting their numbers. When they were forgetting their numbers it could be concluded that it might destruct the atmosphere of the class such as shouting in Bahasa Indonesia “Nomor 4 dipanggil tuh, eh siapa yang nomor 4? (“Guys, who is number 4? Number 4 is being called”). When there was one student who was shouting in such way, the situation were crowded. Some of the students were speaking even more loudly to remind their friend and the other students were also standing and walking to see in which group the students who forget his/her number should be. Some students, who knew that their numbers were being called, were borrowing friends’ notes quickly because they were not prepared with the answer. There were also some students who were just keeping silent and didn’t say anything even when her/his friends reminded him/her that her/his number was being called. In addition, some of the students were laughing and also mocking him when he finally remembered that his number was being called. This action made the class even noisier and it was difficult for the teacher to handle the situation because all the students were speaking and shouting to each other about the students who forgot the number.

Those responses could damage the atmosphere of the learning process, and also could destruct their friends’ concentration. These UDRs could be summarized into the below figure:

Table 2.

UnDesired Responses (UDRs)

Activity or instruction given by the teacher Undesired Responses by the students

Teacher was numbering the students to form groups.

Just walking around

Not paying attention and chatting with friends

Teacher was delivering the material Putting his/her head on the table

Disturbing friend by taking friend’s book

Tweaking someone’s ear Drawing pictures (animal and cartoon)

Making scratch on the table

Teacher was asking questions Folding the paper

Laughing with friend beside her/him (talking about someone else)

Teacher was asking the students to think together

Moving to the other group

Cheating other groups’ answers Whispering with friends beside them and smiling

Teacher was mentioning a certain number to answer the question

Forgetting number Borrowing friend’s note

Keeping silent/didn’t say anything when teacher called her/his number Asking friends for the answer

As the DRs, which could be classified into verbal and nonverbal response (VDRs and NVDRs), the UDRs above could also be categorized into verbal and nonverbal responses (VUDRs and NVUDRs), which could be explained as follows:

a. Verbal UnDesired Responses (VUDRs) is a response of the students by using their utterances which could disturb the learning process. The VUDRs observed from the learning process such as chatting with friends, laughing with friends beside her/him, whispering with friend and smiling together and when the students asking friends about the answer also could be called as VUDRs. Other VUDRs were also shown when the students were looking at their friends who were having difficulty in explaining their answers. Some students were saying something such as “Lama amat sih jawabnya” (“why it is too long to answer the question”), “gak kedengeran”(“I can’t hear”), and other utterances which were making the class more noisy. Those utterances were definitely “undesired” by the teacher.

Table 2a.

Verbal UnDesired Responses (VUDRs)

Activity or instruction given by the teacher VUDRs Teacher was numbering the students to form

groups.

Not paying attention and chatting with friends

Teacher was delivering the material

Laughing with friend beside her/him (talking about someone else)

Teacher was asking the students to think together

Whispering with friend beside her/him and smiling

Teacher was mentioning a certain number to answer the question

Asking friends for the answer

b. Nonverbal Undesired Responses (NVUDRs). It is a physical responses given by the students that disturb the learning process, such as walking around the class, drawing pictures, keeping silent when his/her number was being called by the teacher and tweaking someone’s ear. According to its name is nonverbal response, so the students did a certain response that was not using words but they used their physical gestures instead. This response could be classified into 2 groups which were pair reaction and individual reaction. As has been explained above that during all the observations, the student had shown various responses, which were not only affecting each student individually but also affecting the learning process, and the whole class or their group members.

i. Pair reaction

Is a response by the student that can influence other students or disturb the learning process, such as the students moving to another group and cheating the other groups answer when the teacher was asking the students to answer or to discuss the question. These responses were undesired by the teacher because these responses affected the other students, such as asking the answer from another group. The other group might not allow the answer of their group to be cheated by other groups. When the students did this reaction, the continuing effect would affect also to the whole class and to teacher who applied the NHT technique.

NHT technique’s purpose was making the students collaborate with other students. Besides they were supposed to enable the students to integrate, draw conclusions from the results of their diverse minds and to exchange ideas or their opinions among their peers in the group. If the students didn’t exchange their ideas or their opinions among their peers in the group the student’s reaction was undesired by the teacher.

ii. Individual reaction

Is a response by the student which can disturb the learning process but does not involve other students. The students’ walking

the table and drawing pictures (animal and cartoon) when the teacher was explaining, and also folding paper to form a bird or plane and flying the paper so the paper flew and suddenly landed on the head of some students could be included into individual undesired responses because the students did it individually. All those responses were undesired by the teacher but these responses were not affecting other students but only affecting the students themselves. The below table describes those responses:

Table 2b.

NonVerbal UnDesired Responses (NVUDRs)

Nonverbal Undesired Responses

Pair reaction Individual reaction

Disturbing friend by taking friend’s book Walking around the class Borrowing friend’s note Putting his/her head on the table Tweaking someone’s ear Drawing pictures (animal and

cartoon)

Cheating other’s group answer Making scratch on the table, folding the paper, forgetting number, and feeping silent/didn’t say anything.

DISCUSSION

The students’ responses could be different and varied depending on the teacher instructions in a certain time, such as when the teacher was asking the students to form a group, the teacher might allow them to yell or to speak louder. On the other hand, if the students were being asked by the teacher to listen when teacher was explaining; the teacher might not allow the student to yell or to speak louder. When the students were walking around the class while teacher was explaining, the students’ walking might be undesired by the teacher. However, it was different if the teacher asked them to form a group, the students’ walking were desired by the teacher. Different responses shown by the students did not only depend on the instruction, characters of the students seemed to also affect the students’ responses.

During the observations, the researcher found that the students who did the UDRs were the same persons. From this situation, it could be seen that even the teacher applied various methods or strategies to trigger their students’ activeness; the students who had problem with their characters would not be what the teacher “wanted”, such as lazy students. It could be observed when their friends were busy opening book and discussing the topic, such students were just sleeping or busy of doing unnecessary things. Therefore, various methods or strategies the teacher’s applied to make the students active, somehow were not always able to make the students involve in the learning process activity. It, of course, needed more time and process to change their bad characters. The way to overcome these kinds of students,

the researcher could also be done to study the motivation and family background of those students.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

This study describes the students’ responses when the English teacher used NHT technique to deliver the English lessons. After analyzing the observation and interview which were conducted by the researcher in a state junior high school with the participant of one English teacher and the students of class VIIG here comes the conclusion. Based on Borich as cited in Muhammad (2014) about responses, there are two types of responses which are Desired Responses (DRs) and UnDesired Responses (UDRs). The results of the observation showed that the students performed both DRs such as listening to the teacher, taking notes and discussing the topic and UDRs such as walking around the class, folding paper, chatting unrelated topic, and making noise such as speaking louder talking about someone else. Also from the interview with the students, some students showed UDRs. These UDRs were sleeping, walking, and having some jokes with friends. From the interview with the students, they mentioned some DRs that they showed during class such as raising her/his hand when their names were being called, trying to find the answer when their names were being called and discussing the answer with the member of the group.

Furthermore desired responses can be classified into verbal and nonverbal responses. From the findings the students also performed the verbal responses such as

yelling, discussing the topic, speaking up with the members of their group related to the topic and asking friends for the answer. Non verbal responses such as standing and looking for their group quickly, writing on their book, paying attention to the teacher by looking at the teacher, taking note, opening and closing the book, opening the dictionary and reading handout were also performed. From the interview, it was mentioned that some students were writing in their note while the teacher was delivering the material.

On the other hand, UDRs were also shown by the students such as, walking around the class, not paying attention and chatting with friends which is not related to the topic, putting his/her head on the table, disturbing friend by taking friend’s book, tweaking someone’s ear, drawing pictures (animal and cartoon), making scratch on the table, and folding the paper. As stated by Borich as cited in Muhammad’s journal (2014) those UDR also can be classified into verbal and nonverbal responses.

Verbal undesired responses were performed by the students by chatting with friends and laughing with friend beside her/him talking about someone else. Non verbal undesired responses can be classified into pair/individual reaction. Pair reactions are disturbing a friend by taking a friend’s book, borrowing a friend’s note, tweaking someone’s ear, and cheating other groups answer. Individual reactions were walking around the class, putting his/her head on the table, drawing pictures (animal and cartoon), making scratch on the table, folding the paper, forgetting number, keeping silent/didn’t say anything. Based on the interview result, some students said

that they prefer to be silent when they didn’t know the answer. This silence can be classified as nonverbal responses. Some students also said that when they were getting bored, they would play the paper by folding it and flied it. In addition, some students said that they would joke with friends, sleeping, and didn’t care whatever the teacher said.

From the finding, the researcher found that NHT method makes the students more active and motivated which is desired by the teacher. However, the UDRs were also showed very often by the students during the observation. These UDRs were done by some students who didn’t seem to be motivated to study.

Overall, the students’ responses varied depending on the instructions given by the teacher. When the students don’t give some responses it doesn’t mean that the students don’t learn. The researcher hopes that this study will give benefits to the English teachers to know the students’ responses when the teacher uses NHT strategy and to make the teacher aware about the kinds of methods or strategies that would be used in her/his class because students’ responses or students’ reactions can be different depending on the teachers’ instruction, method, and strategies.

For further study, the students’ responses could be observed from other classes with different levels, which are grade VIII or IX. Further study can also be done by differentiating the genre between male and female students to see whether there is difference. It is also suggested that NHT type would be better if the grouping

is done in small groups (3-4 students) because big groups are more difficult to handle. Further research could also be done to study the motivation and family background of the students who showed UDRs in class

References

Anita and Rita. (2004). Cooperative Learning Mempraktikkan Cooperative Learning

di Ruang- Ruang kelas. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Atmadja, R. (2006). Metode Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Rosda Karya.

Brown, H, D (2000). Principle of Language Learning and Teaching Fourth Edition.

New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Kartiningrum, F (2003). Teaching Cooperative Learning with Structural Approach to

Type Numbered Heads Together Improving Learning Outcomes and Student

Activities. E-journal. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Hammer, J. (1991). The practise of English Language. New York: Longman

Published.

Ibrahim, M, dkk (2000). Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Surabaya: UNESA University

Press

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1998). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon Kagan, S. (1992). Cooperative Learning for Teachers, Inc.

Kartiningrum, F (2007). Teaching Cooperative Learning with Structural Approach to

Type Numbered Heads Together Improving Learning Outcomes and Student

Activities. E-journal. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Lie, A. (2008). Cooperative Learning: Mempraktikan Cooperative Learning di

Ruang-ruang Kelas. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo.

Mahwah, N, J. (2006). Teaching word meanings. The literacy teaching series (ix 220

pp). US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Mulyadi.( 2006). Pengembangan Penerapan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Model NHT

pada Konsep Geometris untuk meningkatkan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar

Siswa. Thesis. Jakarta: Unpublished.

Muhammad A, F (2014) Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe

Numbered Heads Together (NHT) untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Prestasi

Belajar Mata Pelajaran Perakitan Komputer. S1 thesis. Bantul: Universitas

Nana. (1988). Cara Belajar Siswa Aktif dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta:

Sinar baru.

Nisak, K (2009). The effectiveness of the application of NHT method to increase the students’ study result. Thesis. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang

Supartini. (2008). Penerapan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Model NHT dalam upaya 'meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa. Thesis. Jakarta: Unpublished.

Slavin, R.E. (2009). Cooperative learning. In G. McCulloch & D. Crook (Eds.) International Encyclopedia of Education. Abington, UK: Routledge

Suharsimi A, dkk. (2007). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta : PT Bumi Aksara.

Trianto. (2007). Model-model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi

Konstruktivistik. Jakarta: Perpustakaan Nasional KDT.

Webb, N. M. (2008). Learning in small groups. In T. L. Good (Ed.), 21st Century

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This thesis would not have been completed without the help and support from many people. Therefore, I would like to express my sincere appreciation to the following people who have assisted in completing this thesis. First of all, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Jesus Christ, who has made everything beautifully according to his plan. His blessing can’t be explained by any word. Dra. Martha Nandari, M.A., my supervisor, who was abundantly helpful and gave meaningful assistance, support, patience and guidance. Prof. Dr. Gusti Astika, M.A, my second reader, without his knowledge, idea and assistance this study would not have been completed. PESAT Ministry communities. Thanks for the time, pray and the entire donation during my study. My big family, my parents, my siblings, thanks for your pray, time, support, donation and everything. The Principal, the English teacher and the seventh grade students of SMP Negeri 2 Tuntang who helped me to obtain the research data. My beloved boy, ‘3side’ who loves me a lot and always cheer me up. I know without your support I won’t be able to finish this study. CM (Campus Ministry) communities, especially for Mr. Wellem and Mr. Tri who always giving their pray and their time to listen me. All my friends who help, support and motivated me, Vincent, Elis, Vita, Yuni, Lisda. The last, I give my biggest gratitude for all whose names I cannot mention here who help a lot during my study in English Department of Satya Wacana Christian University.

Appendix 1

Observation table

Appendix 2

Interview Questions

For the English teacher

1. Bagaimana kegiatan pembelajaran di kelas ketika ibu menggunakan metode NHT ini?

2. Apakah ibu selalu melakukan strategi NHT ini? Dan disaat situasi seperti apa ibu menggunakan strategi ini?

3. Bagaimana respon anak-anak ketika ibu menjelaskan dan kemudian bertanya

tentang pelajaran yang baru saja ibu ajarkan?

4. Apa yang ibu lakukan untuk mengatasi siswa yang cenderung mengganggu proses pembelajaran?

5. Kesulitan atau kendala-kendala apa saja yang dilakukan murid yang sering ibu temui saat pelajaran berlangsung dengan menggunakan model NHT ini?

For the 10 students

1. _{Apa yang kamu lakukan ketika guru menjelaskan materi pelajaran?}

2. _{Aktivitas apa saja yang kamu lakukan di dalam kelas yang berhubungan} dengan kegiatan belajar?

3. _{Persiapan apa yang kamu lakukan kalau gurumu memanggil nomormu?}

4. _{Apa yang kamu lakukan kalau nomormu dipanggil oleh guru?}

Appendix 3

Interview Result

Interviewing English teacher: Ms. Tari

1. NHT hampir sama dengan kurikulum 2013. Sama2 dibuat grouping dan

anak2 dipacu berfikir menyelesaikan masalah. Menyenangkan. Anak2 berani untuk menjawab walaupun jawaban nya belum tentu benar.

2. Dipakai di saat: lihat keadaan dan materi yang akan dipakai. Tidak semua materi bisa memakai metode yang berkooperatif learning. Tidak semua harus pakek NHT. Materi yang bisa dibuat grouping/diskusi. Kalau tidak ada diskusi tidak pakek NHT.

3. Respon anak2: banyak hal dan bervariasi. Kalau anak yang pintar biasanya kalau pas diskusi serius dan aktif bertanya. Tapi anak yang kurang pintar cuma diam aja dan biasanya yang ribut dan ganggu temannya. Oleh karna itu ketika membuat grouping kalau bisa dalam kelompok kecil saja. Karna semakin besar jumlah anggota dalam 1 group maka akan didapati anak yang hanya diam, melamun, bahkan menggangu, gak mau berfikir. Nah, ketika pakai NHT, saya melihat anak2 itu senang karna mereka aktif. Gak ngantuk. Aktif dalam pembelajaran dan lebih semangat. Sehingga anak2 tidak hanya monoton mendengarkan guru bercerita saja.

4. Bagaimana jika ada anak yg menggangu pembelajaran? Itu adalah masalah dalam sebuah kelas. Dari berbagai latar belakang anak2 saja macem2, apalagi sekolah ini kan bisa dikatakan bukan sekolah favorite jadi maklum kalau yang masuk juga anak2 dari kelas ekonomi kebawah yang mana orang tuanya kurang peduli tentang pendidikan.contohnya ketika anak tidak mengerjakan PR alasannya kesawah dan juga pas kita undang mereka, hanya sedikit yg dteng. Nah, ada anak yang menggangu, gak respon, nakal, ngantuk, dan yang kepala ditaruh di atas meja itu ya orangnya itu- itu aja. Saya biasanya akan menegur dan menasihati dan kadang saya ajak bernyanyi /mengggerak2kan tangan sehingga anak2 fresh lg dan tidak ngantuk lagi. Nyanyi2 yg berhubungan dengan materi.

5. Kendala: anak2 yang seenaknya sendiri, usil. Kadang tidak sungguh2, kalau

grouping terlalu besar kadang hanya melamun, hanya diam saja, jawabannya nunut temannya gak mau mikir sendiri. Kadang juga anak lupa nomor nya karna keseringan gojeg sama temannya. Ketika dikasih nomor, dan pas ditunjuk, eh mereka lupa nomornya sendiri. NHT harus menggunakn grouping yg kecil mungkin hanya beranggotakan 4-5 orang.

Interviewing 10 students Puji

1. yang dilakukan saat guru menjelaskan materi: Gojeg 2.yang dilakukan yg berhubungan dgn pelajaran: memperhatikan 3.yang dilakukan kalau nomor nya dipanggil: andelin punya teman 4.yang dilakukan ketika nomor nya dipanggil Lihat punya teman, 5.jawaban dapat dari: Dapat dari teman.

Niken 1.kadang

mendengarkan dan kadang gojeg sama teman 2.kadang bingung kadang menjawab 3.cepat2 angkat tangan 4.menjawab 5. nyari dibuku, ngelihat catatan yang tadi dijelasin guru, kadang diskusi, kadang tanya teman

Mahmuda 1.mendengarkan, menulis, mencatat pokok2nya

2.bertanya ketika tidak bisa atau tidak bisa mngerti apa yang diajarkan 3.berdiskusi dulu, akan maju 4.maju kedepan kelas 5.berdiskusi dengan teman Winarti 1.mendengarka n mencari apa yg tdk mengerti dan menulis 2.bertanya kepada guru 3.melakukan diskusi terlebih dahulu 4.maju dan bertanya yang gak bisa 5.dari buku Dewi 1.mendengarkan 2.bertanya kepada guru kalau gak jelas 3.diskusi sama teman 4.maju kedepan 5.hasil diskusi teman Intan 1.mendengarkan sambil memahami pelajarannya 2.kerja kelompok sama latihan soal 3.mempersiapkan jawaban yang benar 4.maju dan menjawab pertanyaannya

5.dari kerja kelompok dan mencari dibuku

Rifki

1.mendengarkan 2.tidak tahu. Diam aj dengar guru 3.bingung. 4.mempersiapkan jawabannya

5.hasil diskusi sama teman, kadang Tanya teman

Azizah

1.mendengarka n dan mencatat 2.diskusi 3mempersiapka n jawaban 4.maju kedepan 5.dari membaca catatan dan membuka buku dan kerja kelompok. Mufti 1.mendengarkan 2.gojeg 3.mempersiapkan jawaban 4.ngacung 5.ngarang Ahmad 1.gojeg 2.menggambar 3.mempersiapkan jawaban 4.ngacung 5.nyontoh

Appendix 4

Observation note

Activity given by the teacher Students’ responses/activites

 Numbering to form a group - _{Standing and looking for their}

group quickly

- _Yelling “wey, tadi aku di group mana?”

- _{Just walking around}

- _{Writing note}

- _{Not paying attention and} chatting with friends

 Teacher delivering the material - _{Paying attention to the teacher}

(by looking at the teacher) - _{Not paying attention to the}

teacher (by putting his/her head on the table), laughing with friend beside her/him, disturbing friend by taking friend’s book while his/her friend use it, tweak someone’s ear, pull someone’s head” - _{Coming and going outside the}

class.

- _{Walking around from one chair} to the other chairs.

- _{Whispering with friend beside} her/him

- _{Opening and closing the book} frequently

- _{Taking notes}

- _{Drawing on their book/handout} - _{Making scratch on the table} - _{Playing with her/his stationary.}

 Teacher asking questions - _{Taking notes}

- _{Listening to the teacher}

looking for the teacher) - Didn’t paying attention

(laughing with friends - _{Folding the paper}

 Thinking together - _{Some students discussing}

- _{Busy of opening the dictionary} - _{Reading handout and writing}

notes

- _{Chatting with friends and} laughing

- _{Moving to the other group to} see other’s answers

- Cheating other’s group answer

 Teacher mentioning the number - _{Whose number is called stand}

up and come forward quickly (quick response to the

instructions)

- _{The friends of whose number is} called reminds that her/his number is called

- Forgetting number. Didn’t know that his/her number is called (seen from their

reaction)didn’t do anything until his/her friends remind him/her

- Didn’t get the answer (keep silent/didn’t say anything)

- _{Quickly answering}

- _{Asking the answer to his/her} group

- _{Looking at her/his note} - Borrowing friend’s note

Appendix 5

The list of DRs, UDRs, VRs, and NVRs

DR + NVR DR + VR UDR + NVR UDR + VR

Standing and looking for their group quickly

Yelling “wey, tadi aku di group mana?”

Walking around Not paying

attention and chatting with friends Writing/taking note Discussing the

topic

Putting his/her head on the table

Laughing with friend beside her/him (talking about someone else)

Paying attention to the teacher (by looking at the teacher)

Speaking up with the members of their group related to the topic

Disturbing friend by taking friend’s book Whispering with friend beside her/him and smiling Opening and

closing the book

Asking friends for the answer

Borrowing friend’s note when teacher called certain number

Asking friends for the answer

Listening to the teacher carefully

Chatting with friends related to the topic

Tweaking someone’s ear Busy of opening

the dictionary

Drawing pictures (animal and cartoon)

Reading handout Making scratch on

the table Quick response to

the instructions

Folding the paper Students looking at

her/his note when teacher called number

Moving to the other group Cheating other’s group answer Forgetting number Keeping silent/didn’t say anything when teacher called.

Appendix 6

Based on what Borich says about responses

Desired Responses (DRs)  the response when the teacher “wants”

certain activity to do and the students can fulfill it/support the teaching and learning process.

Undesired Responses (UDRs)  the response that is not related to the teaching and learning process/can destruct the teaching and learning process.

Verbal Responses (VRs)  the students response the teachers by their verbal (can be answer or say something, or when students answering questions, performing speaking, and chatting with friends).

Nonverbal Responses (NVRs)  the students are paying attention, reading the book/handout, keeping silent, walking in the room, and taking notes.

Students’ Responses DRs UDRs VRs NVRs Standing and looking

for their group quickly

 

Yelling “wey, tadi aku di group mana?”

 

Just walking around  

Writing/taking note  

Not paying attention and chatting with friends

 

Paying attention to the teacher (by looking at the teacher)

 

Not paying attention to the teacher (by putting his/her head on the table)

 

laughing with friend beside her/him

 

disturbing friend by taking friend’s book while friend use it

 

tweaking someone’s ear

 

pulling someone’s head using book



Whispering with friend beside her/him and smiling

 

Opening and closing the book frequently

 

Drawing pictures (animal and cartoon) on their book/handout

 

Making scratch on the table

Listening to the teacher carefully (by keeping silent and looking for the teacher)

 

Folding the paper  

Some of them discussing the topic

 

Speaking up with the members of their group related to the topic

 

Busy of opening the dictionary

 

Reading handout and writing notes

 

Chatting with friends and laughing

 

Moving to the other group to see other’s answers

 

Cheating other’s group answer

 

When teacher called certain number, quick response to the

instructions by raising their hand and come forward

 

When teacher called certain number, some students didn’t do anything until his/her friends remind him/her (Forgetting number)

 

When teacher called certain number, didn’t

get the answer (keep silent/didn’t say anything)

When teacher called certain number, he/she asking the answer to his/her group

  

Looking at her/his friend’s note when teacher called certain number

 

Borrowing friend’s note when teacher called certain number.

looking for the teacher) - Didn’t paying attention

(laughing with friends - _{Folding the paper}

 Thinking together - _{Some students discussing}

- _{Busy of opening the dictionary} - _{Reading handout and writing}

notes

- _{Chatting with friends and} laughing

- _{Moving to the other group to} see other’s answers

- Cheating other’s group answer  Teacher mentioning the number - _{Whose number is called stand} up and come forward quickly (quick response to the

instructions)

- _{The friends of whose number is} called reminds that her/his number is called

- Forgetting number. Didn’t know that his/her number is called (seen from their

reaction)didn’t do anything until his/her friends remind him/her

- Didn’t get the answer (keep silent/didn’t say anything) - _{Quickly answering}

- _{Asking the answer to his/her} group

- _{Looking at her/his note} - Borrowing friend’s note

Appendix 5

The list of DRs, UDRs, VRs, and NVRs

DR + NVR DR + VR UDR + NVR UDR + VR

Standing and looking for their group quickly

Yelling “wey, tadi aku di group mana?”

Walking around Not paying attention and chatting with friends Writing/taking note Discussing the

topic

Putting his/her head on the table

Laughing with friend beside her/him (talking about someone else)

Paying attention to the teacher (by looking at the teacher)

Speaking up with the members of their group related to the topic

Disturbing friend by taking friend’s book Whispering with friend beside her/him and smiling Opening and

closing the book

Asking friends for the answer

Borrowing friend’s note when teacher called certain number

Asking friends for the answer

Listening to the teacher carefully

Chatting with friends related to the topic

Tweaking someone’s ear Busy of opening

the dictionary

Drawing pictures (animal and cartoon)

Reading handout Making scratch on

the table Quick response to

the instructions

Folding the paper Students looking at

her/his note when teacher called number

Moving to the other group Cheating other’s group answer Forgetting number Keeping silent/didn’t say anything when teacher called.

Appendix 6

Based on what Borich says about responses

Desired Responses (DRs)  the response when the teacher “wants” certain activity to do and the students can fulfill it/support the teaching and learning process.

Undesired Responses (UDRs)  the response that is not related to the teaching and learning process/can destruct the teaching and learning process.

Verbal Responses (VRs)  the students response the teachers by their verbal (can be answer or say something, or when students answering questions, performing speaking, and chatting with friends).

Nonverbal Responses (NVRs)  the students are paying attention, reading the book/handout, keeping silent, walking in the room, and taking notes.

Students’ Responses DRs UDRs VRs NVRs Standing and looking

for their group quickly

 

Yelling “wey, tadi aku di group mana?”

 

Just walking around  

Writing/taking note  

Not paying attention and chatting with friends

 

Paying attention to the teacher (by looking at the teacher)

 

Not paying attention to the teacher (by putting his/her head on the table)

 

laughing with friend beside her/him

 

disturbing friend by taking friend’s book while friend use it

 

tweaking someone’s ear

 

pulling someone’s head using book



Whispering with friend beside her/him and smiling

 

Opening and closing the book frequently

 

Drawing pictures (animal and cartoon) on their book/handout

 

Making scratch on the table

Listening to the teacher carefully (by keeping silent and looking for the teacher)

 

Folding the paper  

Some of them discussing the topic

 

Speaking up with the members of their group related to the topic

 

Busy of opening the dictionary

 

Reading handout and writing notes

 

Chatting with friends and laughing

 

Moving to the other group to see other’s answers

 

Cheating other’s group answer

 

When teacher called certain number, quick response to the

instructions by raising their hand and come forward

 

When teacher called certain number, some students didn’t do anything until his/her friends remind him/her (Forgetting number)

 

When teacher called certain number, didn’t

get the answer (keep silent/didn’t say anything)

When teacher called certain number, he/she asking the answer to his/her group

  

Looking at her/his friend’s note when teacher called certain number

 

Borrowing friend’s note when teacher called certain number.