Types of Exposition text

3. Concept of Jigsaw Technique

Wendy Jolliffe in her book, “Cooperative Learning in the Classroom”, defines Jigsaw technique as a technique in which students are distributed into groups and each member of a group learns an essential part of a whole of a topic by working with a focus group and then helps the home group to combine the knowledge to complete the task. 26 In Spencer Kagan and Miguel Kagan’s Cooperative Learning, they divide classic cooperative learning method into four types: Jigsaw Designs, Cooperative Investigations, Mastery Designs, and Learning Together. The first Jigsaw concept was applied by Eliot Aaronson and his associates at the national training labs as teambuilding activities. 27 Essentially, Jigsaw technique is a cooperative learning lesson design that takes the place the place of a lecture. Jigsaw technique is a cooperative learning technique that requires everyone’s cooperative effort to produce the final product. Just as in a jigsaw puzzle, each piece-each student’s part- is essential for the production and full understanding of the final product. If each student’s part is essential, then each student is essential. Teacher is not the sole provider of knowledge because most of the work is done by the students themselves which makes it an efficient way to learn. There are a lot of variations in the design of Jigsaw technique. One of these variations that the writer tries to use in this research is Within-Team Jigsaw that was developed by Spencer Kagan and his associates. Unlike the variation of Jigsaw that was developed by Elliott Aaronson and his associates, this variation of Jigsaw works with existing curriculum. The concept of extrinsic rewards or points as proposed by Jigsaw II is also not included in this variation of Jigsaw. To create positive interdependence, Kagan Jigsaw relies on highly structuring interaction among students and intrinsically interesting learning tasks. 28 26 Wendy Jolliffe, Cooperative Learning in the Classroom, London: Paul Chapman Publishing, 2007, p. 48. 27 Spencer Kagan and Miguel Kagan, Kagan Cooperative Learning, San Clemente: Kagan Publishing, 2009, p. 17.2. 28 ibid., p. 17.3. In Within-Team Jigsaw, each student on the team is given a balanced different section of the text to be read and analyze. Later, as an expert the student explains what heshe have learned to the other team member while the other team member take notes on the material that the expert explain. Based on the explanation above, it can be synthesized that Within-Team Jigsaw is one of Jigsaw variations that developed by Kagan that does not reconstruct the curriculum and also does not include extrinsic rewards or points. This variation require student to master their part individually by reading and analyzing their part and later explain to the other team member.

4. Principles of Jigsaw

In applying Jigsaw group work in the classroom, most researchers agree that to be truly cooperative, learning should consist of key elements, which are: a. Positive interdependence. This requires each pupil in a small group to contribute to the learning of the group. Pupils are required to work in a way so that each group member needs the others to complete the task. It is a feeling of ‘one for all and all for one’. 29 b. Individual accountability. This means that each member of the group is accountable for completing his or her part of the work. It is important that no one can ‘hitchhike’ on the work of others. It requires each pupil in the group to develop a sense of personal responsibility to learn and to help the rest of the group to learn also. 30 c. Small Heterogeneous Group. Group needs to be small in order to provide maximum opportunities for oral interaction. The group also should be organized into heterogeneous group for optimum learning. d. Purposeful talk. Students need opportunities to explore, practice, and understand ideas through oral interaction. Oral interaction will help students to get and understand other members’ ideas. 29 Jolliffe, op.cit., p. 3. 30 ibid.

Dokumen yang terkait

The Effectiveness of Pictures in Text in Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Eight Grade Students of MTsN 13 Jakarta).

0 18 178

Comparing The Effectiveness Of Using Jigsaw Technique And Students Team Achievement Divisions Technique In Enhancing Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi Experimental Research At Second Grade Students Of Mts Salafiyah Depok)

2 44 148

The effectiveness of using mind mapping technique on students’ reading of narrative text: a quasi-experimental study at the second grade of MAN 19 Jakarta

0 4 181

The Effectiveness of Using Jigsaw Technique to Develop Students’ Reading Comprehension on Narrative Text; A Quasi Experimental Study at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 63 Jakarta Selatan

0 6 139

The Effectiveness Of Using Reading, Encoding, Annotating And Pondering (Reap) Technique Towards Students’ Reading Skill Of Descriptive Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study At The Seventh Grade Of Mts Salafiyah)

5 18 138

The Effectiveness of Jigsaw Technique in Teacihing Reading Conprehension : An Experimental Study at the Second Grade of MAN 2 Bekasi

0 6 61

The Effectiveness of Using Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) in Teaching Reading of Narrative Text, (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Second Year Students of SMPN I Pakuhaji)

0 10 0

The Effectiveness of Teaching Verbs by Using Cooperative Learning (A-Quasi Experimental Study at the Second Year Students of SMPN 169 Jakarta)

0 4 158

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF JIGSAW TECHNIQUE IN TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION AT SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN1 KRUI

0 21 58

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF JIGSAW TECHNIQUE IN TEACHING READING RECOUNT TEXT (AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AT THE SECOND GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 1 KALIMANAH IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2013/2014) - repository perpustakaan

0 0 11