Gain Score Description of the Data

Table 4.4 Normality of the Pre-test One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test PreScoreExp PreScoreCont N 39 39 Normal Parameters a,b Mean 74.36 69.62 Std. Deviation 9.402 9.893 Most Extreme Differences Absolute .194 .157 Positive .129 .096 Negative -.194 -.157 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1.211 .978 Asymp. Sig. 2-tailed .107 .295 a. Test distribution is Normal. b. Calculated from data. The normality test above used One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test. Table 4.4 shows that the absolute difference D of experimental class data was 0.194. It is smaller than D table with the closest Kolmogorov-Smirnov critical points of 40 with degree of significance = 0.05 which is 0.210, in other words, D experiment D table 0.194 0.210. Meanwhile, the absolute difference D of control class data was 0.157, which is smaller than D table with the closest Kolmogorov-Smirnov critical points of 40 with degree of significance = 0.05 which is 0.210, in other words, D experiment D table 0.157 0.210. The table also shows that the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z experiment was recorded at 1.211 which is bigger than Z table of 0.05 or p 0.05 and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z control was recorded at 0.978 which is bigger than Z table of 0.05 or p 0.05. It showed that there is no difference between the theoretical distribution and the empirical distribution which means that the data from the experimental class and control class was normal.

b. Normality of the Post-test

The test of normality distribution of the post-test data was analyzed by the use of Kolmogorov-Smirnov test in IBM SPSS Statistics 20. The result of the test can be seen as follows: Table 4.5 Normality of the Post-test One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test PostScoreExp PostScoreCont N 39 39 Normal Parameters a,b Mean 79.10 73.85 Std. Deviation 7.059 9.898 Most Extreme Differences Absolute .178 .144 Positive .142 .104 Negative -.178 -.144 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1.112 .897 Asymp. Sig. 2-tailed .169 .397 a. Test distribution is Normal. b. Calculated from data. From the Table 4.5 it can be seen that the absolute difference D of experimental class data was 0.178 and the absolute difference D of control class data was 0.144. The absolute difference D of experimental class was smaller than the D table with the closest Kolmogorov-Smirnov critical points of 40 at the degree of significant 0.05 = 0.210 or D experimental D table 0.178 0.210. Meanwhile, the absolute difference D of control class was also smaller than D table with the closest Kolmogorov-Smirnov critical points of 40 at the degree of significant 0.05 = 0.210 or D control D table 0.144 0.210. The Kolmogorov- Smirnov Z score in table 4.5 above was used as the parameter to determine whether the data is normal or not. The experimental class Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z score was 1.112 which is bigger than Z table of 0.05 or p 0.05. Then again, the control class Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z score was also bigger than Z table in the point 0.897 or p 0.05. Therefore, it can be concluded that the data from both classes in the post test was normal.

c. Homogeneity of the Pre-test

The analysis of the homogeneity variances of both groups in the pre-test was done by employing Levene’s statistic test in IBM SPSS Statistics 20. Here are the results of the calculation: Table 4.6 Homogeneity of the Pre-test Test of Homogeneity of Variance Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig. PreScore Based on Mean .090 1 76 .764 Based on Median .133 1 76 .716 Based on Median and with adjusted df .133 1 75.971 .716 Based on trimmed mean .155 1 76 .695 Table 4.6 shows that the degree of significance based on the mean in the pre-test was 0.764, which is bigger than 0.05. There f ore, it can be concluded that both groups in the pre-test are homogenous.

d. Homogeneity of the Post-test

The analysis of the homogeneity variances of both groups in the post-test was done by employing Levene’s statistic test in IBM SPSS Statistics 20. Here are the results of the calculation: Table 4.7 Homogeneity of the Post-test Test of Homogeneity of Variance Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig. PostScore Based on Mean 2.384 1 76 .127 Based on Median 2.324 1 76 .132 Based on Median and with adjusted df 2.324 1 74.317 .132 Based on trimmed mean 2.393 1 76 .126 From the result of homogeneity test in the Table 4.7, it can be seen that the degree of significance based on mean was 0.127 which is bigger than 0.05. Therefore, it can be concluded that both groups in the pre-test are homogenous.

Dokumen yang terkait

The Effectiveness of Pictures in Text in Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Eight Grade Students of MTsN 13 Jakarta).

0 18 178

Comparing The Effectiveness Of Using Jigsaw Technique And Students Team Achievement Divisions Technique In Enhancing Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi Experimental Research At Second Grade Students Of Mts Salafiyah Depok)

2 44 148

The effectiveness of using mind mapping technique on students’ reading of narrative text: a quasi-experimental study at the second grade of MAN 19 Jakarta

0 4 181

The Effectiveness of Using Jigsaw Technique to Develop Students’ Reading Comprehension on Narrative Text; A Quasi Experimental Study at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 63 Jakarta Selatan

0 6 139

The Effectiveness Of Using Reading, Encoding, Annotating And Pondering (Reap) Technique Towards Students’ Reading Skill Of Descriptive Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study At The Seventh Grade Of Mts Salafiyah)

5 18 138

The Effectiveness of Jigsaw Technique in Teacihing Reading Conprehension : An Experimental Study at the Second Grade of MAN 2 Bekasi

0 6 61

The Effectiveness of Using Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) in Teaching Reading of Narrative Text, (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Second Year Students of SMPN I Pakuhaji)

0 10 0

The Effectiveness of Teaching Verbs by Using Cooperative Learning (A-Quasi Experimental Study at the Second Year Students of SMPN 169 Jakarta)

0 4 158

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF JIGSAW TECHNIQUE IN TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION AT SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN1 KRUI

0 21 58

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF JIGSAW TECHNIQUE IN TEACHING READING RECOUNT TEXT (AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AT THE SECOND GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 1 KALIMANAH IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2013/2014) - repository perpustakaan

0 0 11