Procedures of the Research

2. H Null hypothesis : Students with extrinsic motivation achieved better reading comprehension. H 1 Alternative hypothesis : Students with intrinsic motivation achieved better reading comprehension. For the first hypothesis the criteria is: If the T-count was higher than T-table H was rejected. H 1 was accepted. There was a significant difference between students who have intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in reading comprehension at SMAN 7 Bandar Lampung. The level of significant 0.05 p α. Statistical testing: independent t-test. For the second hypothesis, the researcher got from the mean score of reading comprehension test between students who have intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The procedure of research has been discussed. This includes the research design, population and sample, variables, research instruments, validity and reliability of the instruments, procedures of the research, data analysis, and hyphotesis testing discussed in order to provide an insight to this research.

V. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

This final chapter offers the conclusion of the research findings and suggestions for the next similar research.

5.1. Conclusions of the Research Findings

Referring to the discussion of the research in the previous chapter, the researcher comes to the following conclusion: 1. There was a significant difference in reading comprehension test between students who have intrinsic and those who have extrinsic motivation. This could be identified from the result of computation by using independent t- test showed that the t-count is 3.122 at the significance level 0.05, meaning that t-count t-table 3.122 2.030. The alternative hypothesis H 1 was accepted. 2. Because there was a significant difference in reading comprehension test between students who have intrinsic and those who have extrinsic motivation, the reseacher conducted to find out which group of students with intrinsic and extrinsic motivation achieve better reading comprehension. The result showed that intrinsic motivation achieved better reading comprehension. It can be seen from the result that the mean score of reading comprehension in intrinsic students 78.12 is higher than the extrinsic ones 69.76. Students who have intrinsic motivation are better in those five aspects of reading; identifying main idea, identifying supporting details, making inference, identifying reference, and understanding vocabulary.

5.2. Suggestions

In line with conclusions of the research findings, the researcher proposes some suggestions as follows: 1. For the students, the significant difference between students who have intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in reading comprehension suggest the need to apply their motivation in all aspects, in order to increase their knowledge and autonomy because motivation has an influential role in all aspects. 2. For the teacher, they should pay more attention in English subject especially for extrinsic students with lower reading scores, extrinsic students should give direction that every skill and subject are important to increase their knowledge. The teacher can encourage the students, especially students who have extrinsic motivation, to be more active in order to comprehend the text. Such as identifying main idea, identifying supporting details, making inference, identifying reference, and understanding vocabulary. 3. It is also suggested for other researcher in the future to focused on comparison between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in other skills of learning language listening, speaking and writing.

Dokumen yang terkait

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS TECHNIQUE AND TRANSLATION TECHNIQUE AT SMAN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 4 9

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS TECHNIQUE AND TRANSLATION TECHNIQUE AT SMAN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 3 9

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ WRITING ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN EXTROVERT AND INTROVERT STUDENTS’ PERSONALITY AT THE SECOND YAR OF SMAN 7 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 18 64

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN STUDENTS TAUGHT THROUGH COLLABORATIVE STRATEGIC READING AND TAUGHT THROUGH SELF-QUESTIONING STRATEGY AT THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 8 BANDAR LAMPUNG

3 89 211

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN LEFT-BRAIN AND RIGHT-BRAIN DOMINATED STUDENTS AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMAN 2 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 10 34

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN FIELD-INDEPENDENT AND FIELD-DEPENDENT STUDENTS IN READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT AT SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 AMBARAWA PRINGSEWU

0 12 49

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN HIGH AND LOW STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION IN READING AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMPN1 GEDUNG AJI, TULANG BAWANG

0 7 59

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF READING COMPREHENSION BETWEEN STUDENTS WITH INTROVERT AND STUDENTS WITH EXTROVERT PERSONALITY AT SMA N 2 KALIANDA

0 15 56

CORRELATION STUDY OF STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION AND STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY TOWARD READING COMPREHENSION AT SMPN 31 BANDAR LAMPUNG

4 28 64

A STUDY OF THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION AND THEIR ACHIEVEMENT IN READING COMPREHENSION

0 2 15