Data Analysis Hypothesis Testing

the extrinsic ones 69.76. Students who have intrinsic motivation are better in those five aspects of reading; identifying main idea, identifying supporting details, making inference, identifying reference, and understanding vocabulary.

5.2. Suggestions

In line with conclusions of the research findings, the researcher proposes some suggestions as follows: 1. For the students, the significant difference between students who have intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in reading comprehension suggest the need to apply their motivation in all aspects, in order to increase their knowledge and autonomy because motivation has an influential role in all aspects. 2. For the teacher, they should pay more attention in English subject especially for extrinsic students with lower reading scores, extrinsic students should give direction that every skill and subject are important to increase their knowledge. The teacher can encourage the students, especially students who have extrinsic motivation, to be more active in order to comprehend the text. Such as identifying main idea, identifying supporting details, making inference, identifying reference, and understanding vocabulary. 3. It is also suggested for other researcher in the future to focused on comparison between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in other skills of learning language listening, speaking and writing. REFERENCES Afflerbach, P. 2007. Understanding and Using Readind Assesment K-12. University of Maryland: College Rark. Alderson, J. C. 2000. Assessing Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University. Apple MT. 2005. Extensive Reading and the Motivation to Read. Dushisha Studies in Language and Culture, 81, 193-212. Arikunto, S. 1986. Dasar-Dasar dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bina Aksara. Arikunto. 2005. Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta-Indonesia: PT Rineka Cipta. Bainbridge, C. 2005. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. Retrieved on December 18 th 2014. http:giftedkids.about.comodglossaryintrinsic.htm. Brown, H. D. 1987. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc. Brown, H. D. 1994. Principles of language learning and teaching 3rd Ed.. San Francisco: Prentice Hall. Caldwell, J. S. 2008. Comprehensin Achievent: A Classromm Guide. United States of America: Guilford Press. Carrillo, Lawrence W. 1976. “Teaching Reading”. New York. St. Martins Press. Celce-Murcia Ed., Teaching English as a second foreign language. Boston: Heinle and Heinle. Clark, R. 1993. Developing practices of resistance: critical reading for students of politics in D. Graddol, L. Thompson, and M. Byram eds.. Language and culture. Clevedon Avon: BAALMultilingual Matters, 113-22. Cocks, R, Watts, H. 2004. “Relationships Among Perceived Competence, Intrinsic Value and Mastery Goal Orientation in English Maths.” The Australian Educational Researcher. Danar, Vreedy Frans. 2012. Hubungan Antara Motivasi Belajar Intrinsik Dan Ekstrinsik Siswa Dengan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kelas X Kompetensi Keahlian Teknik Audio Video Smk Ma’arif 1 Wates. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. http:eprints.uny.ac.id8469 Deci E, Ryan RM. 1995. Human autonomy: The basis for True Self Esteem. In Kernis, M. H. ED.. Efficacy, Agency, and self Esteem. New York: Plenum Press. Dornyei Z. 2003. Attitudes, Orientations, and Motivations in Language Learning: Advances in Theory, research, and applications. Oxford: Blackwell. Dunston, P. J., Grambell, L. B. 2009. Motivating Adolecent Learners to Read. New York: The Guilford Press. Eskey, D. E. 1988. Holding in Bottom: An Interactive Approach to The Language Problem of Second Language Reader. In Patricia L. C., Joanne D., and David E. Eskey Ed. Interactive Approach to Second Language Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Gambrell, L. B., Marinak, B. A., Brooker, H. R., McCrea-Andrews, H. J. 2011. The importance of independent reading. In Samuels, S. J. Farstrup, A. E. Eds., What research has to say about reading instruction 4th ed., pp. 143-158. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Gardner RC. 1985. Social Psychology and Second Language Learning: The role of Attitudes and Motivation. London: Edward Arnold. Goodman, K. S. 1967. Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of Reading Specialist, 4. Gottfried, A. E. 1985. Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 776, 631-645. Grabe, W., Fredricka S. 2001. Reading for Academic Purposes Guidelines for the ESLEFL Teacher. In M. Grams, David. 2003. “E-Books, Motivating Students to Read Independently”. Retrieved January 14 th , 2015. Website: http:goknow.comGettingStartedDocumentsGrams_D_e-books.pdf Hamachek, D. 1994. Psychology in Teaching Learning Growth. London: Allyn and Bacon. Harmer, Jeremy. 2002. The Practice of English Language Teaching third edition. London Pearson Educational Limited.

Dokumen yang terkait

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS TECHNIQUE AND TRANSLATION TECHNIQUE AT SMAN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 4 9

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS TECHNIQUE AND TRANSLATION TECHNIQUE AT SMAN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 3 9

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ WRITING ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN EXTROVERT AND INTROVERT STUDENTS’ PERSONALITY AT THE SECOND YAR OF SMAN 7 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 18 64

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN STUDENTS TAUGHT THROUGH COLLABORATIVE STRATEGIC READING AND TAUGHT THROUGH SELF-QUESTIONING STRATEGY AT THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 8 BANDAR LAMPUNG

3 89 211

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN LEFT-BRAIN AND RIGHT-BRAIN DOMINATED STUDENTS AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMAN 2 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 10 34

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN FIELD-INDEPENDENT AND FIELD-DEPENDENT STUDENTS IN READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT AT SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 AMBARAWA PRINGSEWU

0 12 49

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN HIGH AND LOW STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION IN READING AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMPN1 GEDUNG AJI, TULANG BAWANG

0 7 59

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF READING COMPREHENSION BETWEEN STUDENTS WITH INTROVERT AND STUDENTS WITH EXTROVERT PERSONALITY AT SMA N 2 KALIANDA

0 15 56

CORRELATION STUDY OF STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION AND STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY TOWARD READING COMPREHENSION AT SMPN 31 BANDAR LAMPUNG

4 28 64

A STUDY OF THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION AND THEIR ACHIEVEMENT IN READING COMPREHENSION

0 2 15