Validity and Reliability of the Reading Comprehension a.

Difficulty level of the reading comprehension try-out test, after the reseacher was analyzing the level of difficulty of the reading comprehension try-out test, found out that there were 30 easy items, 24 average items, and 6 difficult items in this instrument appendix 12. Below is the table displaying the difficulty level of the reading comprehension try-out. Table 3.3. Difficulty Level of Reading Comprehension Try-out Test Classification Items Percentage Easy 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 14,16, 21,23, 25, 27, 29, 30, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 45, 46, 50, 51, 52, 55, 56, 57 50 Average 9, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 33, 34, 37,41, 42, 43, 44, 47, 48, 49, 58, 59, 60 40 Difficult 10, 11, 31, 32, 53, 54, 10 Total 60 Items 100

d. Discrimination Power

Discrimination power refered to the ability of the test items to distinguish the students who have high capability from those who have low capability. A good item, based on that criterion, is an item which is correctly answered by high level students and is incorrectly answered by low level students. The calculation of the discrimination power is as follows: DP = Notes: DP : discrimination power U : the number of upper class who answer correctly L : the number of lower class who answer correctly N : the total number of the students in upper and lower classes The criteria are: 0.00 – 0.20 : poor 0.21 – 0.40 : satisfactory 0.41 – 0.70 : good 0.71 – 1.00 : excellent Heaton, 1991:182 Discrimination power of the reading comprehension try-out test was analyzing. The researcher found out there were 2 excellent items, 21 good items, 17 satisfactory items, 16 poor items, and 4 bad items appendix 12. The following table presents the distribution of discrimination power of this instrument. Table 3.4. Discrimination Power of Reading Comprehension Try- out Test Classification Items Percentage Excellent 15, 45 3,33 Good 4, 6, 7, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 24, 26, 29, 33, 34, 38, 40, 46, 52, 56, 58, 59, 60 35 Satisfactory 1, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 20, 23, 25, 32, 35, 37, 39, 42, 43, 57 28.3 Poor 2, 8, 11, 14, 27, 28, 31, 41, 44, 48, 49, 50, 51, 53, 54, 55 26.7 Bad Item 3, 30, 36, 47 6.7 Total 60 Items 100 Due to the analysis on the difficulty level and the discrimination power described above, the researcher deleted twenty items of difficult and poor mark, average and poor mark, and also easy and poor mark item 2, 3, 8, 11, 14, 27, 28, 30, 31, 36, 41, 44, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 53, 54, and 55. The other 60 items consisting of 1 easy and excellent item item 45, 10 easy and good items item 4, 6, 7, 21, 29, 38, 40, 46, 52 and 56, 9 easy and satisfactory items item 1, 5, 12, 16, 23, 25, 35, 39 and 57, 7

Dokumen yang terkait

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS TECHNIQUE AND TRANSLATION TECHNIQUE AT SMAN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 4 9

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS TECHNIQUE AND TRANSLATION TECHNIQUE AT SMAN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 3 9

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ WRITING ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN EXTROVERT AND INTROVERT STUDENTS’ PERSONALITY AT THE SECOND YAR OF SMAN 7 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 18 64

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN STUDENTS TAUGHT THROUGH COLLABORATIVE STRATEGIC READING AND TAUGHT THROUGH SELF-QUESTIONING STRATEGY AT THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 8 BANDAR LAMPUNG

3 89 211

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN LEFT-BRAIN AND RIGHT-BRAIN DOMINATED STUDENTS AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMAN 2 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 10 34

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN FIELD-INDEPENDENT AND FIELD-DEPENDENT STUDENTS IN READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT AT SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 AMBARAWA PRINGSEWU

0 12 49

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN HIGH AND LOW STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION IN READING AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMPN1 GEDUNG AJI, TULANG BAWANG

0 7 59

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF READING COMPREHENSION BETWEEN STUDENTS WITH INTROVERT AND STUDENTS WITH EXTROVERT PERSONALITY AT SMA N 2 KALIANDA

0 15 56

CORRELATION STUDY OF STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION AND STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY TOWARD READING COMPREHENSION AT SMPN 31 BANDAR LAMPUNG

4 28 64

A STUDY OF THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION AND THEIR ACHIEVEMENT IN READING COMPREHENSION

0 2 15