Riemann-Hilbert problem and solvability

Riemann–Hilbert problem 193

5. Riemann-Hilbert problem and solvability

D EFINITION 3. A rational function pz : = azz − m is said to be Riemann-Hilbert factorizable with respect to |z| = 1 if the following factorization pz = p − z p + z, holds, where p + z, being holomorphic in |z| 1 and continuous up to the boundary, does not vanish in |z| ≤ 1, and p − z, being holomorphic in |z| 1 and continuous up to the boundary, does not vanish in |z| ≥ 1. The factorizability is equivalent to saying that the R–H problem for the jump func- tion p and the circle has a solution. E XAMPLE 5. We consider pz : = azz − m a0 6= 0 m ≥ 1. Let az be a polynomial of order m + n n ≥ 1. Then we have pz = cz − λ 1 · · · z − λ m z − λ m+1 · · · z − λ m+n z − m = c1 − λ 1 z · · · 1 − λ m z z − λ m+1 · · · z − λ m+n , where λ j ∈ C. We can easily see that p is Riemann-Hilbert factorizable with respect to the unit circle if and only if R H |λ 1 | ≤ · · · ≤ |λ m | 1 |λ m+1 | ≤ · · · ≤ |λ m+n |. T HEOREM 2. Suppose that RH is satisfied. Then the kernel and the cokernel of the map ∗ vanishes. Proof. We consider the kernel of ∗. By definition, π pu = 0 is equivalent to pe iθ ue iθ = ge iθ , where g consists of negative powers of e iθ . If |λ j | 1 the series 1 − λ j e − iθ − 1 consists of only negative powers of e iθ . Hence, if 1 − λ j e − iθ U e iθ = Fe iθ for some F consisting of negative powers it follows that U e iθ = 1 − λ j e − iθ − 1 Fe iθ consists of negative powers. By repeating this argument we see that z − λ m+1 · · · z − λ m+n uz, z = e iθ consists of only negative powers. On the other hand, since this is a polynomial of z we obtain u = 0. Next we study the cokernel. Let f ∈ H 2 T be given. For the sake of simplicity we want to solve 1 − λ 1 e − iθ e iθ − λ 2 ue iθ ≡ f e iθ modulo negative powers, 194 M. Yoshino where |λ 1 | 1 |λ 2 |. Hence we have e iθ − λ 2 ue iθ ≡ 1 − λ 1 e − iθ − 1 f = f + + f − ≡ f + modulo negative powers. Here f + resp. f − consists of Fourier coefficients of non- negative resp. negative part. Hence, we have e iθ − λ 2 ue iθ = f + . The solution is given by ue iθ = e iθ − λ 2 − 1 f + . Hence the cokernel vanishes. This ends the proof.

6. Index formula of an ordinary differential operator