creativity and writing test to the try out class; X-1. The experimental class was X- 3 and the control class was X-5. Teaching method used in experimental class was
discovery learning method wile teaching method used in control class was direct instruction method.
2. Implementation Stage
At the first meeting in the class, the researcher distributed the readable creativity test in order to find out the students’ level of creativity. Then, teaching
and learning process were carried out. The experimental class was taught by using Discovery Learning Method while the control class was taught by using Direct
Instruction Method. The materials taught to each class were chosen and adjusted with the syllabus. The writing test was conducted on the 9
th
meeting to collect the students writing score. Finally, the score obtained by the students were analyzed
using descriptive and inferential statistics.
B. Data Description
As stated in Chapter III, this research employed data obtained from the students’ writing scores taken from the experimental class taught by using DLM
and control class by using DIM. After the writing scores were gained, they were sorted in accordance with students’ creativity levels. The description of the data
are based on the group analyzed which are divided into 8 groups: 1 The writing scores of the students taught by using Discovery Learning Method A
І; 2 The writing scores of the students taught by using Direct Instruction Method A
Ї; 3 The writing scores of the students having high creativity B
І; 4 The writing
scores of the students having low creativity B Ї; 5 The writing scores of the
students having high creativity taught by using Discovery Learning Method A
ІBІ; 6 The writing scores of the students having high creativity taught by using Direct Instruction Method A
ЇBІ; 7 The writing scores of the students having low creativity taught by using Discovery Learning Method A
ІBЇ; and 8 The writing scores of the students having low creativity taught by using Direct
Instruction Method A ЇBЇ.
The data of each group are described as follows: 1.
The description of the writing scores of the students taught by using Discovery Learning Method A
І
The writing scores of the students taught by using Discovery Learning Method are presented in table 4.2. More detail computation is provided in
Appendix 9
Table 4.2 The Writing Score of the Students who are Taught by Using Discovery Learning Method
.
Learning Model
N Mean
Mode Median
s Max
Min
Discovery Learning
Method 36
80.33 78.28
85.32 9.35
93 63
The frequency distribution of writing scores of the students who are taught by using Discovery Learning Method on the whole can be seen in table 4.3 and
histogram and polygon in figure 4.1.
Table 4.3. Frequency Distribution of Writing Scores of the Students who are Taught by using Discovery Learning Method A
І
Class Limit Class
Boundaries
59 – 63
58.5 - 63.5 1
61 61
2.78 64
– 68 63.5 - 68.5
3 66
198 8.33
69 – 73
68.5 - 73.5 6
71 426
16.67 74
– 78 73.5 - 78.5
7 76
532 19.44
79 – 83
78.5 - 83.5 3
81 243
8.33 84
– 88 83.5 - 88.5
5 86
430 13.89
89 – 93
88.5 - 93.5 11
91 1001
30.56 36
2891 100
Mean
80.36
Mode 78.28
Median
85.32
S 9.35
Figure 4.1. Histogram and Polygon of A І
2. The description of the writing scores of the students taught by using Direct
Instruction Method A Ї.
The writing scores of the students taught by using Direct Instruction Method are presented in table 4.4. More complete computation is provided in Appendix 9.
Table 4.4 The Writing Score of the Students who are Taught by using Direct Instruction Method
.
Learning Model
N Mean
Mode Median
s Max
Min
Discovery Learning
Method 36
77.83 76.79
77.41 5.89
90 66
The frequency distribution of writing scores of the students who are taught by using Discovery Learning Method on the whole can be seen in table 4.5 and
histogram and polygon in figure 4.2.
Table 4.5. Frequency distribution of Writing Scores of the Students who are Taught by using Direct Instruction Method A
Ї
Class Limit Class
Boundaries
63 – 66
63.5 - 66.5 1
64.5 64.5
2.78 67 - 70
66.5 - 70.5 2
68.5 137
5.56 71
– 74 70.5 - 74.5
7 72.5
507.5 19.44
75 – 78
74.5 - 78.5 11
76.5 841.5
30.56 79
– 82 78.5 - 82.5
8 80.5
644 22.22
83 – 86
82.5 - 86.5 3
84.5 253.5
8.33 87
– 90 86.5 - 90.5
4 88.5
354 11.11
36 2802
100
Mean 77.83
Mode 76.79
Median 77.41
S 5.89
Figure 4.2.Histogram and Polygon of A Ї
3. The description of the writing scores of the students having high creativity
B І.
The writing scores of the students having high creativity are presented in table 4.6. More detail computation is presented in Appendix 9.
Table 4.6 The Writing Score of the Students who have High Creativity
Creativity N
Mean Mode
Median s
Max Min
High 36
84.2 89.57
86 6.52
93 72
The frequency distribution of writing scores of the students who have high creativity on the whole can be seen in table 4.7 and histogram and polygon in
figure 4.3.
Table 4.7. Frequency Distribution of Writing Scores of the Students who have High Creativity B
І
Class Limit Class
Boundaries
69 – 72
68.5 - 72.5 1
70.5 70.5
2.78 73 - 76
72.5 - 76.5 5
74.5 372.5
8.33 77
– 80 76.5 - 80.5
6 78.5
471 16.67
81 – 84
80.5 - 84.5 3
82.5 247.5
19.44 85
– 88 84.5 - 88.5
8 86.5
692 8.33
89 – 92
88.5 - 92.5 12
90.5 1086
13.89 93
– 96 92.5 - 96.5
1 94.5
94.5 30.56
36 3034
100
Mean
84.2
Mode 89.57
Median 86
S 6.52
Figure 4.3. Histogram and Polygon of B І
4. The description of the writing scores of the students having low creativity
B Ї.
The writing scores of the students who have low creativity are presented in table 4.8. More complete computation is formulated in Appendix 9.
Table 4.8 The Writing Score of the Students who have Low Creativity
Creativity N
Mean Mode
Median s
Max Min
Low 36
73.97 77.3
74.5 5.30
83 63
The frequency distribution of writing scores of the students who have low creativity on the whole can be seen in table 4.9 and histogram and polygon in
figure 4.4.
Table 4.9. Frequency Distribution of Writing Scores of the Students who have Low Creativity B
Ї
Class Limit Class
Boundaries
60 – 63
60.5 - 63.5 1
62 62.0
2.78 64
– 66 63.5 - 66.5
3 65
195.0 8.33
67 –69
66.5 - 69.5 3
68 204.0
8.33 70
– 72 69.5 - 72.5
7 71
497.0 19.44
73 – 75
72.5 - 75.5 6
74 444.0
16.67 76
–78 75.5 - 78.5
9 77
693.0 25.00
79 – 83
78.5 - 83.5 7
81 567.0
19.44 ∑
36 498
2662.0 100
Mean
73.97
Mode 77.3
Median 74.5
S 5.30
Figure 4.4. Histogram and Polygon of B
Ї
5. The description of the writing scores of the students having high creativity
who are taught by using Discovery Learning Method A ІBІ.
The writing scores of the students having high creativity who are taught by using Discovery Learning Method are presented in table 4.10. For complete
computation is presented in Appendix 9.
Table 4.10 The Writing Score of the Students having high creativity who are taught by using Discovery Learning Method.
Creativity Learning
method N
Mean Mode
Median s
Max Min
HighDLM 18
88.11 89.93
89.3 5.17
93 75
The frequency distribution of writing scores of the students having high creativity who are taught by using Discovery Learning Method on the whole can
be seen in table 4.11 and histogram and polygon in figure 4.5
Table 4.11. Frequency Distribution of Writing Scores of the Students having High Creativity who are taught by using Discovery Learning
Method A
ІBІ.
Class Limit Class
Boundaries
72 – 75
71.5 - 75.5 1
73.5 73.5
2.78 76
– 79 75.5 - 79.5
1 77.5
77.5 8.33
80 – 83
79.5 - 83.5 80.5
16.67 84
– 88 83.5 - 88.5
5 85.5
427.5 19.44
89 – 92
88.5 - 92.5 10
90.5 905
8.33 93
– 96 92.5 - 96.5
1 94.5
94.5 13.89
∑ 36
1578
Mean
88.11
Mode 89.93
Median
89.3
S 5.17
Figure 4.5. Histogram and Polygon of A ІBІ
6. The description of the writing scores of the students having high creativity
who are taught by using Direct Instruction Method A ЇBІ.
The writing scores of the students having high creativity who are taught by using Direct Instruction Method are presented in table 4.12. More detail
computation is presented in Appendix 9.
Table 4.12 The Writing Score of the Students having high creativity who are taught by using Direct Instruction Method.
Creativity Teaching
method N
Mean Mode
Median s
Max Min
HighDM 18
80.33 77.83
79.7 5.78
90 72
The frequency distribution of writing scores of the students having high creativity who are taught by using Direct Instruction Method on the whole can be
seen in table 4.13 and histogram and polygon in figure 4.6.
Table 4.13. Frequency Distribution of Writing Scores of the Students having High Creativity who are taught by using Direct Instruction
Method A
ЇBІ
Class Limit Class
Boundaries
69 – 72
68.5 - 72.5 1
70.5 70.5
2.78 73
– 76 72.5 - 76.5
4 74.5
298 8.33
77 – 80
77.5 - 80.5 5
79.5 397.5
16.67 81
– 84 80.5 - 84.5
3 82.5
247.5 19.44
85 – 88
84.5 - 88.5 3
86.5 259.5
8.33 89
– 92 88.5 - 92.5
2 90.5
181 13.89
∑ 36
1454 100
Mean
80.33
Mode 77.83
Median
79.7
S 5.86
Figure 4.6. Histogram and Polygon of A ЇBІ
7. The description of the writing scores of the students having low creativity
who are taught by using Discovery Learning Method A ІBЇ.
The writing scores of the students having low creativity who are taught by using Discovery Learning Method are presented in table 4.14. More complete
computation is provided in Appendix 9.
Table 4.14 The Writing Score of the Students having low creativity who are taught by using Discovery Learning Method.
Creativity Teaching
Method N
Mean Mode
Median s
Max Min
LowDLM 18
72.6 70.5
72.5 5.58
82 63
The frequency distribution of writing scores of the students having low creativity who are taught by using Discovery Learning Method on the whole can
be seen in table 4.15 and histogram and polygon in figure 4.7.
Table 4.15. Frequency Distribution of Writing Scores of the Students having Low Creativity who are taught by using Discovery Learning
Method A
ІBЇ
Class Limit Class
Boundaries
60 – 63
59.5 - 63.5 1
61.5 61.5
2.78 64
– 67 63.5 - 67.5
2 65.5
131 8.33
68 – 71
67.5 - 71.5 5
69.5 347.5
16.67 72
– 75 71.5 - 75.5
4 73.5
294 19.44
76 – 79
75.5 - 79.5 4
77.5 310
8.33 80
– 83 79.5 - 83.5
2 81.5
163 13.89
∑ 18
1307 100
Mean 72.6
Mode 70.5
Median 72.5
S 5.58
Figure 4.6. Histogram and Polygon of A ІBЇ
8. The description of the writing scores of the students having low creativity
who are taught by using Direct Instruction Method A ЇBЇ.
The writing scores of the students having low creativity who are taught by using Direct Instruction Method are presented in table 4.16. More detai
computation is presented in Appendix 9.
Table 4.16 The Writing Score of the Students having low creativity who are taught by using Direct Instruction Method.
Creativity Teaching
method N
Mean Mode
Median S
Max Min
Low DM 18
75.3 77.5
76.10 4.74
83 66
The frequency distribution of writing scores of the students having low creativity who are taught by using Direct Instruction Method on the whole can be
seen in table 4.17 and histogram and polygon in figure 4.8.
Table 4.17. Frequency Distribution of Writing Scores of the Students having Low Creativity who are taught by using Direct Instruction
Method A
ЇBЇ
Class Limit Class
Boundaries
64 – 66
63.5 - 66.5 1
64.5 64.5
5.56 67
–70 66.5 - 70.5
2 68.5
137 11.11
71 – 74
69.5 - 72.5 4
72.5 290
22.22 75
– 78 72.5 - 75.5
6 76.5
459 33.33
79 –82
75.5 - 78.5 4
80.5 322
22.22 83
– 82 78.5 - 81.5
1 84.5
84 5.56
18 447
1356 100
Mean 75.3
Mode
76.5
Median 75.83
S
5.10
Figure 4.8. Histogram and Polygon of A ЇBЇ
C. Data Analysis
