Introduction Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:P:Precambrian Research:Vol105.Issue2-4.2001:

1. Introduction

In recent years there have been great advances in our understanding of the mainly Proterozoic hypabyssal dyke swarms intruded into Precam- brian cratons. Much information has come from studies of mainly Phanerozoic continental flood basalt CFB provinces which have similar chem- istry. Although field evidence of such a relation- ship is often lacking see arguments expressed in Ross, 1983; Tarney, 1992; Cadman et al., 1995, it can sometimes be deduced that flood basalts were fed from the extensive dyke systems which are now exposed in Precambrian cratons e.g. Baragar et al., 1996. Despite very detailed research on both phenom- ena, the degree to which various petrogenetic processes such as fractional crystallisation, crustal contamination and mantle metasomatism control their chemistry is still hotly debated. An obvious difficulty in any petrogenetic analysis of dykes is that the same process may have operated on the magma at different stages in its genesis; for exam- ple, crystal fractionation within a basaltic magma may take place both prior to dyke injection e.g. within a magma chamber and subsequently within the dykes themselves, the relative influence of fractionation within each environment may be very difficult to ascertain. Hence although many studies of intradyke petrogenetic processes have been undertaken e.g. Gibb, 1968; Komar, 1972, 1976; Ross, 1983, 1986; Platten and Watterson, 1987; Blichert-Toft et al., 1992; Ernst and Bell, 1992 the degree to which basalt petrogenesis may be controlled by hypabyssal processes within mafic dykes is still uncertain. Study of the Kangaˆmiut dyke swarm offers an excellent opportunity to help resolve some of these questions. Earlier workers have noted that unlike the vast majority of continental mafic swarms, the dykes were injected into an overall contractional environment e.g. Escher et al., 1976 and throughout much of their extent horn- blende is the dominant primary ferromagnesian mineral Korstga˚rd, 1979; Bridgwater et al., 1995. However, the major element chemistry of the swarm suggests a normal tholeiitic Fe-enrich- ment trend Escher et al., 1975; Bridgwater et al., 1995. As hornblende is associated with calc – al- kaline fractionation, it would appear that the petrogenetic processes governing the chemistry of the dykes may be unrelated to the crystallisation processes within the dykes themselves. The field setting and unusual petrographical characteristics of the Kangaˆmiut dyke swarm also require that models developed to explain the petrogenesis of other dyke swarms are applied in order to test their validity. In this paper we seek to undertake comprehensive major and trace element modelling of the chemistry of the Kangaˆmiut dykes with a view to understanding the processes governing their formation.

2. Field relationships and geological setting