Concept of Morphological Awareness
33
synthesis aspect. The syntactic aspect is morpheme identification awareness, while the synthesis aspect is morphological structure awareness.
1 Morpheme Identification Awareness
First aspect of morphological awareness is the morpheme identification awareness. McBridge 2005 defines morpheme identification awareness
as “the ability to distinguish different meanings across homophones”. She demonstrated
this skill by giving example when a language learner understands that the flower in flowerpot is represented by a plant with petals as opposed to a sack of white
powder flour. Another example is when the language learner can differentiate the sound of the word dead in dead body to the sound of the word debt in a
spoken language. Here the emphasis is what the learner can develop for his vocabulary acquisition based on his acquired word in term of homophone, and
how the learner can differentiate the homophones. However, this current study uses another operational definition of
morpheme identification awareness. The previous definition is related to definition of morpheme as sound, while this study defines morpheme as smallest
meaningful unit of language in the form of word. Hence, morpheme identification awareness in this current study is the ability to distinguish different meanings by
examining the components of the word construction. It is the learners’ ability to figure out the meaning of words by examining the components which construct
the words.
34
2 Morphological Structure Awareness
The second aspect of morphological awareness is morphological structure awareness. It is the ability to create new meanings by making use of familiar
morphemes Berko in McBridge, 2005. He studies this ability in which children’s
grammatical knowledge illustrates this skill. A child who understands that the famous concept of greater than one wug is represented by the word wugs,
involving two morphemes, demonstrates morphological structure awareness skill. This particular example reflects inflectional knowledge of morphology.
Similarly, Chang, Wagner, Muse Chow, 2005 define morphological structure awareness as the ability of the learners to make use the linguistic
knowledge to derive new meaning. It is similar to the previous definition as the aspects cover the language elements and new meaning. It relates the receptive
skills to be performed as productive skills. The learners who are able to know the concept of present participle will recognize that the present participles are derived
from present verbs plus –ing. Thus, they can produce new meaning of the words that are recognized as present verbs to be added –ing to make it as present
participles. In addition, since present participles can transform into adjectives, the learners can also produce new words as adjectives from other present participles
e.g. confusing, amazing, boring. Morphological structure awareness requires complete awareness to construct new meaning and to confirm whether the words
exist in English. For instance, one may construct new word derived from the words cactus by adding –es to the word. So the word is cactuses. However the
new word is incorrect since cactus cannot be added –es instead of cacti. In other
35
words, the learners should be equipped by sufficient knowledge of the morphemes to be able to construct new words correctly.
To sum up, morphological structure is closely related to the ability to construct new words from the morphemes the learners have learnt. It requires the
learners to know affixes inflections and derivations together with their meaning and use. The ability requires the learner to perform productive skills from the
knowledge they get through receptive language activities e.g. reading and listening.