45
was adapted from the original version of Morphological Awareness Test by Chang, C. M., Wagner, R. K., Muse, A. Chow, H. S 2005. There were two
kinds of test i.e. Morpheme Identification Awareness Test and Morphological Structure Awareness Test.
H. Data Analysis
The data obtained was analyzed by SPSS program. The statistical technique used to analysis the data was Correlation of Pearson Product Moment
. The first
step the data analysis was about the normality and linearity of the data distribution .
It was used to fulfill the requirement for further analysis. Correlation of Pearson Product Moment was used to measure the correlation of the variables. The
coefficient correlation was used to find p-value for each analysis. The p-value was used to reject or not to reject the null hypotheses. Null hypothesis was rejected if
p-value 0.05, while null hypothesis was not rejected if p-value
0.05. The first data analysis was about the correlation between vocabulary size
and morpheme identification awareness. The null hypothesis “ There is no
correlation between vocabulary size and morpheme identification” was rejected if p-value
0.05. In other word, there was a correlation between vocabulary size and morpheme identification awareness. The second analysis was the correlation
between vocabulary size and morphological structure awareness. The null hypothesis “ There is no correlation between vocabulary size and morphological
structure awareness” was rejected if p-value 0.05. It meant that there was a
correlation between vocabulary size and morphological structure awareness. The
46
third analysis was about the correlation between morpheme identification awareness and morphological structure awareness.
The null hypothesis “ There is no correlation between morpheme identification awareness and morphological
structure awareness ” was rejected if p-value 0.05. It proved that there was a
correlation between morpheme identification awareness and morphological structure awareness.
