7
2. METHODOLOGY
This study is an exploratory research. Exploratory research is a research which has goal to elaborate  new  science  or  assumption  to  give  suggestion  for  the  next  research  Kuncoro:
2013.  The  descriptive  analysis  method  was  used  to  explain  the  results  of  this  study. Frequency distribution was used to explain what kind of help they needed to enhance their
business  and  what  kind  of  material  will  help  them  while  running  their  business.  The frequency  distribution  is  a  method  to  display  the  number  of  cases,  percentage,  or  both
corresponding for each variable‟s value.
The design of this study is quantitative. The population of this article is the small business group  in  Cepogo,  Boyolali.  This  business  group  is  the  only  one  business  group  in  East
Cepogo. The sample of this article is all of the members of Logam Timur business group or seventeen  persons.  Primary  data  were  collected  by  distributed  the  questionnaire  to  all
participants  after  the  training  program  done.  The  questionnaires  were  divided  into  two types.  The  first  questionnaire  is  closed  ended-question  and  the  second  one  is  an  open
ended-question.  The  closed  ended-question  used  Likert  scale.  Likert  scale  is  used  to measure  behaviour, opinion,  and  perception  of  the  person or group of  social  condition  or
phenomenon  Sugiyono, 2009.  Likert  scale  is  given  in  five  options,  on  a  scles  of  one  to five, from very poor to very good.
The firs t part of the questionnaire is designed to clarify metal craftsmen‟s perception on the
training  session  and  the  second  one  is  designed  to  know  what  they  need  to  run  their business  afterwards.  There  are  four  components  asked  in  the  questionnaire,  about  the
materials,  supporting  training,  overall  training,  and  the  trainers‟  evaluation.    The respondents of this study are all  metal craftsmen  who become  members of Logam Timur
Business  Group  in  Cepogo  County  and  also  who  followed  the  training.  The  total  of  the questionnaires that was distributed are 17 and 100 of questionnaire were collected.
In  this  study,  there  are  two  types  of  data  presents.  Nominal  data  show  demographic characteristic of the trainees. Nominal data present age and gender of trainees. Ordinal data
showing their perception towards the effectiveness of the training will be presented in the part of discussion and analysis. To measure trainees‟ perception, mean scale was used and
8 to determine the effectiveness indicator each aspect. Range of scales was used to calculate
the score of each aspect Sugiyono, 2005.
�� = −
� Which  means,  Rs  =  range  of  scales;
m
=  the  highest  score;
n
=  the  lowest  score  that probably  happened;
b
=  amount  of  scale.  By  this  formula,  it  will  give  result  as  the following;
�� = 5 − 1
5 = 0,8
From the result of the formula above, the range of scale is 0,8. The classifications of scales range summarize in the table below;
Table 2.  Classification of Scales Range
Rating Scale
Very ineffective 1,00  x ≤ 1,80
Ineffective 1,81  x ≤ 2,60
Moderate 2,61  x ≤ 3,40
Effective 3,41  x ≤ 4,20
Very Effective 4,21  x ≤ 5,00
To  compute  the  mean  value  of  the  data  from  the  questionnaire,  it  used  calculation  as follows;
� = �
� Which means, X = mean; ∑x = sum of value of cases; N= number of cases
The  questionnaires  were  adopted  from  the  research  by  Ugoji  and  Mordi  2014.  .  They arranged  the  questionnaires  into  two  sections.  The  questionnaire  was  designed  to  clarify
reactions of the firm‟s employees on the training evaluation initiative of the organization. In this study, the questionnaire‟s structure highlighted as the following:
1.
Section  1  contains  the  background  information  of  the  participants,  such  as  name, age, and gender.
9
2.
Section  2  questioned  of  the  training  evaluation  in  terms  of  the  general  aspect  of training, training material, training supports and quality of the trainers.
3.
Section 3 focus on supporting need by the participants for the next training
3. FINDINGS