Excess Air from Flue Gas Analysis
Excess Air from Flue Gas Analysis
In operating plants, data on flue gas analysis will be available using which the plant engi- neer may arrive at the excess air used. This will help the plant engineer evaluate the boiler efficiency, and air and flue gas quantities. A formula that is widely used to obtain excess air E in % is [2]
(1.2) where O 2 , CO, and N 2 are % volume of oxygen, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen on dry flue
E = 100 × (O 2 – CO/2)/[0.264N 2 – (O 2 – CO/2)]
gas basis. Another formula is used when an Orsat-type analyzer is used for analyzing the flue gases; SO 2 will be absorbed with CO 2. The oxygen is on dry volumetric basis.
E=K 1 O 2 /(21 – O 2 ) (1.3) Constant K 1 = (100C + 237H 2 + 37.5S + 9N 2 – 29.6O 2 )/(C + 3H 2 + 0.375S – 0.375O 2 ) (1.4)
where C, H 2 ,N 2 , S, and O 2 are fraction by weight of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, sulfur, and oxygen in fuel.
Combustion Calculations
Let us check the value of constant K 1 for Example 1.1.
% weight of CH 4 in fuel = 83.4 × 16/(83.4 × 16 + 15.8 × 30 + 0.8 × 28) = 0.729. % weight of C 2 H 6 in fuel = 15.8 × 30/(83.4 × 16 + 15.8 × 30 + 0.8 × 28) = 0.259
%N 2 by weight in fuel = 0.012
Carbon C in CH 4 = 0.75 × 0.729 = 0.5467 and fraction hydrogen = 0.1823 Carbon in C 2 H 6 = (24/30) × 0.259 = 0.2072 and fraction hydrogen = 0.0518
Total C fraction by weight = 0.5467 + 0.2072 = 0.7539, and total hydrogen by weight = 0.0518 + 0.1823 = 0.2341. Hence,
K 1 = [100 × 0.7539 + 237 × 0.2341 + 9 × 0.012]/[0.7539 + 3 × 0.2341] = 89.9 Let us compute the heating value of the fuel from the weight fractions. Lower heat-
ing value (LHV) = 0.729 × 21,529 + 0.259 × 20,432 = 20,980 Btu/lb = 11,655 kcal/kg = 48,800 kJ/kg (where 21,529 and 20,432 in Btu/lb are the LHV of methane and ethane from Tables 1.1 and 1.2).
HHV = 0.729 × 23,879 + 0.259 × 22,320 = 23,188 Btu/lb = 12,882 kcal/kg
= 53,940 kJ/kg = 53.93 × 10 6 J/kg.
K 1 may also be obtained from Table 1.4 for various fuels. If oxygen is measured on true volume basis (wet basis), then one uses constant K 2 for excess air evaluation as shown:
K 2 = (100C + 363H 2 + 37.5S + 9N 2 – 29.6O 2 )/(C + 3H 2 + 0.375S – 0.375O 2 ) (1.5) Many modern analytical techniques, such as those employing infrared or paramagnetic
principles, also measure on a dry gas basis because they require moisture-free samples to avoid damage to the detection cells. These analyzers are set up with a sample condition- ing system that removes moisture from the gas sample. However, some analyzers, such as in situ oxygen detectors employing a zirconium oxide cell, measure on the wet gas basis. Results from such equipment need to be corrected to a dry gas basis before they are used in the ASME equations.
These values of K 1 and K 2 have been arrived at after performing calculations on several fuels with different fuel analysis and hence give a good working average value.
TABLE 1.4
Constants K 1 and K 2 for Excess Air Evaluation
Carbon monoxide
Blast furnace gas
Coke over gas
10 Steam Generators and Waste Heat Boilers: For Process and Plant Engineers
TABLE 1.5
Combustion Constants A (Air Required for 1 MM kJ fuel), kg
Fuel
A, kg/GJ
Max CO 2 (Dry Flue Gas) A, lb/MM Btu
575 Bagasse
Blast furnace gas
20 650 Coke oven gas
670 Refinery and oil gas
13.3 720 Natural gas
727–733 Fuel oils, furnace oil, and lignite
740–750 Bituminous coals
Using Table 1.4, for methane (natural gas), K 1 = 90. O 2 on dry flue gas basis is 3%. Hence, excess air = 90 × 3/(21 – 3) = 15%. If wet basis is used, then K 2 = 110.5. Then, excess air = 110.5 × 2.47/(21 – 2.47) = 14.7—close to 15%. These constants are good estimates for a type of fuel, and so some minor variations may be expected depending on actual fuel analysis.
There is another approximate method to get the excess air from CO 2 values, but the accu- racy is not good; see Table 1.5.
E = max CO 2 on dry flue gas basis/%CO 2 measured. In our example, from Table 1.5, max CO 2 = 12%, while actual is 10.3%. Hence, E = 12/10.3 = 1.165 or 16.5% excess air. This is only an estimate. The O 2 basis is more accurate.
Parts
» For Process and Plant Engineers
» A Few Typical Solved Problems
» Excess Air from Flue Gas Analysis
» Simplified Combustion Calculations
» Relating Oxygen and Energy Input in Turbine Exhaust Gases
» Evaluating Fuel Quantity Required to Raise Turbine Exhaust Gas Temperature
» Simplified Formulae for Boiler Efficiency
» Firing Fuels with Low Heating Values
» Boiler duty and efficiency calculations
» Acid Dew Point Temperature T dp
» Steam Generator Furnace Design
» Advantages of Water-Cooled Furnaces
» Furnace Exit Gas Temperature Evaluation
» Empirical Formula for Furnace Duty Estimation
» Distribution of Radiation to Tube Banks
» External Radiation to Heat Transfer Surfaces at Furnace Exit
» Correlations for CHF (Critical Heat Flux) and Allowable Steam Quality
» Guidelines for Good Circulation System Design
» Emissions Affect Steam Generator Designs
» Adding Condensate Heater to Improve Boiler Plant Efficiency
» Understanding Boiler Surface Areas
» Steam Generators for Oil Sands Application
» Radiant versus Convective Superheaters
» Steam Inlet and Exit Nozzle Location
» Case Study of a Superheater with Tube Failure Problems
» Problem at Low Loads with Inverted-Loop Superheaters
» Data Required for Performing Steam Generator Analysis
» Evaluating Part Load Performance
» Tube Wall Temperature Estimation at Economizer Inlet
» Methods to Minimize Low-Temperature Corrosion Problems
» Water Chemistry, Carryover, Steam Purity
» Sizing and Performance Calculations
» Flue Gas Composition and Gas Pressure
» Heat Recovery in Sulfur Plants
» Heat Recovery in Sulfuric Acid Plant
» Heat Recovery in Hydrogen Plants
» Combining Solar Energy with Heat Recovery Systems
» Natural versus Forced Circulation HRSGs
» Optimizing Pinch and Approach Points in HRSGs
» HRSG Performance and Evaluating Field Data
» Advantages of Supplementary Firing in HRSGs
» Performance with and without Export Steam
» Cement Plant Waste Heat Recovery
» Fluid Heaters and Film Temperature
» Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient h o
» Off-Design Performance with Addition of Economizer
» Simulation of Fire Tube Boiler Performance
» Simplified Approach to Evaluating Performance of Fire Tube Boilers
» Heat Transfer Inside and Outside Tubes
» Specifying Waste Heat Boilers
» Understanding Pinch and Approach Points
» Estimating Steam Generation and Gas–Steam Temperature Profiles
» Why Cannot We Arbitrarily Select the Pinch and Approach Points?
» Off-Design Performance Evaluation
» Single- or Multiple-Pressure HRSG
» Cogeneration Plant Application
» Water Dew Point of Flue Gases
» Condensation Heat Transfer Calculations
» Condensation over Finned Tubes
» Drum Coil Heater: Bath Heater Sizing
» Checking Heat Transfer Equipment for Noise and Vibration Problems
» Steam Drum Calculations Steam Velocity in Drum
» Flow Instability in Two-Phase Circuits
» Superheater Design and Off-Design Calculation
» NTU Method of Performance Evaluation (Number of Transfer Units)
» Appendix B: Tube-Side Heat Transfer Coefficients and Pressure Drop
» Another Method of Estimating h c for Water
» Importance of Streams in Superheater, Economizer
» Simplified Procedure for Evaluating Performance of Plain Tube Bundles
» Appendix D: Nonluminous Heat Transfer Calculations
» Determination of Heat Transfer Coefficient h c Convective Heat Transfer Coefficient
» How Is Life of Superheater Affected by High Tube Wall Temperatures?
» Effect of h i on Fin Selection
» Reduce Weight of Tube Bundles Using Smaller Tubes
» Effect of Outside Fouling Factor
» Effect of Fin Thickness and Conductivity
» Why Are Fins Not Used in Gas–Gas Exchangers?
» Appendix F: Properties of Gases
» Flue Gas Mixture Properties Calculation
» Appendix G: Quiz on Boilers and HRSGs with Answers
Show more