Determination of Heat Transfer Coefficient h c Convective Heat Transfer Coefficient
Determination of Heat Transfer Coefficient h c Convective Heat Transfer Coefficient
The ESCOA correlations that were revised in 1993 [2,3] for solid and serrated fins are widely used in the industry (Table E.2). For an inline bundle,
For a staggered bundle,
. 0 25 ( d + 2 h ) T
NLS w ( T − A o )
where
A o =+2 d nbh (E.4)
A o is the obstruction area, m 2 /m
C p is the gas specific heat at average temperature, J/kg K
h c is the convective heat transfer coefficient, W/m 2 K
k is the thermal conductivity of gas, W/m K µ is the viscosity, kg/m s (Gas properties are computed at the average gas temperature.)
T g ,T f are absolute temperature of gas and fin, K
G is the gas mass velocity, kg/m 2 s
d is the outer diameter of tube, m N w is the tubes/row or number of tubes wide L is the effective length, m
h is the fin height, m
b is the fin thickness, m n is the fin density, fins/m W g is the gas flow, kg/s S T ,S L are transverse and longitudinal pitch, m S is the spacing between fins = 1/n-b, m
Appendix E: Calculations with Finned Tubes 417
TABLE E.2
ESCOA Revised Correlations: Factors C 1 –C 6 for Solid and Serrated Fins in Inline and Staggered Arrangements
Solid fins Inline
5 = 11 . − (. 0 75 1 5 − . e − 07 . N d ) e − 20 . SL/S T C 6 = 16 . − (. 0 75 1 5 − . e − 07 . N d ) e e −2 0 .( SL/ST )
J = CCC 1 3 5 [(d 2h)/d] [(t + 0.5 g + 460)/(t a + 460 )] 05 .
2 C 2 5 = 07 . + (. 0708 − . e − . 0 15 N d )[ e − 10 . SL/S T ] C 6 = 11 . + (. 1821 − . e − . N N 0 15 d ) e − 20 .( SL/S T ) − [. 0708 − . e − . N 0 15 2 d ] e − 06 .( SL/S T )
JCCCd = 1 3 5 [( + 2 h)/d ] [( 05 . t g + 460 )/( t a + 460 )] . 0 25
f = CCC 2 4 6 [( d + 2 h)/d ] [( 05 . t g + 460 )/( t a + 460 )] − . 0 25
Serrated fins Inline
C 5 = 11 . − (. 0 75 1 5 − . e − 07 . N d ) e − 20 . SL/S T C 6 = 16 . − (. 0 75 1 5 − . e − 07 . N d ) e e −2 0 .( SL/ST ) 2
2 C 2 5 = 07 . + (. 0708 − . e − . 0 15 N d )[ e − 10 . SL/S T ] C 6 = 11 . + (. 1821 − . e − . N N 0 15 d ) e − 20 .( SL/S T ) − 2 [. 0708 − . e − . N 0 15 d ] e − 06 .( SL/S T )
J = CCC 1 3 5 [( d + 2 h)/d ] [( 05 . t g + 460 )/( t a + 460 )] . 0 25
fCCC = 2 4 6 [( d + 2 h)/d ] [( 05 . t g + 460 )/( t a + 460 )] − . 0 25
Source: Fintube Technologies, Tulsa, OK.
418 Appendix E: Calculations with Finned Tubes
Fin Efficiency and Effectiveness For Both Solid and Serrated Fins
1 − ( 1EA − ) f
A (E.5)
where A f ,A t are area of fins and total area per unit length, m 2 /m.
For Solid Fins
A f = π n × ( 2 dh + 2 h 2 + bd + 2 bh )
(E.6)
A t = A f + π d ( 1 − nb
(E.7)
Fin efficiency E is given by the following formula using Bessel functions:
( e o ) ×
E = 2 r /m/ r 2 − r 2 ( )( ) ( )( )
1 I mr K mr e 1 o − K 1 mr I mr e 1 o
(E.8)
I o ( mr K mr m o )( 1 e ) + 1 ( I mr K e )( o mr o )
where
Bessel functions I 1 ,I o ,K 1 ,K o are shown in Table E.4
r e = (d + 2h)/2 and r o = d/2, m
A simpler formula for E is
2 (E.9) 1 + . 33 mh
{ ( d + 2 h /d }
K m is the thermal conductivity of fin, W/m K.
For Serrated Fins
π dn 2 h × ( ws b + ) +× b ws
d ( 1 − nb )
(E.12)
Appendix E: Calculations with Finned Tubes 419
E = tanh mh ( )
m =√ h o ( b + ws /K /b/ws ) m
(E.14)
ws is the width of serration, m.
Nonluminous Heat Transfer Coefficient
With finned tubes, due to the large surface area for a given volume, the beam length will
be much smaller than a comparable plain tube bundle at the same tube spacing, and hence, the nonluminous heat transfer coefficient is not high. The beam length may be approxi- mated as
(E.15)
Using the procedure discussed in Appendix D, the gas emissivity and the nonluminous heat transfer coefficient h n may be estimated. Generally, this is quite small compared to plain tubes due to the larger surface area in a given volume.
Gas Pressure Drop across Finned Tube Bundles
. 2 0 205 faGN +
(E.16)
where ΔP g is the gas pressure drop, mm wc N d is the number of rows deep ρ g is the density of gas at average gas temperature, kg/m 3
For staggered arrangement,
. 0 25 − ( d + 2 h ) T
f = friction factor = CCC 2 4 6
(E.18)
For inline arrangement,
. 0 25 ( d + 2 h ) T
f = CCC 2 4 6
(E.19)
420 Appendix E: Calculations with Finned Tubes
(E.20)
4 N
dx ( t g + 273 )
Parts
» For Process and Plant Engineers
» A Few Typical Solved Problems
» Excess Air from Flue Gas Analysis
» Simplified Combustion Calculations
» Relating Oxygen and Energy Input in Turbine Exhaust Gases
» Evaluating Fuel Quantity Required to Raise Turbine Exhaust Gas Temperature
» Simplified Formulae for Boiler Efficiency
» Firing Fuels with Low Heating Values
» Boiler duty and efficiency calculations
» Acid Dew Point Temperature T dp
» Steam Generator Furnace Design
» Advantages of Water-Cooled Furnaces
» Furnace Exit Gas Temperature Evaluation
» Empirical Formula for Furnace Duty Estimation
» Distribution of Radiation to Tube Banks
» External Radiation to Heat Transfer Surfaces at Furnace Exit
» Correlations for CHF (Critical Heat Flux) and Allowable Steam Quality
» Guidelines for Good Circulation System Design
» Emissions Affect Steam Generator Designs
» Adding Condensate Heater to Improve Boiler Plant Efficiency
» Understanding Boiler Surface Areas
» Steam Generators for Oil Sands Application
» Radiant versus Convective Superheaters
» Steam Inlet and Exit Nozzle Location
» Case Study of a Superheater with Tube Failure Problems
» Problem at Low Loads with Inverted-Loop Superheaters
» Data Required for Performing Steam Generator Analysis
» Evaluating Part Load Performance
» Tube Wall Temperature Estimation at Economizer Inlet
» Methods to Minimize Low-Temperature Corrosion Problems
» Water Chemistry, Carryover, Steam Purity
» Sizing and Performance Calculations
» Flue Gas Composition and Gas Pressure
» Heat Recovery in Sulfur Plants
» Heat Recovery in Sulfuric Acid Plant
» Heat Recovery in Hydrogen Plants
» Combining Solar Energy with Heat Recovery Systems
» Natural versus Forced Circulation HRSGs
» Optimizing Pinch and Approach Points in HRSGs
» HRSG Performance and Evaluating Field Data
» Advantages of Supplementary Firing in HRSGs
» Performance with and without Export Steam
» Cement Plant Waste Heat Recovery
» Fluid Heaters and Film Temperature
» Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient h o
» Off-Design Performance with Addition of Economizer
» Simulation of Fire Tube Boiler Performance
» Simplified Approach to Evaluating Performance of Fire Tube Boilers
» Heat Transfer Inside and Outside Tubes
» Specifying Waste Heat Boilers
» Understanding Pinch and Approach Points
» Estimating Steam Generation and Gas–Steam Temperature Profiles
» Why Cannot We Arbitrarily Select the Pinch and Approach Points?
» Off-Design Performance Evaluation
» Single- or Multiple-Pressure HRSG
» Cogeneration Plant Application
» Water Dew Point of Flue Gases
» Condensation Heat Transfer Calculations
» Condensation over Finned Tubes
» Drum Coil Heater: Bath Heater Sizing
» Checking Heat Transfer Equipment for Noise and Vibration Problems
» Steam Drum Calculations Steam Velocity in Drum
» Flow Instability in Two-Phase Circuits
» Superheater Design and Off-Design Calculation
» NTU Method of Performance Evaluation (Number of Transfer Units)
» Appendix B: Tube-Side Heat Transfer Coefficients and Pressure Drop
» Another Method of Estimating h c for Water
» Importance of Streams in Superheater, Economizer
» Simplified Procedure for Evaluating Performance of Plain Tube Bundles
» Appendix D: Nonluminous Heat Transfer Calculations
» Determination of Heat Transfer Coefficient h c Convective Heat Transfer Coefficient
» How Is Life of Superheater Affected by High Tube Wall Temperatures?
» Effect of h i on Fin Selection
» Reduce Weight of Tube Bundles Using Smaller Tubes
» Effect of Outside Fouling Factor
» Effect of Fin Thickness and Conductivity
» Why Are Fins Not Used in Gas–Gas Exchangers?
» Appendix F: Properties of Gases
» Flue Gas Mixture Properties Calculation
» Appendix G: Quiz on Boilers and HRSGs with Answers
Show more