Superheater Design and Off-Design Calculation
Superheater Design and Off-Design Calculation
We will now illustrate the design and off-design calculations for a finned tube super- heater (Figure A.2). One may refer to Appendix E, where the U value is evaluated for this superheater.
Example A.1
A 50.8 × 44 mm (2 × 1.732 in.) solid finned superheater with 78 fins/m (2 fins/in.), 12.7 mm (0.5 in.) high fins, and 1.52 mm (0.06 in.) thick is arranged in inline fashion with 101.8 mm (4 in.) square pitch: 18 tubes/row, 6 rows deep, 3.1 m (10.2 ft) long tubes with 9 streams. Gas flow is 100,000 kg/h (220,400 lb/h) with the following exhaust gas analysis by vol-
ume% CO 2 = 3, H 2 O = 7, N 2 = 75, O 2 = 15. The bundle is designed with inlet and exit exhaust
gas temperatures of 550°C (1022°F) and 479°C (892°F) and with 25,000 kg/h (55,100 lb/h)
of saturated steam at 51 kg/cm 2 g (725 psig) raised from saturation temperature of 265°C (509°F) to 369°C (696°F). Surface area is 188 m 2 (2030 ft 2 ). Check if the design is reasonable.
Flue gas data from Appendix F at the average gas temperature of 514°C have been esti-
mated as follows: C p = 0.2755 kcal/kg °C (0.2755 Btu/lb °F), µ g = 0.127 kg/m h (0.085 Btu/ ft h), k g = 0.0468 kcal/m h °C (0.0314 Btu/ft h °F). Assume 1% heat loss.
Appendix A: Boiler Design and Performance Calculations 365
Gas in
Steam out
Steam in
Gas out
FIGURE A.2
Typical convective superheater.
Solution
First let us check the design. The exit gas temperature is 479°C. The duty is then
Q =W g ×C pg × (T g1 −T g2 ) × (1 − h l ) = 100,000 × 0.2755 × (550 − 479) × .99 = 1.936 × 10 6 kcal/h (7.68 MM Btu/h) (2.25 MW).
Enthalpy absorbed by steam = 1.936 × 10 6 /25,000 = 77.4 kcal/kg (139.3 Btu/lb). From steam tables at 51.5 kg/cm 2 of steam pressure, saturated steam enthalpy from steam tables is 667.3 kcal/kg (steam-side pressure drop of 1.5 kg/cm 2 was assumed); exit enthalpy = 667 + 77.4 = 744.7 kcal/kg. Hence, exit steam temperature = 368°C (694°F). For counter-flow arrangement,
Δ T = [(479 − 265) − (550 − 368)]/ln [(479 − 265)/(550 − 368)] = 197.6°C (355°F).
U o from Appendix E is 51.9 kcal/m 2 h °C (10.6 Btu/ft 2 h °F).
Surface area required A = 1.936 × 10 6 /197.6/51.9 = 189 m 2 (2033 ft 2 ). Surface area pro- vided is 188 m 2 (2023 ft 2 ). Hence, the duty is close to that assumed, and the design is
reasonable. If U is not given, then one may use the methods discussed in Appendices B through E to arrive at U.
What if the plant engineer is asked to design a superheater from scratch for a specific duty or parameters? In such cases, the following points may be kept in mind.
1. Calculate the duty of the superheater as we know the mass flow of steam and its inlet and desired exit temperatures; evaluate the flue gas exit temperature. The flue gas mass flow should be known or will be available. Then, the LMTD is computed as all the four temperatures are known.
2. The cross section of the superheater should be selected such that the gas veloc- ity is in the range of 20–35 m/s (for dust-laden gases, the velocity will be much lower, say, around 10–20 m/s). Values beyond the range may sometimes be
366 Appendix A: Boiler Design and Performance Calculations
acceptable due to layout and shipping considerations. The gas pressure drop will have to be checked later and should be within allowable values; if not, the cross section is revised.
3. Streams should be selected on the tube side such that the steam-side velocity is in the range of 15–30 m/s depending on steam pressure and pressure drop. At lower pressure, the specific volume of steam is higher and so the velocity. For
a discussion on streams, refer to Appendix B. 3. Calculate h c ,h n ,h i , and U using the methods described in the appendices. 4. Using the equation Q = UAΔT, determine A and the number of rows deep as before. 5. Compute the gas- and steam-side pressure drops as shown in Appendices B and C and see if they are reasonable. If not, repeat from step 2 by manipulating the tube length, size, or length or tube spacing.
Parts
» For Process and Plant Engineers
» A Few Typical Solved Problems
» Excess Air from Flue Gas Analysis
» Simplified Combustion Calculations
» Relating Oxygen and Energy Input in Turbine Exhaust Gases
» Evaluating Fuel Quantity Required to Raise Turbine Exhaust Gas Temperature
» Simplified Formulae for Boiler Efficiency
» Firing Fuels with Low Heating Values
» Boiler duty and efficiency calculations
» Acid Dew Point Temperature T dp
» Steam Generator Furnace Design
» Advantages of Water-Cooled Furnaces
» Furnace Exit Gas Temperature Evaluation
» Empirical Formula for Furnace Duty Estimation
» Distribution of Radiation to Tube Banks
» External Radiation to Heat Transfer Surfaces at Furnace Exit
» Correlations for CHF (Critical Heat Flux) and Allowable Steam Quality
» Guidelines for Good Circulation System Design
» Emissions Affect Steam Generator Designs
» Adding Condensate Heater to Improve Boiler Plant Efficiency
» Understanding Boiler Surface Areas
» Steam Generators for Oil Sands Application
» Radiant versus Convective Superheaters
» Steam Inlet and Exit Nozzle Location
» Case Study of a Superheater with Tube Failure Problems
» Problem at Low Loads with Inverted-Loop Superheaters
» Data Required for Performing Steam Generator Analysis
» Evaluating Part Load Performance
» Tube Wall Temperature Estimation at Economizer Inlet
» Methods to Minimize Low-Temperature Corrosion Problems
» Water Chemistry, Carryover, Steam Purity
» Sizing and Performance Calculations
» Flue Gas Composition and Gas Pressure
» Heat Recovery in Sulfur Plants
» Heat Recovery in Sulfuric Acid Plant
» Heat Recovery in Hydrogen Plants
» Combining Solar Energy with Heat Recovery Systems
» Natural versus Forced Circulation HRSGs
» Optimizing Pinch and Approach Points in HRSGs
» HRSG Performance and Evaluating Field Data
» Advantages of Supplementary Firing in HRSGs
» Performance with and without Export Steam
» Cement Plant Waste Heat Recovery
» Fluid Heaters and Film Temperature
» Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient h o
» Off-Design Performance with Addition of Economizer
» Simulation of Fire Tube Boiler Performance
» Simplified Approach to Evaluating Performance of Fire Tube Boilers
» Heat Transfer Inside and Outside Tubes
» Specifying Waste Heat Boilers
» Understanding Pinch and Approach Points
» Estimating Steam Generation and Gas–Steam Temperature Profiles
» Why Cannot We Arbitrarily Select the Pinch and Approach Points?
» Off-Design Performance Evaluation
» Single- or Multiple-Pressure HRSG
» Cogeneration Plant Application
» Water Dew Point of Flue Gases
» Condensation Heat Transfer Calculations
» Condensation over Finned Tubes
» Drum Coil Heater: Bath Heater Sizing
» Checking Heat Transfer Equipment for Noise and Vibration Problems
» Steam Drum Calculations Steam Velocity in Drum
» Flow Instability in Two-Phase Circuits
» Superheater Design and Off-Design Calculation
» NTU Method of Performance Evaluation (Number of Transfer Units)
» Appendix B: Tube-Side Heat Transfer Coefficients and Pressure Drop
» Another Method of Estimating h c for Water
» Importance of Streams in Superheater, Economizer
» Simplified Procedure for Evaluating Performance of Plain Tube Bundles
» Appendix D: Nonluminous Heat Transfer Calculations
» Determination of Heat Transfer Coefficient h c Convective Heat Transfer Coefficient
» How Is Life of Superheater Affected by High Tube Wall Temperatures?
» Effect of h i on Fin Selection
» Reduce Weight of Tube Bundles Using Smaller Tubes
» Effect of Outside Fouling Factor
» Effect of Fin Thickness and Conductivity
» Why Are Fins Not Used in Gas–Gas Exchangers?
» Appendix F: Properties of Gases
» Flue Gas Mixture Properties Calculation
» Appendix G: Quiz on Boilers and HRSGs with Answers
Show more