MODALIZATION IN THE POLITICAL COLUMN OF TEMPO MAGAZINE.
MODALIZATION IN THE POLITICAL COLUMN
OF TEMPO MAGAZINE
A THESIS
Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of
Sarjana Sastra
By:
MARIA BETTI SINAGA
Registration Number: 2121220007
ENGLISH AND LITERATURE DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF LANGUAGE AND ARTS
STATE UNIVERSITY OF MEDAN
2017
ABSTRACT
Sinaga, Maria Betti. 2017. Modalization in the Political Column of Tempo
Magazine. Thesis, English and Literature Department. Faculty of Language
and Arts, State University of Medan.
The study focuses on analyzing the use of modalization in the Political Column of
Tempo Magazine. The objectives were to find out the type of modalization and to
describe the use of modalization in the Political Column of Tempo magazine. The
data were taken from Political Column of Tempo magazine published in June and
July 2017. The source of data was Political Column in Tempo magazine. The data
analysis applied descriptive qualitative research. There were 135 clauses which
contained Modalization from political columns. There were two type of
modalization used in the Political column namely, Probability and Usuality. The
dominant type of Modalization used in Political text was Probability 97,7% then
Usuality 2,93%. The probability itself was realized by modal auxiliaries and
modal adjunct. The modal auxiliary which expressed the use of probability in the
text was should. The value of the modalization itself was realized by medium
value. The use of modalization expressed the attitude of the writer toward the
proposition. The use of medium value showed the prediction of the writer about
what would happen in the future and expressed the stance of the writer for what
he said.
Key words: Modalization, Political text, Tempo
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pages
ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................ i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .................................................................................... ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................... iv
LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................... vi
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................1
A. Background of the Study ............................................................................1
B. Problem of the Study ..................................................................................6
C. Objective of the Study .................................................................................6
D. Scope of the Study .....................................................................................7
E. Significance of the Study ...........................................................................7
CHAPTER II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE .....................................................8
A. Theoretical Framework ..................................................................................8
1. Functional Grammar .................................................................................8
a. Metafunction .....................................................................................9
b. Interpersonal Function ......................................................................9
2. Modality .................................................................................................13
a. Types of Modality ............................................................................15
b. Value of Modality .............................................................................19
c. Orientation of Modality ....................................................................21
d. Realization of Modality .....................................................................27
3. Opinion ..................................................................................................30
4. Mass Media.............................................................................................31
5. Journalism ...............................................................................................32
iv
6. Language Feature in Politics ..................................................................33
7. Tempo Magazine ....................................................................................34
B. Relevant Studies .........................................................................................35
C. Conceptual Framework ................................................................................37
CHAPTER III. RESEARCH METHOD ..........................................................39
A. Research Design ........................................................................................39
B. Data and Source of Data .............................................................................39
C. Technique for Collecting Data ...................................................................40
D. Technique of Analyzing Data ....................................................................40
CHAPTER IV. DATA ANALYSIS, FINDING, AND DISCUSSION .............41
A. The Data and Data analysis .......................................................................41
1. Types of Modalization Used in the Text ..............................................41
2. The Realization of Modalization..........................................................47
a. Types of Modalization ..................................................................47
b. The Value of Modalization ............................................................... 48
B. Findings .....................................................................................................52
C. Discussion .................................................................................................53
CHAPTER V. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ......................................56
A. Conclusion ................................................................................................56
B. Suggestion .................................................................................................57
REFERENCES .....................................................................................................58
APPENDIX 1. Findings .......................................................................................60
APENDIX 2. The Opinion Text ..........................................................................73
v
List of Tables
Pages
Table 2.1 Speech Function ................................................................................... 10
Table 2.2 Finite Verbal Operator ...........................................................................12
Table 2.3 The System of Probability .....................................................................14
Table 2.4 Modalization and Modulation ...............................................................19
Table 2.5 The Values of Modality .........................................................................20
Table 2.6 The Orientation and Types of Modality.................................................23
Table 2.7 Modal Responsibility .............................................................................26
Table 4.1 The Types of Modalization ....................................................................39
Table 4.2 Modalization Indicators ........................................................................40
Table 4.3 The Value of Modalization ....................................................................46
Table 4.4 Indicators of Modalization Value ..........................................................48
vi
58
REFERENCES
Asdinlou and Valipour. 2014. An Investigation of Metaphorical Modality in
Barack Obama’s Speeches from Systemic Functional Perspective. Iran.
International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 3(1), 28-33.
Christians and Wilkins. 2009. Mass Media Ethics. New York. Routledge.
Dong, J. 2013 . “Interpersonal Metaphor in Legal Discourse: Modality in CrossExaminations”. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 4(6), 13111321.
Eggins, S. (1994). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistic.London:
Printer Publishers.
Feng & Liu. 2010. “Analysis of Interpersonal Meaning in Public Speeches- A
case study of Obama’s Speech”. Journal of Language Teaching and
Research.1(6), 825-829.
Gerot. W. 1994. Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Sydney: Gerld Stabler.
Guerra, Hernandez. 2013. Textual, Intertextual and Rhetorical Features in
Political Discourse: The Case of President Obama in Europe. Revista de
Linguistic Lengua Aplicadas. Vol 8, 59-65. Accessed on January 19th
.2014.
Halliday and Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. New
York: Arnold.
Keeble, R. 2006. The Newspaper Handbook. New York: Taylor and Francis
group.
Kothari. 2004. Research Methodology Methods and Techniques. Delhi: New age
International.
Moindjie. 2015. “The Function of Modality in Translation”. International Journal
of Comparative Literature & Translation Studies. 3(2), 11-24.
Mao. et. al.2014. “Corpus Functional Stylistic Analysis of Modal Verbs in Major
Barbara and Its Chinese Versions”. Theory and Practice in Language
Studies. 4(1), 70-78.
Matthiessen and Painter. 1997.Working with Functional Grammar.New York:
Arnold.
Miles and Huberman. 1992. Qualitative Data Analisis. Jakarta: UI press.
Nur, S. 2015. “Analysis of Interpersonal Metafunction in Public Speeches: A case
study of Nelson Mandela’s Presidential Inauguration Speech”.The
International Journal of Social Science. 30(1), 53-63.
59
Palmer, F, R. 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Saragih. 2014. Discourse Analysis: A study on Discourse Based on Systemic
Functional Linguist Theory: Medan: Unimed
Sinar, S. T. 2002. Linguistic-Oriented Discourse Analysis. Deezed Consult.
Singapore.
Thompson, G. 1996. Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Xu, J. 2009. “Interpreting Metaphor ofModality in Advertising English”. China
Journal of Linguistics. 2(4), 117-122.
Yuyun, I. 2010. “A study of Arguments in Senior High School Debate”. Jurnal
Penelitian. 14(1), 129-139.
Zheng, Tongtao. 2000. Characteristics of Australian Political Language Rhetoric:
Tactics of Gaining Public Support and Shirking responsibility. November,
issue 4: 1-3. Accesed on January 10th, 2014.
OF TEMPO MAGAZINE
A THESIS
Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of
Sarjana Sastra
By:
MARIA BETTI SINAGA
Registration Number: 2121220007
ENGLISH AND LITERATURE DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF LANGUAGE AND ARTS
STATE UNIVERSITY OF MEDAN
2017
ABSTRACT
Sinaga, Maria Betti. 2017. Modalization in the Political Column of Tempo
Magazine. Thesis, English and Literature Department. Faculty of Language
and Arts, State University of Medan.
The study focuses on analyzing the use of modalization in the Political Column of
Tempo Magazine. The objectives were to find out the type of modalization and to
describe the use of modalization in the Political Column of Tempo magazine. The
data were taken from Political Column of Tempo magazine published in June and
July 2017. The source of data was Political Column in Tempo magazine. The data
analysis applied descriptive qualitative research. There were 135 clauses which
contained Modalization from political columns. There were two type of
modalization used in the Political column namely, Probability and Usuality. The
dominant type of Modalization used in Political text was Probability 97,7% then
Usuality 2,93%. The probability itself was realized by modal auxiliaries and
modal adjunct. The modal auxiliary which expressed the use of probability in the
text was should. The value of the modalization itself was realized by medium
value. The use of modalization expressed the attitude of the writer toward the
proposition. The use of medium value showed the prediction of the writer about
what would happen in the future and expressed the stance of the writer for what
he said.
Key words: Modalization, Political text, Tempo
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pages
ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................ i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .................................................................................... ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................... iv
LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................... vi
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................1
A. Background of the Study ............................................................................1
B. Problem of the Study ..................................................................................6
C. Objective of the Study .................................................................................6
D. Scope of the Study .....................................................................................7
E. Significance of the Study ...........................................................................7
CHAPTER II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE .....................................................8
A. Theoretical Framework ..................................................................................8
1. Functional Grammar .................................................................................8
a. Metafunction .....................................................................................9
b. Interpersonal Function ......................................................................9
2. Modality .................................................................................................13
a. Types of Modality ............................................................................15
b. Value of Modality .............................................................................19
c. Orientation of Modality ....................................................................21
d. Realization of Modality .....................................................................27
3. Opinion ..................................................................................................30
4. Mass Media.............................................................................................31
5. Journalism ...............................................................................................32
iv
6. Language Feature in Politics ..................................................................33
7. Tempo Magazine ....................................................................................34
B. Relevant Studies .........................................................................................35
C. Conceptual Framework ................................................................................37
CHAPTER III. RESEARCH METHOD ..........................................................39
A. Research Design ........................................................................................39
B. Data and Source of Data .............................................................................39
C. Technique for Collecting Data ...................................................................40
D. Technique of Analyzing Data ....................................................................40
CHAPTER IV. DATA ANALYSIS, FINDING, AND DISCUSSION .............41
A. The Data and Data analysis .......................................................................41
1. Types of Modalization Used in the Text ..............................................41
2. The Realization of Modalization..........................................................47
a. Types of Modalization ..................................................................47
b. The Value of Modalization ............................................................... 48
B. Findings .....................................................................................................52
C. Discussion .................................................................................................53
CHAPTER V. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ......................................56
A. Conclusion ................................................................................................56
B. Suggestion .................................................................................................57
REFERENCES .....................................................................................................58
APPENDIX 1. Findings .......................................................................................60
APENDIX 2. The Opinion Text ..........................................................................73
v
List of Tables
Pages
Table 2.1 Speech Function ................................................................................... 10
Table 2.2 Finite Verbal Operator ...........................................................................12
Table 2.3 The System of Probability .....................................................................14
Table 2.4 Modalization and Modulation ...............................................................19
Table 2.5 The Values of Modality .........................................................................20
Table 2.6 The Orientation and Types of Modality.................................................23
Table 2.7 Modal Responsibility .............................................................................26
Table 4.1 The Types of Modalization ....................................................................39
Table 4.2 Modalization Indicators ........................................................................40
Table 4.3 The Value of Modalization ....................................................................46
Table 4.4 Indicators of Modalization Value ..........................................................48
vi
58
REFERENCES
Asdinlou and Valipour. 2014. An Investigation of Metaphorical Modality in
Barack Obama’s Speeches from Systemic Functional Perspective. Iran.
International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 3(1), 28-33.
Christians and Wilkins. 2009. Mass Media Ethics. New York. Routledge.
Dong, J. 2013 . “Interpersonal Metaphor in Legal Discourse: Modality in CrossExaminations”. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 4(6), 13111321.
Eggins, S. (1994). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistic.London:
Printer Publishers.
Feng & Liu. 2010. “Analysis of Interpersonal Meaning in Public Speeches- A
case study of Obama’s Speech”. Journal of Language Teaching and
Research.1(6), 825-829.
Gerot. W. 1994. Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Sydney: Gerld Stabler.
Guerra, Hernandez. 2013. Textual, Intertextual and Rhetorical Features in
Political Discourse: The Case of President Obama in Europe. Revista de
Linguistic Lengua Aplicadas. Vol 8, 59-65. Accessed on January 19th
.2014.
Halliday and Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. New
York: Arnold.
Keeble, R. 2006. The Newspaper Handbook. New York: Taylor and Francis
group.
Kothari. 2004. Research Methodology Methods and Techniques. Delhi: New age
International.
Moindjie. 2015. “The Function of Modality in Translation”. International Journal
of Comparative Literature & Translation Studies. 3(2), 11-24.
Mao. et. al.2014. “Corpus Functional Stylistic Analysis of Modal Verbs in Major
Barbara and Its Chinese Versions”. Theory and Practice in Language
Studies. 4(1), 70-78.
Matthiessen and Painter. 1997.Working with Functional Grammar.New York:
Arnold.
Miles and Huberman. 1992. Qualitative Data Analisis. Jakarta: UI press.
Nur, S. 2015. “Analysis of Interpersonal Metafunction in Public Speeches: A case
study of Nelson Mandela’s Presidential Inauguration Speech”.The
International Journal of Social Science. 30(1), 53-63.
59
Palmer, F, R. 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Saragih. 2014. Discourse Analysis: A study on Discourse Based on Systemic
Functional Linguist Theory: Medan: Unimed
Sinar, S. T. 2002. Linguistic-Oriented Discourse Analysis. Deezed Consult.
Singapore.
Thompson, G. 1996. Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Xu, J. 2009. “Interpreting Metaphor ofModality in Advertising English”. China
Journal of Linguistics. 2(4), 117-122.
Yuyun, I. 2010. “A study of Arguments in Senior High School Debate”. Jurnal
Penelitian. 14(1), 129-139.
Zheng, Tongtao. 2000. Characteristics of Australian Political Language Rhetoric:
Tactics of Gaining Public Support and Shirking responsibility. November,
issue 4: 1-3. Accesed on January 10th, 2014.