78
CHAPTER IV ANALYSIS RESULTS
This chapter presents the study results derived from the collections of data obtained throughout the research period. The first section of the chapter  presents
the findings obtained prior to the action cycles commencement, which provides a basis for the discussions of the first research question: Is differentiated instruction
incorporated in the action taken to solve the problems in an English speaking class of  mixed-competence  learners?  Meanwhile  the  second  section  will  provide  the
empirical data and analysis serving as a response to the second research question: how  effective  was
the  action
in developing  learners’  speaking  skills  as  well  as
promoting learner’s collaboration skill?
A. INCORPORATION  OF  DIFFERENTIATED  INSTRUCTION  INTO
THE TAKEN ACTION
Responding  to  the  research  question  regarding  whether  differentiated instruction  was  incorporated  in  the  action  taken  to  solve  the  problems  in  an
English speaking class of mixed-competence learners, this section argues that the key
factor  contributing  to  the  success  of  this  action  research  is  participants’ empowerment  in  the  attempt  of  improving  the  problematic  situations  in  their
study  environment.  As  it  was  outlined  in  the  literature  review,  action  research serves  as  a  democratic,  emancipatory,  empowering,  and  life-enhancing  research
method that involves reflective actions in the purpose of overcoming problematic PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
79 situations  to  bring  about  improvements  in  the  practices  Burns,  2010;  Mbato,
2013. Therefore, this action research began with a discussion session in the form
of  mini  workshop  involving  all  research  participants  including  the  students,  the teacher  collaborators,  and  I  as  the  researcher.  The  goal  of  this  workshop  session
was to formulate the suitable action to solve the existing problems in the mixed- competence  speaking  class  through  communal  consensus  among  all  participants.
In  addition,  this  workshop  session  aimed  at  finding  out  whether  the  participants incorporated  differentiated  instruction  strategies  in  their  formulated  action.  A
researcher’s  observation  field  note  was  the  technique  employed  to  collect  data from  this  research  stage.  The  qualitative  data  obtained  from  this  field  note  were
analyzed  and  interpreted  in  the  following  discussions. All  students’  names
mentioned in this report are pseudonyms. A  preliminary  session  in  the  form  of  mini  workshop  before  the  English
speaking  course  commencement  was  conducted  with  the  main  purpose  of collaboratively deliberating and negotiating the solutions in the effort to solve the
problems  that  potentially  occurred  in  their  mixed-competence  classroom.  The session  began  with  introduction  of  oneself.  Everyone  was  expecting  that  on  that
day they were to speak English, so all of them introduced themselves in English. This  was  a  good  opportunity  for  the  teachers  to  recognize  their  English  ability
although  only  on  the  surface.  The  fact  that  all  students  were  willing  to  speak  in English indicated a positive sign that they were there, ready to practice speaking
English. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI