Materials and methods Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:P:PlantScience:PlantScience_Elsevier:Vol148.Issue2.2000:

2. Materials and methods

2 . 1 . Plant material N. tabacum L. cv. Samsun NN plants were grown in soil in a greenhouse at 18 – 22°C and 40 – 60 relative humidity. In vitro plants were cultured in Murashige and Skoog [11] medium without growth regulators and with 2 sucrose under a light – dark regime of 16:8 h at 3000 lux and a mean temperature of 24°C. The cell suspension line 425 was started from callus of S275N, a suspension-cultured line of cloned N. tabacum L. cv. Havana 425 pith tissue [12,13], which was kindly provided by F. Meins Basel, Switzerland. The culture was initiated and maintained as described previously [14]. 2 . 2 . Induction of CBP 20 Greenhouse plants used for induction of CBP20 were 12–14 weeks old 3 weeks before flow- ering. At this stage, they had 16–18 leaves. In vitro plants taken for the same kind of experi- ments were, if not otherwise noted, 4 – 6 weeks old with 8 – 10 leaves. Leaves were derived from ma- ture source to sink leaves as described in the figure legends. For wounding leaves, shoots and roots were scratched with razor blades arranged with a distance of 10 mm and subsequently placed in dishes in distilled water. The dishes were gently shaken on a gyratory shaker 60 rpm in the dark at room temperature for different times as indicated. For salicylic acid treatment, in vitro plants were sprayed with a solution of 50 mM and, after 48 h fully expanded leaves were harvested and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Suspension-cultured cells were filtered and washed as described by Kunze et al. [14] and subsequently transferred into media containing different heavy metals in different concentrations as indicated in results. After incubation for differ- ent times, cells were harvested by filtration and extracted as described earlier [15].Each experiment was repeated at least twice. 2 . 3 . Transcription inhibition experiments Floating experiments with leaf disks were per- formed as described by Jacobs et al. [16] using actinomycin D Sigma, Germany at 100 mg ml − 1 . After incubation with and without actinomycin D for 2 and 4 h, leaves were used for RNA extrac- tion as described below. 2 . 4 . RNA extraction and Northern blot experiments Total RNA was prepared as described by Loge- mann et al. [17], separation of RNA in denaturing agarose gels, blotting and hybridization of nylon membranes were performed as described by Her- bers et al. [18]. The CBP20-containing fragment isolated by the Qiagen kit Qiagen, Germany from plasmid DNA of E. coli was used as probe. 2 . 5 . Protein extraction and immunoblotting Cells were collected on 56-mm pore-size nylon filters from suspension cultures after different in- cubation periods as indicated in figure legends. Extracts of cells, leaves, shoot segments and roots were prepared by freezing the material in liquid nitrogen, grinding with a mortar and pestle, and vortexing the ground material with five glass beads for 3 min in 1 ml buffer TNT 500 mM NaCl, 0.02 Triton X-100, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0 per 1 g fresh weight of cells. After centrifugation 34,000 x g for 15 min the supernatant was used to measure the protein concentration by the method of Bradford [19] using bovine serum albu- min BSA as a standard. Five mg protein per lane were separated by SDS-PAGE as described by Laemmli [20] except for using gradient gels from 11 to 20 polyacrylamide. Immunoblot analysis was performed as described elsewhere [21]. The antibody directed against CBP20 was prepared as described by Hensel et al. [15]. The antibody raised against the large subunit of the D -ribulose- 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase rubisco was kindly provided by K.-H. Su¨ß IPK, Gatersleben, Germany. 2 . 6 . Chlorophyll assay Chlorophyll contents were determined as de- scribed by Hanfrey et al. [22]. For this leaf, discs were excised in triplicate from different areas of each leaf. Four parallel samples were used to calculate the standard deviation using the com- puter program ‘Excel 5.0’.

3. Results and discussion