Distinction between Mistake and Error Goal of Error Analysis

In a classroom context, the teacher or textbook can lead the learner to make faulty hypothesis about the language. Students often make errors because of misleading explanation of the teacher, faulty presentation of a structure or word in a textbook, or even because of a pattern that was rottenly memorized in a drill but improperly contextualized. d. Communication Strategies Communication strategies were defined are related to learning style. Learners obviously use production strategies in order to enhance getting their message across, but at times these techniques can make themselves become a source of error. Mean while, Richard distinguishes three causes of error as follows: a. Interference errors as a result of the use of element from one language while speaking another. b. Intra lingual errors reflect the general characteristics of rule learning such as faulty generalization, in complete application of rule and failure to learn condition under which rules apply. c. Development errors occur when the learner attempts to build up hypotheses about the target language on the basis of limited experience. 7

3. Distinction between Mistake and Error

Most of people misunderstanding about errors and mistakes; they think they are in the same meaning. So we need to distinguish errors and mistakes. Errors reflect gaps in a learner’s knowledge; they occur because the learner does not know what is correct. Mistakes reflect occasional lapses in performance; they occur because, in particular instance, the learner is unable to perform what he or she knows. Brown defines error and mistake. According to him an error is a noticeable deviation from the adult grammar of a native speaker, reflects the 7 Rod Ellis, Second Language Acquisition, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 58 compete nce of the learner. And mistake is a “slip,” a failure to utilize a known system correctly, and mistakes can be self-corrected. 8 Based on the definition above the writer concludes that students make error because they do not know of the knowledge about what they write, and they can not recognize it unless other people, their friends or their teachers tell and correct them. And for mistake, actually the students have known about what they write but they just ‗slip up’ and do mistake. In this case, students are able to correct and realize their own mistake.

4. Goal of Error Analysis

According to Heidi Dulay and his friends, there are two major purposes in studying learners’ errors: 1 Provides data from which inferences about the nature of the language learning process can be made 2 Indicates to teacher and curriculum developers which part of the target language students have most difficulty producing correctly and which error types detract most from a learner’s ability to communicate effectively. 9 Rod Ellis states that helping learners to learn a L2 by evaluating errors is the purpose of error analysis. 10 It means that after the research found the error that students make, it is important to evaluate them and explain to learners so they will not do the same errors in another time. And then, they will understand and learn L2 better than before. 8 Douglas Brown, Principle of Learning and Teaching, New York: Prentice hall, Inc, 1987, p.217 9 Heidi Dulay, Marina Burt, and Stephen Krashen, Language Two, New York: Oxford University Press, 1982, p. 138 10 Rod Ellis, Second Language Acquisition …,p.19

5. Types of Error

Dokumen yang terkait

Some difficulties faced by the student in learning the present perfect tense

0 4 82

Presented to the Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher’s Training in a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of S.Pd. (Bachelor of Art) in English Language Education

1 12 102

Error Analysis on Transforming Affirmative to Negative and Interrogative Sentences of Simple Presnt Tense (a case study at SMP YAPERA Ciledug)

2 26 98

An error analysis on the use of present perfect and present perfect continous tense: a case study at the third grade student of SMP Muhammadiyah 17 Ciputat

0 6 126

An Analysis On Students’ Errors In Using Present Perfect Continuous Tense (A Case Study at First Grade Students of SMAN 63 Jakarta)

1 6 116

An Error Analysis on the Use of Present Perfect Tense and Present Perfect Continous Tense” (A Case study at third grade students of SMP Muhammadiyah 17 Ciputat Timur

0 6 126

AN ANALYSIS OF GRAMMATICAL ERROR IN CONSTRUCTING SENTENCES IN SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE AN ANALYSIS OF GRAMMATICAL ERROR IN CONSTRUCTING SENTENCES IN SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE AND SIMPLE PAST TENSE MADE BY THE LEARNERS AT GAMA INTEGRA PEDAN KLATEN IN 2006 / 2007 A

0 0 14

An Error analysis of simple present and present perfect tenses of students` writing in critical reading and writing course.

0 0 98

An error analysis on simple past tense and perfect tense.

0 0 100

AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ ERRORS IN USING PASSIVE FORM OF THREE TENSES (SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE, SIMPLE PAST TENSE, AND PRESENT PERFECT TENSE) (A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF PURWOKERTO) - repository perpustakaan

0 0 15