24
24. “Mr. Cotton Answer, man”
ANALYSIS: The utterance is classified into Directive illocutionary act because there is an intended meaning to be delivered by the speaker in the form of
order.Jack and Mr. Cotton are the participants involved in aconversation where Jack as the speaker and Mr. Cotton as the hearer. When the utterance occurred, Jack was in a
dock when recruiting some crew that would join him in sailing. Suddenly Jack encountered Mr. Cotton and he invited Mr. Cotton to join him on sailing. The purpose
of the utterance was togive Mr. Cotton an instruction to respond Jack’s question. 25.
“Mr. Cotton‘s parrot. Same question.”
ANALYSIS: The utterance is classified into Directive illocutionary act because there is an intended meaning to be delivered by the speaker in the form of
order. Jack and Mr. Cotton’s parrot are the participants involved in aconversation where Jack as the speaker and Mr. Cotton’s parrot as the hearer. When the utterance
occurred, Jack was in a dock when recruiting some crew that would join him in sailing. Suddenly Jack encountered Mr. Cotton and he invited Mr. Cotton to join him on
sailing. Mr. Cotton could not answer Jack’s question because he was a mute person so Jack tried to ask the same question to Mr. Cotton’s parrot hoping it would answer his
question. The purpose of the utterance was togive Mr. Cotton’s parrot an instruction to answer Jack’s question.
26. “Satisfied?”
ANALYSIS: The utterance is classified into Directive illocutionary act because there is an intended meaning to be delivered by the speaker in the form of
request. Jack and William are the participants involved in aconversation where Jack as the speaker and William as the hearer. When the utterance occurred, Jack was
recruiting some crew that would help them in sailing. Jack had found some crews that
25
were ready to join. The purpose of the utterance was toask William politely to give his opinion about the crews that Jack had just recruited.
27. “Aye, that one. What say you?”
ANALYSIS: The utterance is classified into Directive illocutionary act because there is an intended meaning to be delivered by the speaker in the form of
request. Jack and Anamaria are the participants involved in aconversation where Jack as the speaker and Anamaria as the hearer. When the utterance occurred, Jack
promised to give Anamaria a ship as change of the ship that he had stolen before. William told that Jack would give a ship named Interceptor and Jack was forced to
agree because he was afraid of Anamaria’s anger. The purpose of the utterance was
toask Anamaria to give her opinion about the ship that Jack would give to her. 28.
“It’d be far worse not to have her.”
ANALYSIS: The utterance is classified into Directive illocutionary act because there is an intended meaning to be delivered by the speaker in the form of
warning. Jack and Gibbs are the participants involved in aconversation where Jack as the speaker and Gibbs as the hearer. When the utterance occurred, Jack commanded all
of the crew that he had just recruited to prepare a ship for sailing. Gibbs warned Jack that it would bring a bad luck if Anamaria join them in sailing. The purpose of the
utterance was to gave a statement to Gibbs that indicated a danger if Anamaria did not
join them in sailing. 29.
“Let go of the anchor”
ANALYSIS: The utterance is classified into Directive illocutionary act because there is an intended meaning to be delivered by the speaker in the form of
commanding. Jack and his ship’s crews are the participants involved in aconversation where Jack as the speaker and his ship’s crews as the hearers. When the utterance
26
occurred, Jack and the others had arrived on an island named Isla de Muerta where Barbossa was. The purpose of the utterance was togiveJack’s crews an authoritative
order to stop the ship.
30. “Keep to the code.”