The Test Result RESULT OF INVESTIGATION

When the time was over, she asked the students to collect the test papers. After that, she scored the test and analyzed the result. The result of the both pre and post-test can bee seen in appendix.

4.2 The Test Result

Based on the analysis of the students’ result of the composition which was scored using Heaton’ grid, each percentage of the total of the five items that are fluency, grammar, vocabulary, content, and spelling are as follows : Table 4.2 Percentage of the total of the five Items Heaton’s Grid Group F G V C S Experimental 19.40 18.88 19.91 21.64 20.17 Control 19.56 18.72 20.95 20.39 19.80 4.2.1 Test Scoring As being discussed in chapter III, after the writer conducted the post-test, she began to score the achievement as shown in appendix. In order to know the students’ post-test achievement in detail, the writer used the following formula to find out the achievement of each items. ΣOSc Stsc.Ss Ssa = x 100 Where : Ssa = student’s achievement Σ = number of obtained scores Σ = number of students For the experimental group, the computation is like this : a. The fluency Student’s achievement = = 79.88 b. The grammar Student’s achievement = = 77.73 c. The vocabulary Student’s achievement = = 81.97 d. The content Student’s achievement = = 89.09 e. The spelling Student’s achievement = = 83.03 For the controlled group, the computation is like this : a. The fluency Student’s achievement = = 74.39 b. The grammar Student’s achievement = = 71.21 c. The vocabulary Student’s achievement = = 79.69 131.75 5.33 x 100 128.25 5.33 x 100 135.25 5.33 x 100 147 5.33 x 100 137 5.33 x 100 112.75 5.33 x 100 117.5 5.33 x 100 131.5 5.33 x 100 d. The content Student’s achievement = = 77.57 e. The spelling Student’s achievement = = 75.30 From the computation it is clear that the items of content of the experimental group got the highest percentage of the achievement, 89.09. This occurred because using pictures in writing descriptive writing increase the student’s ability. 4.2.2 Level of Student’s Achievement The data were obtained from the student’s achievement of writing in descriptive paragraph test. The following is the tables that show the average scores for pre and post-test for all items and each item. Table 4.3 The Result of Pre-test Post-test Average Scores of the Experimental and Controlled Groups Group of Pre-Test of Post-Test The difference Between the pre and post test 128 5.33 x 100 124.25 5.33 x 100 X X Experimental 17.8 20.58 2.78 Control 17.38 19.01 1.63 The difference between experimental and control group 0.42 1.57 According to the table above, the difference average between the pre-test of the experimental and control group is 0.42, the difference average between the post-test of the experimental and control group is 1.57. The difference between pre-test and post-test of the experimental group is 2.78 and the difference between pre-test of the control group is 1.63. Table 4.4 The Result of Pre-test and Post-test Average Scores of the Experimental and Control Group of each items writing scoring Group Group Item of Writing Scoring The average scores of the pre-test The average score of the post test Fluency Experimental 3.40 4.00 Control 3.30 3.72 Grammar Experimental 3.20 3.87 Control 3.24 3.56 Vocabulary Experimental 3.51 4.09 Control 3.43 3.98 Content Experimental 3.47 4.45 Control 3.54 3.88 Spelling Experimental 3.64 4.15 Control 3.48 3.76 According to the table, the difference in each item after the treatment by using pictures was better than just by using explanation. In order to show the result of the writing test, the writer shows it in the form of grade as suggested by Harris 169:134 as follows : Table 4.5 Harris’s Scoring Grade Criteria of Mastery Level A 91 – 100 Excellent B 81 – 90 Very good C 71 – 80 Good D 61 – 70 Fair E 51 - 60 Poor Less than 50 Very poor The list below was the achievement according to the grade for both groups Table 4.6. The list of Experimental group Frequency Percentage Grade Pre-test Post-test Pre-test Post-test A 0 5 00.00 15.15 B 0 17 00.00 51.51 C 20 11 60.66 33.33 D 11 0 33.33 00.00 E 2 0 06.06 00.00 Table 4.7 The list of Control group Frequency Percentage Grade Pre-test Post-test Pre-test Post-test A 0 - 00.00 00.00 B 0 9 00.00 27.27 C 16 19 48.48 57.57 D 15 5 45.45 15.15 E 2 0 06.06 00.00 To make the difference easier to understand, the writer applied the percentage scores into charts as follow : Chart 1 The polygon describes the result of writing test obtained by the experimental and control group when pre-test Chart 1 shows the C were 60.66. While the achievement of the control group, the student who got E were 06.06, the students who got D were 45,45 and the students who got C were 48.48,

Dokumen yang terkait

An Analysis On High School Students’ Ability To Master Passive Voice A Study Case : The Second Year Students At SMK Negeri 2 Pematangsiantar

1 73 52

A Descriptive Study of the Eight Grade Students’ Ability in Writing A Descriptive Paragraph by Using Individual Pictures at SMPN 3 Kencong, Jember in the 2010/2011 Academic Year

0 7 14

The Effectiveness of Pictures in Text in Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Eight Grade Students of MTsN 13 Jakarta).

0 18 178

The effectiveness of using pictures in teaching prepositions of place : (an experimental study at the eight grade students of Islamic Junior High School Al-Ghazaly Bogor)

3 18 57

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT AT THE EIGHT GRADE A Descriptive Study On Students’ Ability In Writing Recount Text At The Eight Grade Of SMP N 2 Colomadu In 2013/2014 Academic Year.

0 0 11

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT AT THE EIGHT GRADE A Descriptive Study On Students’ Ability In Writing Recount Text At The Eight Grade Of SMP N 2 Colomadu In 2013/2014 Academic Year.

0 3 10

STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT AT THE EIGHT GRADE OF SMP N 3 SAWIT IN 2013/2014 ACADEMIC YEAR Students’ Ability In Writing Descriptive Text At The Eight Grade Of SMP N 3 Sawit In 2013/2014 Academic Year.

0 2 13

STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT AT THE EIGHT GRADE OF SMP N 3 SAWIT IN 2013/2014 ACADEMIC YEAR Students’ Ability In Writing Descriptive Text At The Eight Grade Of SMP N 3 Sawit In 2013/2014 Academic Year.

0 1 12

The Use of Clustering Technique in Teaching Writing (An Experimental Study of The Eight Grade Students of Junior High School)

0 0 15

THE TEACHING AND LEARNING IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT (A Case Study at the Eight Grade Students of 5 Junior High School of Kota Cirebon, in Academic Year 2015/2016) - UNWIDHA Repository

0 0 27