Analytical Exposition Test I

words, there were 26.89 of all 17 participants, for about five participants, comprehend analytical exposition texts. For further details, there were 8.82 of all 17 participants, for about two participants, comprehend the social function of analytical expositions which was to persuade the reader or listener that something is the case. There were 5.88 all 17 participants, for about one participant, comprehend the generic structure of recount texts and 76.47, for about 13 participants comprehend the lexicogrammatical features of analytical expositions. For further details of the participants’ level of comprehension of the first test, focusing on each essential part of the text types identification and purpose, generic structure, and lexicogrammatical features, the researcher provided table 4.7, 4.8, and 4.9 as follows. Table 4.7. Identification and Purpose of the First Test No. Partici pants Identification and purpose Total news item descriptive Narrative recount analytical exposition procedure 1. A 50 100 100 . 2. B 100 100 50 50 50 50 . 3. C 50 100 50 50 . 4. D 50 100 100 100 . 5. E 50 50 50 50 50 . 6. F 100 100 100 50 50 . 7. G 100 100 100 100 . 8. H 100 100 50 50 50 . 9. I 100 50 50 50 . 10. J 50 100 100 100 . 11. K 50 100 100 50 . 12. L 100 100 100 100 . 13. M 100 100 100 . 14. N 100 100 100 100 . 15. O 50 100 100 100 . 16. P 50 100 100 100 50 . 17. Q 50 50 100 100 50 . Average . Table 4.7. showed the result of microteaching students’ level of comprehension of the identification and purpose section of the first test. The average score of the identification and purpose of the first test was 56.37; for about 56.37 of the participants for about nine participants comprehend this section. In other words, there were for about eight participants out of 17 participants did not comprehend this section of the text types. For further details, the highest score was obtained by participant B, F, G, L, N, and P who scored 66.67. The lowest score was obtained by participant A, C, E, and I who scored 41.67. Table 4.8. Generic Structure of the First Test No. Partici pants Generic structure Total news item descriptive narrative recount analytical exposition procedure 1. A 50 40 33.33 . 2. B 50 20 33.33 66.67 . 3. C 20 100 4. D 40 100 . 5. E 20 33.33 . 6. F 7. G 20 33.33 . 8. H 50 66.67 33.33 9. I 50 40 100 . 10. J 50 60 100 100 . 11. K 50 60 . 12. L 50 20 66.67 . 13. M 100 60 10 100 14. N 50 40 100 . 15. O 50 80 100 33.33 100 . 16. P 66.67 33.33 . 17. Q 50 60 100 33.33 100 . Average . Table 4.8. showed the result of microteaching students’ level of comprehension of the generic structure section of the first test. The average score PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI of the generic structure of the first test was 27.68; for about 27.68 of the participants for about five participants comprehend this section. In other words, there were for about 12 participants out of 17 participants did not comprehend this section of the text types. For further details, the highest score was obtained by participant O who scored 60.56. The lowest score was obtained by participant F who scored 0. Table 4.9. Lexicogrammatical Features of the First Test No. Partic ipants Features Total news item descriptive narrative recount analytical exposition procedure 1. A 50 100 100 100 50 100 . 2. B 100 100 100 100 50 100 . 3. C 50 100 100 100 100 50 . 4. D 50 100 100 100 100 50 . 5. E 100 100 50 100 50 100 . 6. F 100 100 100 100 100 100 7. G 50 100 50 100 100 100 . 8. H 100 100 100 100 100 100 9. I 50 100 100 100 100 50 . 10. J 50 50 100 100 50 100 11. K 50 100 100 100 50 100 . 12. L 100 100 100 100 100 100 13. M 50 100 100 100 50 100 . 14. N 100 100 100 100 100 100 15. O 50 100 100 100 100 50 . 16. P 100 50 100 100 50 100 . 17. Q 50 100 100 100 50 100 . Average . Table 4.9. showed the result of microteaching students’ level of comprehension of the lexicogrammatical features section of the first test. The average score of the lexicogrammatical features of the first test was 87.25; for about 87.25 of the participants for about 15 participants comprehend this section. In other words, there were for about two participants out of 17 participants did not comprehend this section of the text types. For further details, the highest score was obtained by participant F, H, L, and N who scored 100. The lowest score was obtained by participant J who scored 75.

2. Test II

The test II was testing microteaching students’ level of comprehension of the rest of the six text types those were report, hortatory exposition, spoof, explanation, discussion, and review. The details of the findings and discussion for each text types were discussed as follows.

a. Report

There were six texts in the test II. The report text was the text titled Harvesting Machines which was on the third number of the test II. Table 4.10. Report No. Partic ipants Identification and purpose Generic structure Features Total name purpose general classification descriptions subject tense 1. A - - - √ √ √ . 2. B - - - √ - - . 3. C - - - √ √ √ . 4. D - - - - √ √ . 5. E - - - - - √ . 6. F - - - - √ √ . 7. G - - - - √ √ . 8. H - - - - - √ . 9. I - √ - - √ √ . 10. J - - - √ - √ . 11. K √ - - - √ √ . 12. L - - - - √ √ . 13. M - - - √ - √ . 14. N - √ - √ √ √ . 15. O - - - - - √ . 16. P - - - √ - √ . No. Partic ipants Identification and purpose Generic structure Features Total name purpose general classification descriptions subject tense 17. Q - - - - √ √ . Total . . . Average 35.29 35.29 35.29 35.29 Table 4.10. showed the result of microteaching students’ level of comprehension of reports. The average score was 35.29 or in other words, there were 35.29 of all 17 participants, for about six participants, comprehend report texts. For further details, there were 8.82 of all 17 participants, for about two participants, comprehend the social function of reports which was to describe the way things are, with reference to a range of natural and social phenomena in our environment. There were 20.59 of all 17 participants, for about four participants, comprehend the generic structure of report texts and 76.47, for about 13 participants comprehend the lexicogrammatical features of reports.

b. Hortatory Exposition

The hortatory exposition text was the text titled Corruption which was on the fifth number of the test II. Table 4.11. Hortatory Exposition No. Partic ipants Identification and purpose Generic structure Features Total name purpose thesis arguments recomme ndation subject tense 1. A - - - √ - - √ . 2. B - - - √ - √ √ . 3. C - - - - - √ √ . 4. D - - - - √ √ √ . 5. E - - - - √ - √ . 6. F - - - - √ - √ .