Analytical Exposition Test I
words, there were 26.89 of all 17 participants, for about five participants, comprehend analytical exposition texts. For further details, there were 8.82 of
all 17 participants, for about two participants, comprehend the social function of analytical expositions which was to persuade the reader or listener that something
is the case. There were 5.88 all 17 participants, for about one participant, comprehend the generic structure of recount texts and 76.47, for about 13
participants comprehend the lexicogrammatical features of analytical expositions. For further details of the participants’ level of comprehension of the first
test, focusing on each essential part of the text types identification and purpose, generic structure, and lexicogrammatical features, the researcher provided table
4.7, 4.8, and 4.9 as follows.
Table 4.7. Identification and Purpose of the First Test
No. Partici
pants Identification and purpose
Total news
item descriptive
Narrative recount
analytical exposition
procedure
1. A
50 100
100
.
2. B
100 100
50 50
50 50
.
3. C
50 100
50 50
.
4. D
50 100
100 100
.
5. E
50 50
50 50
50
.
6. F
100 100
100 50
50
.
7. G
100 100
100 100
.
8. H
100 100
50 50
50
.
9. I
100 50
50 50
.
10. J
50 100
100 100
.
11. K
50 100
100 50
.
12. L
100 100
100 100
.
13. M
100 100
100
.
14. N
100 100
100 100
.
15. O
50 100
100 100
.
16. P
50 100
100 100
50
.
17. Q
50 50
100 100
50
.
Average
.
Table 4.7. showed the result of microteaching students’ level of
comprehension of the identification and purpose section of the first test. The average score of the identification and purpose of the first test was 56.37; for
about 56.37 of the participants for about nine participants comprehend this section. In other words, there were for about eight participants out of 17
participants did not comprehend this section of the text types. For further details, the highest score was obtained by participant B, F, G, L, N, and P who scored
66.67. The lowest score was obtained by participant A, C, E, and I who scored 41.67.
Table 4.8. Generic Structure of the First Test
No. Partici pants
Generic structure Total
news item
descriptive narrative
recount analytical
exposition procedure
1. A
50 40
33.33
.
2. B
50 20
33.33 66.67
.
3. C
20 100
4. D
40 100
.
5. E
20 33.33
.
6. F
7. G
20 33.33
.
8. H
50 66.67
33.33 9.
I 50
40 100
.
10. J
50 60
100 100
.
11. K
50 60
.
12. L
50 20
66.67
.
13. M
100 60
10 100
14. N
50 40
100
.
15. O
50 80
100 33.33
100
.
16. P
66.67 33.33
.
17. Q
50 60
100 33.33
100
.
Average
.
Table 4.8. showed the result of microteaching students’ level of
comprehension of the generic structure section of the first test. The average score PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
of the generic structure of the first test was 27.68; for about 27.68 of the participants for about five participants comprehend this section. In other words,
there were for about 12 participants out of 17 participants did not comprehend this section of the text types. For further details, the highest score was obtained by
participant O who scored 60.56. The lowest score was obtained by participant F who scored 0.
Table 4.9. Lexicogrammatical Features of the First Test
No. Partic
ipants Features
Total news
item descriptive
narrative recount
analytical exposition
procedure
1. A
50 100
100 100
50 100
.
2. B
100 100
100 100
50 100
.
3. C
50 100
100 100
100 50
.
4. D
50 100
100 100
100 50
.
5. E
100 100
50 100
50 100
.
6. F
100 100
100 100
100 100
7. G
50 100
50 100
100 100
.
8. H
100 100
100 100
100 100
9. I
50 100
100 100
100 50
.
10. J
50 50
100 100
50 100
11. K
50 100
100 100
50 100
.
12. L
100 100
100 100
100 100
13. M
50 100
100 100
50 100
.
14. N
100 100
100 100
100 100
15. O
50 100
100 100
100 50
.
16. P
100 50
100 100
50 100
.
17. Q
50 100
100 100
50 100
.
Average
.
Table 4.9. showed the result of microteaching students’ level of
comprehension of the lexicogrammatical features section of the first test. The average score of the lexicogrammatical features of the first test was 87.25; for
about 87.25 of the participants for about 15 participants comprehend this section. In other words, there were for about two participants out of 17
participants did not comprehend this section of the text types. For further details, the highest score was obtained by participant F, H, L, and N who scored 100. The
lowest score was obtained by participant J who scored 75.