Chlorhexidine Bathing Chlorhexidine has been shown to be effective in

Table 17.6 Example of central venous catheter CVC maintenance bundle Care practice Bundle recommendations Hand hygiene Hand hygiene performed before and after CVC insertion, care, and catheter entry or after contact with any inanimate object; use clean gloves for all CVC access as needed; glove use does not preclude use of hand hygiene Surface disinfection Clean work surfaces with germicidal wipe prior to CVC care Use of maintenance kitsCVC cart Procedure kitscarts containing supplies help to ensure all required supplies are available at the time of the procedure, including those required for insertion, dressing change and CVC removal Insertion Bundle recommendations Hand hygiene Hand hygiene is followed by waterless surgical scrub application Maximal sterile barrier precautions Patient is covered from head to toe with sterile drapes; mask, cap, sterile gown and sterile gloves during insertion procedure; all staff including the assistant and family members to wear regular face mask and cap when within 3 ft of sterile fi eld Skin antisepsis Skin disinfected with chlorhexidine gluconate; apply back and forth friction scrub for 30 s and allow to dry completely for 30 s 2 min scrub for wet sites, such as the groin; site must be dry before skin puncture Universal protocol utilized Staff observers are skilled in monitoring elements of sterile technique; staff empowered to stop non-emergent procedure if sterile technique not followed Assessment Bundle recommendations Ongoing assessment of catheter site Inspect catheter site for cleanliness and dressing integrity; assess CVC site for complications hourly when infusing solutions and every 4 h when locked Daily assessment of need for CVC Discuss ongoing need for CVCs daily with medical team during rounds; assess patient for appropriateness of their vascular access device based on infusateslength of therapy and available vessels; promptly remove unnecessary CVCs Catheter site caremanagement Bundle recommendations Skin antisepsis Use clean gloves for all CVC access; maintain clean disposable towel or 4 × 4 gauze under CVC access port before accessing; skin disinfected with chlorhexidine gluconate; apply back and forth friction scrub for 30 s and allow to dry for 30 s 2 min scrub for wet sites, such as the groin CVC dressing assessment and change Routine dressing changes performed by clinicians with demonstrated competency; use of catheter securement device with PICC dressing changes; mask and sterile gloves for dressing changes; dressing change frequency: transparent dressing, every 7 days and as needed for soiled dressing or loss of integrity; gauze and non- occlusive dressing, every 48 h and as needed Antisepsis of needleless connectors, IV junctions and catheter hub Vigorously scrub needleless connectors, IV junctions and hub diaphragm and sides prior to accessing with an alcohol swab using friction for a minimum of 15 s CRBSI criteria Bundle recommendations Blood culture sampling Consider DTP protocol when drawing blood cultures with signifi cant time differential of CVC culture versus peripheral culture positivity of 2 h; generally peripheral blood cultures are not drawn on oncology patients who have central lines see Chap. 1 Administrative Bundle recommendations Education Education of clinicians responsible for managing CVCs to include: care and maintenance strategies, identifi cation and management of complications Routine surveillance of CVCs Collect and benchmark outcome data with the National Healthcare Safety Network PICC peripherally inserted central catheter, IV intravenous, CRBSI catheter-related bloodstream infection, DTP differential time to positivity Adapted from Mermel 2000 , Marschall et al. 2008 , Horan et al. 2011

17.7.5.2 Antiseptic Needleless Connectors and Antiseptic

Port Barrier Caps Contamination of the CVC hub is the main source of CLABSI 10 days after insertion. Novel products are now available to decrease the incidence of this complication. Three such devices are currently marketed. V-link with VitaShield protective coating Baxter is a needleless connector with an antimicrobial coating silver on the interior and exterior sur- face. Curos® port protector is a barrier cap with a sponge saturated with 70 isopropyl alcohol IPA. Disinfection occurs 3 min after being threaded onto the connector. The cap may be left in place up to 7 days protecting the connec- tor from airborne and contact contamination. Caps should be placed on all needleless injec- tion sites and changed after each access. Saralex-CL Menyhay is an antimicrobial bar- rier cap that threads onto the needless connector bathing the connector in 2 chlorhexidine glu- conate in 70 IPA. Disinfection occurs in 5 min and may be left in place up to 96 h. The cap protects the connector from airborne and contact contamination. A new cap is applied after each access. A prospective simulation study by Menyhay and Maki 2006 evaluated the effi cacy of cleans- ing a CVC hub with 70 alcohol compared to the use of a Saralex barrier cap. One hundred fi ve needleless connectors from three manufac- turers were tested. The septum of each device was contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis and allowed to dry for 24 h. A control group of 15 connectors were not disinfected, 30 were cleansed with a 70 alcohol swab and 60 had a Saralex barrier cap applied and removed after 10 min. Nutrient broth was injected through each connector, collected and cultured. Cultures from all control connectors were positive. Twenty connectors 67 with conventional disinfec- tion with 70 alcohol were culture positive, whereas only 1 1.6 of the connectors disin- fected with use of the Saralex cap was culture positive. Further study through randomized trials is needed to determine if practice changes are indicated.

17.8 Summary

CVCs are a central component in the care of pediatric oncology patients and allow for safe and effective administration of chemotherapeutic agents in addition to antibiotics, blood products, parenteral nutrition and multiple additional medi- cations. Blood can be easily drawn from exter- nally tunneled CVCs and in accessed implanted ports. Infection and thrombosis are the most common risk factors with CVC placement, and practitioners must be aware of the clinical signs and symptoms associated with these complica- tions, methods to prevent these side effects, and treatment of these problems. Generally, practice and management are based on consensus guide- lines and expert opinion as robust evidence is lacking, especially in pediatric patients. References Adler A, Yaniv I, Steinberg R et al 2006 Infectious com- plications of implantable ports and Hickman catheters in paediatric haematology-oncology patients. J Hosp Infect 62:358–365 Alomari A, Falk A 2006 Median nerve bisection: a mor- bid complication of a peripherally inserted central catheter. J Vasc Access 7:129–131 Augoustides JG, Cheung AT 2009 Pro: ultrasound should be the standard of care for central catheter insertion. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 23:720–724 Baggott CR, Kelly KP, Fochtman D, Foley GV eds. 2002 Nursing care of children and adolescents with cancer, 3rd edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia Balls A, LoVecchio F, Kroeger A et al 2010 Ultrasound guidance for central venous catheter placement: results from the Central Line Emergency Access Registry Database. Am J Emerg Med 28:561–567 Bard Access Systems. https:www.bardaccess.com . Accessed 21 Apr 2014 Baskin JL, Pui CH, Reiss U et al 2009 Management of occlusion and thrombosis associated with long- term indwelling central venous catheters. Lancet 374:159–169 Burns D 2005 The Vanderbilt PICC service: program, procedural, and patient outcomes successes. J Assoc Vasc Access 10:183–192 Cesaro S, Tridello G, Cavaliere M et al 2009 Prospective, randomized trial of two different modalities of fl ush- ing central venous catheters in pediatric patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:2059–2065 Chaiyakunapruk N, Veenstra DL, Lipsky BA, Saint S 2002 Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine solution for vascular catheter-site care: a meta- analysis. Ann Intern Med 136:792–801 Deshpande KS, Hatem C, Ulrich HL et al 2005 The inci- dence of infectious complications of central venous catheters at the subclavian, internal jugular, and femo- ral sites in an intensive care unit population. Crit Care Med 33:13–20 Dillon PA, Foglia RP 2006 Complications associated with an implantable vascular access device. J Pediatr Surg 41:1582–1587 Donlan RM 2011 Biofilm elimination on intra- vascular catheters: important considerations for the infectious disease practitioner. Clin Infect Dis 52:1038–1045 Eisen LA, Narasimhan M, Berger JS et al 2006 Mechanical complications of central venous catheters. J Intensive Care Med 21:40–46 Fazeny-Dorner B, Wenzel C, Berzlanovich A et al 2003 Central venous catheter pinch-off and fracture: recog- nition, prevention and management. Bone Marrow Transplant 31:927–930 Gillies D, O’Riordan E, Carr D et al 2003 Central venous catheter dressings: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs 44:623–632 Gonzalez G, Davidoff AM, Howard SC et al 2012 Safety of central venous catheter placement at diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. Pediatr Blood Cancer 58:498–502 Hadaway L 2006 Heparin locking for central venous catheters. J Assoc Vasc Access 11:224–231 Handrup MM, Moller JK, Frydenberg M, Schroder H 2010 Placing of tunneled central venous catheters prior to induction chemotherapy in children with acute lym- phoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer 55:309–313 Hatler C, Buckwald L, Salas-Allison Z, Murphy-Taylor C 2009 Evaluating central venous catheter care in a pedi- atric intensive care unit. Am J Crit Care 18:514–520 Horan TC, Arnold KE, Rebmann CA, Fridkin SK 2011 Network approach for prevention of healthcare- associated infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 32:1143–1144 Kline AM 2005 Pediatric catheter-related bloodstream infections: latest strategies to decrease risk. AACN Clin Issues 16:185–198 Kusminsky RE 2007 Complications of central venous catheterization. J Am Coll Surg 204:681–696 Kuter DJ 2004 Thrombotic complications of central venous catheters in cancer patients. Oncologist 9:207–216 Lefrant JY, Muller L, De La Coussaye JE et al 2002 Risk factors of failure and immediate complication of sub- clavian vein catheterization in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 28:1036–1041 Levy I, Katz J, Solter E et al 2005 Chlorhexidine- impregnated dressing for prevention of colonization of central venous catheters in infants and children: a random- ized controlled study. Pediatr Infect Dis J 24:676–679 Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ 2006 The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravas- cular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin Proc 81:1159–1171 Male C, Chait P, Ginsberg JS et al 2002 Comparison of venography and ultrasound for the diagnosis of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis in the upper body in children: results of the PARKAA study. Prophylactic Antithrombin Replacement in Kids with ALL treated with Asparaginase. Thromb Haemost 87:593–598 Mansfi eld PF, Hohn DC, Fornage BD et al 1994 Complications and failures of subclavian-vein cathe- terization. N Engl J Med 331:1735–1738 Marschall J, Mermel LA, Classen D et al 2008 Strategies to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infec- tions in acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 29:S22–S30 Mayo DJ 1998 Fibrin sheath formation and chemother- apy extravasation: a case report. Support Care Cancer 6:51–56 McGee DC, Gould MK 2003 Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med 348:1123–1133 McLean TW, Fisher CJ, Snively BM, Chauvenet AR 2005 Central venous lines in children with lesser risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: optimal type and tim- ing of placement. J Clin Oncol 23:3024–3029 Menyhay SZ, Maki DG 2006 Disinfection of needleless catheter connectors and access ports with alcohol may not prevent microbial entry: the promise of a novel antiseptic-barrier cap. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 27:23–27 Mermel LA 2000 Prevention of intravascular catheter- related infections. Ann Intern Med 132:391–402 Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E et al 2009 Clinical prac- tice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 49:1–45 Monagle P, Chan AK, Goldenberg NA et al 2012 Antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of chest physicians evidence- based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 141:e737S–e801S Montecalvo MA, McKenna D, Yarrish R et al 2012 Chlorhexidine bathing to reduce central venous catheter- associated bloodstream infection: impact and sustainability. Am J Med 125:505–511 Munoz-Price LS, Hota B, Stemer A, Weinstein RA 2009 Prevention of bloodstream infections by use of daily chlorhexidine baths for patients at a long-term acute care hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 30:1031–1035 Nace CS, Ingle RJ 1993 Central venous catheter “pinch- off” and fracture: a review of two under- recognized complications. Oncol Nurs Forum 20:1227–1236 O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger EP et al 2002 Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter- related infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep 51:1–29 O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA et al 2011 Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular