Analysis of The Results of The Dry Season

Proceedings of MatricesFor IITTEP – ICoMaNSEd 2015 ISBN: 978-602-74204-0-3 Physics Page 228 The infiltration capasity curve during the dry season as shown at figure .2 below Figure 2. Infiltration capacity curve in the dry season Table 1. Comparison between the infiltration rate of Season Variable Dry season Rainy season Sig t Remarks fo near cluster 130.68 6.21 0.001 Significan fo out cluster 12.30 1.73 0.001 Significan fc near cluster 2.23 0.01 0.001 Significan fc out cluster 1.24 0.01 0.001 Significan f near cluster 102.90 51.19 0.001 Significan f out cluster 11.97 6.44 0.001 Significan K near cluster 0.251 0.463 0.002 Significan K out cluster 0.166 0.197 0.001 Significan Remarks: fo: initial infiltration rate fc: the final infiltration rate f: the average infiltration rate K: constant infiltration

3.2. Analysis of The Results of The Dry Season

Table 2. Comparison between the position of the infiltration rate of the dry season Variable Position Anova Result Hight Midle Low Sig F Description fo near cluster 130.51 130.52 131.02 0.017 Significan fo out cluster 12.27 12.36 12.26 0.512 Notsignifican fc near cluster 2.20 2.24 2.24 0.039 Significan fc out cluster 1.24 1.24 1.24 0.412 Notsignifican f near cluster 102.57 103.49 102.63 0.242 Notsignifican f out cluster 11.96 11.91 12.03 0.964 Notsignifican k near cluster 0.245 0.245 0.264 0.022 Significan k out cluster 0.168 0.165 0.164 0.062 Significan Remarks: fo: initial infiltration rate fc: the final infiltration rate f: the average infiltration rate K: constant infiltration 0,00 20,00 40,00 60,00 80,00 100,00 120,00 10 20 30 40 50 observation time minute Near the cluster model Out side the cluster model Near the cluster data Out side the cluster data     2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 C C G G C C C C C G C G C m          Proceedings of MatricesFor IITTEP – ICoMaNSEd 2015 ISBN: 978-602-74204-0-3 Physics Page 229 In this study, the study site is divided into three positions. First, the top position with a height of 508 meters above sea level. Second, the center position with a height of 330 meters above sea level. Third, the down position with a height of 44 meters above sea level. There are four variables that were observed in the data measurement and the calculation is the initial infiltration rate fo, the final infiltration rate fc, the average infiltration rate f, and the constant infiltration k in both conditions near the clump of 0.5 m, and outside the clumps 2.5 m. These variables are presented comparative value of each position in the dry season. From the above results in the dry season, seen a difference in the initial infiltration rate, the final infiltration rate, and significant infiltration konsntantan between the three positions. Position the top with a height of 508 meters above sea level is characterized by initial infiltration rate is lower, the rate of infiltration of the lower end, and a constant infiltration low position with a height of 330 meters above sea level was characterized by high initial infiltration rate, infiltration rate of the high , and constant infiltration is low. In the low position with a height of 44 meters above sea level is characterized by high initial infiltration rate, and constant infiltration is low.

3.3. Analysis of The Results of The Rainy Season