Note: x = X – MX
y = Y – MY
N1 = Students of Experiment Class N2 = Students of Control Class
The writer calculated the data based on the steps of the test. The formulation as followed:
a. Determining Mean of Variable X, with formula:
=
1
325 20
= 16.25 b.
Determining Mean of Variable Y, with formula:
=
2
215 20
= 10.75 c.
Determining Standard of Deviation Score of Variable X, with formula:
� =
2 1
=
1143 ,75 20
= 57,19
7.56 d.
Determining Standard of Deviation Score of Variable Y, with formula:
� =
2 2
=
763,75 20
= 38,19
= 6.18
e. Determining Standard Error Mean of Variable X, with formula:
� =
�
1
−1
=
7.56 19
=
7.56 4,36
= 1.73 f.
Determining Standard Error Mean of Variable Y, with formula:
� =
�
2
−1
=
6.18 19
=
6.18 4.36
= 1.42 g.
Determining Standard Error of different Mean of Variable X and Mean of Variable Y, with formula:
�
−
= �
2
+
2
= 1.73
2
+ 1.42
2
= 2.99 + 2.02
= 5.01
= 2.23 h.
Determining , with formula:
�
�
=
−
�
−
=
16.25 −10.75
2.23
=
5.5 2.23
= 2.47
i. Determining Degrees of Freedom df, with formula:
df =
– 2 = 20 + 20 -2
df = 38
The value of degrees of freedom df is not mentioned in the �
� ��
, so the writer uses the closer value to 38 that is 40 as degrees of freedom.
The value of df 40 at the degrees of significance 5 or �
� ��
5 of df 40 = 2,02
The writer formulated Null Hypothesis �
�
and Alternative Hypothesis
� as follow: �
�
: There is no significant different achievement in learning simple present tense between students are taught by using STAD technique
and students are taught by using Grammar Translation Method. � : There is significant different achievement in learning simple present
tense between students are taught by using STAD technique and students are taught by using Grammar Translation Method.
The assumption of this hypothesis as follow: If
�
�
≥ �
� ��
, the Null Hypothesis
�
�
is rejected. It means there is significant different achievement in learning simple present tense between
students are taught by using STAD technique and students are taught by using Grammar translation Method.
If �
�
�
� ��
, the Null Hypothesis
�
�
is accepted. There is no significant different achievement in learning simple present tense between students are taught
by using STAD technique and students are taught by using Grammar translation Method.
Based on the description of calculation above, it can be inferred that: 1.
The value of
�
� ��
in the significance 5 is 2,02 2.
The value of
�
�
is 2.47 The writer summarized that
�
�
≥ �
� ��
, it means that the Null Hypothesis �
�
is rejected and the Alternative Hypothesis � is accepted.
3. The Interpretation of Data
Based on the result of analysis data, the value of �
� ��
in the significance 5 is 2.02 and the value of
�
�
is 2.47. It means that the alternative hypothesis Ha is accepted and the null Hypothesis Ho is
rejected. Therefore, it can be inferred that the use of STAD Technique is more effective in teaching Simple Present Tense than Grammar
Translation Method. It simply illustrates that the students who are taught by using STAD Technique have a significant difference
achievement in learning Simple Present Tense between the students who are taught by using Grammar Translation Method.
34
CHAPTER IV CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS
A. CONCLUSION
Based on the calculation in chapter III, the writer obtained the value of �
� ��
in the significance 5 is 2.02, and the value of �
�
is 2.47. It can be said that
�
�
≥ �
� ��
which Ha alternative hypothesis is accepted. The hypothesis means there is a significant difference achievement in learning
simple present tense between students who taught by using STAD technique and students who taught by using Grammar Translation Method.
From the result above, the writer can conclude that there is the significant influence in mastering simple present tense between the students
who are taught through STAD technique and the students who are taught by using Grammar Translation Method.
B. SUGGESTIONS
In line with the research findings previously, here are some suggestions that can be given related to the writer conclusion and hopefully
can take the benefit to anyone who read this “skripsi”. The suggestions are as follow:
a. The teachers should be a creative person in order to make the teaching
and learning process become more interesting, effective, and comfortable for students.
b. The teachers should know the methods in learning and teaching in
order to the teacher can choose the suitable method for the suitable material in the classroom.
c. The teachers should be a flexible person, not only teaching, giving
critique, asking, and questioning but also sharing, receiving critique from the students.
d. The students should share their difficulty in learning to their friends
and their teacher in order to they can solve their problem in the learning activity.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Anonymous, Departemen Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan RI, Keputusan Menteri: No.096kep1967,”Bahasa Inggris Sebagai Bahasa Asing Pertama Di
Indonesia Dan Mata Pelajaran Wajib Untuk SLTP Sampai Perguruan Tinggi
” Azar, Betty Schrampfer, Understanding and Using English Grammar, 2
nd
edition, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc., 1989
Azar, Betty Schrampfer, Understanding and Using English Grammar, Jakarta: Binarupa Aksara and Prentice Hall, Inc., 1993
Brown, H.Douglas, Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, New York: Addison Wesley Longman, inc., 2000
Chalker, Sylvia, et.al., Dictionary of English Grammar, New York: Oxford University Press, 1998
Freeman, Diane Larsen, Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching, 2
nd
ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000
Harmer, Jeremy, How to Teach English new edition, Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited, 2007
Hornby, A.S, Guide to Pattern and Usage in English, 2
nd
edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975
Kesler, Carrolyn, Cooperative Language Learning, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc, 1992
Kirn, Elaine, Darcy Jack and Jill Korey O’ Sullivan, Interaction 1 Grammar 4
th
edition, New York: McGraw –Hill, Inc. 1990
Nunan, David, Collaborative Language Learning and Teaching, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992
Renandya, Willy A and George M. Jacobs, ed, Learners and Language Learning, Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre, 1998
Richards, Jack C and Theodore S.Rodgers, Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1986
Richards, Jack C and Theodore S. Rodgers, Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching, 2
nd
ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001
Slavin, Robert E, Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2
nd
edition, Boston: Ally Bacon, 1995 Sudijono, Anas, Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan, Jakarta: PT.Raja Grafindo
Persada,2008 Thomson, A.J and A. V. Martinet, A Practical English Grammar, 4
th
edition, New York: Oxford University Press, 1986
Werner, Patricia K, Interaction 2 Grammar, 4
th
edition, New York: The McGraw- Hill Companies, Inc., 2002
Wishon, George E and Julia M. Burks, Let’s Write English, New York: Littion
Educational Publishing, Inc. 1980 http:college.hmco.com.educationpbltccoop.html1. Retrieved
02032010 http:edtech..kennesaw.eduintechcooperativelearning.htm. Retrieved 02092010
http:niigatajet.net . Retrieved 10052010
http:spaces.isu.edu.tw . Retrieved 10052010
http:www.criminology.fsu.edufacultyclarkmodule1partcontentappendix4.ht mstad
. Retrieved 02032010 http:www.slideshare.netvacokagrammar-translation-method-presentation.
Retrieved 02032010
III. Indikator
1. Siswa dapat membaca nyaring dengan ucapan, tekanan dan
intonasi yang benar 2.
Siswa dapat mengidentifikasi berbagai informasi dalam teks tulis fungsional pendek sangat sederhana berupa teks descriptive
3. Siswa dapat mengetahui langkah retorika dalam teks descriptive
4. Siswa dapat mengetahui ciri kebahasaan teks descriptive
5. Siswa dapat mengetahui fungsi teks descriptive
6. Siswa dapat memahami makna kosakata sulit dalam teks
descriptive 7.
Siswa dapat membentuk kalimat positif, negative dan interrogative Simple Present Tense
8. Siswa dapat membedakan penggunaan form to be dengan subject
yang berbeda dalam kalimat
IV. Tujuan Pembelajaran
Pada akhir pembelajaran siswa mampu: 1.
Membaca nyaring dengan ucapan, tekanan dan intonasi yang benar 2.
Mengidentifikasi berbagai informasi dalam teks tulis fungsional pendek sangat sederhana berupa teks descriptive
2. Mengetahui langkah retorika dalam teks descriptive
3. Mengetahui ciri kebahasaan teks descriptive
4. Mengetahui fungsi teks descriptive
5. Memahami makna kosakata sulit dalam teks descriptive
6. Membentuk kalimat positif, negative dan interrogative Simple
Present Tense 7.
Membedakan penggunaan form to be dengan subject yang berbeda dalam kalimat
V. Materi PembelajaranUraian Materi Pokok
Terlampir