Terms in Debate Review of Theoretical Studies

3 RD SPEAKER 1. Rebuttal 2. Summary of team case 3. Summary of case 1. Rebuttal 2. Summary of team case 3. Summary of case 2.2.4.2 Order of Speakers Participants speak in order, alternating sides. The affirmative team speaks first followed by first negative Quinn, 2005:5. The following diagram shows the order of speakers. AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Figure 2.1 Order of Speakers Quinn, 2005:5

2.2.6 Terms in Debate

D‘Cruz 2003: 12 states that there are some terms that exist in debate, they are as follows: 1 Sides FIRST AFFIRMATIVE SECOND NEGATIVE SECOND AFFIRMATIVE REPLY NEGATIVE FIRST NEGATIVE REPLY AFFIRMATIVE THIRD NEGATIVE THIRD AFFIRMATIVE In each debate there are two sides, Affirmative and Negative. Each side will have four members. The Affirmative argues for the topic at hand e.g. ―Smoking in the public area should be banned‖ and the Negative argues against the topic e.g. ―Smoking in the public area should not be banned‖. Each side will give the same number and type of speeches. 2 Adjudicator The adjudicator adopts the role of an average reasonable person, who has the average reasonable person‘s knowledge of the topic but who, unlike the average reasonable person, has expert knowledge of the rules of the debate. The adjudicator has three functions: a. to decide which team has won the debate; b. to provide an explanation of the reasons for the decision; and c. to provide constructive feedback to the debaters. 3 Speech An effectively structured speech will tend to have the following features: a. an interesting, which captures audiences‘ attention and build rapport; b. a clear statement of the purpose and general direction of the speech; c. a logical sequence of ideas which is easy for the audience to follow; d. prioritized arguments with time allocated according to their strategic importance; and e. a conclusion or summary of the major points made in the speech. A second aspect of a speake r‘s structure is the performance by each speaker of certain duties. A summary of these duties is set out in the table below: Table 2.3 Summary of Speakers‘ Duty SPEAKER DUTY First affirmative speaker Define the topic – set out affirmative‘s interpretation of the topic – identify issues which will be in contention Present team structure – team line – team split Present arguments allocated to the first speaker First negative speaker Identify major areas of initial disagreement with the affirmative case – include any disagreement about the definition – rebut the major affirmative arguments Preset team structure – team line – team split Present arguments allocated to the first speaker Second speakers Identify the major areas of disagreement with the other team – include definitional issues which are still in contention – rebut major arguments Defend own case against rebuttal by previous speaker s Present arguments allocated to second speaker Third speakers Present an overview of the debate – identify the essential issues upon which teams disagree – rebut the important aspects of the opposing team‘s case – defend own team‘s case against attack – summarize own case Both affirmative and the negative teams have their own task in a debate. The affirmative must define the motion and support it by giving constructive arguments. The right to define first and primary resides with the affirmative that is expected to propose a reasonable definition for the motion. In contrast, the negative team side must oppose the motion and build a counter case against the government. In the event the negative side feels the definition is invalid, they may challenge the definition and propose an alternative definition. To determine the winner in debate, the adjudicators use Victory Points how many they won in the preliminaries, scores and margins the difference of the score between the winner and the team which lost in round.

2.2.6 Australasian Debate Championship ADC and Java Overland Varsities English Debate JOVED

Dokumen yang terkait

An Analysis On High School Students’ Ability To Master Passive Voice A Study Case : The Second Year Students At SMK Negeri 2 Pematangsiantar

1 73 52

ENGLISH LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY MALE AND FEMALE STUDENTS OF INSAN CENDEKIA English Learning Strategies Used By Male And Female Students Of Insan Cendekia Al Mujtaba Junior High School.

0 1 11

ENGLISH LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY MALE AND FEMALE STUDENTS OF INSAN CENDEKIA English Learning Strategies Used By Male And Female Students Of Insan Cendekia Al Mujtaba Junior High School.

0 1 14

INTRODUCTION English Learning Strategies Used By Male And Female Students Of Insan Cendekia Al Mujtaba Junior High School.

0 2 9

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Comparative Analysis Of Interlanguage Errors Made By Junior High School, Senior High School, And University Students.

0 2 6

COMPARATTIVE ANALYS Comparative Analysis Of Interlanguage Errors Made By Junior High School, Senior High School, And University Students.

0 3 19

LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL BATIK 2 SURAKARTA IN DEVELOPING Learning Strategies Used By Eleventh Grade Students Of Senior High School Batik 2 Surakarta In Developing Reading Skill.

0 3 14

LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL BATIK 2 SURAKARTA IN DEVELOPING Learning Strategies Used By Eleventh Grade Students Of Senior High School Batik 2 Surakarta In Developing Reading Skill.

0 3 18

AN ANALYSIS OF AUTONOMOUS LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS.

0 1 7

View of Nationalism Among Students: A Comparison Between Students of Islamic Junior High School and Students Of Junior High School in Serang Municipality and Serang Regency

0 0 20