IQ and Learning Achievement

Spearman, intelligence is the capacity for constructive thinking, which involves a discovery of appropriate qualities and relations of the ideas, that are before us and bringing in of the other relevant ideas. All these definitions define intelligence in their own way, in view of this problem many psychologist have accepted a definition by Weschler. He said Intelligence is the aggregate or global capacity of an induvidual to think rationally, to act purposefully, and to deal effectively with his environment 11 . Commonly IQ is not only uses in educational field, it also uses as a reference in worklife. In educational field IQ tests are given to diagnose students at school. Usually it helps school and stake holders to diagnose students who have difficulty in learning, so it may help the teachers to evaluate through teaching and learning activites. Every individual in a society will have some amount of intelligence. Some may harder to solve something, some may be average, and some other people maybe more intelligent. There are some students who taking time to study and facing problem in some subjects and also having lower score. There are students who learn easier rather than others and almost have no problem during learning. There are also some students who learn normally and have stabil achievement with some subjects at school. Those cases usually can be proven by the score of IQ. Another function is that the IQ is to classify student to the next level or next grade in school. For some schools in Indonesia reaching next grade year at junior high school there is a classification. And score of IQ is used as reference for school to classified students to those kind of classes. As the writer mentioned before IQ test is also used in some big companies for the purpose of job interview. 11 Aman Sharma, www.psychologydiscussion.netessaysintelligence-essay-on- intelliegence-940-words608. If we measure the intelligence of a large number people and plot the IQ score of people it can be seen by classification table below. Based on Weschler level intelligence of people can be calssified by the IQ score as follows: Table 2.1 Classification of IQ IQ Range Defiation IQ IQ Classification 130 above Very Superior 120-129 Superior 110-119 High Average 90-109 Average 80-89 Low Average 70-79 Borderline 69 and below Extremely Low 2. The Theory of Intelligence While Intelligence is one of the most talked about subjects in psychology, there is no standard definition of what exactly constitutes „intelligence‟. Some researchers have suggested that intelligence is a single, general ability; while other believe that intelligence encompasses a range of aptitudes, skill and talents. The term of “Intelligence Quotient”, or IQ was first coined in the early century by a German Psychologist named William Stern. Psychologist Alfred Binet was the first to introduce about children‟s ability owned by certain age 12 . 12 Kendra Cherry, Psychology.about.comodcognitivepsychologypintelligencehtm Theories of Intelligence Different researchers have proposed a variety of theories to explain nature of intelligence. The following are some of the major theories of intelligence: Charles Spearman – General Intelligence The British Psychologist who described a concept general intelligence or the g-factor. He concluded that intelligence is general cognitive ability that could be measured and numerically expressed. He uses a technique known as factor analysis to examine some mental aptitudes tests, Spearman believes that people who performed well on one cognitive test tended to perform well on other test while those who score badly on one test tended to score badly on others 13 . Louis L. Thurstone – Primary Mental Abilities This Psychologist offered a differing theory of Intelligence. Instead of viewing intelligence as a single, general ability, he focused on seven different “primary mental abilities”. The ability described as followed: 1.Verbal Comprehension A person‟s capacity to comprehend the language utilized by other people, as certained by their receptive vocabulary and linguistic abilities. 2. Reasoning The process of thinking about something in a logical way in order to form a conclussion or judgement. 3.Perceptual Speed Perceptual speed is the ability to quickly and accurately compare letters, numbers, objects, pictures, or patterns. In the test of perceptual speed the things to be compared maybe presented at the same time or one after another. 4.Word Fluency The ability to speak easily and smoothly. 13 Ibid 5. Associative Memory The ability to learn and remember the relationship between unrelated items. 6. Spatial Visualization Is the ability to mentally manipulate 2-dimensional and 3 diemnsional figures. It is typically measured with simple cognitive test and is predictive ofuser performance with some kinds of user interfaces. Robert Stenberg – Triarchic Theory of Intelligence Robert defined intelligence as mental activity central to one‟s life in real world environments. He unfolded the theory of succesful in three phases; first phase is the validation of the fundamental importance of different abilities and the collection of supporting evidence from different cultures. Second phase included studies designed to develop valid and reliable methods to asses analytical, practical and creative abilities. The last phase was designed to apply the theory of value pedagological to develop analytical, practical and creatives ability. 14 Edward L. Thorndike Thorndike divided intelligence into three elements, the three elements are: 1. Social Intelligence; the capacity to effectively negotiate complex social relationship and environment. or the ability to communicate with people, understand and perform in social relations. 2. Abstract Intelligence; is a human enquiry of both natural and artificial intelligence at the reductive embodying levels of neural, cognitive, functional and logical from the bottom up. 14 Elena Grigorenko, http:www.education.comreferencearticletriarchic-theory-of- intelligence- , December 23,2009. 3. Mechanical Intelligence; the ability to visualize relationship among objects. Or the ability to effectively to control body and manipulate objects 15 . Stenberg‟s triarchic theory named in the other named, those are : 1. Practical Intelligence is the ability to do well in informal and formal educational settings; adapting to and shapings one‟s environment, street smarts. 2. Experential Intelligence is the ability to adapting in novel situations; the ability effectively automate ways in dealing so they are easily handled in the future; the ability to think in novel ways. 3. Componential Intelligence is the ability to process information effectively. These include metacognitive, executive, performance, knowledge-acquisition components that helps to steer cognitive process. 16 3. The Strength and The Weakness of IQ Score However IQ score has its strength and its weakness. It is not 100 accurate to measure or to predict someone‟s intelligence. Here are some details about the strength of IQ score 17 : a. They produce pretty reliable result b. Whichever IQ test is used, it turns out that score on all the subtests, although their various items seen so different, shows positive correlation with one another. c. Score on subtests tend to cluster together in groups, which seems to be taping recognize able abilities or factors. 15 Triantoro Safaria,Interpersonal Intellegence. Yogyakarta : Amara Books, 2005, hal.20 16 http:en.wikipedia.orgwikiintelligence-quotient 17 Richard Fox, Teaching and Learning: Lesson from Psychology, United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing, 2005. p.185-187 d. The test do manage to asses abilities that people associate with the term “intelligence” e. The test predict academic achievement quite well with typical correlation between +0.5 and +0.8 And the main weaknesses of the same test, from teacher‟s point of view : a. Although the result are stable when one looks at large group of people, or individual child will on a given day produce one score, which is only a sample of intelligent behaviour. b. Although one does indeed obtain a profile of scores for a child, across the range of subject, the profile is not terribly informative. c. There is more basic objection to calling these test evaluation of humans intelligence. d. One can argue that the cultural effects of the test are generally malign. e. Another argument often launched against IQ test is that they are culturally unfair. IQ test sometimes used to detect whether children should be put into special education classes or accelerated learning programs. IQ test can be valuable tool for assessing intelligence, but they also have several drawbacks and weakness as mentioned above. To sum up, the main strength of IQ test is the ability to provide a rough estimate of the raw intellectual ability of a test taker. The result of test can be used to estimate future performance of test taker, but IQ test are limited in scope and therefore are not always good predictors of academic or job performance. And the main weaknesess of IQ test is that designing a test to interprate intelligence presumes that intelligence can be adequately defined and tested by using a simple paper-and-pencil, multiple choice exam. IQ test often contain logical word problems or problems involving shapes and numbers, but such problems may not necessarily form an accurate picture of intelligence. Another failing of IQ test is the inability to evaluate characteristic that are important to achievement in the world that may not be directly related to IQ Scores. And next problem with IQ test is that the results can vary considerably from one test administration to another. Even a difference of 5 points in the result of an IQ test could move someone from what is considered a low IQ to well within the average range. The result of the IQ can be changed especially in kid and adult. The highest score reached in adult age and can be decreased toward old age. Eventhough there are some researchers were defined that the increasing of the IQ score more influenced by the increasing of physics ability in doing the test than the increasing of the intelligence level. 4. The Wechsler Test The new measurement instrument by American psychologist were developed by David Wechsler. He believed that intelligence involved a number of different mental abilities, describing intelligence as the global capacity of person to act purposefully, to think rationally, and to deal effectively with his environment. There are scales divided by by six base on and five performances subtest, they are Verbal intelligence, the component most associated with academic success, implies the ability to think in abstract terms using either words or mathematical symbols. Performance intelligence suggests the ability to perceive relationship and fit separates parts together logically into a whole 18 . The purpose of the Weschler intelligence scales for children and primary scale of intelligence are used as tools in school placement, in determining the presence of a learning disability, developmental delay, in identifying giftedness, and in tracking intellectual development. They are 18 Juanita Shell, http:healthofchildren.comU-ZIntelligence-test.html often included in neuropsychological testing to assess the brain function of individuals with neurological impairments. The most distinctive feature of the Weschler test is their division into a verbal section and a nonverbal performance section, with separate scores available for each subsection. The Wechsler Intelligence scales are standardized test, meaning that as part of the test design, they were administered to a large representative sample of the target population, and norms were determined from the results. The scales have a mean, or average, standard score of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. The standard deviation indicates how far above or below the norm the subject‟s score is. While the full scale IQ score provides a reference point for evaluation, it is only an average of variety skill areas. A trained psychologist evaluates an interpret a c hild‟s performance on the scale subtest to discover their strengths and weakness and offer recommendations based upon these findings. The only known risk of the Wechsler intelligence test is that the result are misused or are given undue weight. But, The Wechsler test have useful diagnostic capabilities that enable a skilled examiner to evaluate such personal characteristic as general defense mode of handling life situation. 5. Definition of Learning Learning is a process where people can gain an information, experience, or kind of thing like knowledge. Commonly learning is taking place in the class room, at course, college or university. In fact people can learn everywhere, everyone can gain information, experience and knowledge from everything that they see, they hear even from what they read. For a new thing that people gained through learning there is a changing such as from nothing they know and then they know about something, from zero to something, from the wrong to the right, and etc. Learning is not only mapping the knowledge or information gained but also how to involve individual actively and revise the learning into private experience. In learning there is process needed on it. Learning is the act of acquiring new or modifying and reinforcing, existing knowledge, behaviour, skills, values, or preferences and may involve synthesizing different of information. The ability to learn is possessed by humans, animals, and machines. Learning maybe viewed as a process, rather than a collection of factual and procedural knowledge. Learning also produces changes in the organism and that changes produced are relatively permanent. Human learning may occur as part of education, personal development, schooling, or training. It may be goal oriented and may be aided by motivation. Learning may occur as a result of habituation or classical conditioning. Learning also may occur consciously or without conscious awareness. Behaviorists believe that learning is a conditioning aspect that refers to target education. Teachers or educators learning process that includes a person‟s behaviour changing such a narrow one and prefer to focus on the lerarner itself rather than the environment also the complexities of human memory. 19 . Cognitive theory is emphasized the process of learning rather than the result of the learning itself. Learning is not only involve between stimulus and response, learning is an understanding. Changing of perception and understanding is not always shaped as behavioural that can be seen. Jean Piaget sees the learning process as a gradually activity and intellectual function from concrete into an abstract. The development of intellectual is not quantitative, but qualitative 20 . Based on Morgan Gino, he stated that learning is one of a relativity from behaviour that comes from experience. It can be said that learning is 19 https:en.m.wikipedia.orgwikiLearning_Theory_education 20 Aristwn.staff.iainsalatiga.ac.id , Teori Blejar Kognitif. P.1 a conscious effort that human do through experience and exercises to gain new ability. Gerow assumed that learning is demonstrated by a relatively permanent change in behaviour that occurs as the result of practice or experience 21 . Based on Winkel said that “Learning is all mental of physics activities that take place in an active interaction in the environment and produce a changing in understanding ” 22 . The Condition of Learning a book by Gagne, he said “Learning is a change that shown in changing of behaviour, and the condition is different from the individual before he is in learning and after he was ” 23 . There are many ways of learning, it could be through learning process, geetting information, or experience and excercise as James Patrick Chaplin in his book of Dictionary of Psychology mentioned “Learning is restricted into two formulation. The first, learning is a changing in behaviour that is relatively stayed because of experience and excercising. The second formulation learning is a process of getting responses beacuse of certain excercises. ” 24 . In the book of “Theories of Learning 1975”, Hilgard and Bower explained learning as “Learning is related with changing of someone‟s behaviour into certain situations caused by the experience, where the changing of the behaviour can not be explained or based on personality, maturity, or the condition of the individual such as tired, medicine effect and et c.” 25 . In “Educational Psychology” Wiherington also explaind learning as “Learning is a process of changing inside of personality of a person which 21 Akhmad Solihin, http:Visiuniversal.blogspot.com201403pengertian-belajar , March 2, 2014. 22 Haryanto, S.Pd 2010. Pengertian Belajar Menurut Ahli. 23 Ibid 24 Ibid 25 Drs. Ngalim Purwanto, MP 1992. Psikologi Pendidikan. PT. Remaja Rosda Karya. P.84 claimed as the new pattern from reaction such as ability, attitude, habit, intelligence or kind of understan ding.” 26 . From statement of Wiherington if a person really learn something or he obtain new information or knowledge there must be a changing which takes places on personality, attitude, habbit, intelligence and also understanding. A person who is really learn something he must be AS. Hornby‟s explains that “Learning is gaining knowledge or skill by studying from experience, from being tought, etc. Or becoming aware of something by hearing about it from somebody else or studying and repeating something in order to be able to remember or gradually changing your attitudes about something so that you behave in different way 27 . Some psychologist have different definition about learning, as follows: 1. “According to Hilgard, Learning is the process by which an activity originated or it changes through training procedures whether in laboratory or natural environment is distinguish from changing by factors not attributable to training.” 2. Based on Harold Spears “Learning is to observe, to read, to immitate, to try something the mselves, to listen, to follow direction” 3. And based on James O. Whittaker “Learning may defines as a process by which behaviour originates or is altered through training or experience 28 ” Based on definition of learnimg above it can identified some necessary elements of learning, they are: 1. Learning is a changing process of behaviour, where that changes can lead into something good behaviour, but also leads into bad behaviour. That change doesnt have to appears after learning process it can appears in future. 26 Ibid 27 AS. Hornby, Oxford Learner’s Dictionary, 6th ed Oxford University Press, 2000. P.481 28 M. Alisuf Sabri, Psikologi Pnedidikan, Jakarta: Pedoman Ilmu Jaya, 1996. P.54 2. Learning is changing process by experience and trials 3. To be called learning, mostly the changes gained new ability that stay in long time. 4. The changing behaviour or habit usually related to personal aspect physically or psychologis. Most of theories principally defines learning involved all changes in thinking, knowledge, information, appreciation and understanding as well. Changing process exists because there is an effort from the individual, learning is an active process, cuase the activity through consciousness and has purposes. So it can be summarized that learning is a kind of changing process where there are increasing information, experiment and knowledge included on it. 6. Definition of Learning Achievement In educational field to measure how far the learning goes there is a learning achievement. Usually learning achievement is written in the report book or a report file. Learning achievement itself comes from accumulated numbers during certain time of learning process. Achievement is something that gained through certain times, it also needs some efforts to help, sometimes achievement takes time to do. There are some processes on it, it is also not easy for some people to reach. Qohar said “Achievement is something that achieved, result of work, a result that makes a person happy and it gained through hard work .” 29 . W.J.S Purwadarminta “Something that have been reached through action and something that have done called by achievement” 30 . As said above that learning achievement is something that need an effort to do. It is in line with Arif Gunarso “Learning achievement is an 29 Dr. Hamdani, M.A. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. CV Pustaka Setia, 2011. p.137 30 Ibid extra effort that has been reached through learning efforts by someone” 31 . There five kind of learning achievement classified by Gagne, Intelectual ability, cognitive strategy, verbal information, behaviour, capability‟ 32 . Intellectual ability includes is an ability about a person handle his mind, it also an ability how they understand something, the way person understand process of something and also how person learn from examples or experience. While cognitive strategy is related to human memory and how it works, the way thinking of a judgment, the way of human solve the problem and making decision. Another achievement by Gagne is verbal information, it is how do a person or people collect information or reach knowledge. Student‟s human level such as accepting, denying, making value from information in learning process can be said as learning achievement 33 With learning evaluation teachers can summarized student‟s learning achievement. High or low student‟s learning achievement is getting from the result of learning evaluation 34 . Ngalim Purwanto defines learning as some elements 35 : a. Learning is changing in behaviour b. Learning is process of changing that happens through exercise c. To be called learning, it process should be constant. d. Aspects that have been changing includes of personality physically yet psychology. 7. Factors Influencing Learning Achievement In learning process there are some factors that can influence, generally there are two factors that may influence such as internal factor and external factor 36 . 31 Id. at.138 32 Id. at.138 33 Id.at.138 34 Id. at.139 35 DRS. M Ngalim Purwanto, Mp. Psikologi Pendidikan. PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 1992 p.85 Internal and external factors are divided as 37 : a. Internal Factor Factor that comes from students is called by internal factors. It includes: 1. Intellegency 2. Physical and physiology 3. Attitude 4. Interest 5. Talent b. External Factor External factors covered two points, they are social environment and non-social environment. Social environment such as; teachers, headmaster, administration staff, classmates, home where students live, etc. While non-social environments are school buildings, and time study. Others factor external are: 1. Condition of family 2. Condition of school 3. Society environment Those factors above are supported by Ngalim Purwanto who explained factors as followed 38 : Chart 2.2 Factors Influence Learning Achievement 36 Hamdani, Op.Cit.,139 37 Hamdani, Op.Cit.,140 38 Drs. M. Ngalim Purwanto, MP. Psikologi Pendidikan. PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 1992. p.107

B. Theoritical Study

Commonly people measure person‟s intteligence by using Intelligency test or it is known as IQ test. IQ itself is supported by many scientists as Santrock, Halonen, Thurstone and so on. Brodi in his research stated that there is a correlation between IQ and how many years person able to finish level of study 39 . SiaTjundjing on his journal said that IQ has a positive correlation with student‟s achievement in school 40 . Based on some theories above and from the writers mentioned in previous chapter, it is assumed that there is also a correlation between IQ and student‟s achievement of junior high school students of SMPIT Nurul Fikri. The writer chooses Intelligency to calculates the correlation because intelligency interprets intelligence smart that shows the ability of person 39 Tjundjing, Sia 2001. Hubungan Antara IQ, EQ, dan AQ Dengan prestasi studi Pada Sisa SMU. Anima Indonesian Psychological Journal, vol.17., No.1. p.85 40 Ibid Eksternal Environment: Nature, Social Instrumental: Curricullum, Teacher, Facilities, Administration or Management Internal Fisiology: Physical condition, Five sense condition Psychology: Talent, interest, Intelligency, Motivation, Cognitive in some academic fields 41 . So far it can be assume that there is a correlation between IQ and student‟s learning achievement and that is why this study focuses on how far the correlation between the variables which can be answered by the result of data.

C. Previous Study

To support this writing the writer takes two previous studies. Both studies talk about correlation of IQ, EQ and students achievement at school. First previous study is a journal written by Sia Tjundjing. The writer also uses this journal for reference. A journal by Sia discusses about IQ, EQ and Student‟s achievement 42 . But in this research He adds another variable; it is AQ or known as Adversity Quotient. Adversity quotient itself includes three elements of science; cognitive psychology, psychoneuroimmunology, and neurophysiology. AQ holds two important components that they are theories and the applies in daily life. So there are two differences between this writing and a journal by Sia Tjundjing discussed. Instead of using three variables IQ, EQ and AQ, this journal uses cross- sectional method for quantitative-exploratory research. The population and sample this journal take place at second year students of SMK St. Carolus which gained by purposive sampling. For research instruments Sia uses ARP Quick Taker TM to know the AQ score of students. From what the writer read the assumption of this research is AQ has strong correlation in students achievement at school. Sia believes that AQ Adversity Quotient more important than IQ and EQ. 41 Id. at. 86 42 Sia Tjindjing 2001. Hubungan Antara IQ, EQ, dan AQ Dengan prestasi studi Pada Sisa SMU. Anima Indonesian Psychological Journal, vol.17., NO.1. p.69-92 The results of the journal mention as follows: - There is a positive correlation between AQ and student‟s EQ as many 0,310 with significance level 99. - There is no correlation between AQ and IQ. - A negative correlation for EQ and IQ as many -0,202 - No correlation between AQ and Student‟s achievement - No correlation between EQ and student‟s achievement - There is a positive correlation between IQ and student‟s achievement as many 0.105 for first semester, and 0,100 at second semester. Second previous study, the writer gets from a skripsi written by Aning Madjinatul. This study disscused about the correlation of IQ and student‟s achievement but there is another one variable that is EQ 43 . Especially, this skripsi uses Mathematic score for student‟s achievement, and it is different from what writer discusses in this study. The population of this study is first grade students from Global MAN 2 Tulungagung. For technique sampling Aning use the same technique like Sia, a purposive sampling. For tehcnique collecting data Aning uses 3 steps, they are interview, questionaire, and documentation. Aning in his writing uses Validity construct to do a validity test for his skripsi. There is also a reability test using kind formula “alpha crobanch”. The results of the research are: - There is positive correlation between student‟s achievement in Mathematic score and IQ as many 0,254 . - And a negative result for correlation between EQ and student‟s achievement as -0,006. So from both previous studies the writer tries to inform that there is a difference between this study and those previous studies. It can be seen as 43 Aning Madjinatul, Korelasi antara IQ, EQ dan kecerdasan Siswa, IAIN Tulungagung, 2012.

Dokumen yang terkait

An analysis of the students' error in learning plural forms of nouns (A case study at the first year sudents of MTs Nurul Huda Bogor)

0 8 71

The correlation between students' interest in learning english and their english learning achievement : a survey at second year students of mts. an.nizhomiyah depok

0 6 61

Analysis on the students' error in learning reported speech of question sentence at the third year students of AMKIT Nurul Qolbi Bekasi (A cse study at the third year students of SMKIT Nurul Qolbi bekasi)

0 22 69

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS' ACHIEVEMENT IN GENERIC STRUCTURE AND THEIR LISTENING COMPREHENSION AT THE FIRST YEAR OF SMAN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 6 51

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS‘ ACHIEVEMENT IN GENERIC STRUCTURE AND THEIR LISTENING COMPREHENSION AT THE FIRST YEAR OF SMAN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 13 34

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE MOTIVATION OF THE FIRST- YEAR STUDENTS OF SMA IN SURABAYA IN LEARNING ENGLISH AND THEIR ENGLISH ACHIEVEMENT

0 0 13

The correlation between the motivation of the first-year students of SMA in Surabaya in learning English and their English achievement - Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya Repository

0 0 20

The correlation between the motivation of the first-year students of SMA in Surabaya in learning English and their English achievement - Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya Repository

0 0 19

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE ENGLISH CONVERSATION ACTIVITY IN WEEKLY PROGRAM AND THE STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN ENGLISH SPEAKING AT THE FIRST YEAR OF MA HUSNUL KHOTIMAH KUNINGAN - IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

0 0 18

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION IN LEARNING ENGLISH AND THEIR ACHIEVEMENT IN READING COMPREHENSION AT THE FIRST GRADE STUDENTS OF MTS AT-TAQWA PASAWAHAN - IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

0 0 17