Introduction Research Framework tesis english lang literaturee
There were seven Form four classes in the chosen school. The total number of the population of form 4 students was 210. The sampling design was that of convenience.
Class 1 was chosen as the experimental group and Class 2 was chosen as control group. Class 3 was chosen as the pilot study group for the improving of the instruments. The
students were grouped as class 1 and class 2 based on English teacher’s perception, PMR results as well as monthly Test 1 results. The sample class profile is shown in Table 3.2
below.
Table 3.2 Distribution of sample by Gender and perceived English Ability
Class Name : Class 1 Experimental Group Profile of Class
Gender English Ability
As perceived by teacher and monthly
Test 1 Results Number of
pupils Number of
Males and females
Percentage 0f males
And females
Male High 3 17
53 Average 9
Low 5 Female High
2 15 47 Average 11
Low 2 Total
32 100
Table 3.2 shows the profile of all the samples for experimental group. As found in table 3.2, five students were considered as high level of English proficiency. Majority of
them i.e. twenty of the students were considered as average level of English proficiency. However, seven of the students have low English proficiency level.
Table 3.3 Distribution of sample by Gender and perceived English Ability.
Class Name : Class 2 control Group
Profile of Class Gender English
Ability As perceived by
teacher and monthly Test 1 results
Number of pupils
Number Of males
And females Percentage
Of males And females
Male High 2 15 52
Average 7 Low 6
Female High 2 14 48
Average 8 Low 4
Total 29
100
For the control group, four students were considered as high level of English proficiency. Majority of them i.e. fifteen students were grouped as average level while
ten students were categorized as low English proficiency level.
Both classes have more or less the same English proficiency level as well as family background. Most of their parents are farmers and only a few Government
Servants. Most of the students have intermediate English proficiency level i.e. twenty students from Class 1 and 15 students from Class 2 .Only a few students achieved high
Proficiency level i.e. 5 students from Class 1 and 4 students from Class 2. Furthermore, 7 students from Class 1 and 10 students from class 2 were considered as having low
proficiency level. This had been proven by their English teacher’s perception, monthly Test 1 results as well as their PMR results.