Photoinhibition and photosuppression Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:J-a:Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology:Vol250.Issue1-2.Jul2000:

B .W. Touchette, J.M. Burkholder J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 250 2000 169 –205 183 as species-specific range of 3–12 h reported for Z . marina, with this high variability likely resulting from differences in temperature, metabolic activity, and biomass distribution between C-sink and C-source tissues Zimmerman and Alberte, 1991. Thus, use of H to predict productivity should not be extrapolated to multiple sites Dennison sat and Alberte, 1985; Zimmerman et al., 1989, 1991; Herzka and Dunton, 1998. The H model assumes that productivity does not occur at light levels below I , thus sat k omitting light-limited photosynthesis from consideration Herzka and Dunton, 1997, 1998. Although the model has been used successfully to estimate productivity of Z . marina, Herzka and Dunton 1998 demonstrated that it is more limited in estimating productivity of the subtropical seagrass, Thalassia testudinum. For example, during a period of low irradiance due to light attenuation, the H model predicted 0–37 of the sat production that was calculated from numerical integration of empirical data Herzka and Dunton, 1998. In this and other seagrass species with higher light requirements, the H sat model may not be applicable because of the potential for extended periods of light- limited photosynthesis.

4. Photoinhibition and photosuppression

Although most seagrasses are regarded as shade- or low light-adapted Ralph and Burchett, 1995, shallow-water or intertidal species may sustain photoinhibition from high photon flux densities during low tides Ralph and Burchett, 1995. Photoinhibition is defined here as a reduction in photosynthetic rates in response to high light intensities, whereas photosuppression is defined as a reduction in photosynthetic rates due to other processes such as toxicological e.g., herbicides, metals or physiological effects e.g., feedback inhibition. Photoinhibition is believed to be a photoprotective mechanism that depresses photosynthetic rates PSII and impairs both electron transport and photo- phosphorylation, thus allowing excessive light energy to be dissipated as heat Krause and Weis, 1991; Hanelt et al., 1994. In seagrasses, this process appears to occur at light 22 21 22 21 intensities between 700 and 1600 mE m s , most often at.1000 mE m s , with maximal photoinhibition between 1200 and 1500 h Table 5; Dawes et al., 1987; Hanelt et al., 1994. The increased energy dissipation in photoinhibition is generally associated with an increase in zeaxanthin levels in plants, and or with a decrease in the number of active PS II centers Guenther and Melis, 1990; Adams and Demming-Adams, 1992; Hanelt et al., 1994. Zeaxanthin increases following de-epoxidation of violaxanthin in the xanthophyll cycle, providing the mechanism for the energy dissipation Demming- Adams and Adams, 1992; Adams et al., 1995; Flanigan and Critchley, 1996. Energy dissipation may also be accomplished through turnover of the D1 protein in the reaction center of PSII. In high light, continuous D1 protein degradation replacement is believed to occur; but in extremely high light, repair of the reaction center via D1 protein replacement occurs much more slowly than D1 protein degradation, thus producing a photoinhibitory response Ohad et al., 1984; Guenther and Melis, 1990; Krause and Weis, 1991; Aro et al., 1993. However, in the seagrass Zostera capricorni, maximum 22 21 synthesis and degradation of D1 occurred at 350 mE m s , much lower than the light 184 B .W. Touchette, J.M. Burkholder J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 250 2000 169 –205 Table 5 22 21 Irradiance-associated photoinhibition reported in seagrass species, including light intensities mE m s and experimental and or culture conditions Species Light Conditions Source Temperate Posidonia sinuosa .1020 Young and basal leaves Masini et al. 1995 Zostera capricorni 1100 Based on fluorescence Flanigan and Critchley 1996 2 Zostera marina .1500 NO enrichment Touchette 1999 3 ´ Zostera marina 1200 Young leaves Jimenez et al. 1987 Zostera marina No inhibition Light levels.1400 Mazzella and Alberte 1987 ´ Zostera noltii No inhibition Light levels.5900 Jimenez et al. 1987 Tropical subtropical Halophila engelmannii 700 Culture bottles Dawes et al. 1987 Halophila ovalis 1000 After 120 min Ralph and Burchett 1995 Halophila stipulacea 1000 Based on chl response Drew 1979 Thalassia hemprichii 1600 Low tide Hanelt et al. 1994 22 21 levels considered to photoinhibit this species 1100 mE m s ; Flanigan and Critchley, 1996. Moreover, D1 protein turnover was not proportional to irradiance, suggesting that the D1 protein levels in this plant may be more influenced by pH and ATP levels in the thylakoid lumen. If so, then — at least in this seagrass species — D1 protein turnover does not function in photoprotection via photoinhibition Critchley and Russell, 1994; Flanigan and Critchley, 1996. Chlorophyll fluorescence techniques for example, PAM fluorimetry have enabled non-intrusive study of the behavior of photosystem II and electron transport Krause and Weis, 1991; Beer et al., 1998; Ralph et al., 1998. Under typical temperature regimes, most chlorophyll a fluorescence is attributed to PSII, and can be used to gain information about light conditioning, photosynthetic capacity, photosynthetic efficiency, and electron transport of PSII Krause and Weis, 1991; Ralph et al., 1998. Variable fluorescence F is related to maximum and initial fluorescence F and F , respective- v m o ly as: F 5 F 2 F Ralph et al., 1998. In ‘sun’ plants that are adapted to grow under v m o high light, F remains relatively constant and F fluctuates Demmig and Bjorkman, o m 1987; Franklin et al., 1992; Ralph and Burchett, 1995. In contrast, ‘shade’ plants that are adapted for growth in low-light conditions tend to fluctuate substantially in F — a o response that has been linked to photoinhibition and or other adverse affects on the PSII reaction centers Demmig and Bjorkman, 1987; Franklin et al., 1992; Ralph and Burchett, 1995; Dawson and Dennison, 1996. The F F ratio photochemical v m efficiency is used to evaluate the physiological state including the extent of photo- inhibition of the photosynthetic apparatus in various plants, including some seagrasses Table 6. A decrease in this ratio may be associated with environmental stressors that directly affect PSII efficiency Krause and Weis, 1991. Seagrasses such as Halophila ovalis and Posidonia australis show variations in F v that have been interpreted to indicate photosuppression due to UV-B radiation in a photoinhibition-like response see below; Larkum and Wood, 1993. This UV-B response suggests a lower electron flux through the oxidizing side of reaction center B .W . Touchette , J .M . Burkholder J . Exp . Mar . Biol . Ecol . 250 2000 169 – 205 185 Table 6 a Photochemical efficiencies quantum yield, F F reported in seagrass species as an indication of physiological stress v m Species F F F F Conditions Source v m v m Control Treatment Light treatments Cymodocea serrulata 0.810 0.680 25 increase UV; 7 d Dawson and Dennison 1996 Halodule uninervis 0.860 0.470 25 increase UV; 7 d Dawson and Dennison 1996 22 21 Halophila ovalis 0.650–0.700 0.200 1000 mE m min ; 2 h Ralph and Burchett 1995 Halophila ovalis 0.840 0.540 25 increase UV; 7 d Dawson and Dennison 1996 Halophila ovalis 0.700–0.800 No change Light deprivation Longstaff et al. 1999 Syringodium isoetifolium 0.800 0.680 25 increase UV; 7 d Dawson and Dennison 1996 Zostera capricorni 0.840 0.710 25 increase UV; 7 d Dawson and Dennison 1996 Other stressors 21 Halophila ovalis 0.780 0.700 .1 mg Cd l ; 24 h Ralph and Burchett 1998a 21 Halophila ovalis 0.780 0.150–0.650 1 mg Cu l ; 24 h Ralph and Burchett 1998a 21 Halophila ovalis 0.780 0.700–0.720 1 mg Pd l ; 48 h Ralph and Burchett 1998a 21 Halophila ovalis 0.780 0.300–0.700 1 mg Zn l ; 24 h Ralph and Burchett 1998a Halophila ovalis 0.780 0.630–0.700 Variable oil exposure; 24 h Ralph and Burchett 1998b Halophila ovalis 0.780 0.650–0.680 Variable oil dispersant; 24 h Ralph and Burchett 1998b a Halophila ovalis 0.750 0.600–0.740 Hyposaline 0–50 sw Ralph 1998 Halophila ovalis 0.730 0.300–0.700 Hypersaline 150–250 sw Ralph 1998 a a Zostera marina 0.730 ls 0.600 hs Variable salinity Kamermans et al. 1999 23 Zostera marina 0.832–0.855 0.219 25 mg Irgarol 1051 dm ; 10 d Scarett et al. 1999 a Values are indicated for plants in ambient conditions controls and various treatments. The data indicate a general decline in photochemical efficiencies under treatment conditions. Abbreviations: sw, seawater; ls, low salinity; hs, high salinity. 186 B .W. Touchette, J.M. Burkholder J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 250 2000 169 –205 1 P680 in PSII, including the primary donor of P680 Z; reaction side of the D1 protein, which would prevent Q from being reduced Larkum and Wood, 1993. Increases in F , o apparently result, as well, from UV damage to the PSII reaction centers in the seagrasses Cymodocea serrulata, Halodule uninervis, Halophila ovalis, Syringodium isoetifolium and Zostera capricorni Dawson and Dennison, 1996. F F ratios have been used in v m seagrasses to demonstrate photosuppression and PSII responses to UV radiation, light deprivation, and other stressors Table 6.

5. Carbohydrate metabolism