Characters  are  the  persons  represented  in  a  dramatic  or  narrative  work, who are interpreted by the reader as being endowed with particular moral,
intellectual, and emotional qualities by inferences from what the persons say  and  their  distinctive  ways  of  saying  it  and  from  what  they
do1999:32.
M.J.  Murphy  has  a  detailed  explanation  of  the  theory  of  character  and characterization  in  his  book
Understanding  the  Unseen
1972:  161-173.  In  his book, Murphy describes nine ways to determine the characteristics of a character
in a story. 1.
Personal  description.  The  author  can  describe  the  character  by  hisher appearance.  The  character  can  be  thin,  fat,  handsome  or  bad  looking.  The
clothes can describe the character’s economical condition. The rich one will use good or better clothes.
2. Character as seen by another. The author can give imagination or perspectives
by other character. A characteristic of a character can be seen by the point of view of other characters in a story.
3. Speech.  The  author  can  give  information  by  what  a  character  says  in  the
story. The conversation  between the  analyzed character and  other characters gives the reader some descriptions about hisher characteristics.
4. Past life. What has happened to the character in a story can give the readers
much better information in understanding the characteristics of a character. 5.
Conversation  of  others.  The  author  gives  an  easy  clue  to  understand  a characteristics by how other characters in a story talking about the character
being analyzed. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
6. Reaction. The reaction of a character to something, an accident, a conflict and
else given by the author can help the reader to understand the characters. 7.
Direct  comment.  The  author  gives  a  direct  description  of  a  character’s thought, mind, and feeling.
8. Thought. The author gives the reader a direct description and perspectives of
what’s on the character’s mind. It can reflect the character’s characteristics. 9.
Mannerism. The author can describe a character by hisher manners or habits. The writer does not use all the elements of the nine-elements of the theory of
characters and characterization. The writer uses only several ways that can help in analyzing the character in the novel. Those chosen elements are used by the writer
to  find  out  the  characteristic  of  the  existing  character  in  the  novel
The  Queen  of the Tearling
.
2. Theory of Conflict
The conflict happens in a story can identify the explicit messages in the story.  Theory  of  conflict  will  be  able  to  help  the  writer  to  analyze  the  conflict
which is faced by the character of
The Queen of the Tearling
. According  to  Laurence  Perrine  in
The  Sound,  Sense,  and  Structure
,  the conflict was a fight between the actions, ideas, and desires between two people or
between  people  in  a  society.  A  conflict  can  also  be  detailed  as  physical,  mental, emotional, or moral. Conflict could also be something that is easy or even difficult
to understand 1974: 44. Holman and Harmon in
A Handbook to Literature
1986:107 define and divide  conflict  into  four  types.  According  to  them,  conflict  is  a  struggle  that
occurs  when  two  focuses  become  opposite  in  a  storyline.  Four  types  of  the conflict according to Holman and Harmon were as follows,
a. A struggle against nature
This conflict is presented when a character is struggling with the natural surroundings.  An  example  is  when  a  character  has  to  fight  natural  disasters
such earthquake, tsunami, storm, etc. b.
A struggle against another person This  conflict  is  shown  when  a  character  has  to  face  the  other  characters
either physically, mentally, or thought. c.
A struggle against society This  conflict  is  shown  when  a  character  is  dealing  with  the  mind  of  a
community. A character has a different idea with the public at a large scope. d.
A struggle against fate or destiny This conflict is shown when a character must fight the Creator, which is
God. A character shall face hisher destiny to make hisher decision. Meanwhile Stanton’s
Introduction  to  Fiction
describes  the  conflict  into two  main  parts.  Two  important  parts  are  internal  conflict  and  external  conflict.
Stanton describes it as follows, a.
Internal Conflict This  conflict  is  indicated  when  a  character
’s  having  argument  against himherself.  A  protagonist  argues  with  himherself.  The  argument  lasts  the
entire  storyline.  Things  become  an  argument  between  characters  by themselves is about determining the right decisions that will be taken.
b. External Conflict
This  conflict  is  indicated  when  a  character  againsts  hisher  surrounding environment.  A  main  character  has  to  deal  with  different  thought  of  hisher
surroundings.  This  conflict  can  be  seen  as  a  main  character  argues  with another  character,  society,  etc.  The  argument  lasts  because  they  have  two
different opinions and objectives.
3. Theory of Message
A message is an element that we often find in a work of art. The artwork can be sculpture, paintings,  and literary works.  In this  study, the writer  wants  to
reveal the message of a novel, one form of literary works.
An Introduction of the Study of Literature
by Henry Hudson states that a good message is a message that is  most  likely  unconscious.  Many  of  literary  work  authors  are  trying  to  say  and
give a clue to all these possibilities through their works. A good message does not stand  with  the  common  pattern  but  rather  leads  to  a  humanity  and  norm  value
pattern 1958: 23. Whereas,  on  the  book  titled
New  Worlds  of  Literature
by  Beaty Hunter,  a  detailed  message  is  as  easy  as  a  real  meaning  or  a  conclusion  that  is
already  in  a  work  1989:  899.  Meaning  to  say,  a  message  is  a  picture  of  the conclusion of the values that can be taken from a story.
According to Kenny in
How to Analyze Fiction
, it is explained that when people are talking about a message, they usually also discusses the moral values.
Thus,  it can be concluded that the moral  values could  be a good or bad learning PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI