Social Pressure Theory of Psychology a. Theory of Personality
26
own person, to choose their own companies and pastimes, and to preserves the privacy of their thoughts, feelings, and belongings Lefrancois 407, Kimmel 234.
In his book, Kimmel pointed out three kinds of family relationship patterns 434-435:
a Democratic parents They are in the best position to help an adolescent son or daughter progress
toward identity achievement. Their supportive, accepting, and responsible but not domineering stance fosters security in considering alternatives.
b Autocratic parents They tell their children what to think and do. In some cases adolescents may
rebel against the dictates of autocratic parents and insist on finding their own way of life.
c Permissive parents They give their children free rein to make their own decisions but seldom
guide them in choosing well or help them in facing up to their mistakes. As a result, permissively reared adolescents tend to shy away from considering
alternatives. Apart from those kinds of family relationship patterns, Conger
straightened out that not having a father or having one who is ineffective, passive, neglecting, or distant from the child is likely to handicap the boy in cognitive
development. Father-absent
boys are
also generally
more immature
27
psychologically, have more difficulty in forming satisfying peer relations, and are less popular with their peers 258.
Furthermore, as what happened to Luke, the subject of this study, parents who are employing “love-withdrawal techniques” simply give direct but
not physical expression to his anger or disapproval of the child for engaging in some undesirable behavior. Such a parent may ignore the child, refuse to speak to
him, express dislike, or threaten to leave him. This parental pattern disrupts communication and learning opportunities between child and parent, and fails to
make use of the child’s capacity for empathy Conger 528. Thus, it is commonly held that much of the trouble between the
generations either parent or adolescent is due to their inability or unwillingness to
communicate, misunderstandings,
and parents’
interference towards
adolescents’ need for independence Conger 330, Ausubel 229. Sebald, however, perceives that conflict between adolescents and their parents stems from their
desire to associate more frequently and more closely with peer groups and also from a variety of other sources as parental interference with social life, lack of
adequate financial assistance, parental intrusion about schoolwork or criticism of grades, and parental criticism of friends. In words, parent-adolescent conflict
typically arises because the changing needs and interests of the adolescent require a readjustment in the family system due to the difference in age between
individuals of two generations 462.
28
2 Peers As a matter of fact, peers play a vital role in the psychological
development of most adolescents. Peer relations perform many of the same functions in adolescence as in childhood: they provide an opportunity to learn
how to interact with agemates, to control social behavior, to develop age-relevant skills and interests, to share similar problems and feelings, to increase one’s own
level of cognitive development, and to reduce egocentrism among adolescents Conger 325, Ausubel 367, Kimmel 149. Lefrancois, in addition, has another
perception. According to him, peer groups are of particular importance in developing positive self-concepts, as well as in the formation of sexually
appropriate values and attitudes 408. The peer group is the major training institution for adolescents in our
society. It is in the peer group that “by doing they learn about the social processes of our culture. They clarify their sex roles by acting
and being responded to, they learn competition, cooperation, social skills, values and purposes by sharing the common life” Ausubel
384.
Adolescent peer groups vary in size, interests, social backgrounds, and structure, but it tends to consist of individuals of relatively similar ages. Another
type of peer relationship is formed by individuals with different sexes, and frequently this kind of relationship grows into such feeling of love. Kimmel states
that the love of adolescence is the developmental necessity to discover one’s own identity from within a close relationship that involves sexual attraction. Such
29
romantic love is important in adolescence partly because it fits adolescent egocentrism 382-383.
In adolescent friendship, the more important thing is similarity in orientation and competence in social relationships as judged by measures of social
adjustment, social maturity, social intelligence, and sociality Ausubel 368. Conger, as stated in his book, explains that an adolescent’s personality
characteristics and social behaviors affect the likelihood of being accepted by peers, whereas the other factors include intelligence and ability, physical
attractiveness, special talents, social class and socioeconomic status, and ethnic- group membership 343.
Every important social relationship undergoes changes during adolescence. Changes in the adolescent’s ongoing relationships with family and
friends, as well as new relationships with teachers, employers and other members of the community, require a development of new strategies for interpersonal
relating. It is not rare, therefore, that peers may also create such pressure towards adolescent’s social life. Pressures for conformity to peer group originate both
from the group and from within the individual. Moreover, there are several reasons which can break up adolescent friendships, the most self-evident of which
is tension generated by disparity in age, ability, physical maturity, and socioeconomic status Parsons 117, Ausubel 369.
30
3 School One cause of adolescent’s problems is more likely come from the
environment outside family and peers, whereby adolescents get used to socialize in an educational institution namely school. Adolescents who are under such
pressure often results in poor school performance or dropping out of school. According to Conger, there are several factors affecting school dropouts, such as:
intelligence, school difficulties both academic and social, individual teacher-pupil relationship, deficiencies in home background, in motivation, in emotional
adjustment, family and peers influences and in individual psychological characteristics of the students themselves, including less confident of their own
worth, lower in self-esteem, more lacking in a clearly defined self-image and sense of identity 407-408.
Underachieving students are more likely to be characterized by a high level of free-floating anxiety; negative self-concepts; hostility toward
authority; difficulty in relating to peers, combined with excessive dependence on the peer group; a high level of independence-
dependence conflict; a social, pleasure-seeking orientation, rather than an academic one; and unrealistic goal orientations or no long-term
goals at all Conger 396-397.
Lack of educational stimulation in the home and parental disinterest in academic achievement are thus directly related to children having school-learning
problems and receiving relatively low grades. As further results, adolescents who do poorly or drop out of school often develop low self-esteem, remain
psychologically immature, and fail to realize their intellectual potential Kimmel 468.
31
Furthermore, as stated in Journal of Educational Psychology, the characteristics of social pressure on minorities in an academic and social
environment such as school includes several things as follows: a dramatic increase or decrease in grades, not volunteering to speak in class or other public
forums, not participating in extracurricular activities. It is concluded that these characteristics would innately influence the performance of students as well as
their social status. The effects of social pressure can be both positive and negative. Putting doubts into a student’s mind is a form of social pressure that can
reduce his or her motivation, which is one example of the negative one. In contrast, if people are given positive impression, they are more likely to perform
better Allen and Bragg 302-308. Having explained three sources of social pressure on adolescents, it is
wise to also recognize several negative effects of it. 1 Loneliness
According to Parsons, loneliness occurs at those times when one has a feeling of desolation, of isolation, of being cut off and estranged. Quite often the
lonely, alienated youth has failed to develop the necessary prerequisite skills for gaining admission and acceptance into the peer group. They feel like living in a
chronic state of disappointment and experience a state of total estrangement between themselves and the world-an estrangement in which they not only feel
alone and cut off but also unwanted, unvalued and unloved by all 119-123.
32
2 Psychological disturbance Susceptible to depression, failing to find support from the significant
others in their environment, and feeling hopeless and helpless, adolescents are often left with a sense of total despair. The sense of loneliness, hopelessness and
helplessness which accompany depression often blocks the adolescents’ ability to define and resolve the real problems facing them Parsons 131.
Moreover, Conger pointed out that the depressed adolescents may reveal their feelings through bodily complaints, such as waking up tired and
fatigued or exhibiting hypochondriacal symptoms and excessive bodily preoccupations, difficulties in concentration and failing school performance.
Those symptoms may chronically lead to such psychological disturbance called hypochondriasis.
It is an excessive preoccupation with functioning of the body which deals with anxiety. Psychological disturbance in an adolescent, thus, may
be reflected in real or imagined physical symptoms like what is known as hallucination 605-609.