1. Home
  2. Lainnya

Implications CONCLUSIONS, IMPLICATIONS, AND SUGGESTIONS

88 Hirose, Keiko. 2008. Cooperative Learning in English Writing Instruction through Peer Feedback. Aichi: Aichi Prefectural University. Hylan, Ken. 2004. Second Language Writing. New York: Cambridge University Press. Johnson, D., and Johnson, R. 1994. Learning Together and Alone, Cooperative, Competitive, Individualistic Learning. Needham Heights, MA: Prentice- Hall. Kagan, Spencer. 1989. Cooperative Learning Resources for Teachers. San Juan Capistrano, CA: Resources for Teachers. ______. 2010. Cooperative Learning. San Clemente, CA: Kagan Publishing. Kemmis, S., and McTaggart, R. 1988. The Action Research Planner 3 rd ed. Geelong: Deakin University Press. Lyman, F. T. 1981. The Responsive Classroom Discussion: The Inclusion of All Students. In Mainstreaming Digest, ed. A. Anderson, 109-113. College Park: University of Maryland Press. Mandal, R. R. 2009. Cooperative Learning Strategies to Enhance Writing Skills. Lady Willing Don Institute of Advance Study in Education, Chennai. McKay, Sandra Lee. 2006. Researching Second Language Classroom. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Richards, J. C., and Renandya, A. Willy. 2002. Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge: CUP. Ross, J., and Smythe, E. 1995. Differentiating Cooperative Learning to Meet the Needs of Gifted Learners: A Case for Transformational Leadership. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 63-82. Sargent, D. 2004. Using Cooperative Writing Activities to Build Community, Fluency, and Accuracy. Available on: http:www.schoolofesl.compublicationscooperative_writing_project.pdf [Retrieved 210813] Slavin, R. E. 1995. Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. Massachusetts: Allyn Bacon. Spratt, Mary et al. 2005. The TKT Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sumarsih. 2011. Improvin g Students’ Achievement in Writing Narrative Text through Think-Pair-Share Technique. Medan: University of Medan Area. 89 Wallace, Trudy. 2004. Educational Practices Series-14: Teaching Speaking, Listening, and Speaking. Geneva: International Bureau of Education – Publications Unit.

Dokumen yang terkait

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING PROCEDURE GENRE TO IMPROVE WRITING SKILL FOR VII GRADE STUDENTS IN SMP N 1 GROGOL, SUKOHARJO

0 3 44

Using jigsaw to improve students` participation in learning English in grade XI IPA 1 SMAN 2 Klaten.

0 0 115

Using contextual teaching and learning to improve speaking skills of XG students in SMA N 1 Kasihan Bantul.

5 34 170

The effectiveness of using recount genre to improve writing skill for VIII grade students in SMP Negeri 40 Purworejo isnani

0 0 42

USING GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILLS OF GRADE VIII AT SMP NEGERI 5 WATES IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2015/2016.

0 1 245

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILLS IN DESCRIPTIVE TEXTS THROUGH QUANTUM LEARNING STRATEGY OF GRADE VIII A OF SMP N 5 SLEMAN.

0 0 250

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ENGLISH READING SKILLS BY USING PEER ASSISTED LEARNING STRATEGIES OF GRADE VII STUDENTS OF SMP 1 JOGONALAN KLATEN IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2013/2014.

0 0 165

USING COMIC STRIPS TO IMPROVE THE SPEAKING SKILLS OF GRADE VIII STUDENTS OF SMP N 15 YOGYAKARTA IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2013/ 2014.

2 2 220

USING STORY-MAPPING TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE THE WRITING ABILITY OF GRADE VIII STUDENTS AT SMP N 2 GAMPING, SLEMAN IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2013/2014.

0 0 208

USING PEER RESPONSE TO IMPROVE WRITING ABILITY OF GRADE VIII STUDENTS AT SMP 3 BERBAH IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2013/2014.

1 2 268