5.2 Suggestions
Having seen the result of the study, the researcher would like to offer the suggestions as follows;
1. It is advisable for the guests either speaker or listener to understand the
cooperative principle, particularly the four maxims and to follow the rules of conversational maxim in making conversation run smoothly and clearly.
2. It is suggested that the rules of conversational maxims are taught to students in
Language Course or even for students of University in order to make them speak efficiently especially for those who face interview session in getting a
job. 3.
It is suggested to other researchers and the students of Applied Linguistics who are taking pragmatics or conducting research to find more the reasons in
obedience and violation in conversational maxims. 4.
The next research is suggested to elaborate the reasons of conversational maxims related to the language politeness especially in Indonesian language
and culture. 5.
It is expected that obedience or violation in conversational maxims will not be a barrier conversation since listeners are still able to understand what speakers
mean by other aspects in Pragmatics to catch the meaning such as presupposition, reference and speech act.
REFERENCES
Brown, P and Levinson, S.C. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language
Usage: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crowley, David and Mitchell, David 1994. Communication Theory Today.
Stanford: Stanford University Press. Cruse, D. A. 2000. Meaning Language: An Introduction to Semantic and
Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University. Denzim, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. 1994 Introduction: Entering the Field of
Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Gazdar, G. 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form.
New York: Academic Press Grice, H. Paul. 1975 Logic and Conversation, in P. Cole and J.L. Morgan eds,
Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3. New York: Academic Press. Hofmann, R. 1980. On The Derivation Of A Conversational Maxim.
Shimane National University Matsue City, Shimane, Japan 690. Hopper, Robert, Susan Koch and Jennifer Mandelbaum. 1986. Conversation
Analysis Method. Hutchby, I. 2006. Media Talk: Conversation Analysis and the Study of
Broadcasting. Reviewed by Pentti Haddington, pp. 185. Glasgow: Open University Press.
Leech, G. 1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman. Levinson, Stephen. C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. Lincoln Y Guba EG 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publication.
Newbury Park, CA. Marrying, P. 2000. Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social
Research Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
95
Nanda, Sheila, Sukyadi, Didi and Sudarsono M.I. 2012. Conversational Implicature of the Presenters in Take Me Out Indonesia. Indonesian
Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 1 No. 2 Nofsinger, R. E. 1991. Everyday Conversation. Newbury Park: Sage.
Patton, M.Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. London: Sage Rahardi, Kunjana. 2005. Pragmatik. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Rustono. 1999. Pokok-Pokok Pragmatik. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press. Sugiyono, 2011. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan RD. Bandung.
AFABETA, cv. Tennant, T. 2000.
Talk Isn’t Cheap: A Brief History of the Talk Show. Timberg, B.M., 2002. Television Talk: A History of the TV Talk Show. University
of Texas Press. Wray, Alison, Kate Trott and Aileen Bloomer. 1998. Projects in Linguistics:
A Practical guide to researching language. London: Arnold. Yule, George. 1996 Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Website Materials: http:www.matanajwa.comreadabout
http:m.artikata.comarti-98695-issue.html www.wikepedia.org.
www.youtube.com
Kategori