Bad Sides of Life: Pleasures of Acknowledging Newness, of Escaping, and

in a context that absorbs their attention 122 ”. In other words, children receive the topics adults assume to be difficult very well especially because they are ready with exploring newness. For the first example, the perfect, happy, middle-class and neat family has been widely celebrated in children’s books as it has turned to be stereotypical and ideal to have harmonious nuclear family. Altston has observed even separated for 166 years, the english work from 1830s like Holiday House to the 2005’s Charlie in the Chocolate Factory share a similar rhetoric of family that true happiness seems to be impossible without the love and support of a dedicated family 123 . The depiction of the family in children’s literature remains conservative, ideal, and fixed. It promotes a specific ideology to instil in its readers certain values which dictate how families should be: loving, respectful, preferably with two parents, contained in domestic harmony and sharing wholesome home-cooked family meals 124 . Breaking the boundaries burdening kids from knowing difficult life as they are assumed to live in a typical simplicity, Blume raises sophisticated themes which remain untold in children’s books. Marital problem, as one of those non-children’s matters, appears in It’s Not the End as the primary issue the young character Karen has to cope. In Margaret , readers can also find the frictions over Margaret’s vacation to Florida which is driven by their own marital problem of eloping. Blume’s fictional parents are depicted to be, instead of constantly harmonious, over conflicted or at 122 Peter Hunt, ed., International Companion Encyclopedia of Children’s Literature. Second New York: Routledge, 2004 557. 123 Ann Alston,The Family in English Children’s Literature New York: Taylor Francis, 2008 1. 124 Alston 2. least some times conflicted. Karen’s parents fight for everything from foods to the mode of parenting which turns divorce to be only way to struggle for. Meanwhile Margaret’s parents successfully end the fight with support, understanding, and solution. The ‘new’ model of parents in Blume’s novel offers freshness in reading stories by deconstructing the classic and replicated figure of parents which has been long and widely idealized. Like adults, young readers also want stories with the glorification of change, of novelty, and of discarding the old in favour of something new. In doing so, young readers can enjoy the new world and novelty in providing diverse perspective, solution, and anticipation of belonging problem of the unpleasant parental relationsh ip that the previous stories of the similarly typical parents’ relations do not offer. T he theme of divorce is also considered to be excluded from children’s matters. E ven though recent English children’s books have diversity in including single-parent family, Alston suggests that the family with two heterosexual-parents still constructs the ideological fictional nuclear family in children’s literature in the twenty-first century 125 . Therefore, in this case, Blume’s novel offers the pleasure of newness again. Another example of newness can also be found in the presence of issues related to problems with religion. Since usually children’s life is understood as naiveté from sophisticated issues such as religious problems from stories, readers are kept away from the pleasure of adding new knowledge and perspective. Especially 125 Alston 5. because most children acquire the religious views from their parent, it is almost ‘abnormal’ when a kid like Margaret in Margaret questions about the most appropriate religion she has to belong when her family practices no religion. While related to the pleasure of freshness among the wide number of books avoiding such darkness in life because of the fear that children can not master issues they are not familiar, Nodelman argues the potentially inexperienced children can absorb new topics even when they have not experienced losing someone they love including the harm the books are suspected to bring to child readers. Nodelman sees in a more positive light by recalling that readers do not read everything with the same degree of attention. Like adults, children do not always read closely and analytically. They know how to skim and they also do not keep reading books they dislike because they feel equally free to stop to read against the texts 126 . Moreover, Avery also suggests [the child] has his own defence against what he doesn’t like or doesn’t understand in the book…He ignores it, subconsciously perhaps, or he makes something different from it… [Children] extract what they want from a book and no more.’ This sums up that children are more open even to genuinely radical thought and the ways of understanding texts 127 . Secondly, in addition to the pleasure of newness, as designer of childr en’s books and literature, adults also need to concern about ‘escapism’. For Lesson in Oberstein in Hunt, 1998:26, the good book for the ‘child’ offers not only the ‘child’ back to itself, but also needs to offer the ‘child’ that which is not itself. This is 126 Nodelman The Pleasures 29. 127 See Hunt, Understanding 19. because literature has power to be an imaginative insight to transport to what another person may be feeling, and the contemplation of possible human experiences which are not at that moment going through readers’ life. Harahap suggests that there are things people can only learn by facing them directly like honouring honesty, choosing good or bad, acknowledging God’s affections, solidarities because they can only be achieved by living that life. Fortunately, he adds, civilization has found a mean which make it possible for people to enter, to feel, to taste, and learn the life without dealing with risks and danger of having them. The mean is literature 128 . In other words, b esides expanding their experiences through new things, children are also possibly pleased by the experience of stepping out from reality to be emotionally involved in the fictional characters. Secondly, as the appearance of brute life offers pleasure of escaping from daily problems, its pleasure of newness builds experiences. Children, too, seek pleasure of expanding their horizon through vicarious experiences because they can visit new places, gain new experiences, meet new people, as well as learn about a variety of cultures and life. To enter another person’s experience who suffers certain disease through fictions is one of the example how readers can enrich their experiences. It is because especially in children’s fiction, one of the idealized child characters is depicted to be normally healthy. Without really suffering scoliosis in Deenie, young readers are invited to experience the diseases by discovering the 128 Mula Harahap, Tentang Sastra Anak-anak. 16 April 2007. ETSA: Kumpulan Esai dan Tulisan Kreatif Lainnya. Website. 13 July 2013. https:mulaharahap.wordpress.com20070416tentang-sastra-anak-anak. common goals and similar emotions found in the characters without taking any consequences and risks for being ill. Experiencing death vicariously through Davey’s journey of healing herself after her father’s death can also prove that literature enables readers to escape from one’s daily life to enter a condition needing the distinguished emotion they do not experience. Yet literature makes readers capable in positioning themselves to see such experience right in front of them without really losing a father. Similarly, as depicted in the novels analysed, child readers do not need to experience the pain of having their parents divorced or witnessing their battles. It is also not necessary for them to feel disappointed for the unexpected experiences as well as being confused with their religious choices. The third pleasu re of presenting brute realities in Blume’s novel is the way how readers can recognize gaps during reading sophisticated topics. Even though it might turn to be another kind of generalization in understanding children, yet, in his more optimistic perspecti ve toward children, Hunt says that “Play is a natural part of their [children] outlook, they will regard language as another area for playful exploration. They are less bound by fixed schema, and in this sense see more clearly 129 . This can be said that child ren’s books should not be necessarily less serious than adult books or therefore, simpler in providing issues that children’s literature can deal with them all as well as adult books. Nodelman also believes that it 129 Rederick McGillis,ed. Voices of the Other: Children’s Literature and Postcolonial Context Canada: Oxford University Press, 1996 12. is pleasurable for readers including the young ones to look for meanings and messages by filling the gaps of the texts 130 . Possessing the expertise in filling gaps, readers can turn small information into a rich experience. The ‘dissatisfying’ ending of Forever can tell so rich about the messages even though Blume does not clearly says about them. The positive message indeed lies on the reason why Katherine decides to break up the relationship. Readers know that Theo, the guy formerly mentioned in the camp, contributes to the problem 103. However , Katherine’s objection for Michael’s assumption that she leaves because she has another sexual relationship suggests that the main character does not approve sexual affair 107. Instead, Katherine holds the belief that sex should not be done with someone she does not love or no longer love which becomes an important perspective about sexuality as this knowledge is shared in the previous part of the novel to be reader’s repertoire 16. The novel also tells how the character puts the honour to mean love that it is not cheaply used for the sake of sexual pleasure 61. This is clearly implied in former reading as Katherine needs a long time to say ‘I love you’ to Michael who started saying it but Katherine feels unsure saying to the guy she meets only nineteen times 19. Readers also get this message as they go back to the early process of the sexual intercourses when Katherine keeps telling Michael not to be hurry to be 130 Nodelman, The Pleasures 21. By using Reader Response perspective, Nodelman suggests the term gap is understood to describe the condition in which most written text is capable in building the communication with readers with the minimal information on it. In its process of building the meaning, the gaps evoke a reader’s knowledge to make them meaningful. In addition, it is also believed that readers’ knowledge of a context which includes the pre-existing repertoire can help readers how to fill those gaps. Readers do this activity both consciously and unconsciously. engaged in sexual activity until she is mentally ready, which in fact refers to the feeling of love 14. This is why when the love is gone Katherine eventually rejects the invitation of her sexual partner Michael to make love pretending to want it. She finds it unfair to do sex by pretending to like her partner. In this part, readers previously are presented the knowledge that both Katherine and Michael have made promise to be honest when something goes wrong in the relationship 27. These values are in fact the positive points about sexuality shared in Forever. In fact, dealing with the jump up conclusion will commonly assume that Forever does not teach teenagers the consequences of pre-marital and teen sex because it does not end with the bad life like pregnancy, suicide, being isolated, of getting venereal diseases, and the fact that the protagonist does not appear to regret of what she has done. Blume ’s novel enables readers to learn the other ways as the protagonist’s belief about ‘forever’ is shaken. Katherine realizes she is too careless to define the forever commitment 109. Both Katherine and Michael are depicted to get hurt for the separation. Yet, in the case that Katherine does not regret is understood by readers that what she has passed through with Michael is special that this evokes readers to receive it tru e that Katherine’s love journey mentions something romantic about their relation 110. Sex here can be recognized as expressions of love instead of sex that people can do with anyone because the protagonist suggests careful mental and physical arrangement in her decision. Obviously, Blume leaves the gaps in gaining the values with less manipulation because she leaves the messages openly that only by reading the whole text strategically and closely readers can obtain what Blume wants to say. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI In addition, in the case of Blubber ’s immorality, it might be clearly seen that Jill the protagonist has learnt about the pain she feels to be disliked by the whole class because she is then in Linda’s shoes after she does not follow Wendy’s order to conduct an unfair trial to the former bully target Linda. However, the value indeed does not lie in readers’ expectation that Wendy, too, should get herself into Linda or Jill’s shoes. Otherwise, Blume departs the important ending through Jill’s eyes. Jill gets the key of th e problem by ruining Wendy’s authorities as Jill messes up the loyalty of the gang’s members Caroline and Linda to get disbanded. By this chance the bullying is over and Jill explains the change in the lunch time, Nobody called me Baby Brenner during lunch. Donna and Caroline moved their desks together and Wendy invited Laurie to eat with her. Linda sat alone at her desk, the way she used to. 125 Without dictating and manipulating her readers to prevent them doing bullying by accepting that bad behaviour will lead anyone to his or her bad luck and ugly reward as reality does not say so, the readers are allowed consciously and unconsciously to analyse and appreciate the protagonist’ insight and development in order to catch up the significance of her actions. It is clear to say that the ‘new’ and ‘distinguished’ topics in Blume’s novels frequently become topic of debate. Blume’s novels seem to be breaking the common beliefs in choosing subjects in children’s literature. It is because the topics might not probably new but it is Blume who dares to open the gate to welcome the newness. Besides expanding their experiences through new things, children are also possibly pleased by the experience of stepping out from reality to be emotionally involved in the fictional characters. While when they are considered to be lack of skills of dealing PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI with bad sides of life, the analysis of this research has showed that it is also pleasing to fill in the gaps found in the stories.

3. The Bad Sides of Life: Coping Difficulties through Literature

Believing that the childhood in the real life offers absolute happiness is indeed error knowledge because recently, children are exposed to a much higher level of stressful factors. As a result, providing kids with the issues related to the dark side of life in their books will help them through their personal tribulation. To assist children through the difficult times, Lowe suggests, it is best to provide them with an outlet of expression like what they can find through literature. Reading stories helps children relate to fictional characters and therefore cope with their emotions to find solution to their own personal life situation. In other words, through literature, children can learn the coping skills needed to successfully handle the difficult times in their own life to emerge a sense of self-control, hope, and resilience. Through the process of universalization or known as identification, young readers can acknowledge that the other children experience similar anguish. While in catharsis they connect with the character in the story. In this stage, the empathy and problem solving are exhibited. Finally, insight helps readers to self-reflect or to apply their knowledge to others and society 131 . By using bibliotherapy, readers unknowingly encompass all of those characteristics because it is natural for readers to analyse, emphasize, and internalize story attributes. 131 Lowe 2. For the first example, the ugly conflicts in Karen or Margaret’s family can practically help children to cope the difficulties through the shared experiences in the novels. It is considered normal for a kid to experience or witness the high degree of her parents’ hostility and anger frequently that might get them depressed and upset about situation which is out of their control. By building the identification in the universalization process through Karen, readers who might and might not experience the family conflict are able get involved to revive and reappraise their previous experience through the vicarious experience in reading since Karen gets very upset about the conflicts and is terribly worried that the conflicts would lead to her parents splitting up. What will happen to me if they get divorced? Who will I live with? Where will I go to school? Will my friends laugh? I want a mother and a father and I want them to live together-right here- in this house I don’t care if they fight. I would rather have them fight than divorced. I’m scared…I’m so scared. I wish somebody would talk to me and tell me it’s going to be all right. I miss Daddy already. I hate them both. I wish I was dead. 14 For a while, it seems to be true that for Karen, like for some other kids, being together is so much better than being away from one of her parents. Yet, kids then also meet the catharsis when every struggle Karen makes to get her parents stop from divorce all turns to be failures. First, when Karen tries to put some cocktail napkins that say Ellie and Bill, her mother rejects the idea by calling it funny 51. Then, it is also a disappointing respond from her parent to remind them the anniversary so that the parents would feel bad about the divorce plan 97. From her dad, the unexpected response is received when she tries to describe how pretty her mother with her new haircut is now in order to attract his attention 70. Moreover, her plan to show her PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI diorama which is hoped to enable her parents meet and the panicking situation of her brother Jeff ’s runaways would make both parents ‘look at each other and touch hands... kiss her and they’ll never fight again…” and ‘see that they belong together. That we’re a family. Any minute now Daddy will tell her he’s sorry he left” 131- 132. Yet, the plan ends up in a greater crash for fighting over Jeff’s runaway. Once Karen realizes that even a crisis will not prevent their parents from fighting, she begins to accept the inevitable result. Through Karen’s case, readers are brought to their insight that among the conflicts which have been so painful to her, Karen learns that conflicts are needed to resolve instead of to keep. With the greater tenses growing each day and the messy feeling she feels upon her parents, brother, and sister, Karen begins to change her mind believing that having her mother and father apart is not bad because being together is much more impossible and hurting everybody in the house. Up to these three stages of therapeutic reading, experts believes young readers can benefit from the fictional characters’ emotion, experiences, and solution that it is possible to generate them in their own problem or at least to believe that there are more than one alternatives in dealing with difficult moment like parental conflicts to try as young readers are allowed to gain variety of stories with this issue. The second issue of divorce brings significance, too. It is of course sad to see children cling to any evidence that their family was a happy and then they have to see that it breaks up. In the situation of divorced family, Johnson, et al explains that as