16
iv. Discourse
Regarding the presentation of discourse in the coursebook, Mrs. X and Mrs. Y agreed that it was generally average. The aspects of discourse in the book such as paragraphing, organization
of written discourse and reference pronouns, or substitutions were presented through activities and they provided good models for the students. Besides providing good models, they were also
presented progressively from easy to difficult ones. To this, the writers agreed with the teachers` opinions.
Here, the writers added that there was another aspect of discourse covered by the book besides paragraphing or organization of written discourse and reference pronouns or substitutions
as what Mrs. X said. That was structure and convention in a conversation, particularly how to ask and answer questions in a conversation based on certain situation.
v. Appropriacy
In term of language appropriacy, the teachers had different opinion. According to Mrs. X, there was no reference for language appropriacy in the coursebook. While, according to Mrs. Y, in
the book, there was only one reference for language appropriacy that was presented in the reference of choice of vocabularies. Specifically, the language appropriacy presented in the book
was related to classroom language used for the students. It was presented on pages 203 until 205 in the coursebook. By presenting it, Mrs. Y added that the book also tried to link the language style to
social situation. To this, the writers agreed with Mrs. Y who said that the book presented one reference that was classroom language used for students.
vi. Varieties of English
Regarding the varieties of English presented in the book, the teachers agreed that the variety of English used and presented in the coursebook was American English even though there
was no statement which explicitly said that the book used this variety. Here, the writers were in opinion with the teachers. The writers added that the words, color, dialog, and favorite, in the
coursebook also indicated that the book used American English.
B. The Teachers` Opinions Regarding the Presentation of English Skills in the
Coursebook
i. Skills
Regarding the presentation of skills in the coursebook, Mrs. X and Mrs. Y agreed that the coursebook presented the integration of four English skills practices based on the real situation.
Moreover, they argued that the skills practices progression were in line with the grammatical and lexical progression in the coursebook. These two teachers also claimed that the use of authentic
material in the coursebook was not too difficult, nor too easy. In other words, it was appropriately presented to the students` level. To this discussion, the writers were in opinion with the teachers.
The coursebook used not only authentic material, but also non-authentic material or artificial material. In fact, the materials included in the book were mostly artificial
– those which designed for the educational purposes. The artificial materials in the book could provide good models for the
students, for instance, descriptive paragraphs presented in the coursebook. They could be considered as good model because they had good organization.
ii. Listening
Regarding the presentation of listening skills in the coursebook, Mrs. X and Mrs. Y agreed that the coursebook did not provide any recorded material, such as audio recorded on cassette or
video, to support the listening practices in the book. They also agreed that pre-listening activities, tasks, or questions to make the students focus on the topic were not included in the coursebook.
Here the writers were in opinion with the teachers.
Although listening practices were not supported with the recorded material and pre- listening activities, Mrs. X and Mrs. Y argued that the listening materials in the coursebook were
presented in the realistic contexts. Here, the writers also agreed with the teachers` opinions.
17
iii. Speaking
Regarding the presentation of speaking skill in the coursebook, Mrs. X and Mrs. Y argued that the book had enough speaking activities. Through the coursebook, the students also had
enough practices in speaking English. However, these two teachers were not in opinion related to the emphasis of spoken English in the coursebook. Mrs. X said that it was more than 50 in the
book. While, Mrs. Y argued that it was not more than 50. Moreover, they also had different opinion regarding the availability of strategies for kinds of spoken practices in the coursebook.
Here, the writers agreed with Mrs. X and Mrs. Y who argued that the speaking activities in the book were enough for the students. In addition, they were also in opinion with Mrs. X that the
emphasis on speaking practices in the book was more than 50. In fact, there were more than forty speaking practices in the coursebook. They also agreed with Mrs. Y who said that the book
provided strategies for one spoken activity. That was strategy for questioning and answering in a conversationdialogue.
iv. Reading
Regarding the presentation of reading skill in the coursebook, Mrs. X and Mrs. Y were in opinion that, to develop the students` comprehension skill, the book provided intensive and
extensive reading activities. They also agreed that the reading materials presented in the coursebook could be used to expand the students` knowledge and to consolidate the language
work. It was because, according to the teachers, some reading materials in the book were related to writing work. To this, the writers added that some reading materials in the book were related to not
only writing work, but also listening and speaking works.
Mrs. X and Mrs. Y also agreed that the book did not focus on the development of reading skill and strategies. Moreover, the teachers were in opinion that the length of the reading texts
presented in the book was not more than 500 words. Besides that, these teachers argued that the type of reading texts in the book was descriptive text. They also claimed that the subject matter
presented in the reading texts was topical. To this, Mrs. Y added that it was also varied. Here, the writers were in opinion with Mrs. X and Mrs. Y. For the subject matter of the reading material,
they were in opinion with Mrs. Y who said that it was varied because it was presented based on more than ten topics.
However, these teachers were not in opinion related to the overall presentation of reading skill in the coursebook. Mrs. X considered it as poor. While, Mrs. Y considered it as good. To this,
the writers were in opinion with Mrs. X. It was average because the book did not provide pre and post reading activities which were important to give the students` background knowledge related to
the reading activity and to make the students focus on the topic being discussed.
v. Writing
