Difficulty Level Difficulty Level and Discrimination Power of the Instruments

Where: DP : discrimination power U : the proportion of the upper group students L : the proportion of the lower group students N : total number of the students The criteria are: a. If the result is positive, it means the number of high students who have given correct answers is more than the number of low students who have given correct answers. But if the result is zero, it means there is no discrimination. b. If the result is negative, it means there are more low students who have given correct answers than high students. c. In general, the higher the discrimination index, the better. In classroom situation most items should be higher than 0.20 indexes. Shohamy, 1985: 81 The results of the discrimination power for inferring word meaning from context test and reading comprehension test are available on Appendix 10 and 11. Based on the criteria above, calculation discrimination power indicates inferring word meaning from context test consisted of one poor item 8 and the rest items twenty nine items were good in discrimination power. While in reading comprehension test, it consisted of thirty good items in discrimination power.

F. Data Treatment

The researcher used the procedures to treat the data as follows:

1. Normality Test

Normality test is used to test whether the data has normal distribution. According to Setiyadi 2006: 168:169, one of the assumptions should be fulfilled in using T- test is that the data should have a normal distribution. The criteria are as follows: H : the data is distributed normally H 1 : the data is not distributed normally In this research, H would be accepted if Signα and the researcher used the level of significant 0.05. Based on the result see Appendix 8, we can see that the classes gave sign α. Therefore, it proved that H was accepted and the whole data were distributed normally.

2. Random Test

Random test is used to ensure whether the data is random or not, as stated by Setiyadi 2006: 168-169, one of the assumptions should be fulfilled in using T- test is that the data should be taken from random sample in a population. The criteria are as follows: H : the data is random H 1 : the data is not random In this research, H would be accepted if Signα and the researcher used the level of significant 0.05. Based on the result see Appendix 9, we can see that the classes gave sign α. Therefore, it proved that H was accepted and the whole data were random.

G. Research Procedure

In conducting the research, researcher used the steps as follows: 1. Determining the sample of population The researcher took the first year students at SMA Negeri 1 Kibang, East Lampung as the sample in this study. There were 5 classes consist of 30 to 35 students. The researcher took 8 students in each class to become sample. 2. Preparing the test of inferring word meaning from context The test consisted of 30 items of multiple choices. The students were required to choose one of the words that best defines the target words bold presented in the sentence and paragraph. 3. Preparing the test of reading comprehension. The test consisted of four texts with 30 items of multiple choices with four options and one of them was as the correct answer.

Dokumen yang terkait

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON THE USE OF FOLKLORE ON THE EIGHTH YEAR STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT THEIR READING INTEREST A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON THE USE OF FOLKLORE ON THE EIGHTH STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT THEIR READING INTEREST AT

0 2 14

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS' ACHIEVEMENT IN GENERIC STRUCTURE AND THEIR LISTENING COMPREHENSION AT THE FIRST YEAR OF SMAN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 6 51

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN STUDENTS TAUGHT THROUGH COLLABORATIVE STRATEGIC READING AND TAUGHT THROUGH SELF-QUESTIONING STRATEGY AT THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 8 BANDAR LAMPUNG

3 89 211

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS‘ ACHIEVEMENT IN GENERIC STRUCTURE AND THEIR LISTENING COMPREHENSION AT THE FIRST YEAR OF SMAN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 13 34

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SCHEMATA AND THEIR READING COMPREHENSION ABILITY IN MAKING SENSE OF NARRATIVE TEXT AT THE FIRST YEAR OF SMAN 2 KOTABUMI

0 9 51

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ GRAMMAR MASTERY AND VOCABULARY MASTERY AND THEIR READING ABILITY AT THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS OF SMA NEGERI 1 BANDAR LAMPUNG

5 28 83

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN VOCABULARY MASTERY AND STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ABILITY AT SMA N 1 SIDOMULYO

2 24 56

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ READING HABIT IN ENGLISH AND STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ABILITY IN THE FIRST GRADE OF SMP PGRI 1 GUNUNG PELINDUNG, EAST LAMPUNG

4 21 69

STUDENTS’ MASTERY OF READING SKILLS AND ITS CORRELATION WITH THEIR READING COMPREHENSION ABILITY :A study at the second year students of an SLTP in Lembang.

0 0 40

A STUDY OF THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION AND THEIR ACHIEVEMENT IN READING COMPREHENSION

0 2 15