Qualitative CBA and Prioritized Strategies

CLIMATE ADAPTA- TION STRATEGIES BENEFITS BENEFITS TION STRATEGIES Economy Social Environment Others 14. Mainstreaming climate change into formal education cur- ricula Economic lost due to environmental degradation can be reduced Increasing knowl- edge of people at school and uni- versity Community-based environmentally sound activities will grow considerably Key success for the implementation of climate adaptation program 15. The establishment of Center for Cities and Climate Changes Availability of infor- mation, data base, and human re- source to local gov- ernment The capacity of government and public will increase Key success for the implementation of climate adaptation program 16. Involvement Pri- vate Sector in Climate Adaptation Projects Alternative sources of climate adapta- tion funding are available Environmental man- agement activities increase which con- tribute to resilience Key success for the implementation of climate adaptation program 17. Strategic Envi- ronmental Assess- ment of City Master- plan with Climate Change Criteria Non-physical so it less expensive ac- tivity The future impact of CC to society can be anticipated by spatial plan- ning. Environmental pres- sure that exacerbate the impact of CC can be identified

5.4. Qualitative CBA and Prioritized Strategies

Qualitative CBA were chosen as a prioritization tool. The value were chosen column by column from the left cost to the right benefit. Firstly, based on the qualitative description as shown by two matrices above, the CWG then decided the highest and the lowest value of strategies in each column. Although the maximum and the minimum value are 5 and 1 respectively, the value within each column is not always at maximum and minimum. After that, the rest of strategies were valued gradually between those highest and lowest. The following matrix is the result of Qualitative BCA. 62 Table 5.4: Qualitative CBA of Climate Adaptation Strategies CLIMATE ADAPTATION COSTS BENEFITS BENEFITS BC Ratio CLIMATE ADAPTATION STRATEGIES Economy Social Environ- ment Others Total Costs Economy Social Environ- ment Others Total Benefits Ratio 1. Rain Harvesting 3 1 2 1 7 5 3 5 - 13 1.86 2.Water Saving 3 3 - - 6 4 - 4 - 8 1.33 3. Purification of public wells contaminated water sources 3 3 - - 6 3 3 - - 6 1.00 4.Seawater desalination 4 - - 4 8 2 4 - - 6 0.75 5. Sea wall 5 3 3 4 15 5 3 - - 8 0.53 6. Channels belt network 5 3 - 1 9 4 3 - - 7 0.78 7. Neighborhood Drainage Sys- tem 5 - - 3 8 3 3 - - 6 0.75 8. Flooding Shelter 4 2 - - 6 3 4 3 - 10 1.67 9. Upstream Conservation of Jatibarang Dam 2 4 - 3 9 4 2 2 - 8 0.89 10. Domestic liquid waste man- agement to protect water re- sources 4 2 - 2 8 4 3 5 - 12 1.50 11. Vegetative Treatment to address landslide in the high slope areas 3 4 - 3 10 3 3 4 - 10 1.00 12. Green belt along the shore- line in aquaculture land 3 4 - 3 10 3 2 4 - 10 1.00 13. Diversification of marine and fisheries business and products 3 4 2 3 12 3 3 4 - 10 0.83 14. Mainstreaming climate change into formal education curricula 4 4 - - 8 3 3 3 2 11 1.38 15. The establishment of Center for Cities and Climate Changes 3 - - 4 7 4 4 - 3 11 1.57 16. Involvement Private Sector in Climate Adaptation Projects 2 4 - - 6 2 - 3 2 7 1.17 17. City Masterplan Evaluation- with Climate Change Criteria 1 4 - - 5 1 3 7 1.40 Note : Assessment Range: 1 - 5 For the cost C 1 for inexpensive low and 5 for the expensive high For the benefit B 1 to benefit low less and 5 to high benefit high 63 From the matrix above, the priority adaptation actions in Semarang City can be formulated as follows: • Rain Harvesting 1.86 • Flood shelter 1.67 • The establishment of Center for Cities and Climate Changes 1.57 • Domestic liquid waste management to protect water resources 1.50 • City Masterplan Evaluation with Climate Change Criteria 1.40 • Mainstreaming climate change into formal education curricula 1.38 • Water Saving 1.33 • Involvement Private Sector s CSR in Climate Adaptation Projects 1.17 • Purification of public wells contaminated water sources 1.0 • Vegetative treatment to address landslide in the high slope areas 1.0 • 100 m Green belt along the shoreline in aquaculture land 1.0 • Upstream Conservation of Jatibarang Dam 0.89 • Diversification of marine and fisheries business and products 0.83 • Channels belt network 0.78 • Neighborhood drainage system 0.75 • Seawater desalination 0.75 • Sea wall 0.53 64 6. Implementation and ME

6.1. Implementation and Funding Priority for Actions