The Problems of the Study The Objectives of the Study
1 The findings of this study can be used for twitter followers to help overcome the difficulties in interpreting tweets containing ellipsis and
ambiguity. 2 The findings of this study are also suggested to be used for further
researchers as reference to conduct in-depth research about linguistic development in social media.
REFERENCES
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian. Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. 4
th
edition. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta Arceneaux, Noah, and Amy Schmitz Weiss. 2010. Seems Stupid Until You Try It:
Press Coverage of Twitter, 2006-9. New Media and Society. Journal. Ary, D. 2010. Introduction to Research in Education. New York: Holt, Rinehart
and Winston. Beaugrande, R. Dressler, W. An Introduction to Text Linguistics, London,
Longman, 1981 paper of XIV Congress of Linguists, Berlin 1987 Brown, Keith.2006. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2
nd
edition. Oxford: Elsevier.
Dash, Niladri Sekhar. 2008. Context and Contextual Word Meaning. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics. 2008, vol. 5, no. 2. pp.21-31
Denzin,N.K, Lincoln,Y.S. 1994. Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
Fortin, Catherine R. 2007. Verb Phrase Ellipsis in Indonesian. Journal of Proceedings of thirty-seventh Western Conference of Linguistics. Vol 18,
pp.44-55. Gibbs, G. 2002. “Qualitative analysis with Nvivo”, Open University Press,
Buckingham. Grenat, H. Mohammed, Dr. Taher, M. Mohammed, Dr. On The Translation of
Structural Ambiguity. Journal of Al- Satil, pp.9-20. Halliday, M.A.K. 1978. Language as a Social Semiotic. London: Longman.
Halliday, M., Hasan, R. 1976. Cohesion in English. New York: Longman Johnson, R.B. 1997. Examining the validity structure of qualitative research.
Education,Vol. 118, No.2, pp.282-292. Kaplan, Andreas M.,Michael Haenlein.2010.Users of the world, unite The
challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons 53 1: pp.59–68. Journal.
Katz, J.J. 1972. Semantic Theory. New York: Massachusets Institute of Technology.