10. On Saturday, 2 May 2009 at 06.50 up to 08.20, the researcher observed the
Chemistry teacher at the immersion class X SMA Negeri 1 Klaten. The observation was the second observation of the Chemistry teacher. The
seventh observation data was obtained. 11.
On Saturday, 2 May 2009 at 12.20 up to 12.40 during the school break time, the researcher interviewed the Chemistry teacher at her room. The fourth
interview data was obtained. 12.
On Monday, 4 May 2009 at 08.20 up to 09.50, the researcher observed the Mathematics teacher at the immersion class X SMA Negeri 1 Klaten. The
observation was the second observation of the Mathematics teacher. The eighth observation data was obtained.
13. On Monday, 4 May 2009 at 12.20 up to 12.40 during the school break time,
the researcher interviewed the Mathematics teacher at his room. The fifth interview data was obtained.
The whole data obtained through the observation and interview was gathered and the data needed to be analyzed in order to answer the first and
second research question.
F. Data Analysis Technique
In this qualitative research, the data was presented in sentences, in a form of narrative or descriptive, rather than numerical or statistical. The whole data
which had been obtained from the observation and the interview was analyzed in order to answer the first and second research questions.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
The researcher analyzed the data by conducting these following steps. First, the researcher grouped the observation data into some categories. According
to Nusyirwan 2008, the data taken from the observations and interviews should be classified with a special classification to make the data manageable. The
researcher had taken all of the data collected into categories and labeled them with list of coding. The categories were based on the language competence stated by
Burkart 1998 which were employed to identify at which language aspect the immersion teachers’ problems were. By grouping the immersion teachers’
teaching acts which had been observed at the classroom, the researcher was able to identify of which the teachers’ acts showed the language problems.
Summarizing the observation data into groups helped the researcher to understand how the teacher dealt with their language problems at the classroom.
Second, the researcher worked on the interview data. The researcher transcribed the interview data into sentences. After transcribing, the researcher
labeled the participants’ statements with some codes in order to group the teachers’ statement into some categories. By coding the immersion teachers’
statements, the researcher was able to identify to which categories the immersion teachers’ language problems belonged. Summarizing the interview data into
groups helped the researcher to understand in which language aspects the immersion teachers’ language problems were and how the immersion teachers
dealt with the problems. Third, the researcher read through all the data. This process aimed to
obtain the general sense of the information and to reflect on its overall meaning.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
The researcher read through all the data that had been written in the form of tables to get the overall meaning of the data written on the tables.
Fourth, the researcher interpreted the data. According to Creswell 2003, this step could involve the researcher’s personal interpretation based on the
individual understanding that the researcher brings to the study from the researcher’s own culture, history, and experience. The researcher interpreted the
data of this research using mindful and careful interpretation and also analyzed all data based on the underlying theories described in Chapter II.
Fifth, the researcher described the immersion teacher’ problems in order to answer the first research question. Then, the researcher described the teachers’
acts which showed how the immersion teachers dealt with the problems. The description was presented to answer the second research question.
G. Research Procedure
