Discussion The Errors in the English Questions

36 Continued from page 35 No Category of Errors Subcategory of Errors Example of Errors Number of Errors Percentage Auxiliary ‘have’ as operator What we have learned today? Do you know what is that? Verb in an embedded question Can you explain what is identification? Modal auxiliary as operator What kind of expression you should use? 4. Misordering ‘Be’ as operator Why we are not allowed to use them too often? 80 26.2 You like to read a magazine? After orientation we have what? It is sad ending or happy ending? Being a mother is difficult? Everybody got one? 5. Other Errors Uninverted forms Usually it uses what kind or types of tense? 65 21.3 Total number of errors 305

2. Discussion

Based on the data presented, it can be shown that the participants made errors which were quite various in types. This is not to mention the fact that based on the transcriptions there was a tendency that a number of participants preferred to switch the language into Bahasa Indonesia when they asked questions to the students. The reason for this case became unquestionable because it was definitely easier for the participants to say something or form questions in their first 37 language. Consequently, it became harder for the writer to find errors as they did not speak in English. However, the findings are still interesting to discuss in this part due to their diversity. The writer will discuss the findings by highlighting some important points. There were 94 errors or 30.8 of the total errors regarded as omission errors. ‘Do’, which is an auxiliary performing as operator, became one of the most omitted items in the participants’ question production. Another example for this kind of error is 1a What we call it? In the previous erroneous item, ‘do’, which should be put after ‘what’ is omitted. When it happens, the item becomes a noun clause, not an interrogative sentence. Thus, the correction of item 1a should be 1b What do we call it? Other cases like 2a You just buy it? and 3a You know? were classified into two categories, which are omission and uninverted form. When forming items either 2a or 3a, the participants did not apply any inversion and only put rising intonation at the end of the sentence and, consequently, omitted ‘do’ before the subject. The grammatical forms of items 2a and 3a therefore are 2b Do you just buy it? and 3b Do you know? Under addition category, there were 29 errors or 9.5 of the total errors. One of the most influential errors found in double marking subcategory was that of tense marker, such as 4a What did we got from this lesson? which is the deviant form of a grammatical question 4b What did we get from this lesson? This kind of error is characterized by the existence of two items which are marked for the same feature. In the latter example of erroneous item 4a, ‘did’ and ‘got’ are marked for the same feature, which is past tense. Other errors in this 38 subcategory are those related to double objects and subjects. Another subcategory in addition category is simple addition. In simple addition, the participants simply added features which should not be put in a grammatical sentence, e.g. 5a What is the main ideas of paragraph 26? Since the verb ‘is’ implies singular marker, plural marker ‘-s’ should not be added after the word ‘idea’. Hence, the question will be 5b What is the main idea of paragraph 26? Although errors in the misformation category were only as many as 37 errors or 12.1 of the total errors, there were quite various forms of errors. Errors are classified into this category when there is wrong form of the morpheme or structure. As the writer did not find any error falling under regularization category, there is only one subcategory, namely archialternating form. Most of the errors classified into archialternating form category were those related to overgeneralization of the use of certain auxiliaries, such as ‘do’, and ‘be’. Other examples of this kind of error besides those presented in Table 4.1 are 6a Do you have finished? and 7a Maybe when you hear, you are say what? In 6a, the participant overgeneralized the use of ‘do’ as auxiliary while the sentence already contained ‘have’ performing as the auxiliary. The correct question then should be 6b Have you finished? In 7a, the participant used ‘are’ instead of ‘do’ which already performed as the operator. Hence, the correction will be done by changing ‘are’ into ‘do’ and put the word in the correct order so that it becomes 7b Maybe when you hear, what do you say? Other common errors in archialternating form were those related to incorrect application of certain verb forms as presented in Table 4.1. 39 The fourth category, misordering, covered as many as 26.2 of the total errors or 80 errors. In most cases, participants made errors when producing embedded questions as seen in 8a Do you know what is it? This is actually the product of overgeneralization in the learner’s mind. Generally, second language learners learn how to produce simple or direct questions first, e.g. What is it? When they have already acquired the knowledge, however, they may become failed in producing indirect or embedded questions. Learners make errors for they possibly invert the auxiliary as they usually do in forming simple questions, while in embedded questions, auxiliary inversions are not applied. Thus, the correct form of the example should be 8b Do you know what it is? The inversion and do-insertion are only applied to Do you know, which should be followed by what it is since the auxiliary of the embedded question should remain in the same position as it is in a statement. It was interesting to figure out that 21.3 of the total errors or 65 errors were the results of the absence of an inversion in the question formation. In other words, the participants tended to put rising intonation at the end of their affirmative sentences to ask questions as seen in 9a You know? for 9b Do you know? and 10a It is bored? for 10b Is it bored? Being declarative statements with final rising intonation, uninverted forms of questions are actually acceptable and familiar in spoken communication. However, they can only be used in restricted contexts and determining whether they are produced contextually correct needs thorough analysis. Therefore, the writer regarded them as deviations in forming questions. 40 Commonly, errors in uninverted forms also belonged to other categories. It can be seen in the question 10a It is bored?, which could be categorized as both uninverted forms and misordering. It bears the characteristic of an uninverted question for it is produced in a declarative form with final rising intonation. Besides, it belonged to misordering category due to the wrong order of the words. If an inversion is applied, the process will move the operator ‘is’ before the subject. In another case, the question 9a You know? belonged to uninverted question as well as omission. It was also categorized as omission because there is not any do-insertion in item 9a.

B. The Causes Underlying the Errors

Dokumen yang terkait

ERROR ANALYSIS IN ORAL PRODUCTION MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS Error Analysis In Oral Production Made By English Department Students In Microteaching Class At Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

0 2 15

ERROR ANALYSIS IN ORAL PRODUCTION MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS Error Analysis In Oral Production Made By English Department Students In Microteaching Class At Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

0 2 13

SPOKEN INTERLANGUAGE ERRORS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS MADE BY STUDENTS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT Spoken Interlanguage Errors In Microteaching Class Made By Students Of English Department Of Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

0 5 21

INTRODUCTION Spoken Interlanguage Errors In Microteaching Class Made By Students Of English Department Of Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

0 4 5

SPOKEN INTERLANGUAGE ERRORS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS MADE BY STUDENTS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT Spoken Interlanguage Errors In Microteaching Class Made By Students Of English Department Of Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

0 2 14

ERRORS IN SPOKEN PRODUCTION MADE BY STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS OF DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH Errors in Spoken Production Made by Students in Microteaching Class of Department of English Education of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta in 2013/2014 Acade

0 5 15

ERRORS IN SPOKEN PRODUCTION MADE BY STUDENTS INMICROTEACHING CLASS OF DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH EDUCATION Errors in Spoken Production Made by Students in Microteaching Class of Department of English Education of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta in 2013/20

0 2 12

ERROR ANALYSIS OF ORAL PRODUCTION MADE BY ENGLISHDEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS Error Analysis Of Oral Production Made By English Department Students In Microteaching Class at Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

0 5 17

ERRORS MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS ERRORS MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS.

0 2 12

ERRORS IN THE ENGLISH QUESTION FORMATIONS MADE BY MICROTEACHING CLASS STUDENTS A THESIS Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements to Obtain the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree in English Language Education

0 1 120